logo
#

Latest news with #workplaceinjury

Norman Iveson Steel fined after Bedale man fractured spine
Norman Iveson Steel fined after Bedale man fractured spine

BBC News

time3 days ago

  • Business
  • BBC News

Norman Iveson Steel fined after Bedale man fractured spine

A construction firm and its director have been fined after a worker suffered life-changing injuries when he fell through a barn Croft, 30, sustained fractures to his spine, skull, ribs and shoulder from the incident, which happened in Leyburn, North Yorkshire, in October Croft, from nearby Bedale, also suffered a collapsed left lung, hearing loss and injuries to his cheek and wrist. An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found his employer, Norman Iveson Steel Products, failed to implement "basic" height control measures. Safety netting to prevent falls from height did not cover all areas and was installed by people without the sufficient skills to rig it, the HSE company was fined £100,000 and ordered to pay costs of £6,101 at York Magistrates' Court last week after pleading guilty to a breach of Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act, the HSE Iveson, who admitted to a breach of Section 37 of the same Act, was fined £1,822 and told to pay costs of £2, after the hearing, HSE inspector Gavin Carruthers said: "This was a tragic incident where a young man narrowly escaped death but received life-changing injuries. "Falls from height continue to be the leading cause of workplace death in Great Britain and this incident was fully avoidable if steps were taken to address the risks." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Discusses Construction Accidents and Workers' Rights
Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Discusses Construction Accidents and Workers' Rights

Globe and Mail

time5 days ago

  • Business
  • Globe and Mail

Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Discusses Construction Accidents and Workers' Rights

The Western Pennsylvania construction accident lawyers at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. ( recently shed light on the serious risks faced by construction workers and the legal options available to those injured on the job. Construction remains one of the most hazardous industries, with thousands of workers suffering injuries each year. Despite strict safety regulations, negligence and oversight continue to contribute to preventable accidents. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), construction-related incidents account for a significant percentage of workplace injuries and fatalities. The lawyers at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. understand the severe impact of these accidents and work diligently to hold responsible parties accountable. With a strong commitment to legal advocacy, the Western Pennsylvania construction accident lawyers fight for the rights of injured workers across the region. Construction sites present numerous dangers, including falls from heights, equipment failures, electrical hazards, and structural collapses. While safety regulations are in place to minimize risks, negligence and oversight continue to contribute to preventable accidents. The Western Pennsylvania construction accident lawyers note that when property owners, contractors, or equipment manufacturers fail to maintain safe conditions, injured workers may have legal options. From road construction to high-rise developments, Pennsylvania's construction industry is a critical part of the economy. However, data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that Pennsylvania ranks among the top five states with the highest number of construction-related injuries. In 2023, Pennsylvania reported approximately 6,500 construction site injuries, a sharp increase from the previous year. Construction accidents often result in severe injuries such as fractures, spinal cord damage, burns, and traumatic brain injuries. Some workers face permanent disabilities, impacting their ability to return to their profession. The legal team at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. understands the long-term consequences of workplace injuries and is committed to securing compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. OSHA has identified four primary causes of fatal construction accidents: falls from heights, struck-by object accidents, electrocutions, and caught-in or between accidents. Falls are among the most common, occurring when workers slip from scaffolding, ladders, or rooftops. A lack of proper fall protection increases the likelihood of serious injuries. Struck-by object accidents happen when tools, construction materials, or heavy machinery hit workers on-site. These incidents can cause catastrophic injuries or fatalities. Electrocutions remain a significant hazard on construction sites, particularly when live power lines, faulty wiring, or unsafe electrical equipment are present. Workers who come into contact with these dangers often suffer severe burns, nerve damage, or even death. Caught-in or between accidents are another common risk, where workers become trapped in collapsing trenches, between heavy equipment, or within dangerous machinery. Determining liability in a construction accident can be complex, as multiple parties may be responsible. The legal team at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. investigates accidents to identify all potentially liable parties, which may include employers, contractors, property owners, and equipment manufacturers. Employers and contractors are responsible for maintaining a safe work environment and ensuring compliance with OSHA regulations. When they fail to do so, injured workers may have a valid legal claim. Property owners must also uphold safety standards for workers on their premises. If hazardous conditions exist and cause an accident, they may be held accountable. Equipment manufacturers can be liable for defective machinery or unsafe tools that contribute to workplace injuries. When faulty products cause harm, workers may have the right to pursue a product liability claim. Under Pennsylvania law, workers' compensation benefits provide financial support for injured employees. However, in cases where a third party is at fault, such as a subcontractor or equipment supplier, injured workers may also have the right to file a personal injury lawsuit for additional damages. Construction accident victims may be entitled to different forms of compensation, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, disability benefits, and wrongful death claims for families who have lost a loved one due to workplace injuries. Workers' compensation claims do not cover pain and suffering, but injured employees may pursue a third-party claim for full compensation. The Western Pennsylvania construction accident lawyers at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. can work with medical and financial professionals to assess damages and fight for maximum recovery. Securing a fair settlement or verdict is essential for injured workers to move forward with their lives. Managing a construction accident claim can be challenging, especially when insurance companies and employers attempt to minimize liability. The attorneys at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. can guide clients through every step of the legal process, helping ensure that they receive the support they need. With decades of legal experience, Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. has built a reputation for strong advocacy and successful case outcomes. The firm represents injured construction workers across Western Pennsylvania, including Lawrence, Beaver, Butler, Mercer, and Allegheny counties. About Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C.: With nearly a century of legal experience, Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. is dedicated to representing injured individuals across Western Pennsylvania. The firm provides compassionate legal representation for victims of construction accidents, workplace injuries, and other personal injury claims. Their commitment to justice has earned them a strong reputation for securing substantial settlements and verdicts for their clients. Embeds: Youtube Video: GMB: Email and website Email: lmkelly@ Website:

Tecumseh company fined $60,000 after workplace injury
Tecumseh company fined $60,000 after workplace injury

CTV News

time5 days ago

  • Business
  • CTV News

Tecumseh company fined $60,000 after workplace injury

Tecumseh company Precision Stamping has been charged after a workplace injury in 2022. On Nov. 28, 2022, the Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training, and Skills Development said a worker was critically injured after being pinched between two metal racks in a forklift collision. The quality technician was inspecting stamped metal parts, that were held on metal racks. During the inspection, a forklift collided with the racks, which created a pinch point. The forklift operator said there were brake issues, and they completely failed in the collision. It was determined by the ministry that the company failed as an employer to make sure the forklift was maintained in good condition, contrary to the Occupational Health and Safety Act. The company pled guilty in a Windsor court, leading to the $60,000 fine. The court imposed a 25 per cent victim fine surcharge as well. The surcharge is credited to a special provincial government fund to help victims of crime.

Does an accident on commute in the UAE count as a workplace injury for insurance?
Does an accident on commute in the UAE count as a workplace injury for insurance?

Arabian Business

time6 days ago

  • Business
  • Arabian Business

Does an accident on commute in the UAE count as a workplace injury for insurance?

Injuries sustained during the commute to and from work in the UAE should be treated as a workplace injury and compensation should be paid accordingly, said the General Pension and Social Security Authority (GPSSA). Insured Emiratis and/or their beneficiaries are offered a compensation payment if proven to suffer from a work-related injury while commuting to and from work or if proven to be exposed to a work-related injury, the GPSSA in the UAE said. An official police report must be submitted in the event of an accident to determine whether the insured's injury or decease was the result of a work-related injury or otherwise, depending on the route taken while commuting to and from work. UAE commute injury insurance If an injury leads to death or total disability, the insured is entitled to a pension payment regardless of the employment years. This pension amount is calculated at a maximum of 100 per cent of the insured's pension calculation salary, if the individual has completed a service period of 35 years. According to the provisions of UAE Federal Law No. 7 of 1999 regarding pension and social security and its amendments, a compensation of AED75,000 ($20,400) is distributed to the insured's beneficiaries as per the Sharia Islamic law if the insured's decease has been proven to lead to total disability due to a work-related matter. However, if the injury has resulted in a partial disability, the insured is entitled to a compensation equal to the percentage of the disability, multiplied by AED75,000 ($20,400). If the insured has been proven to inflict injury on his/herself or if the injury was found to be the result of consuming prohibited substances, he/she is denied a compensation. A compensation is also denied if found that the insured individual has violated security and safety procedures or workplace instructions, as submitted official proof by a competent authority. Insured individuals are advised by the GPSSA to follow the rules and procedures that preserve their rights when and if involved in an accident while commuting to work, and to adhere to their office policies regarding prompt and accurate attendance and departure records to determine exact travel logistics to the workplace. A work-related injury as per the federal pension law is defined as an injury resulting from an accident that an insured individual is exposed to during or because of a work-related injury or an accident while commuting to or from work, in addition to an occupational disease because of embarking in certain procedures and professions, or decease due to work-related fatigue or stress, concluded the GPSSA.

Garda settles High Court case against State over submachine gun discharge
Garda settles High Court case against State over submachine gun discharge

Irish Times

time23-05-2025

  • Irish Times

Garda settles High Court case against State over submachine gun discharge

A garda who was shot in the leg when his submachine gun discharged after it allegedly snagged on his bulletproof vest has settled his High Court action against the State. The garda brought an action against the Garda Commissioner, the Minister for Justice and the Attorney General. Ms Justice Denise Brett ruled that the media cannot identify the garda or any Garda witness in the case. The garda's ankle was allegedly shattered after he manoeuvred himself within the confined space of a patrol vehicle, causing the safety selector switch and the trigger of his firearm to snag on his bulletproof vest. He claimed the gun discharged one round during the incident in July 2019. READ MORE In evidence, he told the court he had never experienced pain like it and nearly passed out. On the third day of the hearing, the garda's senior counsel, Richard Kean, instructed by solicitor Brigid O'Donnell, told the court the case has settled and could be struck out. In his case, the garda claimed there was a failure to provide him with a safe place of work and he had been caused to carry his firearm in a confined space while wearing allegedly inappropriate personal protective equipment. At the opening of the case this week, the court heard liability was admitted by the defence. In his evidence, the garda, who had been in the force for more than 15 years at the time of the incident, said he was wearing a bulletproof vest, had a pistol in a holster and a submachine gun in a sling around his neck pointing down. He said he was in the driver seat and turned around to check the back seat when his submachine gun discharged. 'I felt immediate excruciating pain, and I saw smoke from the weapon and blood squirting up to the seat,' he said. He said his colleague made his weapons safe and he was brought to hospital. 'The ankle was shattered. I remember the doctor saying my leg was a mush before I went into surgery,' he told the judge. The bullet went through the back of his left leg and ankle joint and his left ankle had shattered. He had to have surgery and physiotherapy and was out of work for 18 months. The garda told the court he did everything he could to build up his leg afterwards 'but the pain never really left'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store