12 hours ago
Opinion: Rolling back pro-density zoning restricts housing choice
On June 30, Edmonton city council will decide whether to roll back some new zoning rules that enabled building gentle density in all neighbourhoods. It's not hard to predict the arguments they will hear in opposition to infill: 'Preserve neighbourhood character;' 'This is too much, too fast;' 'I'm not against infill, but I have some concerns.'
The language is careful, and measured. Nobody wants to sound unreasonable. The opposition to infill insist they're not against density. They understand we need more housing to accommodate growth sustainably, improve city finances, and shorten commutes. They just have concerns about the pace, the scale, the process. But strip away the diplomatic language and the crux of the debate becomes clear: Should people be able to live where they want to live, in the neighbourhoods they love?
The answer should be obvious, yet here we are again, debating whether people have the right to choose affordable homes in desirable neighbourhoods.
It's no surprise that people want to live in places like Garneau, Belgravia, and Crestwood. Edmonton's mature neighbourhoods offer something special: walkable streets, established trees, proximity to downtown, access to quality schools and community amenities. Even if it means renting instead of owning, accepting smaller square footage, or living in a basement unit, the iron law of real estate remains unchanged: People want location, location, location. These are reasonable compromises, practical choices that reflect what people can afford while still accessing the neighbourhoods they value.
Fortunately, Edmonton has begun to respond to this demand. In 2024, new zoning rules came into force that allow different types of housing, such as rowhouses, to be built in neighbourhoods that previously only allowed single-family homes. According to city development data, 4,000 new infill homes have since been permitted in mature neighbourhoods, validating what many already knew: There is strong pent-up demand to live in our central neighbourhoods. Thanks to the zoning changes, thousands more people will soon be able to live in the neighbourhoods they love.
Unfortunately, city council is poised to roll back some zoning changes, prioritizing the complaints of a vocal minority of existing homeowners over the needs of people who want to live in infill housing. Pitched as a compromise to make new infill fit in with the neighbourhood, the proposed changes include reducing maximum building lengths, and limiting the number of side doors. In short, this means reducing flexibility granted with the new zoning bylaw. As Coun. Michael Janz openly implied, these changes will result in fewer rowhouses built in mature neighbourhoods. That means more people priced out of mature neighbourhoods, gatekeeping Edmonton's best neighbourhoods so that rowhouses look like single-family homes.
The irony is that despite complaints about new zoning moving too fast, mature neighbourhoods continue to change gradually. The data show that at current rates, if you live in a mature neighbourhood, it will be an average of 29 years until a home on your block develops into a rowhouse of five or more units. The home next to you? An average of 140 years. Practically, this means that when you walk around mature neighbourhoods, you will almost surely encounter a larger rowhouse, but they will not be anywhere near the norm for decades. There is no need to further slow the pace of change, when the pace of change is already slow.
We need to better contextualize the infill debate within this broader housing crisis. The question isn't whether neighbourhoods will change; they always have and always will. The question is whether we will allow them to change in ways that give people the freedom to live in neighbourhoods they love. This freedom shouldn't be a luxury reserved for the wealthy. It should be a basic right in a city that claims to welcome growth and opportunity. When we restrict housing choice, we're not preserving neighbourhood character: We're enforcing neighbourhood exclusion.
Jacob Dawang is a volunteer with Grow Together Edmonton, a pro-housing advocacy group run by ordinary Edmontonians, and a data blogger on the side.
We invite you to write letters to the editor. A maximum of 150 words is preferred. Letters must carry a first and last name, or two initials and a last name, and include an address and daytime telephone number. All letters are subject to editing. We don't publish letters addressed to others or sent to other publications. Email: letters@
Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — add and to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.
You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today: The Edmonton Journal |The Edmonton Sun.
