Councils given four bin guidelines to end ‘wild west' recycling policies
Under the new plan, local authorities will be told to give residents and workplaces four containers including a non-recyclable waste bin, a food and green waste container, a bin or bag for paper and cardboard and a bin for other recyclables.
Under current legislation, some households are required to separate waste into seven bins.
The four containers may be bins, bags or stackable boxes.
Current legislation introduced in 2021 defined recycling as glass, plastic, food waste, paper and card, resulting in some authorities issuing individual bins for each
The new rules will come into place for business recyclable waste collection from March 31 next year and one year later for residential households.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said communities have faced an 'avalanche of rubbish' in streets, rivers and seas.
'Today we end the Conservative fiasco that would force households across the country to have seven bins,' he said.
'This Labour Government is ending the Wild West and introducing a streamlined approach to recycling to end to the postcode lottery, simplify bin collections and clean up our streets for good.'
The new guidance also revealed from March 31 2026, all waste authorities should be providing weekly food waste collections from households to allow people to 'dispose of odorous organic waste frequently'.
Household recycling rates in England have stagnated at 45% since 2015, according to Government data.
The Government said the four-bin default requirement is not expected to increase in the future to ensure councils and other waste collectors 'still have the flexibility to make the best choices to suit local need'.
Households in England dumped 5.6 million tonnes of packaging last year, according to analysis commissioned by the Local Government Association (LGA), County Councils Network (CCN) and District Councils Network (DCN).
The report found that 3.2 million tonnes of packaging were put into recycling bins, 2.3 million tonnes were put into residual – or 'black' bins, and 70,000 tonnes were mistakenly put in with food waste.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tiny beach town asks SLO County for help after resignations leave it shortstaffed
In San Simeon's latest governmental setback, two recent resignations have left the diminutive town's community services district with only three board members and no manager. After a closed session at the San Simeon Community Services District board's special July 30 meeting, the directors requested temporary management assistance from the county while the CSD again searches for an interim general manager. In the open meeting, Supervisor Bruce Gibson told the board the county can provide the interim help, under provisions of a statewide mutual assistance agreement for water and wastewater districts. That request doesn't obligate the district to accept the help, only to receive information on what it could include and how much it might cost, the board's counsel Nubia Goldstein told the directors. They could decide at a future meeting if they want to accept the temporary help, she said. Neither Gibson nor the attorney explained how the county's temporary assistance would differ from what San Simeon's board has been negotiating for in the past year — permanently handing off to the county either the district's major services or the entire district operations. 'Basically, the SSCSD has asked for some short-term assistance, and the county will be meeting with them to see what exactly that might entail,' Gibson told The Tribune. 'My expectation is that this will be administrative oversight of SSCSD operations until they can secure the services of an interim general manager,' he said. 'With an interim on board, we and they can also proceed to do the plan of services study that is part of the process for their dissolution ... which is still in process.' What triggered the CSD's request? Interim General Manager Geoff English and Director Jacqueline Diamond both resigned in mid-July. That left acting Chairperson Karina Tiwana and board members Holly Le and Michael Donahue totally in charge of the agency that provides the town's visitors, businesses and a few hundred residents with various services, such as water and sewage treatment. The board now also oversees the work of bookkeeper Kathy East and administrative assistant Ruth Montgomery, and operations of the tiny office that's open from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Mondays through Thursdays. Technicians from Fluid Resource Management of San Arroyo Grande run and maintain San Simeon's water and wastewater plants. With so few residents in San Simeon — just about 300 people, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's Census Reporter tool — the district often has had a tough time getting enough candidates to fill a five-member board. The town straddles Highway 1 on its way north to Hearst Castle and Old San Simeon Village, the elephant seal rookery and — when there's no landslide blocking the way — Big Sur. After several years of upheaval over a host of management issues, there's been an exodus of directors, with four having resigned since 2020. Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
VA terminates key union contracts
The Department of Veterans Affairs is terminating collective bargaining agreements with several key government unions representing its employees. In an announcement Wednesday, the VA said the move is in response to an executive order President Donald Trump signed in March that nixed collective bargaining rights for many federal workers in the name of national security. The agency's decision comes after a federal appellate court lifted a lower court ban on the ending of union contracts on Friday, although the Trump administration previously issued guidance that agencies should not terminate any collective bargaining agreements until litigation challenging the order is over. 'Too often, unions that represent VA employees fight against the best interests of Veterans while protecting and rewarding bad workers,' VA Secretary Doug Collins said in a statement. 'We're making sure VA resources and employees are singularly focused on the job we were sent here to do: providing top-notch care and service to those who wore the uniform.' The VA said it notified five major unions that their contracts for 'bargaining-unit employees' were being terminated: the American Federation of Government Employees; the National Association of Government Employees; the National Federation of Federal Employees; the National Nurses Organizing Committee/National Nurses United; and the Service Employees International Union. Contracts covering the roughly 4,000 VA police officers, firefighters or security guards represented by those unions will remain in place, the agency said. The VA said the move will allow staff to 'spend more time with Veterans,' noting that in 2024, nearly 2,000 union employees 'spent more than 750,000 hours of work on taxpayer-funded union time.' Without those obligations, 'those hours can now be used to serve Veterans instead of union bosses,' the agency said. The move will also open up more physical space for veterans' needs, the VA said. 'More than 187,000 square feet of its office and clinical space is currently being used by union representatives free of charge,' the agency said, adding that it has 'cost VA millions of dollars in lost rent and expenses.' The agency also says labor contracts have restricted managers' ability to hire, promote and reward high performing employees and to hold poor performers accountable. The move was met with outrage by at least two of the top unions representing VA employees. AFGE, which represents 320,000 employees at the agency, said it is assessing its options to challenge Collins' move. 'Secretary Collins' decision to rip up the negotiated union contract for majority of its workforce is another clear example of retaliation against AFGE members for speaking out against the illegal, anti-worker, and anti-veteran policies of this administration,' AFGE National President Everett Kelley said in a statement. He noted that Collins' action is 'inconsistent' with Office of Personnel Management guidance instructing agencies to hold off on ending union agreements while the legal challenges played out. Those losing their representation by AFGE and several other unions include nurses, doctors, housekeepers, maintenance, food service workers, lawyers, mental health specialists, cemetery workers and others, according to AFGE. NNU, the largest union of registered nurses in the country, said the VA's announcement to terminate its contract and those of the other unions 'is an attack on those who dedicate their lives in the service of others.' 'We know this administration is hellbent on silencing nurses and other VA workers to steamroll the destruction of the VA,' the nurses' union said in a statement to CNN. 'It is because of VA nurses' ability to speak up about patient safety through our union that our nation's veterans receive the highest level of care.' NNU says it will 'continue to pursue legal action with our fellow unions.' The department's move comes just days after a federal appeals court in California lifted a lower court's preliminary injunction that had blocked several federal agencies from canceling certain union contracts. Trump's expansive executive order applies to more than 1 million federal workers across many agencies, including the departments of State, Defense, Justice and Health and Human Services. The order is aimed at stopping federal unions that have 'declared war on President Trump's agenda,' according to a White House fact sheet. It noted that the largest union – AFGE – has filed many grievances to 'block Trump policies.' 'President Trump refuses to let union obstruction interfere with his efforts to protect Americans and our national interests,' the fact sheet said. The two largest federal employee unions – AFGE and the National Treasury Employees Union – sued in separate courts, saying Trump was retaliating for their advocacy for their members and for federal services. The unions were initially successful in blocking the order in separate federal district courts, but they each lost on the appellate level. NNU, as well as other unions, joined AFGE in its lawsuit against the executive order.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Stephen A. Smith suggests support for federal investigation into WNBA for treatment of Caitlin Clark
Stephen A. Smith responded to a recent opinion piece by the Wall Street Journal that called for a government investigation into the WNBA for the controversial handling of physical plays against superstar Caitlin Clark. The Wall Street Journal piece titled "The WNBA and Caitlin Clark's Civil Rights" drew mixed reactions this week after it argued that Clark has been subject to a hostile workplace due to how referees have called physical plays against her dating back her rookie season in 2024. The piece called for a federal probe into "potential civil rights violations." Smith suggested support for a potential investigation. "I'm not here saying the case will be won by the government if it gets to the points. I'm saying they have a case, they have an argument," Smith said of the idea during an episode of his show on Tuesday. Smith also suggested President Donald Trump could use such an investigation to solidify support among his followers. "Do we doubt that at his discretion, at his disposal, if he finds this to be an issue that is politically expedient to him, that Trump won't use this to feed his base?" Smith said. "If [Clark] is seen to be physically getting abused on the basketball court in a way that is such a clear and flagrant discrepancy compared to what happens to others, that that man is not going to say something? "You don't think Catilin Clark could become an issue of national, potentially international, and definitely federal proportions?" Smith cited recent agreements by Columbia University and Harvard University with Trump's administration to settle alleged civil rights violations against Jewish students and employees as a comparison for a potential probe into the WNBA's treatment of Clark. "If the Trump administration can settle with Columbia for a $221 million settlement over what's taken place on a campus, you think you can definitively rule out what kind of noise could be made if the WNBA continues to allow this treatment of Caitlin Clark?" Smith said. Clark's teammate, Fever star Sophie Cunningham, has been one of the most vocal critics of the WNBA players and referees in the physical treatment of Clark and how it is handled. Cunningam revealed how her former team, the Phoenix Mercury, planned to play Clark during the phenom's rookie season in 2024. Cunningham played her first five seasons in Phoenix before leaving to join the Fever this past offseason. "You have seen players in our league try to, like, toughen up Caitlin… Even when I wasn't on her team, I know the talks that Phoenix had in the locker room, like, 'No, we're going to show her what the W really is,' and I get it to a certain extent, and every rookie coming into the league, that's how you're going to treat 'em, but there's just more for her," Cunningham said on her podcast last week. "And now being on her team and seeing it, I'm like, 'What are people doing?' Actually, it's just too much. It's too much. I'm over it, and if I think it's too much, it's probably too much." Cunningham was on the other side of the situation when she started a fight to defend Clark during a game against the Connecticut Sun earlier this season. Cunningham said that after the game, Clark exclaimed "finally!" in the locker room. "In the locker room, she goes, I think she's like, 'Finally!'" Cunningham said. "But I think it kind of had our team together as a whole. Everyone was like, 'We do have to protect eachother.'" The scuffle went down in Connecticut on June 17, when Cunningham committed a hard foul on Sun guard Jacy Sheldon. Sheldon poked Clark in the eye earlier in the game, and then fellow Sun player Marina Mabrey shoved Clark to the ground. Cunningham previously called out referees just days after the June 17 fight while speaking to reporters, for not protecting Clark, when she had to first address the fight publicly. "During that, it was just part of the game. I think the refs had a lot to do with that. It was a build-up for a couple years now of them just not protecting the star player of the WNBA," Cunningham said. "At the end of the day, I'm going to protect my teammates. That's what I do."
