Latest news with #legalCase
Irish Times
23-05-2025
- Irish Times
Man given suspended sentence for putting Valium in partner's sandwich
A man who told gardaí he put Valium in his partner's sandwich because she had been stressed and he thought he was 'doing the right thing' has been handed a suspended sentence. Judge Eugene O'Kelly heard Mark O'Neill's partner of 30 years, Helen Nolan, discovered the Valium tablets in a sandwich he made for her last August after taking one bite. She said it tasted 'metallic' and she immediately went to sleep. Mark O'Neill (62), of Cois na Coille, Pollerton, Carlow , was in court for sentencing after he pleaded guilty to an offence under section 12 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, which is defined as 'intentionally or recklessly administering, or causing to be taken, a substance which he/she knows to be capable of interfering substantially with the other's bodily functions'. Judge O'Kelly heard at an earlier sitting of Carlow Circuit Court from defence counsel Ross Pratt-O'Brien that the accused accepted it was a horrific thing to do. He co-operated fully with the Garda investigation and pleaded guilty at the first opportunity. READ MORE The investigating garda told the court O'Neill got sick in 2009 when he had cancer and that although he made a good recovery, he rarely left the house and did not drive, work or socialise. When the case came back before court today on Friday for sentencing, Judge O'Kelly said the accused man's partner was not aware of the substance in the sandwich. The accused said he took it upon himself to use it as his partner was going through a difficult time. It was a shocking thing to do, the judge said. 'It was a shocking incident, particularly with a person whom he knew had shocking medical issues which required lots of medication, so he knew perfectly well what he was doing to his partner,' said Judge O'Kelly. The judge said O'Neill has no previous convictions and is at low risk of reoffending. Judge O'Kelly imposed a sentence of one year and six months, which he fully suspended. Speaking directly to the accused, Judge O'Kelly said: 'I can assure you that you have used up every opportunity that is available from this court.' The court heard the couple's relationship deteriorated over the years to the extent that they could go days or weeks without speaking to each other. Mr Pratt O'Brien told the court there was no violence or aggression in the relationship. On the day of the offence, the court heard, Ms Nolan was in her bedroom on the phone when she asked O'Neill to make her a sandwich. O'Neill returned with a tomato and mayonnaise sandwich and left the bedroom. The court heard Ms Nolan took a bite and it tasted metallic, so she put it down and did not have any more. She fell asleep, waking the following morning still feeling 'overwhelmingly tired' throughout the day. She returned home during the day to go back to bed. Judge O'Kelly was told she saw the sandwich still on her bedside locker and noticed the bread had turned blue in places. Upon investigation, she saw blue tablets mixed into it. She went to her doctor, who said she was medically fine but advised her to go to the gardaí about the matter. In a statement to gardaí, Ms Nolan said she had had seven car accidents in recent months but she could not be sure it had anything to do with being medicated. She also told gardaí she had only taken a single bite of the sandwich and 'God knows what would have happened' if she had eaten the whole thing. An investigating garda told the court O'Neill made admissions, saying he'd put 'mayonnaise, tomatoes and two blue Valium tablets' in the sandwich. He told gardaí he wanted Ms Nolan to be able to relax because she'd been stressed recently and he took it upon himself to do it, thinking he was 'doing the right thing'. O'Neill told gardaí they were his tablets and they could 'knock a horse out for hours' they were so strong. Judge O'Kelly was told O'Neill had denied ever doing it before and said he had no intention of harming her because she meant too much to him after she took care of him when he was sick with cancer.
Yahoo
08-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Diddy Prosecutors Need Gag Order to Block Potential Appeal, Deputy D.A. Explains
Diddy Prosecutors Need Gag Order to Block Potential Appeal, Deputy D.A. Explains Mark Geragos may not like that Diddy's lawyers are subject to a gag order -- and so is he ... but, a prominent prosecutor from L.A. says prosecutors need it to avoid a possible appeal. Kirsten Brown-Neil -- a deputy district attorney for L.A. County -- spoke with us on "TMZ Live" about Judge Arun Subramanian warning Geragos to watch what he says on our "2 Angry Men" podcast. Getty When asked about Geragos citing a Supreme Court ruling saying defendants and their attorneys have the right to speak publicly about the case, Kirsten said she thinks Geragos is taking a very narrow view of the ruling. Kirsten says our very own Harvey Levin needs to watch what he says on the podcast too ... or, he and Geragos might end up being used as a grounds for appeal in this case! Diddy Through The Years - Click image to open gallery As for whether it should be up to the defense to decide if they're talking too much to the public and potentially poisoning their case, Kirsten says it's actually unfair to the prosecutors ... 'cause someone like Geragos could end up sabotaging his own client on accident. The way Brown-Neil explains it, if Geragos is some sort of unofficial member of Diddy's legal team -- something he's kept mum on so far -- then by speaking out and biasing the jury in some way, he himself could be used in an ineffectiveness of counsel appeal. The Diddy Trial: Jury Selection Continues And Geragos In Hot Water Over '2 Angry Men' Podcast | TMZ Live So, if prosecutors are able to secure a conviction, they don't want MG talking ... because Diddy's side could try to use something like that to appeal the decision. Brown-Neil says prosecutors can't just secure a conviction -- they have to protect it once they get one too. Diddy Judge Arun Subramanian Looks Like He's Heading to School Kirsten also talks about how prosecutors are representing the public ... so, the public has the right to hear them discuss the case when they can. Of course, prosecutors sent a letter to the judge about Geragos referring to them as a "6-Pack of White Women" on a recent episode of "2 Angry Men" -- and he told Geragos, "I'm going to be watching and I'm going to be listening. All right? You have one more listener for your podcast." Day three of jury selection finished up Wednesday ... and, the 45-member jury pool has now been selected. While there's no court tomorrow, that number will be whittled down to 12 jurors and 6 alternates on Friday. The trial's moving along -- with Opening Arguments to begin next week ... just don't expect to hear the defense discuss it!
