logo
"Nothing Is Stopping": Peace Talks Feel Far Away For Ukrainian Soldiers

"Nothing Is Stopping": Peace Talks Feel Far Away For Ukrainian Soldiers

NDTV2 days ago

Istanbul:
Sipping a coffee under the blazing sun around 20 kilometres from the front line, Ukrainian platoon commander Andriy is ready for peace.
But as Russia and Ukraine hold direct talks in search of an end to the three-year war, he sees no let up to the fighting in east Ukraine, ravaged by Russia's full-scale invasion.
"Nothing is stopping. Everything is as it was," the 27-year-old told AFP, in the town of Druzhkivka while on a break from the combat.
Hours after negotiations in Istanbul ended on Monday, the sound of Russian glide bombs flying over -- and down onto -- the town resumed. The next morning, those civilians who refuse to leave set about their daily business, meandering through streets dotted with destroyed buildings.
Andriy was clinging to hope the war will end this year, and said talks should continue, despite little sign of progress.
But asked about Moscow's hardline demands for Ukraine's army to completely pull out of the four regions Russia says it has annexed -- Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia -- he is skeptical.
"That's too much, I would say. But if the border remained as it is now, then maybe."
'No real impact'
Nearby, another young soldier who goes by Leleka, in his early thirties, was trying to relax.
He is just back from near Toretsk, one of the hottest spots on the eastern front where Russian and Ukrainian soldiers have been killing each other for months in a battle for the city, claimed by Russia earlier this year.
"To be honest, I haven't watched the news for a long time because it doesn't really affect the reality we face here. So it's a bit like a parallel reality," he told AFP.
After two rounds of talks that yielded only prisoner exchanges, the ginger-bearded soldier sees no point in trying to deal with the Russians.
"It does not work. Negotiations with them? How? How do negotiations work? We talk about peace, and at the same time, they are shooting at us," he said.
Moscow has repeatedly rejected calls by Ukraine, the United States and European countries for a full and immediate ceasefire.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Russia of dragging out the talks and not seriously wanting to halt its invasion.
The Kremlin said Tuesday negotiations were "extremely complex" and that it was "wrong" to expect a speedy breakthrough.
Leleka said there is "no way" Ukrainian troops would pull back from territory they still control.
"The local commanders will not allow it."
For 59-year-old deputy commander Did -- a call sign which means "grandfather" in Ukrainian -- an unconditional ceasefire is the only "logical" way to end the fighting.
But he understands why Russia is refusing.
"They have more weapons, their factories are working, they have more men, and North Korea and China are supplying them. Why would they stop?"
Moscow's army will only halt their attacks, if Ukraine can deliver "a beating so bad that their teeth fall out or they swallow them," he said.
'Give us weapons'
Instead of a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire, Moscow has proposed a partial pause to the fighting -- two-to-three days and only in certain areas of the frontline.
"They really need this. They need to regroup their troops. They need to restore their logistics," Leleka said of the Russian call for a temporary truce.
Both Did and Leleka instead issued their own request for the West to step up its military support to Ukraine -- saying that could help give them a leg-up on the battlefield, and at the negotiating table.
"Give us more weapons. We know how to use them ... Give us good weapons and we will stop them. We will stop them, we know how to do it," Did said.
Standing away from the other two, Andriy, his head bowed, was thinking of home.
"I want to be with my wife, to rest," he whispered.
He has been fighting for three years and got married amid the war.
"Whatever it takes, I want to go home."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Response to terrorist acts': Putin 'avenges' Ukraine's 'Spiderweb' op, strikes Kyiv with missiles
'Response to terrorist acts': Putin 'avenges' Ukraine's 'Spiderweb' op, strikes Kyiv with missiles

Time of India

time20 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Response to terrorist acts': Putin 'avenges' Ukraine's 'Spiderweb' op, strikes Kyiv with missiles

Russia launched a powerful overnight missile and drone assault across Ukraine, striking the capital Kyiv and multiple other cities. At least three emergency workers were killed while responding to fires and damaged infrastructure. The attack follows Ukraine's daring drone strike on Russian airbases, reportedly destroying over 40 strategic bombers. Show more Show less

Strike against Kyiv was a response to Ukrainian 'terrorist acts': Russia
Strike against Kyiv was a response to Ukrainian 'terrorist acts': Russia

Business Standard

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Strike against Kyiv was a response to Ukrainian 'terrorist acts': Russia

Russia's Defence Ministry said on Friday that its forces had carried out a massive and successful strike on military and military-related targets in Ukraine overnight in response to what it called Ukrainian "terrorist acts" against Russia. Russia's military released the statement after Ukrainian officials said Russia had launched an intense missile and drone barrage at Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, in the early hours of Friday and that three people had been killed. Russia has accused Ukraine of being behind a deadly bomb attack on a bridge over a railway line in western Russia at the weekend that was blown up just as a train carrying 388 passengers to Moscow was passing underneath. Seven people were killed and 155 injured in the incident which Kyiv has not taken responsibility for. Separately, Ukraine attacked Russian nuclear-capable bomber planes at airfields over the same weekend, causing significant damage. President Vladimir Putin told U.S. President Donald Trump this week that he would retaliate. The Kremlin confirmed on Friday that the big overnight strikes had been a response to what it called Kyiv's "acts of terrorism". "Everything that is taking place within the framework of the special military operation (in Ukraine), everything that is being done by our military on a daily basis, is a response to the actions of the Kyiv regime, which has acquired all the characteristics of a terrorist regime," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. Ukraine has frequently accused Russia of terrorism, citing attacks in which thousands of civilians have been killed. Both sides say they do not target civilians. The Russian military said in its statement that it had used long-range weapons to strike Ukraine. "In response to terrorist acts by the Kyiv regime, the Russian Armed Forces carried out a massive strike overnight with long-range air, sea and land-based precision weapons," the ministry said. It said the strike had targeted "Ukrainian design bureaus, enterprises for the production and repair of weapons and military equipment, assembly workshops for strike drones, flight training centres, and Ukrainian armed forces weapons and military equipment depots." "The objective of the strike was achieved. All designated targets were hit." Russian troops had also taken control of the settlement of Fedorivka in eastern Ukraine, the Defence Ministry said. Reuters could not independently confirm the battlefield report.

India at BRICS is a balancing force, not anti-US
India at BRICS is a balancing force, not anti-US

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

India at BRICS is a balancing force, not anti-US

India may have its own share of grudges with the West or even the US, including its recent experience during Operation Sindoor, but it will prefer bilateral mechanism to register them on a one-on-one basis read more US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick made an explosive statement this week when he said that the United States views India's membership of BRICS in a very negative way because of the grouping's obsession with de-dollarisation, something that does not go down well in making friends or influencing people in America. While Lutnick is right about BRICS's fixation with challenging the dollar hegemony, he is absolutely off the mark when it comes to judging India's role at the grouping. As a matter of fact, if there is one country that effectively tempers the anti-US or the larger anti-West rhetoric and agenda at BRICS then it has to be India. It is a different matter that Trump administration officials such as Lutnick may not want to engage with nuanced arguments while putting charges but even a cursory assessment of reality will prove how India is a genuinely balancing force at BRICS. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After the end of the Cold War, in the emerging geopolitical scenario of the 1990s, all the three prominent BRICS member countries—India, China and Russia—were duly following a policy of mending their respective bridges with the West. Unlike India and Russia, China had a greater advantage here because its rapprochement with the West had begun a little earlier with the famous 1972 visit by US President Richard Nixon to Beijing. For India, the world had changed drastically in 1991 with the disintegration of the erstwhile Soviet Union and a debilitating balance of payment crisis. India as a much-reformed economy was naturally gravitating towards the capitalist powerhouse of the world, the United States, as best captured in the visit by the then- Prime Minister, PV Narasimha Rao, who declared to corporate America loudly that India is now open for Business. The firm steps of conviction that each of these countries including India, China and Russia were taking towards the west left little doubt towards their intentions. However, an interesting twist came in the late 1990s when Russian foreign minister Yevgeny Primakov gave his famous 'Primakov Doctrine' that advocated for a multipolar world order to counterbalance the US particularly through a strategic triangle between Russia, India and China. Although the RIC strategic triangle has since remained a pipe dream, this coordination took a concrete shape with the establishment of BRICS in the year 2009. Ironically, BRICS was a term that was originally coined by an American economist Jim O'Neill in 2001 to refer to the potential of emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China that according to him would even dominate the global economy by 2050. But soon this term took on a life of its own when a rising and increasingly assertive China and a revisionist Russia started using the BRICS forum to push their own alternative to a West-led world order. One of the leading examples of their efforts is the thrust on expanding the grouping to include countries such as Iran and Cuba which are one of the biggest opponents of the West-led international order. While both China and Russia have their own agenda in using BRICS to create a geopolitical counterweight to the West, India is in a different league altogether. First, India does share the dreams of a multipolar world order with them, one where the US is not the only power to call the shots. But in order to realise this dream, it is counting only on its individual potential to rise as a formidable great power and not membership of any forum such as BRICS. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nothing sums this up more clearly than Prime Minister Narendra Modi's statement in 2024 when he categorically called for the grouping to avoid becoming an anti-West forum as it expands further. Despite having articulated several times that India is a great power in its own right, PM Modi cautioned against the grouping taking an anti-West character. This proves that multipolarity may be a cherished goal for a rising India but to achieve that it is not willing to lock horns with the West. India's stand on BRICS taking an anti-US stance becomes even more apparent when one takes the issue of de-dollarisation into account. Unlike Russia and China that have taken a lead in promoting de-dollarisation of the world economy, India, a rising economy, has many a times affirmed that it has no intent to undermine the US dollar or back a BRICS currency that seeks to do the same. In a speech given on the floor of Parliament early this year, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar clearly outlined that undermining the American currency was not a part of the country's strategic or economic policy. This stand stems from the stability that India widely enjoys due to its heavy dependence on dollars for international trade, foreign exchange reserves and even remittances. India is also very aware that de-dollarisation would come with an additional risk of Chinese Yuan gaining prominence as an international currency and this is a scenario that India would never find acceptable at all. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India may have its own share of grudges with the West or even the US, including its recent experience during Operation Sindoor, but it will prefer a bilateral mechanism to register them on a one-on-one basis. For India, the scariest geopolitical scenario will be a world where China replaces the US as the hegemon. It is precisely to balance China that India has willingly signed up for the Quad initiative in the Indo-Pacific. Until India and China are locked in this geopolitical tussle, BRICS would never become the kind of forum that US Commerce Secretary Lutnick has accused it to be. In fact, India's presence at BRICS should be seen as a relief by the Americans because it is just the kind of balancing force that they badly need. One of the biggest achievements of India at the forum is to amplify the voice of the Global South and make it a genuinely inclusive grouping. It is time the West, especially the United States, started appreciating the role that India is playing rather than trade charges or undermine the core interests of a so-called ally. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is a New Delhi-based commentator on geopolitics and foreign policy. She holds a PhD from the Department of International Relations, South Asian University. She tweets @TrulyMonica. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store