Latest news with #legalsettlements
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Business
- Irish Times
McKinsey sheds 10% of staff in 2-year profitability drive
McKinsey has cut more than 10 per cent of its staff in the past 18 months, reversing a big expansion plan that peaked during the coronavirus pandemic when consulting services were in high demand and the firm increased its workforce by almost two-thirds. The consulting firm has about 40,000 employees, according to people familiar with the matter, compared with more than 45,000 at the end of 2023, when it most recently published a figure. The job cuts, which are among the largest in McKinsey's nearly 100-year history, reflect the sharp slowdown in revenue growth across the consulting market. The group has also been hit with $1.6 billion in legal settlements from its work for US opioid manufacturers. As well as laying off 1,400 back-office staff in a restructuring that began in 2023, McKinsey last year dismissed 400 specialists in areas such as data and software engineering. It also increased pressure on its weakest-performing consultants to quit via an unusually tough mid-year performance review programme last year, according to people familiar with the matter. READ MORE McKinsey's headcount had grown by almost two-thirds in the five years to 2023 as it expanded beyond its core advisory services into larger-scale project implementation and business boomed for all consulting firms during the pandemic. Since the consultancy boom ended, the number of staff voluntarily leaving professional service groups has swung to record lows. The reduced level of attrition has caught many groups by surprise, following the 'Great Resignation' when a roaring jobs market and the effects of the pandemic led to workers quitting in favour of more rewarding or better-paid roles elsewhere. Bob Sternfels, McKinsey global managing partner, told colleagues last year that the firm intended to be 'back in balance' by the end of 2024. McKinsey's shrinking headcount contrasts with its smaller rival BCG, which last month reported a 10 per cent increase in global revenue to $13.5 billion for 2024 and said its workforce had grown by about 1,000 people to 33,000. Its headcount stood at 30,000 two years ago. McKinsey's workforce was '45,000 plus' at the end of 2022 and 45,100 at the end of 2023, according to its annual reports. The report for 2024, published this month, did not include staff numbers. The report also did not include a figure for 2024 revenue, unlike in previous years. McKinsey's revenue was $16 billion in 2023. McKinsey said: 'Our firm continues to grow and we're doing more impactful work, in more ways, than ever. We continue to recruit robustly and will welcome thousands of new consultants to our firm this year.' As well as slower revenue growth, the consulting industry is contending with the introduction of generative artificial intelligence, which is set to automate tasks performed by junior employees while increasing the productivity of others. Janet Truncale, global chief executive of EY, said at the Milken Institute annual conference this month that her firm would not cut jobs in response to AI but could do more with less. 'I like to think we can double in size with the workforce we have today,' she said. McKinsey said: 'Generative AI enables new levels of productivity for our teams.' Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Forbes
17-05-2025
- Business
- Forbes
Most Lawsuit Settlements Trigger An IRS Form 1099, But Not These Two
1099-Misc form Most defendants issue IRS Forms 1099 for legal settlements. The form may be issued to the lawyer, the client, or both. Frequently, both the client and the lawyer receive a Form 1099 for 100%, making it appear that the settlement amount was 200% of the payment. The biggest exception is for compensatory personal physical injury damages. In an injury accident case settling before trial, the lawyer should receive a Form 1099 for the proceeds, but the plaintiff should not. If the case settles after a verdict with punitive damages or interest, a Form 1099 is required for the taxable portion, although the amount that is taxable can often be debated. In even the most vanilla case, it never hurts to be clear in settlement agreements what tax forms will be issued, to whom, and in what amount. Otherwise, you leave it up in the air. Many plaintiffs are surprised in January by the tax forms they receive for their prior year settlements. There are plenty of myths about IRS Forms 1099, and it pays to avoid surprises if you can. Plaintiffs may receive Forms 1099 they did not expect, or with amounts they did not expect. A prime example is legal fees. Normally, the plaintiff's Form 1099 will include 100% of the settlement, even if the fees are paid directly to their lawyer. Another unpleasant surprise may involve an unexpected type of Form 1099. What if the plaintiff receives a Form 1099-NEC, but was expecting a Form 1099-MISC? Either form spells income, but Form 1099-MISC is 'other income,' while Form 1099-NEC means non-employee compensation, triggering self-employment tax on top of income tax. The self-employment tax rate is 15.3%, which is a combination of a 12.4% Social Security tax and a 2.9% Medicare tax on net earnings. Only the first $176,100 of earnings is subject to the 12.4% Social Security tax. However, an .9% additional Medicare tax applies if your net earnings from self-employment exceed $200,000 for a single taxpayer or $250,000 for a married couple. There is no ceiling on that additional .9% tax. You can claim that a payment should not be subject to self-employment tax on your tax return but the IRS may disagree. Aside from personal physical injury settlements, Forms 1099 are issued in most every case. However, there is another category of settlement payments that should also not trigger the form. If a defendant does not know whether any of a settlement is income to the plaintiff, the defendant should not issue a Form 1099. Other than physical injuries, how might a payment not be, or not all be, taxable income to the plaintiff? The most common are recoveries that are capital in nature. After all, the IRS taxes legal settlements, but some are capital gain. Examples are disputes over the sales price of assets or damage to property like stock or real estate. Say you are suing over a defective home construction or remodel, or damage to your property. Or perhaps you are suing your investment adviser over bad account management. All of these are fundamentally disputes that are capital in nature, where your tax basis is relevant. Some of the settlement may be income to the plaintiff, but the full amount should not be. Say that you purchased a property for $100, spent $75 improving it, and then sell it for $225. Your gross income is $50 of gain ($225 minus $175). The portion of the $225 that reimburses you for your $175 of adjusted tax basis is not a deduction. It is not gross income at all. IRS Form 1099 are supposed to report only gross income. The IRS Form 1099-MISC instructions say that a payment that is a tax-free recovery of the recipient's adjusted tax basis should not be reported on a Form 1099. The IRS Forms 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC instructions say payors should 'not report damages. . . [t]hat are for a replacement of capital, such as damages paid to a buyer by a contractor who failed to complete construction of a building.' When a settlement is ordinary income, the legal fees and expenses that may be paid out of the recovery do not change the fact that the entire settlement is gross income. That means it all belongs on Form 1099. A deduction for legal fees can reduce the taxpayer's adjusted gross income or taxable income, but not the taxpayer's gross income. It is the latter that is reported on Form 1099. Capital recoveries are different. Here, a plaintiff's legal fees and expenses are capital expenditures that increase the plaintiff's adjusted tax basis. They then decrease the resulting gain from the settlement. A defendant cannot know how much to accurately report on Form 1099 in a capital case without knowing the plaintiff's adjusted tax basis in the asset, including any adjusted tax basis created by capitalized legal fees and expenses. The legal expenses are almost always a moving target as a case is moving toward settlement. So the defendant is simply not supposed to issue a Form 1099 to the plaintiff where some or all of the proceeds are capital in nature. The IRS has confirmed this in many rulings. And there is some practical precedent too. There were billions of dollars of legal settlements paid to victims of California wildfires by PG&E and Southern California Edison. Both companies determined not to issue Forms 1099 to fire victims. They issued Forms 1099 to the law firms for the plaintiffs (as gross proceeds paid to an attorney in Box 10 of Form 1099-MISC), but not to the clients. Because of tax basis and other issues, both defendants concluded that they could not accurately identify the extent that the settlements represented gross income to the fire victims. If you want to read more about the huge topic of Form 1099 reporting, here is a guide for lawsuit settlements. Plaintiffs should consider taxes and Form 1099 issues before they sign a settlement agreement. A Form 1099 does not prevent you from taking the tax position that a recovery is not income or is capital gain. But nearly everyone would rather not have a Form 1099 that will be viewed by IRS computers as ordinary income.
