Latest news with #literaturereview
Geeky Gadgets
a day ago
- Science
- Geeky Gadgets
AI Literature Review Tools Exposed: Which Ones Are Lying to You?
What if the tool you trusted to streamline your research was quietly feeding you lies? In the race to harness AI for academic productivity, literature review tools promise to save hours of tedious work. But here's the catch: not all of them tell the truth. Imagine submitting a paper only to discover that 1 in 4 of your references is fabricated. That's the reality I uncovered while testing three popular AI-powered tools—Manis, Gen Spark, and Gemini AI. The results? Eye-opening. Only one of them delivered the accuracy and reliability essential for serious research, while the others left me questioning their place in academic workflows. If you've ever wondered whether AI can truly be trusted with your literature reviews, this rundown might surprise you. Andy Stapleton breaks down the performance of these tools based on speed, usability, and—most critically—accuracy. You'll discover which AI tool churned out a 61-page report with near-perfect references, and which one sacrificed credibility for speed. Whether you're a researcher seeking to save time or just curious about the limits of AI in academia, this comparison will help you navigate the trade-offs. By the end, you'll know which tool is worth your trust—and which might lead you astray. Because when it comes to academic integrity, the stakes are too high for guesswork. AI Literature Review Tools Manis: Speed Over Accuracy Manis demonstrated impressive speed, completing a literature review in just three minutes. It generated a 14-page document with 38 references, making it an appealing option for researchers who prioritize efficiency. However, its accuracy raised concerns. Approximately 16% of the references were either fabricated or inaccurate, posing a risk to the credibility of any research relying on its output. Key Strengths: Exceptional processing speed (3 minutes). Organized research themes for easier navigation. Downloadable PDF format for immediate use. Key Weaknesses: Moderate fabrication rate (16%). Repetition and inaccuracies in references. Manis is a viable option for generating quick overviews, but its reliability is compromised by the need for thorough manual verification. While its speed is a clear advantage, the trade-off in accuracy limits its utility for rigorous academic research. Gen Spark: A Balanced but Limited Option Gen Spark offered a more balanced approach, completing the task in 5-7 minutes. It produced 19 references and demonstrated a reasonable understanding of the research prompt. However, its fabrication rate was higher at 26%, and its limited output made it less suitable for in-depth academic projects. Key Strengths: Moderate processing time (5-7 minutes). Reasonable comprehension of research prompts. Key Weaknesses: High fabrication rate (26%). Limited number of references (19). Output format is less user-friendly compared to competitors. Gen Spark may serve as a starting point for preliminary research, but its higher error rate and limited scope make it less dependable for detailed academic work. Researchers seeking comprehensive and accurate results may find its limitations restrictive. I Tested 3 Literature Review AIs – Only One Didn't Lie to Me Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in AI Literature Review Tools. Gemini AI: The Benchmark for Reliability Gemini AI emerged as the most reliable tool among the three tested. While it required the longest processing time—20 minutes—it delivered a 61-page document with 105 references. Only 1% of these references were problematic, and the issues were related to accessibility rather than outright fabrication. Gemini AI also stood out for its inclusion of structured data, tables, and up-to-date references, providing a level of detail unmatched by the other tools. Key Strengths: Extensive output (61 pages, 105 references). Minimal inaccuracies (1%). Inclusion of tables and structured data for clarity. Key Weaknesses: Longest processing time (20 minutes). Does not strictly adhere to peer-reviewed sources. Lacks integration with reference management tools. For researchers who value accuracy and depth, Gemini AI is the most dependable choice. While its longer processing time requires patience, its detailed output and low error rate make it a standout tool for academic literature reviews. Final Assessment After evaluating all three tools, Gemini AI clearly stands out as the most reliable option for academic literature reviews. Its detailed output, minimal error rate, and comprehensive analysis set it apart, despite its longer processing time. Manis, with its speed and moderate accuracy, is a reasonable alternative for quick overviews, while Gen Spark falls short due to its higher fabrication rate and limited scope. Final Rankings: First Place: Gemini AI for its depth, accuracy, and comprehensive output. Gemini AI for its depth, accuracy, and comprehensive output. Second Place: Manis for its speed and relatively low fabrication rate. Manis for its speed and relatively low fabrication rate. Third Place: Gen Spark due to its higher inaccuracy and limited scope. Practical Insights for Researchers AI tools for literature reviews hold significant potential, but they are not without flaws. Regardless of the tool you choose, manual verification remains essential to ensure the accuracy and credibility of your references. Among the tested options, Gemini AI sets the standard for academic productivity, offering a balance of precision and thoroughness that researchers can trust. While Manis and Gen Spark have their merits, they fall short of the reliability and depth required for rigorous academic work. Researchers should weigh their priorities—whether speed, accuracy, or comprehensiveness—when selecting the right tool for their needs. Media Credit: Andy Stapleton Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
National Post
14-05-2025
- Business
- National Post
CapeStart Helps Life Science Teams Scale Faster, Boost Productivity with New Release of MadeAi™, Award-Winning GenAI Platform
Article content MadeAi-LR solution now supports AI-aided Review, AI as Reviewer, Summary- and Arm-Level Extraction, and Built-in Quality Appraisal—cuts literature review time in half and delivers 90% accuracy Article content Article content MONTREAL & CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — At today's ISPOR Montreal 2025 Conference, CapeStart, Inc. announced a major new release of MadeAi™—its award-winning generative AI-based platform that expedites the synthesis of content and data for the life sciences, helping time-strapped teams to scale faster, strengthen regulatory submissions, and advance the pace of scientific research. Article content MadeAi first launched in November of 2024 with MadeAi-LR, a GenAI-enabled software solution leveraging the MadeAi platform to streamline key applications used in new therapy development including systematic literature reviews (SLR), clinical evidence reports (CERs), meta-analysis, targeted literature reviews (TLRs), and other clinical literature assessments. MadeAi-LR cuts literature review time in half while centralizing the process with an end-to-end platform, delivering 90% accuracy, and providing sourcing and attribution along the way for verifiable, traceable, and trustworthy results. Article content MadeAi's new release introduces advanced features for more complex literature review execution and content synthesis, including: Article content Support for AI-aided Review and AI as Reviewer capabilities for both Title & Abstract Screening and Full-text Screening. For the AI-aided Review mode, AI-generated suggestions are shared with two blinded human reviewers to facilitate faster, more informed decisions. For the AI as Reviewer mode, one human reviewer works in parallel with the AI, which serves as the second reviewer—reducing manual workload without compromising review quality. Expanded and customizable Screening model, offering more than a dozen screening criteria including PICOS. In addition, user-defined criteria are also supported to accommodate projects with novel screening needs. More dynamic Extraction, providing a Summary-level Extraction and an Arm-level Extraction. Summary-level Extraction is ideal for internal desk research, offering a consolidated view of key information from each study. For more detailed insights, Arm-level Extraction provides a granular breakdown of outcomes across different study groups, showing the user the origin of the extracted content, making reviewing and editing fast and efficient. AI Agent-Enhanced Extraction, enabling the ability to extract information from text, tables, graphs, and figures. Quality Appraisal built into the MadeAi workflow, allowing users to assess the risk-of-bias for included articles and visualize the results through intuitive tables and charts. Article content Developed with top 15 pharmaceutical companies, MadeAi-LR centralizes the literature review workflow, while bringing full sourcing attribution and transparency into research decision considerations. It frees teams to focus on higher-value work while driving greater productivity, stronger regulatory submissions, sharper internal strategies, and deeper research. With a single review demanding hundreds of onerous hours, MadeAi-LR helps pharma, biotech, and medtech organizations save time, stretch critical resources, and scale research to accelerate innovation. Article content 'MadeAi-LR customers are completing more literature reviews in less time and seeing immediate ROI, and they're eager for us to evolve our platform to address their more complex research needs,' said Gaugarin Oliver, founder and CEO of CapeStart. 'Our latest release offers enhancements that allow the GenAI to support more dynamic aspects of literature review research—including AI as Reviewer, Arm-level Extraction, and Quality Appraisals, among other improvements—so teams can scale faster and focus on what matters most: advancing science.' Article content Since MadeAi's launch in 2024, the platform has been recognized for AI excellence in life sciences several times over. It received a Stevie® award in the 21st Annual International Business Awards® program, where it was recognized as an innovative Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Solution in Healthcare within the Business Technology category. The platform was also named a PM360 2024 Innovator in the Generative AI Category. And most recently, MadeAi was named a winner of the 2025 Artificial Intelligence Excellence Awards, presented by the Business Intelligence Group. Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content Media Contacts: Meghan Oates-Zalesky Chief Marketing Officer for CapeStart 617-435-2470 Article content Article content
