&w=3840&q=100)
Ukraine, Russia meet in Turkiye for peace talks amid heightened tensions
Delegations from Russia and Ukraine gathered in Turkiye on Monday for their second round of direct peace talks in just over two weeks, although expectations were low for any significant progress on ending the three-year war.
The Ukrainian delegation led Defence Minister Rustem Umerov was in Istanbul for the meeting, Heorhii Tykhyi, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, said in a message posted on the Ukrainian Embassy Whatsapp group.
The Russian delegation headed by Vladimir Medinsky, an aide to Russian leader Vladimir Putin, arrived Sunday evening, Russian state media reported.
Turkish officials said the meeting would start at 1 pm local time, with Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan presiding over the talks and officials from the Turkish intelligence agency also present.
However, Ukrainian spokesperson Tykhyi said the start would be at midday local time. It was not immediately possible to clarify the discrepancy.
Recent comments by senior officials in both countries indicate they remain far apart on the key conditions for stopping the war. Fierce fighting has in the meantime continued along the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, and both sides have hit each other's territory with deep strikes.
On Sunday, a Ukrainian drone attack destroyed more than 40 Russian planes deep inside Russia, Ukraine's Security Service said, while Moscow pounded Ukraine with missiles and drones.
Russian air defences downed 162 Ukrainian drones over eight Russian regions overnight, as well as over the annexed Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, Russia's Defence Ministry said Monday.
Ukrainian air defenses damaged 52 out of 80 drones launched by Russia overnight, the Ukrainian air force said.
Two ballistic missiles struck a residential neighbourhood in the northeastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv on Monday morning, including one that hit near a school, the city's mayor said.
One missile landed near an apartment building, while the second struck a road near the school, Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov said in a statement and published a photo of a wide crater.
Standing next to the crater, you realise how different it all could have been, Terekhov wrote. A few more meters and it would have hit the building. A few more minutes and cars, buses would have been on the road.
No casualties were reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
43 minutes ago
- United News of India
Russia labels British Council an undesirable organisation, calls it a tool of UK government
Moscow, June 5 (UNI) Russia has called the activities of the British Council as undesirable in the country, claiming that the so-called-independent body is a tool of the British government to advance London's interests. Moscow has also termed UK as the "main source of global crises, a provocateur and instigator of wars". "The Prosecutor General's Office of Russia has decided to recognise the activities of the British Council international organisation as undesirable in Russia. Positioning itself as an independent structure, the council builds all its work in accordance with the priorities of the UK government, it is accountable to the parliament and is financed by the foreign ministry of this country," the office said in a statement, reports Sputnik. Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) said on Thursday that it has advised all friendly states to likewise put a stop to the work of British Council in their countries. "Security agencies recommend that partners from friendly countries follow Moscow's example and curtail the council's work on the territory of their states," the FSB said in a statement. The agency alleged that the UK organisation was working to obtain information about the development of the domestic political and socio-economic situation in Russia amid its war with Ukraine through the established network of contacts, the statement read. "At the same time, the intelligence and subversive work of UK foundation Oxford Russia Fund, whose activities had previously been recognised as undesirable on the territory of the Russian Federation, was exposed," the FSB said. According to the FSB, "Under the guise of educational and cultural activities and work to organise educational events under the pretext of English-language programs, members of the Council actually promote long-term British interests and values in education, culture and youth policy," reported Russian state-media TASS. The British Council is also an active proponent of the LGBTQ+ movement, which is outlawed in Russia, and through its programmes is working to implement projects to steadily discredit Russia's domestic and foreign policies, prosecutors in Moscow said. They added that the group's aim is to essentially "eradicate Russian identity among the populations of former Soviet republics." As part of a consortium with other undesirable organisations, the British Council implements a programme of so-called "cultural cooperation" designed to unite the anti-Russian Baltic states. As the British Council actively prioritises its work with the younger generation, Russian authorities alleged that the organisation involves members of its Chevening scholarship and fellowship programme in a mission to build "a global network of agents of British influence", the Russian Prosecutor General's Office stated. The FSB also claimed that the British Council is a direct party to the UK government's confidential projects, and collaborates with its intelligence services to undermine the sovereignty of independent states, becoming London's main instrument of influence. "It is no longer a secret that the UK is the main source of global crises, a provocateur and instigator of wars. London organises coups d'état, weakens not only its geopolitical opponents but also its closest allies, sets nations against each other and does not allow the bloody conflicts it has unleashed to be resolved," a FSB representative said in a video address. UNI ANV RN
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Pakistan has lost thousands of lives to terrorists official
Over the past decade and half, the country has suffered from extremism, the PMs adviser on foreign affairs Syed Tariq Fatemi told RT Pakistan has lost 90,000 people to terrorists over the past 15 years, Syed Tariq Fatemi, special assistant on foreign affairs to the country's prime minister, has told RT. Fatemi emphasized that the Pakistani government is determined to counter terrorism and has made it clear to its neighbors that they must prevent such extremists from entering the country. "We have lost over a billion and a half US dollars in terms of the damage that they have done," he told RT in an exclusive interview. The diplomat was in Moscow earlier this week to meet Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and brief him on Islamabad's view of the current situation in Indo-Pakistan relations. Speaking about theApril 22 attackin Pahalgam, Kashmir, that killed 26 people, mainly tourists, Fatemi re-iterated that Pakistan denies having any involvement in the attack, refuting New Delhi's claim. The region has been the epicenter of a long-standing dispute between the two neighboring countries since their independence from Britain. The terrorist attack prompted a military response from India, which conducted air strikes on what it alleged wereterrorist basesin Pakistan. After a four-day escalation, the two nuclear-armed nations announced aceasefire on May 10. Fatemi claimed that it would be impossible for terrorists to cross from Pakistan into Indian-administered Kashmir without being detected, given the heavy presence of the Indian military in the area. "They would need to be superhumans," he noted. READ MORE: As India and Pakistan eye each other, this superpower eyes the whole map The political adviser drew parallels to a similar incident that occurred in the 1990s, when Pakistan was accused of collusion in a terrorist attack during the administration of former US President Bill Clinton, before his scheduled visit to India. "From past experience, whenever a very prominent foreign leader would visit India, something like this would take place," he said, adding that former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright later hinted in her book that the attack had been a false flag operation and that Pakistan had had nothing to do with it. The senior adviser also expressed appreciation for theWhite House's effortsto broker a ceasefire between the two countries, citing US President Donald Trump's directive to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to speak with leaders in both New Delhi and Islamabad. "The US Secretary of State suggested that Pakistan should agree to a ceasefire, which is what the Indians wanted. So we said, 'fine'," he explained. Notably, India denied Washington's role in the ceasefire, maintaining that the decision was achieved bilaterally - at the initiative of Pakistan. width="560" height="315" src=" frameborder="0" > (
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Secure the perimeter Russias strategy beyond the Ukraine front
Moscows foreign policy enters the post-Western era The world - including Greater Eurasia - has become a more comfortable environment for Russia to pursue foreign policy objectives. Today, the balance of investment and return in Moscow's external strategy is more favorable than at any time in recent memory. What remains is to sharpen the effectiveness of this policy in Russia's immediate neighborhood, aligning it more clearly with national development goals. Russia has demonstrated its ability to withstand direct confrontation with the West, largely by mobilizing internal resources and adapting to emerging challenges. At the same time, the shift in the global balance of power - most notably the strategic irrelevance of Western Europe - has played into Russia's hands. In doing so, Moscow has reaffirmed a central aim of its foreign policy: defending its sovereign right to determine all matters concerning its national security. Yet even as Russia holds the line at its borders, it faces persistent uncertainty in the broader regional space. That is where the concept of Greater Eurasia, introduced in the mid-2010s, becomes relevant. This strategy aims to build a secure environment around Russia without resorting to coercion or domination. It is rooted in Moscow's core interests and offers a realistic path to stability in a world where direct control over neighboring states is no longer desirable - nor sustainable. There are three reasons why Russia has no interest in continued territorial expansion. First, history shows that extending beyond the natural boundaries of Russian settlement has repeatedly endangered statehood itself. Second, the cost of exerting control over neighboring states - even small ones - would quickly generate dissatisfaction among Russian citizens. Third, the Greater Eurasian space is no longer the geopolitical vacuum it was in the 18th and 19th centuries. Then, Russia could only ensure stability through force. Today, it is flanked by structured powers such as China and India, alongside assertive smaller states determined to chart their own paths. In this context, Russia has neither the need nor the justification to rely exclusively on military or diplomatic means to safeguard its national interests. The geopolitical environment in Greater Eurasia has grown more favorable, particularly in terms of the cost-benefit ratio for Russian engagement. Still, this does not eliminate the risks. Regional powers have tensions among themselves. The border clashes between India and Pakistan, for example, underscore how vulnerable Eurasian stability remains - even among nations that are formally cooperative partners of Russia. Many of these countries are involved in the same multilateral institutions as Moscow, such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization or BRICS. Yet cooperation does not negate the potential for conflict. Moreover, Western powers - though weakened - have not disappeared from the game. They continue to interfere in Eurasian affairs, either directly or by encouraging political diversification among Russia's neighbors. In some cases, the West may attempt outright destabilization of friendly Central Asian regimes. In others, the strategy is more subtle: nudging states toward broader foreign policy networks that include Europe or the US. While not inherently hostile, such maneuvers can sow distrust between Russia, China, and their smaller partners. The truth is, the West sees Eurasia less as a zone of strategic interest and more as a playing field for diplomatic gamesmanship. This unpredictability only adds to the region's fragility. At the same time, many smaller Eurasian nations are vulnerable to internal unrest, especially due to their dependency on a global economy dominated by parasitic financial centers. As recent years have shown, Western powers are struggling to reinvent that economic system beyond superficial trends such as the so-called "green transition." For countries lacking global leverage or domestic resilience - including much of Europe - this poses a serious threat. Russia, meanwhile, must consider how these dynamics affect its own stability. Despite successes in confronting the West over Ukraine - thanks in large part to support from the Global South - Moscow is being drawn deeper into regional crises. This increased engagement, though often necessary, places additional strain on national resources. It is in Greater Eurasia that Russia's involvement in managing shared development and security challenges will be most critical. Here, Moscow has the chance to create lasting mechanisms of regional stability and growth. It must do so in a way that integrates the goals of neighboring medium-sized and small states with its own strategic vision - while also considering the long-term trajectories of China and India. The journey toward a safer, more predictable Greater Eurasia is only beginning. But Russia is well-positioned to lead it - not through force, but through principled cooperation and a clear-eyed focus on development. To succeed, it must continue aligning foreign policy with domestic priorities and resist the temptation to be drawn into old imperial habits. Greater Eurasia offers an opportunity to build a new model of regional influence: one that is multipolar, pragmatic, and rooted in mutual respect. This article was first published byValdai Discussion Club, translated and edited by the RT team. (
