Latest news with #waterpolitics

South China Morning Post

Fighting over water is a sign of failure, not strength

Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Advertisement Few diplomatic agreements survive the forces of hatred, bullets and bombings. Yet for 65 years, the Indus Waters Treaty has endured. Today, rash decisions risk ending one of South Asia's few durable successes. A tragic and deadly shooting in Kashmir on April 22 has provoked India into suspending the treaty. Pakistan, predictably, has escalated in response. Neither side seems to grasp what is at stake. The Indus system isn't a mere river network; it's a life source for both nations. More than 80 per cent of Pakistan's irrigated agriculture draws water from it. India's farmers and hydropower projects rely on it too. Playing politics with water is a reckless gamble with millions of lives. Brokered by the World Bank, the treaty gives the eastern rivers to India and the western ones to Pakistan. That balance has kept the peace – at least on the rivers. In reality, India cannot suddenly block Pakistan's access to the rivers. India currently lacks the infrastructure to do so. But symbolism matters. By suspending treaty obligations, India damages its image as a responsible rising power. Pakistan's bluster – that it will respond with 'full force' – is even worse. It treats the flow of water not as a shared necessity but as a trigger for war. The region cannot afford such dangerous bravado. Advertisement As politicians grandstand, the Himalayan glaciers are melting. Water is becoming more scarce, exacerbating droughts as floods become deadlier. The Indus Waters Treaty must be updated, not suspended, to cope with these realities. Cooperation on climate resilience, new dispute mechanisms and smarter agriculture should be on the agenda instead of acts of retaliation.