logo
#

Latest news with #regionalinequality

Working from home ‘has not boosted towns outside London'
Working from home ‘has not boosted towns outside London'

Telegraph

time15-05-2025

  • Business
  • Telegraph

Working from home ‘has not boosted towns outside London'

Working from home has not boosted towns outside of London, research suggests. A study involving nearly 50,000 people found that nearly half of Britain's workforce now spends some time working remotely, but the majority have hybrid working patterns that still require some office time. As a result, most have remained living close to their workplaces. It had been hoped that home working might reduce regional inequality by allowing people to move away from South East England, taking high salaries to less affluent and more remote areas. But the new report from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre for Population Change suggests it has done little to close the divide between the richest and poorest regions. Prof Jackie Wahba, an economics expert from the University of Southampton and the ESRC centre, said: 'It was widely believed that working from home would let high-skilled workers move further from their employers, opening up opportunities for less wealthy areas. 'But so far, it remains most common among higher earners in a few sectors, mostly near London and other major cities.' She added: 'Working from home isn't yet bridging the gap between regions. Policymakers, businesses, and local leaders need to act to ensure that job flexibility does not exacerbate inequality but is harnessed to support real, long-term regional growth.' Working from home surged since the Covid pandemic, especially among older, high-skilled professionals in and around London and other major cities. The UK has previously been dubbed the working-from-home capital of Europe, with British workers spending an average of 1.5 days a week at home, according to data from the Ifo Institute, a German economic think tank. It is significantly more than workers in Germany, who average one day per week from home, and in France, where the average for employees is 0.6 days. The new findings show that 52 per cent of UK employees never work from home. Among high-skilled workers the figure is just 29 per cent. However, the majority of those who work from home do so in a hybrid pattern, with at least some days spent in the office. The researchers analysed data from the Institute for Social and Economic Research's UK Household Longitudinal Study and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Labour Force Survey. They also interviewed local government staff, as well as those working for businesses and universities. The team found that when high-skilled workers changed where they lived, their housing needs tended to be the driver, rather than jobs. The findings suggest that the idea that working from home will allow lagging regions to attract high earners has yet to materialise and may not be realised at all. Prof Wahba said working from home 'could offer major benefits, giving both employers and workers more choice and flexibility. But to achieve this, we must tackle key obstacles to residential mobility.' She added: 'There is little evidence on the net economic impact for local areas of these changes in working patterns.' Interviewees in the study highlighted advantages of working from home, including being able to apply for jobs in more areas, more efficient use of office space and the ability to attract workers to their regions because of lower living costs. However, they raised concerns about quieter city centres, weaker workplace culture and the limited ability to work from home in many sectors. Many companies are now trying to entice workers back to the office. In 2021, a decade-long ONS study found that employees who mainly worked from home were 39 per cent less likely to receive a bonus.

The impact of remote working across UK as firms adopt hybrid policies
The impact of remote working across UK as firms adopt hybrid policies

The Independent

time14-05-2025

  • Business
  • The Independent

The impact of remote working across UK as firms adopt hybrid policies

New research suggests working from home may not be the solution for revitalising struggling regions of the UK, and could even worsen existing inequalities. The study, conducted by researchers from several UK universities including Southampton, St Andrews, Birmingham, De Montfort and University of Arts London, examined post-pandemic working habits and found that the hoped-for boost to areas outside the south-east of England hasn't materialised. While the rise of working from home initially held promise for levelling the playing field, the reality is more complex. The research reveals that most employees now adopt hybrid models, splitting their time between home and the office. This limits the potential for significant regional shifts, as high-skilled workers remain tethered to their workplaces. Across the UK, more than half of all workers (52 per cent) never work from home. However, this figure drops significantly for high-skilled workers, with only 29 per cent never working remotely. The majority of high-skilled workers who do work from home follow hybrid patterns, further reinforcing the link to their physical workplace. This suggests that working from home, in its current form, is not driving a relocation of high-skilled jobs to areas in need of an economic boost. Instead, it may be exacerbating existing regional divides. Professor Jackie Wahba, of the University of Southampton and the ESRC Centre for Population Change, said: 'Working from home is now a normal part of working life, with the potential to change where and how people work. 'It could offer major benefits, giving both employers and workers more choice and flexibility. But to achieve this, we must tackle key obstacles to residential mobility. 'It was widely believed that working from home would let high-skilled workers move further from their employers, opening up opportunities for less wealthy areas. 'But so far, it remains most common among higher earners in a few sectors, mostly near London and other major cities.' She added: 'There is also little evidence on the net economic impact for local areas of these changes in working patterns. We need better data on who is working from home, how often, and in what roles. 'This will help policymakers give targeted support to more regions. Investing in transport links, fast broadband, schools, healthcare, green spaces, cultural venues, and affordable housing are as important as providing flexible work options in drawing and retaining skilled workers. 'Working from home isn't yet bridging the gap between regions. Policymakers, businesses, and local leaders need to act to ensure that job flexibility does not exacerbate inequality but is harnessed to support real, long-term regional growth.' The research project, co-funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, analysed data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study and Labour Force Survey. It also involved interviews with businesses, regional governments and universities in Glasgow, Sheffield and Birmingham. They found that in these 'second-tier regional cities', the advantages of working from home were seen as wider recruitment opportunities, more efficient use of office space, and the ability to attract workers to their regions because of lower living costs. However, they also raised concerns about quieter city centres, weaker workplace culture, and the limited ability to work from home in many sectors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store