logo
#

Latest news with #Westend61

11 things you shouldn't put in the washing machine but probably do
11 things you shouldn't put in the washing machine but probably do

Metro

time19-05-2025

  • General
  • Metro

11 things you shouldn't put in the washing machine but probably do

Link is copied Comments Where would we be without the washing machine? Government statistics reveal that 97% of British homes have one but whether you're in that majority or haul your dirty washing down the launderette once a week, it's vital you know which items you can throw in and those you should avoid. Here are the most common things you should consider washing by hand instead... (Picture: Getty Images) If you're someone who has to wear a tie for work, or you have kids who wear them as part of their school uniform, you'll no doubt be tempted to stick them in the washing machine along with the rest of your weekly laundry. You probably shouldn't though. Ties are often made of silk, wool or another delicate material which doesn't do well in the machine, meaning they could shrink or warp under the pressure of the hot water and detergent. Stick to handwashing instead to keep them looking pristine (Picture: Getty Images/PhotoAlto) Here's one which in certain circumstances - such as if the care label allows it - can be machine washed. But we include it because for the most part you really shouldn't be sticking your bras in the washing machine. For one thing many are made of delicate materials such as silk or lace which could leave them vulnerable to damage being washed in this way. For another, if they have wires inside them, these could tear through and find their way into the inner workings of the machine - potentially causing damage. Stick to handwashing unless it states you can do otherwise (Picture: Getty Images) Like bras, some of your swimwear may be machine washable, and if so feel free to chuck it in the machine along with everything else. But otherwise avoid machine-washing it after your swim or tanning session as the stretchy material in swimsuits can be compromised in the machine, causing it to lose its shape over time. The delicate material could also be damaged if it catches on any clasps or zips from other items in the machine at the same time. Which means you're far better off soaking the suit to remove any seawater (if needed) then washing it by hand (Picture: Getty Images) Whether it's a trusty biker jacket, favourite skirt or even a beloved belt, many of us have something leather in our wardrobe - but what happens when you come to clean it? Well one thing you definitely shouldn't do is stick it in the machine as it's likely to split and crack if you do. The best way to clean it is to sponge it down with a solution of warm water and liquid detergent or washing powder, then dry it with a cloth. And don't ever fully immerse it in water as this could also cause damage (Picture: Getty Images/Westend61) Got a cat or a dog running around the house? If so you'll be all too familiar with the concept of getting pet hair on your socks or other items of clothing. Tempting as it might be to peel them off and stick them in the washing machine avec fur, don't even think about it. If you launder clothes covered in hairs from your pet, you run the risk they could either stick to the drum or clog up the drain filter which could potentially cause damage. Instead remove excess pet hair with a lint roller beforehand (Picture: Getty Images/iStockphoto) You might well own a sequinned dress or outfit which is your go-to partywear, taking pride of place in your wardrobe. Good for you. Don't stick it in the washing machine though. Anything covered in sequins will inevitably be compromised in the machine; at best you'll lose some, meaning your item doesn't look nearly as good as it should, at worst they could get caught in the machine itself, with the sort of consequences you can imagine. Embellishments which are glued on to an item should also be avoided as the hot water could melt the glue, ruining your lovely outfit. Stick to handwashing instead and always follow the instructions on the care label (Picture: Getty Images) If you've been working with flammable materials and your clothes are now covered in them, sticking them in at 40 degrees is a very bad idea. Liquids such as motor oil, cooking oil, petrol and even alcohol could potentially be a fire hazard when faced with the heat generated by the washing machine - and even more so if you also tumble dry them. What you should do instead is hand soak the item, apply a stain remover, then handwash the garment in hot water and hang it up to dry naturally (Picture: Getty Images/iStockphoto) If you have synthetic, cotton or down pillows then you're usually fine to wash them in your machine. But memory foam is another matter. Putting that on a hot cycle is, in general, a really bad idea because you'll likely end up with a heavy, soggy mess of a pillow, and the delicate material could even be split or torn. A better bet is to use a solution of warm water and washing-up liquid - or, if you have an upholstery attachment on your vacuum cleaner, you can use that instead (Picture: Getty Images) There's nothing wrong with machine washing items of clothing with zips. Leaving them unzipped though? That's a different story. Putting an open zip in with the rest of the wash could potentially cause problems, since the metal teeth of the zip could not only catch on other clothes and ruin them, but it could also come into contact with the drum of the machine, causing possible damage. So zip it before you wash it (Picture: Getty Images) This one should be fairly obvious but if you have an item made of delicate fabric in your wardrobe - whether it's a cashmere sweater, a velvet dress, or something made of silk or lace - washing it in the machine with your cottons is not a good idea. Materials like this don't do well when faced with high temperatures and your garment could end up looking faded or worn - and even shrink. Stick to handwashing using a gentle detergent, or even consider getting the item dry-cleaned. And if the label says you can machine wash it, do so carefully in a separate laundry bag for example (Picture: Getty Images) Finally, it might not be a specific item but overfilling your washing machine is as ill-advised as washing your leather jacket or your favourite sequinned party dress. Adding too much laundry could prevent it all from being washed properly since the laundry won't move around as efficiently and the detergent might not reach it all. Plus, the machine itself may struggle to spin everything, meaning your normally quiet device could start shaking and making a bit of a racket. To prevent this, follow the instructions in the manual and only fill it to the recommended capacity (Picture: Getty Images)

How to Solve One of the Biggest Dorm Headaches Students Face
How to Solve One of the Biggest Dorm Headaches Students Face

Yahoo

time07-05-2025

  • Yahoo

How to Solve One of the Biggest Dorm Headaches Students Face

This article may contain affiliate links that Yahoo and/or the publisher may receive a commission from if you buy a product or service through those links. As a Floridian going to college in Vermont, I quickly realized that summer storage is a real challenge when I'm 1,500 miles away from home. Seriously, what do you do with all your dorm stuff when the school year wraps up — especially when you can't just toss it in your car for a quick drive home? Whether you're also hundreds of miles away from home or just don't have the space to store your dorm-life setup, figuring out where to put all your things is tough. My school doesn't provide summer storage for dorm items, and let me tell you — hauling my dorm necessities through the airport wasn't on my list of fun summer activities. So if you're a student looking at a mountain of fairy lights, storage cubes, and way too many clothes and thinking, 'What am I supposed to do with all this?' I've got you! Before you stress out too much, check out all of your options, from renting a storage unit to even selling some of your things (or both!). Look into Storage Options on Campus Not many schools advertise on-campus storage options, but it's always good to check with your RA or a residence life or housing contact. Even if they don't offer official summer storage options, they might have recommendations for local storage solutions that other students have found helpful in the past. Rent a Storage Unit Nearby If you're not sticking around for the summer and need to store your belongings, getting a small storage unit is probably your best option. Just a heads up — these units fill up really quickly, especially in college towns, and they might be a bit of a trek from campus. If you don't have a car, it can get tricky. You'll either need to hitch a ride from a friend or brace yourself for an awkward rideshare trip with your bedding and microwave packed in with you. As you budget for your storage, plan on spending somewhere between $70 and $300 per month, according to storage unit data. A smaller unit close to campus will likely be the cheapest option. Prices can really jump around move-out time, so it's a good idea to book as early as you can. Want the space but not the price tag? Consider sharing a unit with a friend or roommate. Oh, and seriously, label your boxes! Trust me, 'random stuff' isn't going to do you any favors when you're trying to unpack in the middle of move-in day next semester. Credit: Westend61/Getty Images Credit: Westend61/Getty Images Use a Full-Service Storage Company I really wish I had known about these types of services during my freshman year. (When I moved out, my parents drove from Florida to Vermont and loaded all my belongings in the car. Luckily I flew back home with my mom, and my dad drove all my things back home.) Companies like Storage Scholars, Dorm Room Movers, and University and Student Services (USS) come right to your dorm, pick up your stuff, store it in a secure spot over the summer, and drop it back off at your room in the fall. If you don't have a car or just don't want to lug boxes all over campus, it's perfect. Some companies also offer shipping if you need to send things home. You'll probably find that your school will direct you to one of these types of companies when you ask about storage. My school, for example, recommends Storage Scholars. You will pay for the convenience, though. Here's what you can expect when you go with one of these full-service storage companies for dorms. There's a $19.99 registration fee for Storage Scholars that comes with a packing kit: five Storage Scholar boxes, FedEx label pouches, zip ties, one roll of tape, and a permanent marker. From there, you need to pay for a minimum of four months of storage, even if you need less than that, and the monthly fee is priced by item. Standard boxes cost $16 per month, and items like a mini fridge or bicycle cost $28 to store per month — so your final cost will depend on what you store. Also, pay close attention to the dates offered for pickup and drop-off of your items, because if you need a different date, you could pay a $300 fee, according to the Storage Scholars website. (Other companies will have their own rules, but make sure to read the fine print.) Similar to a storage unit, you could split this cost with a friend to make it more manageable. Either way, you're definitely paying for convenience — so if it fits your budget, why not make things easy on yourself? Ask a Local Friend This one is definitely the most budget-friendly: If you have a friend who lives nearby and has a garage, basement, or just some spare space in general, you might be able to leave a few boxes with them. Trust is key here, and it's important to be respectful of their space. I recently offered to let a friend keep some of her stuff at my place between when she has to move out of the dorms and when her lease starts. It's only for a week or two, and because she lives nine hours away it would've been a total nightmare for her to drive everything home and back. If you decide to ask a friend to hold on to some things, make sure you both agree on when you'll come to pick them up — and maybe avoid bringing over a mountain of unmarked trash bags! Because you'll be saving some cash, it might be a nice gesture to get your friend a gift card or a small present to say 'thanks.' Consider Selling or Donating What You Don't Need If you've found that your desk lamp just isn't cutting it anymore, your rug bears the scars of too many iced coffee spills, or you're tired of dragging that extra set of plastic drawers around, it might be time to think about selling some of your stuff. Many campuses have Buy/Sell groups on Facebook or bulletin boards in dorms where you can easily post what you'd like to get rid of. There are also apps like Depop, Facebook Marketplace, or OfferUp if you want to reach a larger crowd. This can also help you declutter while putting a little cash back in your pocket. Just a heads up: It's best to start this process early. Not many people are looking to buy a mattress topper the night before move-out! But don't be deterred, either; what seems like junk to you might just be the perfect addition to someone else's dorm. Whatever you don't sell, try to donate. My school often has collection spots at the end of the semester for clothes, furniture, and supplies to help local charities — an option I prefer over letting my stuff end up in a landfill. Of course, you might not sell everything you're not taking home, but if you can cut down the load you need to store, then you can also bring down the cost of storage. This post originally appeared on Dorm Therapy. See it there: The One Regret I Have About the Most Chaotic Day of Freshman Year (It Could've Been So Much Easier!) Further Reading We Tested (and Rated!) Every Sofa at West Elm — Here Are the Best for Every Type of Need Everything You've Ever Wanted To Know About Article's DTC Furniture See How a Stager Used Paint to Transform a 1950s Living Room Sign up for Apartment Therapy's Daily email newsletter to receive our favorite posts, tours, products, and shopping guides in your inbox.

Can you balance an egg on the equinox?
Can you balance an egg on the equinox?

Yahoo

time19-03-2025

  • Science
  • Yahoo

Can you balance an egg on the equinox?

Thursday, March 20, marks the vernal equinox in the Northern Hemisphere, the official start of astronomical spring and a day that is sometimes associated with the unusual tradition of balancing an egg on its end. According to folklore, you can only balance an egg upright on two days out of the entire year, once on the day of the March equinox and a second time on the September equinox. The belief relies on the gravitational pull of the sun, as on the day of the equinox, appears directly over the planet's equator. However, the real trick lies in a mixture of patience, concentration and finding a level surface. With the right combination of these three factors, anyone can balance an egg on its end on any day of the year. () Similar myths have arisen in the age of social media, with people claiming the equinox is the only time you can balance other objects, including the ability to have a broom stand upright unassisted. But similar to an egg, the feat can be accomplished on any day with the right broom and a level floor. A broom standing by itself. (Westend61/Getty Images) One thing that is almost perfectly balanced only on the equinox is the length of day versus the duration of night. Equinox is derived from the Latin words aequus, meaning "equal" and nox, meaning "night." At the precise moment of the equinox, which takes place on Thursday at 5:01 a.m. EDT, the sun's most direct rays are pointed at the equator. The result is a day featuring around 12 hours of daylight followed by a night lasting about 12 hours everywhere around the globe. Following the vernal equinox, the sun's rays become more focused on the Northern Hemisphere, with days growing longer and longer leading up to the June solistice. Meanwhile, nights become longer than days across the Southern Hemisphere as areas south of the equator experience the start of autumn.

Without a hands-free driving law, SC could lose upwards of $40M in federal road funding
Without a hands-free driving law, SC could lose upwards of $40M in federal road funding

Yahoo

time27-02-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Without a hands-free driving law, SC could lose upwards of $40M in federal road funding

South Carolina has long resisted efforts to outlaw the handheld use of cell phones while driving. Now the state stands to lose federal highway funding. (Stock photo from Westend61 via Getty Images) COLUMBIA — For more than two decades, South Carolina's Legislature has resisted efforts to outlaw holding or scrolling on a cellphone while driving. But now the state stands to lose $40 million to $80 million in annual federal highway funding. That threat could be what finally pushes a 'hands-free' measure to passage. Rep. Bill Taylor began leading the effort in 2018. The Aiken Republican, an avid motorcyclist, had just spent the summer of 2017 on a 3,000-mile road trip with his wife to Canada. On the road, he was hyperaware that many of the drivers around him were distracted by cellphones. When he returned to South Carolina, he sold the motorcycle and pre-filed his bill, which he dubbed DUI-E: 'Driving under the influence of electronics.' He and other advocates warned the distraction was even more dangerous than drunken driving. 'This is not an end-all-be-all, but it is one major distraction we can minimize,' Taylor told the SC Daily Gazette on Wednesday. Taylor once again introduced legislation ahead of the current session, as did Sen. Tom Young, R-Aiken, and House Speaker Pro Tem Tommy Pope, R-York, whose bill has received an initial nod from a House panel. It will likely advance from the full House Judiciary Committee to the chamber floor in the next few weeks. 'I know we've wrestled with this issue over the years,' Pope said when promoting the bill earlier this month. He proposed the legislation after the widow of a former Rock Hill attorney contacted him. A driver distracted by a cellphone hit and killed Earl Gatlin, age 69, in 2023 while he was riding his bicycle. Pope said the family was frustrated so little could be done under state law to hold the driver responsible. He trusts the House can reach a compromise and 'give victims' families some comfort.' Taylor said that's far from the only tragedy caused by distracted driving in the state. But it's a letter from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration that has gotten legislators' attention. One after another House members commented earlier this month on the need for the bill and the deaths caused by distracted driving statewide. In the next breath, they spoke about the federal funding now at risk. A 2011 federal rule required states to pass laws banning handheld cellphone use for drivers of commercial vehicles. Under that rule, South Carolina should have had a law in place by 2015. Five years later, with no law in place, the U.S. Department of Transportation put the state on notice and told officials to make a compliance plan. State officials pointed to Taylor's bill saying the Legislature was considering measures. But that bill had already failed twice and would fail again and again, year after year. In 2022, the Senate passed its own version of the legislation but it failed when it came to the floor of the House. Two more years have gone by since then with no movement. Then late last year a letter came to Gov. Henry McMaster's office and the state Department of Motor Vehicles. Put a law in place by July 2025, it said, or the federal government will start docking 4% of funding it sends to the state for road construction. The penalty would go up to 8% every year after that until the law is changed. Leaders of SC courts, DMV warn what could happen if 'ancient' technology isn't upgraded 'I'm never pleased when the federal government uses extortion to get what it wants. However, in this case, I change my mind,' Taylor said half-jokingly. 'Thank God they're providing a financial nudge in the millions of dollars to get this done.' After all, the measure has the support of truck drivers in the state who say distracted drivers on the road — weaving in and out of lanes in front of massive big rigs not made to stop on a dime — are one of their biggest safety concerns. The state chapter of the motorcycle rights group ABATE (which stands for A Brotherhood Against Totalitarian Enactments) is also a proponent. Smaller than a car, motorcycles can go unnoticed by a distracted driver and possibly be struck or run off the road. Taylor also pointed to Georgia, where traffic deaths went down 17% the first year after the law changed. South Carolina has about 1,000 deaths per year on its roadways. If the statistic holds, that could mean 170 fewer lost lives in the Palmetto State annually. 'This is a bill that's needed in South Carolina,' said Rep. Case Brittain, R-Myrtle Beach 'One death is enough for me.' Under the proposal, drivers caught holding a cellphone in any way — either in their hand or in their lap — could be fined upwards of $100. It's already illegal to text while driving in South Carolina. Legislators passed that law in 2014 only because their unwillingness to do anything for years resulted in a hodgepodge of local ordinances statewide, which the law overruled. But that compromise still allowed drivers to hold their phone to talk or use their GPS. It also allows texting while stopped. Taylor has long argued that toothless law provides offenders so many legal excuses, it's impossible for officers to enforce. So, they don't even try. The advancing proposal would do what he's proposed for years: Make it illegal for drivers to hold, read or watch videos on their cellphone. Hands-free phone calls and voice-to-text messaging would still be legal. And holding the phone while legally stopped would still be OK. Severely injuring someone while distracted by a cellphone could mean five years in prison and a $1,000 fine. Causing a death would be a felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine. All fines collected would go to the state Department of Public Safety to pay for road signs and other educational material urging people not to drive distracted. This is not the first time federal highway dollars have motivated legislators to pass a law. In 2005, the U.S. Department of Transportation dangled an additional $11 million in federal highway funds as an incentive to pass a law allowing police to pull someone over for not wearing a seat belt. State transportation leaders said then the money could go to repair rural roads not previously eligible for federal funding, The Associated Press reported. Before, police could only ticket adult drivers for a seat belt violation if they pulled over a car for a different violation. Legislators argued for years over personal liberty and whether police could tell if someone was unbuckled. Some also worried it would give officers an excuse to pull someone over. 'The government is trying to regulate the amount of risk you can take against yourself based on health and insurance costs,' former Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, told The AP. 'That puts us on a slippery slope because you are buying into the proposition that government has the right to manage risk for you. And where does that stop?' The bill passed in 2005, becoming law despite opposition from former Gov. Mark Sanford. Though Sanford refused to sign the legislation, he did not veto it, allowing it to go into effect. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Senate panel votes to require school cellphone policies
Senate panel votes to require school cellphone policies

Yahoo

time06-02-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Senate panel votes to require school cellphone policies

(Stock photo from Westend61 via Getty Images) A Senate subcommittee gave initial approval Wednesday to Gov. Kim Reynolds' proposal to set a statewide minimum policy restricting students' cellphone use in schools. The bill, Senate Study Bill 1065, would require school boards to adopt policies that, at minimum, ban use of personal electronic devices during instructional periods. Schools could add further restrictions on the use of cellphones through the school day. The measure would require school districts specify disciplinary action if a student uses their cellphone during class or tests, and requires schools set protocols to securely store personal electronic devices. The policies would begin in the 2025-2026 school year. The legislation includes caveats for students with Individualized Education Program (IEP) or 504 plans that require accommodations involving the use of cellphones or other electronic devices. It also requires school districts to allow parents to petition to let their child keep their cellphone with them during class if they can establish 'a legitimate reason related to the student's physical or mental health.' The Department of Education would be required to develop and distribute model policies to Iowa school districts. It would also require the education department to work with the Department of Public Safety to develop and reform emergency plans in line with the cellphone use restrictions, so parents and guardians would be able to contact their child during the school day in the case of an emergency. Molly Severn, legislative liaison for the governor's office, cited a survey from the Pew Research Center that showed 72% of high school teachers said students being distracted by cellphones was a major problem in their classrooms. 'With digital distractions at an all time high, Gov. Reynolds wants ensure that Iowa's classrooms maintain environments for focus, learning and productivity,' Severn said. Several Iowa school districts have already implemented cellphone use policies. In a news release on the governor's proposal, Ottumwa Community Schools Superintendent Michael McGrory said the bill would 'undoubtedly benefit students across Iowa' and that his district has already seen positive impacts from implementing a cellphone policy. Education advocates were largely in support of the measure, though several organizations were registered as 'undecided' because of questions about the timeline for implementation and certain professional development provisions. Sen. Herman Quirmbach, D-Ames, who voted against the measure, asked if school districts are already implementing school cellphone use policies across the state, 'why does the governor need to get involved?' He said cellphone use in schools was a problem, but that legislative action was not necessarily required as school districts already had the authority to set policies on the issue. Quirmbach also said he did not support the measure's limit requiring parents to obtain permission for their child have a cellphone with them in class if having the device is related to the student's health. 'You can imagine situations where a student who has problems with diabetes, epilepsy, food allergy and food poisoning, asthma — there are lots of situations where students may need to have immediate access, first of all, to their parents to let them know something's going on, but also direct access to medical resources to help them avoid a catastrophe,' Quirmbach said. In addition to cellphone use, the legislation would require 6th- through 8th-grade students to take 'effects of social media' training. Sen. Jeff Taylor, R-Sioux Center, said he was appreciative of the measure as a way to help students navigate these online spaces. Several studies have found links between high social media use and negative mental health outcomes among teens. 'Social media, although in some ways, is wonderful, in other ways it can be quite harmful and upsetting, especially to kids of certain age,' Taylor said. The measure is available for consideration by the Senate Education Committee.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store