Latest news with #outrageCulture
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Joe Rogan Tells The Government To 'Figure Out What To Do With The Money They Already Get From Everybody,' Before They 'Tax The Rich People'
Joe Rogan and British comedian Jimmy Carr held nothing back in their latest conversation on 'The Joe Rogan Experience,' tackling outrage culture, taxes, and what they see as government mismanagement. Rogan and Carr criticized the modern trend of gaining attention through outrage or victimhood instead of talent or effort. 'This is a society that rewards outrage and that coddles people for the most preposterous beliefs,' Rogan said. 'It's a weird society of social media and the amount of attention you can generate.' Don't Miss: Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm — Carr referenced a bit from comedian Chris Rock, saying there are three ways to get attention: You could be brilliant, infamous, or a victim. Carr argued that the difference between ambition and entitlement comes down to responsibility. 'If you want to do something about it, that's ambition. If you think that's someone else's problem, that's entitlement,' he said. He said he has empathy for people dealt a tough hand but believes in empowering them to play those cards as best they can. Trending: One of the most passionate parts of the episode came when Rogan slammed the idea of simply taxing the rich to fix America's problems. 'What are you going to do? You're going to enrich [the government],' Rogan said. 'They're just going to get bigger and stronger and have even more power... It's not going to help you if they tax rich people.' 'Are the poor people going to get that money? No. Are their services going to improve? No, you're just going to get more government,' he continued. Then Rogan hit on what he sees as the real issue: government waste and mismanagement. 'Figure out what to do with the money they already get from everybody,' he said. 'And you're not doing a good job with it. That's the problem, the problem isn't that the rich people aren't paying their taxes.' Carr, who faced his own tax scandal in 2012, joked that you know you're in real trouble when 'the prime minister of the country that you live in breaks off from the G20 summit to come out and do a press conference where he talks about nothing other than your personal tax affairs.' 'It was tax avoidance, not tax evasion,' Carr clarified. 'There's a difference, and the difference is about 18 months in prison.'Carr pointed to Scandinavian countries like Norway and Denmark as examples where high taxes actually deliver real public services, without much public resentment. Rogan responded that these are smaller, more manageable societies. 'When you scale that to like hundreds of millions of people, things get really weird,' Rogan said. Carr also praised the European country of Estonia for offering a free, English-language medical school to attract foreign students. The idea behind it, as he says, is that some will stay, work, and contribute to the local economy. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Joe Rogan Tells The Government To 'Figure Out What To Do With The Money They Already Get From Everybody,' Before They 'Tax The Rich People' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
12-05-2025
- Yahoo
The reign of the office snowflakes must end now
From being given the wrong coloured cup to not having her banana cut in the right way, my toddler is in the habit of being offended by almost anything and everything. But she is in good company. As it turns out, the so-called terrible twos really linger. Adults are having tantrums over ludicrous things everywhere, throwing their proverbial toys out of the pram not only at home but also at the workplace. What once would have been considered embarrassing is now encouraged. Outrage culture is thriving, with people happy to kick off over any perceived insult, even though, I'm afraid to say, feeling offended now and then is a part of life. While it goes without saying that we should be sensitive in the way we speak to each other, and obviously some are far more vulnerable than others, nobody can live in a world with no discomfort. Workplaces and the people in them are deeply flawed. That doesn't mean we should put up with the office bully, but rather accept that work can be irritating because of the people in it. But some of the claims going through the clogged-up employment tribunal system suggest our sensitivities have gone too far. This week, we learnt about the NHS worker who was awarded almost £30,000 after being compared to Darth Vader by a colleague. 'Being aligned with his personality is insulting,' a judge concluded, adding that it was reasonable for the aggrieved worker to perceive the characterisation as a 'detriment'. While there's always deeper layers to these tales, it all adds to a growing sense that offence-taking culture has reached its peak. The Star Wars-themed case follows a previous tribunal hearing that saw an NHS nurse awarded £41,000 after being left out of a tea round. Earlier this year, an HMRC employee also successfully sued after she was sent an unwanted birthday card from her boss, while a senior estate agent who resigned because he wanted to sit at a 'symbolically significant' desk successfully sued for unfair constructive dismissal. And beware of offering a 66-year-old a seat at work – a tribunal found last year that doing so could constitute age discrimination. Oh, and don't even think about calling a man bald. In 2022, a panel of balding judges ruled that doing so could be considered sexual harassment. As judges waste time debating which office worker offended whom and how, as if they are breaking up an argument in a school playground, therapy-speak has firmly entered the workplace. Office workers in cushy jobs are saying they can't work on simple projects because the amount of work involved violates their boundaries. All the while, there are those facing horrendous, exploitative working conditions across the country whose stories will never get told. The most extreme cases of workplace abuse often go unnoticed, because the true victims aren't those being left out of tea rounds or being called bald. Society's most vulnerable rarely get heard. Instead, the cultural spotlight is on office tittle-tattle and perceived slights that are increasingly becoming weaponised, with one boss saying that businesses are forced to 'settle claims they think they'll win because they don't want to spend £10,000 on lawyers and be distracted for 18 months'. There are concerns that all of this could get out of hand under the looming Employment Rights Bill, which will give staff the right to claim unfair dismissal from the first day in a job. Bosses point out that they already feel like claims have spiked since the pandemic, coinciding with the sharp rise in home working and mental health issues. There have been employment cases which on the surface seem bonkers, but have been driven by mental health complaints. The Government and employers have the impossible task of trying to work out how much of all of this is part of the so-called 'snowflake culture', and how much is a sign of a systemic post-pandemic mental health crisis. There are fears that some are gaming the system. 'Mental health is a very difficult thing to deal with,' says one boss. 'In the old days, the issue was timekeeping, which was specific. When it's not specific, it becomes very difficult to handle. 'Let's say there's a performance issue – if the person then says, 'sorry I can't cope because I've got X condition and you're now putting too much pressure on me', how are you supposed to respond? 'That's the issue, really – how do you tell if someone is gaming the system? An employer isn't an expert in mental health.' Mental health issues do need to be tackled, and I don't agree with throwing around the term 'snowflake' to dismiss anyone who is just sensitive or might be suffering. But when it comes to other issues – people living in a state of faux, semi-permanent outrage or trying to skive off work because they can't be bothered – then there needs to be a way to deal with the problem without it leading to lawsuits. Employment tribunals are meant to be a last resort, but in the last quarter of 2023, there were close to half a million outstanding claims. Ministers are now scrambling to find a way to make the system more efficient, privately asking business groups and unions for advice on how to cut red tape while still making sure angry workers can fight their corner. The issue is that if the Employment Rights Bill encourages more legal action, everyone could be at it. If 85pc of people really have experienced an annoying colleague, as a poll conducted last year by Kickresume claims, then the amount of pent-up anger out there must be huge. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Telegraph
12-05-2025
- Telegraph
The reign of the office snowflakes must end now
From being given the wrong coloured cup to not having her banana cut in the right way, my toddler is in the habit of being offended by almost anything and everything. But she is in good company. As it turns out, the so-called terrible twos really linger. Adults are having tantrums over ludicrous things everywhere, throwing their proverbial toys out of the pram not only at home but also at the workplace. What once would have been considered embarrassing is now encouraged. Outrage culture is thriving, with people happy to kick off over any perceived insult, even though, I'm afraid to say, feeling offended now and then is a part of life. While it goes without saying that we should be sensitive in the way we speak to each other, and obviously some are far more vulnerable than others, nobody can live in a world with no discomfort. Workplaces and the people in them are deeply flawed. That doesn't mean we should put up with the office bully, but rather accept that work can be irritating because of the people in it. But some of the claims going through the clogged-up employment tribunal system suggest our sensitivities have gone too far. This week, we learnt about the NHS worker who was awarded almost £30,000 after being compared to Darth Vader by a colleague. 'Being aligned with his personality is insulting,' a judge concluded, adding that it was reasonable for the aggrieved worker to perceive the characterisation as a 'detriment'. While there's always deeper layers to these tales, it all adds to a growing sense that offence-taking culture has reached its peak. The Star Wars-themed case follows a previous tribunal hearing that saw an NHS nurse awarded £41,000 after being left out of a tea round. Earlier this year, an HMRC employee also successfully sued after she was sent an unwanted birthday card from her boss, while a senior estate agent who resigned because he wanted to sit at a 'symbolically significant' desk successfully sued for unfair constructive dismissal. And beware of offering a 66-year-old a seat at work – a tribunal found last year that doing so could constitute age discrimination. Oh, and don't even think about calling a man bald. In 2022, a panel of balding judges ruled that doing so could be considered sexual harassment. As judges waste time debating which office worker offended whom and how, as if they are breaking up an argument in a school playground, therapy-speak has firmly entered the workplace. Office workers in cushy jobs are saying they can't work on simple projects because the amount of work involved violates their boundaries. All the while, there are those facing horrendous, exploitative working conditions across the country whose stories will never get told. The most extreme cases of workplace abuse often go unnoticed, because the true victims aren't those being left out of tea rounds or being called bald. Society's most vulnerable rarely get heard. Instead, the cultural spotlight is on office tittle-tattle and perceived slights that are increasingly becoming weaponised, with one boss saying that businesses are forced to 'settle claims they think they'll win because they don't want to spend £10,000 on lawyers and be distracted for 18 months'. There are concerns that all of this could get out of hand under the looming Employment Rights Bill, which will give staff the right to claim unfair dismissal from the first day in a job. Bosses point out that they already feel like claims have spiked since the pandemic, coinciding with the sharp rise in home working and mental health issues. There have been employment cases which on the surface seem bonkers, but have been driven by mental health complaints. The Government and employers have the impossible task of trying to work out how much of all of this is part of the so-called 'snowflake culture', and how much is a sign of a systemic post-pandemic mental health crisis. There are fears that some are gaming the system. 'Mental health is a very difficult thing to deal with,' says one boss. 'In the old days, the issue was timekeeping, which was specific. When it's not specific, it becomes very difficult to handle. 'Let's say there's a performance issue – if the person then says, 'sorry I can't cope because I've got X condition and you're now putting too much pressure on me', how are you supposed to respond? 'That's the issue, really – how do you tell if someone is gaming the system? An employer isn't an expert in mental health.' Mental health issues do need to be tackled, and I don't agree with throwing around the term 'snowflake' to dismiss anyone who is just sensitive or might be suffering. But when it comes to other issues – people living in a state of faux, semi-permanent outrage or trying to skive off work because they can't be bothered – then there needs to be a way to deal with the problem without it leading to lawsuits. Employment tribunals are meant to be a last resort, but in the last quarter of 2023, there were close to half a million outstanding claims. Ministers are now scrambling to find a way to make the system more efficient, privately asking business groups and unions for advice on how to cut red tape while still making sure angry workers can fight their corner. The issue is that if the Employment Rights Bill encourages more legal action, everyone could be at it. If 85pc of people really have experienced an annoying colleague, as a poll conducted last year by Kickresume claims, then the amount of pent-up anger out there must be huge.
