logo
California, coalition of states sue Trump over move to revoke EV mandate

California, coalition of states sue Trump over move to revoke EV mandate

The Hill12-06-2025
California officials on Thursday filed their 26th lawsuit against the Trump administration, after the president signed resolutions overturning the Golden State's landmark electric vehicle (EV) mandate.
'We made a promise that if the president attempted to illegally interfere with our clean air standards, we'd hold him accountable in court,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta said at a press conference announcing the lawsuit.
'Today, we are making good on that promise,' he added.
Bonta submitted the complaint in the Northern District of California together with his colleagues in Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
He said he filed the lawsuit moments after Trump signed three congressional resolutions, which California regulations that had aimed to phase out gas-powered cars by 2035 — and then prompted 11 other states to follow suit.
Rather than directly overturning the rules, the resolutions revoked the Biden administration's authorization of the Golden State's policy. This action occurred via the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which enables the repeal of recently approved regulations with a simple majority.
'We refuse to let this unprecedented and illegal use of the CRA undermine the Clean Air Act waivers that give California the authority to enforce our own mission standards,' Bonta said.
The attorney general was referring to California's unique ability to set stronger-than-federal standards through a 1970 Clean Air Act clause, written amid historic smog conditions in the Los Angeles area. To do so, however, the Golden State must first apply to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for a waiver for each proposed rule — and only following that approval can other states adopt similar such thresholds.
The waiver targeted by Congress and the Trump administration through the CRA received the EPA's approval in December under then-President Biden and enabled the implementation of several key California regulations.
Among the rules repealed as a result of the resolutions is California's Advanced Clean Cars II rule, which required that 35 percent of cars sold in the state in 2026 to be zero-emissions, 68 percent in 2030 and 100 percent in 2035.
A second rule was the Golden State's 'Omnibus regulation,' which sought to cut heavy-duty nitrogen oxide emissions by 90 percent, revamp engine testing procedures and further extend engine warranties.
A third was the Advanced Clean Trucks rule — a regulation that has focused on accelerating the state's transition to less-polluting trucks and would have required 7.5 percent of these vehicles to be emissions-free by 2035.
'Trump's all-out assault on California continues – and this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process,' Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said in a statement on Thursday. 'We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters.'
Bonta, meanwhile, emphasized that no federal administration, Democrat or Republican, has ever voiced disapproval of California's emissions waivers.
'The federal government's actions are not only unlawful, they're irrational and wildly partisan,' he said. 'They come at the direct expense of the health and the well-being of our people, of Californians.'
Accusing Trump of adhering to a 'divisive, partisan agenda' that is endangering the economy, the environment and American lives, Bonta emphasized California's commitment to ensuring that 'future generations inherit a livable planet with breathable air.'
'We don't expect the president's barrage of unlawful, chaotic and disruptive executive orders and actions to slow down, which means neither will our work ahead,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why congressional stock-trade ban efforts are about to heat up
Why congressional stock-trade ban efforts are about to heat up

Business Insider

time8 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Why congressional stock-trade ban efforts are about to heat up

Get ready to hear a lot more about banning congressional stock trading. A top Trump administration official says he's going to start pushing for a ban. Two House Republicans are, in different ways, gearing up to force a vote on the issue. And all the while, lawmakers keep failing to report millions of dollars' worth of stock trades on time. "We've got to move," Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas said on Fox Business earlier this month, saying that while he had given House GOP leadership "grace" as they worked to get the "Big Beautiful Bill" through Congress, that time is now over. "I'm going to demand that we vote on this, this fall." It all comes after an explosive Senate hearing on a stock trading bill last month, where Republicans went after one another over whether President Donald Trump himself should be banned from trading stocks. That led to Trump branding Sen. Josh Hawley as "second-tier," though the Missouri Republican later told BI that he was able to smooth things over with Trump later. "He told me he wants a stock trading ban," Hawley said in July. "He remains committed to getting a stock trading ban, so we'll work with him to do that." Potential House drama over a 'discharge petition' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican known for challenging her own party's leadership, has said she'll start the process of forcing a vote on a stock trading ban when lawmakers return from the August recess. "I won't sit idly by while members of Congress trade stocks, especially those on committees with direct influence over relevant industries," Luna wrote on X last month. "That's corruption at its core, and it needs to stop." Luna has said she'll try to use what's known as a "discharge petition" to bring up a stock trading ban bill authored by Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee. Under that process, the bill would have to be brought to the House floor for a vote — with or without the support of House leaders — if Luna is able to collect signatures from 218 members, a majority of the 435 seats in the House. Not everyone who supports a stock trading ban is on board with Luna's approach. Roy, the co-sponsor of a different stock trading ban bill that has bipartisan support and has been around for years, told Fox Business that a discharge petition is "not the best way" to get it done. "I want the speaker, and Republicans, to control this," said Roy. "Republicans need to control the floor, do our job, bring this to a vote." Roy has been working with a bipartisan group that includes Democratic Reps. Seth Magaziner of Rhode Island and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York to put forward a consensus stock trading ban bill. But after months of discussions, they have yet to release legislative text. That's led Luna to largely dismiss their effort. "Allegedly, there were 'talks' happening? With who?" Luna wrote on X on Thursday. "They were never going to bring a VOTE to the floor. I don't care if this upsets people." The Florida congresswoman's effort is worth taking seriously: she has used this legislative tool before to bring up a bill on proxy voting over the objections of Speaker Mike Johnson, bringing the House to a halt for a full week in April. Lawmakers keep reporting trades late Johnson has said he's supportive of a stock trading ban — though he has "sympathy" for arguments against it. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries began forcefully supporting it this year in the wake of well-timed tariff trades by some lawmakers. Even Trump has backed it, though some Republicans are wary of applying the bill's restrictions to him. This week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent got in on the action, saying he himself would begin pushing for a ban on lawmakers trading individual stocks. "I don't think we have the perfect bill yet," Bessent told Bloomberg this week. "But I am going to start pushing for a single-stock trading ban." Meanwhile, several lawmakers in have been found in violation of the STOCK Act in recent weeks, disclosing millions of dollars worth of trades long after the 30-45 day deadline for doing so. Rep. Lisa McClain of Michigan, the fourth-highest ranking House Republican, was late to disclose over 500 trades made by her husband from March 2024 through June 2025, totalling at least $1.5 million. Republican Rep. Dan Meuser of Pennsylvania failed to disclose that his wife sold between $750,000 and $1.5 million in NVIDIA stock last year. And Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma was late in disclosing millions of dollars made by him and his wife since 2023. Lawmakers are only required to disclose asset ranges on their reports, so we don't know the exact value of the trades. Those lawmakers and their spokespeople blamed errors made by third-party financial managers and lack of awareness of the trades for the late disclosures. A spokesperson for McClain told BI that the congresswoman "promptly filed the necessary paperwork immediately after being made aware of the transactions made in managed accounts and remains committed to transparency and adherence to all House financial disclosure rules and regulations." "I take compliance with all House rules seriously and expect the same from those managing my accounts," Meuser told BI through a spokesperson. "This was a simple, automatic filing that should have occurred without error. The mistake was made solely by my brokerage and benefited me in no way." Mullin's office did not respond to BI's request for comment, but a spokesperson told NOTUS that the senator doesn't trade himself, but relies on a third-party broker.

Aviva First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: UK£0.22 (vs UK£0.23 in 1H 2024)
Aviva First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: UK£0.22 (vs UK£0.23 in 1H 2024)

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Aviva First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: UK£0.22 (vs UK£0.23 in 1H 2024)

Explore Aviva's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Aviva (LON:AV.) First Half 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: UK£12.4b (up 14% from 1H 2024). Net income: UK£578.0m (down 6.3% from 1H 2024). Profit margin: 4.7% (down from 5.7% in 1H 2024). The decrease in margin was driven by higher expenses. EPS: UK£0.22 (down from UK£0.23 in 1H 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Aviva Earnings Insights Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 6.6% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 5.7% growth forecast for the Insurance industry in the United Kingdom. Performance of the British Insurance industry. The company's shares are up 3.1% from a week ago. Risk Analysis You should always think about risks. Case in point, we've spotted 2 warning signs for Aviva you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

Secure Trust Bank First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: UK£0.88 (vs UK£0.67 in 1H 2024)
Secure Trust Bank First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: UK£0.88 (vs UK£0.67 in 1H 2024)

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Secure Trust Bank First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: UK£0.88 (vs UK£0.67 in 1H 2024)

Explore Secure Trust Bank's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Secure Trust Bank (LON:STB) First Half 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: UK£75.4m (up 11% from 1H 2024). Net income: UK£16.7m (up 31% from 1H 2024). Profit margin: 22% (up from 19% in 1H 2024). EPS: UK£0.88 (up from UK£0.67 in 1H 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Secure Trust Bank Earnings Insights Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 16% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 5.8% growth forecast for the Banks industry in the United Kingdom. Performance of the British Banks industry. The company's shares are up 4.1% from a week ago. Risk Analysis You still need to take note of risks, for example - Secure Trust Bank has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store