Latest news with #militaryaction


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Politics
- Daily Mail
Democrats plot next move to stop Trump from seizing even more power amid LA riots
Democrats are increasingly worried that President Donald Trump will seize more power to use military action amid the anti-ICE LA riots. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) is working on legislation to try and prevent this. Trump has mobilized the National Guard and deployed Marines to Los Angeles after violence and destruction ensued over the last week. But the president has not yet imposed the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would give him even more power to use military action in the largest California city. He also didn't rule out the possibility of using the presidential power. Blumenthal is seeking to preemptively stop this action by overhauling the broad act and limiting presidential powers for deploying troops within the U.S. He and other Democrats are concerned that Trump will use the unrest as a 'pretext' for imposing Martial law. 'As Trump moves to expand military deployments, possibly using protests in L.A. as a pretext for more broadly silencing free speech or even imposing martial law, I'll be reintroducing reforms to the Insurrection Act that check potential abuse or overreach,' Blumenthal posted to X late Monday night. Meanwhile, one Democrat – Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania – is calling on his party to condemn the violence and the riots. 'I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that,' Fetterman wrote on X with an image of cars on fire with a masked rioter waving a Mexican flag. He continued: 'This is anarchy and true chaos. My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement.' Billionaire Elon Musk replied to the post with an emoji of an American flag. The protests against ICE raids and Trump's illegal immigration crackdown have descended into rioting, looting and attacks against law enforcement. So far in response, Trump has deployed more than 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 active duty Marines stationed at Twentynine Palms in Southern California, just 60 miles from Los Angeles. This deployment has flown in the face of liberal local and state leaders who have actively put in place laws and 'sanctuary city' policies that thwart federal immigration raids and any cooperation between law enforcement in California with ICE authorities. Trump says that California Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass – both Democrats – have lost control of the situation in Los Angeles. Newsom, however, says local and state authorities can handle it without interference from federal authorities or troops. He also claims that the troop deployment has only stirred more unrest. Blumenthal told Politico: 'The mainstream of America really believes deeply that our military should be used to defend our national interests and security, not to silence protest at home.' The Connecticut senator talked last year about overhauling the Insurrection Act after Trump said he would consider sending the military into U.S. cities to deal with crime and violence. He reupped the idea late on Monday. 'I first introduced Insurrection Act reforms before the election, fearing that future misuse of the military might only inflame conflict & threaten key rights. Now that nightmare seems imminently, fearfully real. Congress must act,' Blumenthal posted to X.


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Politics
- Russia Today
‘We will go deep into Pakistan' if provoked
Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar has said the root causes of New Delhi's conflict with Islamabad remain unchanged and that India is ready to strike anywhere in Pakistan if provoked by terrorist attacks. In an interview with Politico in Brussels on Monday, Jaishankar claimed that Pakistan is openly training a large number of terrorists, estimated to be in the thousands, and deploying them to carry out attacks against India. 'We are not going to live with it. So our message to them is that if you continue to do the kind of barbaric acts which they did in April, then there is going to be retribution, and that retribution will be against the terrorist organizations and the terrorist leadership,' he said. 'And we don't care where they are. If they are deep in Pakistan, we will go deep into Pakistan.' He was referring to the recent military showdown with Pakistan, in which India launched strikes on suspected terrorist facilities in Pakistan-controlled territory on May 7 in response to a terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir in April. The hostilities ended on May 10 when a ceasefire was announced. In the Politico interview, Jaishankar said the Indian military's air capabilities, including fighter jets and missiles, caused significantly more damage to the Pakistani Air Force than Pakistan had inflicted on India. The Indian foreign minister also spoke of New Delhi's efforts to boost its domestic manufacturing of arms and ammunition. Referring to Indian-made weapons, he said, 'some of them have been tested in the recent conflict with Pakistan' and have been 'very successful.' Jaishankar went on to say that some Indian defense companies want to work more with Europe with regard to design, though he does not see this as 'just buying more weapons from Europe.' The foreign minister also touched upon the Ukraine conflict, stating that India has never sought a role in it. 'If we can be of any help … we are open, but we are not pushing ourselves,' he said. Jaishankar added that India has been acting as a conduit between the two sides, keeping lines of communication open and occasionally relaying messages.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
DOD is investigating Hegseth's staffers over Houthi-strikes chats
June 7 (UPI) -- The Defense Department's Inspector General is investigating Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's March 13 Signal chat ahead of the U.S. military's extended aerial strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. The IG's office initiated the investigation weeks ago and has interviewed current and former Hegseth staffers to learn how the chat and one other that occurred on the Signal encrypted mobile messaging app included civilians, ABC News reported. A DOD IG spokesperson declined to comment on the investigation because it is ongoing. Signal supports encrypted group messaging chats, but at least two chats discussed the onset of U.S. military action against the Houthis that started on March 15. The first erroneously included The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, while a second Signal chat included Hegseth's wife and brother. Hegseth in April blamed "disgruntled" former employees and media for the controversy over the Signalchat mishaps that many have dubbed "Signalgate." "This is what media does," Hegseth told media during the annual Easter Egg Roll event at the White House on April 21. "They take anonymous sources from disgruntled former employees and they try to slash and burn people and ruin their reputations," he said. "We're changing the Defense Department and putting the Pentagon back in the hands of warfighters," Hegseth said. "Anonymous smears from disgruntled former employees on old news don't matter." The aerial attacks continued from March 15 until May 6, when President Donald Trump announced the Houthis agreed to stop attacking U.S.-flagged vessels. The Houthis did not stop attacking Israel or commercial shipping in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
'Iran is my biggest concern,' says IAEA Nuclear Chief Grossi in new interview
Grossi claimed that Israel's threats against the Islamic Republic imply that "the Iranian thing has incredible potential to become catastrophic." International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Grossi said that Iran is his "biggest preoccupation" when discussing nuclear-powered countries in an interview with the Financial Times published on Friday. Grossi told the Times this as a new confidential IAEA report said that the Islamic Republic had dramatically increased its uranium stockpile enrichment "close to weapons grade." 'Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon at this moment, but it has the material,' he told the Times. He also claimed that Israel's threats against the Islamic Republic imply that "the Iranian thing has incredible potential to become catastrophic. If there is a failure in negotiation, this will imply, most probably, military action.' Grossi then mentions the nuclear capabilities the Islamic Republic has, saying that one would have to go half a mile underground to find them. "I have been there many times,' he added. 'To get there, you take a spiral tunnel down, down, down." The Times further quoted him saying that "Today we could have 30 countries, which could have nuclear weapons, judging from their technical development, but we have nine,' and says that if Iran is added to that list, "you could have a cascade in the Middle East." He also said that US President Donald Trump's actions on Iran "have triggered negotiations where there were none before, and this is objectively commendable.' Grossi noted his concern for Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia and its occupation by Russian forces. He also told the Times that Russian President Vladimir Putin's repeated threats to use nuclear weapons "is worrying because it normalizes this."
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Trump Says US Won't Agree to Any Uranium Enrichment by Iran
(Bloomberg) -- The US won't allow any uranium enrichment as part of a potential nuclear deal with Iran, President Donald Trump said. Where the Wild Children's Museums Are Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access Trump made the comment in a social media post Monday evening, without elaborating. The US president has regularly signaled that he thinks a deal may be near, and that Iran could face military action if the talks collapse. His post came after an Axios report said US negotiators gave Iran a proposal that would allow limited, low-level enrichment. Iran hasn't commented on the report. Trump has long pledged that Iran won't be allowed a nuclear weapon. He also said last week he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that a military strike on Iran — which could lead to the wider war in the Middle East and push up oil prices — would be 'inappropriate' right now because 'we're very close to a solution.' Netanyahu has said Iran — Israel's arch-enemy — shouldn't be allowed to enrich uranium at all, even to the low levels Tehran says its needs for nuclear power plants and other non-military uses. The Islamic Republic has consistently said it won't accept an agreement with the US that doesn't allow it to enrich uranium to a low level. At the moment, it's processing uranium to a much higher point, almost to the level required for atomic weapons. In addition to the issue of enrichment, Iran says it wants clear assurances of how sanctions would be eased as part of any deal with the US. Washington has not yet been willing to specify how sanctions would be lifted, Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said on Monday. --With assistance from Arsalan Shahla. (Adds Axios report in third paragraph.) YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data