Latest news with #publicCompanies
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
While individual investors own 33% of CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX:9CI), private companies are its largest shareholders with 54% ownership
CapitaLand Investment's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public Bartley Investments Pte. Ltd. owns 54% of the company Institutional ownership in CapitaLand Investment is 13% Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Every investor in CapitaLand Investment Limited (SGX:9CI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. And individual investors on the other hand have a 33% ownership in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CapitaLand Investment, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for CapitaLand Investment Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. CapitaLand Investment already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CapitaLand Investment, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Hedge funds don't have many shares in CapitaLand Investment. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Bartley Investments Pte. Ltd. with 54% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 2.2% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 2.1% of the company stock. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CapitaLand Investment Limited in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own S$20m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling. With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CapitaLand Investment. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. We can see that Private Companies own 54%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CapitaLand Investment better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - CapitaLand Investment has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
11-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Public companies own 26% of Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited (ASX:SOL) shares but individual investors control 52% of the company
Significant control over Washington H. Soul Pattinson by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company Insiders have been buying lately We've discovered 1 warning sign about Washington H. Soul Pattinson. View them for free. Every investor in Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited (ASX:SOL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 52% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Public companies, on the other hand, account for 26% of the company's stockholders. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Washington H. Soul Pattinson. Check out our latest analysis for Washington H. Soul Pattinson Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. Washington H. Soul Pattinson already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Washington H. Soul Pattinson's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Washington H. Soul Pattinson. The company's largest shareholder is Brickworks Limited, with ownership of 26%. With 4.2% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Robert Millner and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth AU$729m. we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling. The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 52% of Washington H. Soul Pattinson shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions. It seems that Private Companies own 3.2%, of the Washington H. Soul Pattinson stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. It appears to us that public companies own 26% of Washington H. Soul Pattinson. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Washington H. Soul Pattinson you should know about. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
New Pacific Metals Corp. (TSE:NUAG) stock most popular amongst retail investors who own 43%, while public companies hold 39%
New Pacific Metals' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company Institutions own 16% of New Pacific Metals Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of New Pacific Metals Corp. (TSE:NUAG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 43% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). And public companies on the other hand have a 39% ownership in the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about New Pacific Metals. View our latest analysis for New Pacific Metals Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. New Pacific Metals already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of New Pacific Metals, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in New Pacific Metals. The company's largest shareholder is Silvercorp Metals Inc., with ownership of 27%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.3% by the third-largest shareholder. We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in New Pacific Metals Corp.. In their own names, insiders own CA$3.4m worth of stock in the CA$275m company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. With a 43% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over New Pacific Metals. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Public companies currently own 39% of New Pacific Metals stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for New Pacific Metals (of which 2 are potentially serious!) you should know about. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
