American Bishops' War With Trump Admin Is Heating Up
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) seems to be battling with President Donald Trump's administration over some of its policies.
Last week, the USCCB, the official assembly of the Catholic Church in the United States, slammed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for rescinding a policy that gave guidance on the care, custody and documentation of pregnant women they encounter.
"It is deeply troubling and inexcusable that measures intended to ensure the basic safety of pregnant mothers and their young children while in government custody could be rescinded with such indifference toward the vulnerability of those involved," said Bishop Mark J. Seitz, of El Paso, Texas, chairman of the USCCB Committee on Migration.
CPB Acting Commissioner Pete Flores issued the memo, which was circulated internally but not publicly announced, on May 5, revealing that four policies were determined "either obsolete or misaligned with current Agency guidance and immigration enforcement priorities."
Bishop Kevin J. Farrell places the Book of Gospels on the head of Monsignor Mark J. Seitz (right) as Father J. Douglas Deshotel kneels with a book on his head during the Episcopal Ordination on...
Bishop Kevin J. Farrell places the Book of Gospels on the head of Monsignor Mark J. Seitz (right) as Father J. Douglas Deshotel kneels with a book on his head during the Episcopal Ordination on April 27, 2010, at the Cathedral Shrine of the Virgin of Guadalupe in downtown Dallas. More
AP
One of them was the 2022 memo "Processing of Pregnant, and Postpartum Noncitizens and Infants," which lays out guidelines for CPB, which include offering a medical assessment to all pregnant women and making sure breast-feeding mothers have access to privacy and rest facilities.
"This decision is all the more concerning as the Administration simultaneously ramps up family detention in place of safer, more cost-effective alternatives to detention," Seitz said.
"Let us be clear: protecting pregnant mothers and their children can never be considered 'obsolete.' This principle irrefutably extends to noncitizens in immigration detention, each of whom possesses an inviolable, God-given dignity that must be respected.
"We urge the Administration to reissue guidance that adequately reflects and affirms the increased standard of care due to this vulnerable population while in government custody."
Newsweek has contacted CBP via email for comment.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/AP/Getty
The memo does stress that CBP agents should continue to uphold the care guidelines laid out in all remaining policies.
"The safety of all who we encounter during operations remains a top priority," it says. "All CBP personnel are expected to treat those in Agency custody in a professional and respectful manner."
It comes amid an ongoing civil case in which the USCCB is suing the Trump administration over its suspension of refugee programs.
In a lawsuit filed in February, the USCCB said it has worked with the government for "nearly half a century" to help "refugees who are fleeing persecution, instability, and oppression and have come to the United States as a place of refuge and hope."
The USCCB said that the spending freeze means the organization "faces irreparable damage to its longstanding refugee resettlement programs and its reputation and relationship with its subrecipients and the refugee populations it serves."
Trump argued in January that his mission to "realign the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program" is because "the United States lacks the ability to absorb large numbers of migrants, and in particular, refugees, into its communities in a manner that does not compromise the availability of resources for Americans."
The Bigger Picture: Trump And The Catholic Church
Trump's relationship with the Catholic Church has made headlines recently, following the election of the first American pope, Leo XIV, this month.
While Leo is in the "middle of the road" in politics," he is "not happy with what's going on with immigration," his brother John Prevost tole The New York Times.
Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity that he is open to talking to Leo about immigration and has also said he wants Leo's other brother, Louis Prevost, "a major MAGA fan" to visit the White House.
Vice President JD Vance, a Catholic convert, traveled to Rome for a private audience with Leo, after attending his inaugural Mass in St. Peter's Square last weekend.
There was already tension between the church, to which 53 million U.S. adults belong, according to U.S. Census Bureau data from 2024, and the Trump administration, after Leo's predecessor, Pope Franics, rebuked Vance for invoking a "Christian concept" of extending love to your family and then fellow citizens before the rest of the world.
But Francis wrote in a letter to Vance: "Christian love is not a concentric expansion of interests that little by little extend to other persons and groups. The true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the 'good Samaritan' (cf. Lk 10:25-37), that is, by meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception."
America's relationship with the Catholic Church has long been important. Newsweek broke down the behind-the-scenes role it has played in American diplomacy and culture here.
"Much of the future approach of the USCCB to the White House will depend also on the signs they will receive from Pope Leo XIV in the Vatican in the next few weeks and months," theology and religious studies professor Massimo Faggioli told Newsweek.
"It's something the White House will pay more attention to. All this in the context of a Catholic VP, JD Vance, who is really trying hard to justify anything that Trump and members of his Cabinet do," the Villanova University academic said. "Vance's pitch is designed for a Catholic audience and the bishops know it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone,' Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though President Trump's recently signed tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in CBP facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.
Buzz Feed
a day ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump Partners With Company Behind Slavery Video
PragerU, a conservative media organization promoting itself as an educational network, is getting called out online for the historically inaccurate and misleading messages it's delivering to children. And, surprise, surprise, Donald Trump's White House is partnering with them. 404Media reported in July that the White House, specifically the Department of Education, partnered with PragerU to unveil an exhibit in the White House's Founders Museum called 'The Road to Liberty,' featuring some AI-generated commentary from the Founding Fathers. After Trump rescinded a bill that cut more than $1 billion in funding for CPB (Corporation for Public Broadcasting), CPB announced it would have to shut down, which could force organizations that rely heavily on its funds, like PBS and NPR, to do massive budget cuts and layoffs. PragerU describes itself as a nonprofit looking to spread "American values through the creative use of digital media, technology, and edu-tainment." They offer content for adults, as well as learning videos and resources for kids. They state their free content — which includes short videos on topics like politics, history, economics, and social issues — "helps people of all ages think and live better." But it appears they've earned quite a bad reputation for a plethora of reasons: In fact, one of PragerU's history videos is currently going viral for its revisionist way to explain slavery to children. The video in question comes from a 2022 episode of PragerU's series Leo & Layla's History Adventures. The siblings discuss having a "weird" day because students and teachers at their schools didn't know if they should acknowledge Christopher Columbus Day as a holiday or call it Indigenous Peoples Day. Leo said people online have split views: some people refer to Christopher as a "really mean guy who spread slavery, disease, and violence to people who would've been better off if he'd never gone to the new world" while others believe he was a "really courageous guy who loved exploring, inspired generations, and spread Christianity and western civilization to people who really benefited from new ways of thinking and doing things." The two go back in time to talk to Christopher himself. Christopher asked if they were "from the future or Indians" because he'd been "having a hard time telling who's who lately." They told him they traveled back in time to tell him he was given a holiday in the future, but they wanted to learn why it was so "controversial." Leo then questioned Christopher about acting like the land he "found" actually being in India. He then asked how he treated the people who discovered the land before he did. Christopher said the Taíno people "were great, peaceful, curious, really helpful, and highly intelligent" and were able to easily "mimic back" the things Christopher and his crew said to them, so he ordered his crew to "treat them well." This made Leo question why he read and heard at school that Christopher "brought slavery and murder to peaceful people." Christopher addressed the accusation by claiming the place he found was far from "paradise" and that the native people weren't "peaceful." Layla was confused by Christopher's contradicting statements after previously describing the people as peaceful. Christopher went on to claim the "Carib tribes" were "vicious warring cannibals." He went on to say that although all the bad things (like jealousy, war, murder, lying, etc.) exist in many places around the world, in Europe, they draw the line at "eating people and human sacrifice." Mind you, there are tons of respected sources that prove the opposite, including slaves being used as human sacrifices and consumed. When asked more about slavery, he replied: "Slavery is as old as time, and has taken place in every corner of the world, even amongst the people I just left. Being taken as a slave is better than being killed, no? I don't see the problem." Layla told him that in today's times, slavery is viewed as "evil and terrible." He also said he met people who had different religious beliefs with "respect." "How can you come here to the 15th century and judge me by your standards from the 21st century?" Christopher asked. "Before you judge, you must ask yourself, what did the culture and society of the time treat as no big deal?" Leo and Layla eventually traveled back to the current day, and they both came to the conclusion that he was a "courageous explorer," and although he might not be a "hero," they believe he did "heroic things that are definitely worth celebrating." They added that the things we "judge him for" were viewed as "normal" back then. And as you can expect, people online had A LOT to say about this historical take: Materials from PragerU are currently offered in public schools in six states: Florida, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Montana, Arizona, and Louisiana. The video is up on PragerU's page. Personally, I am really saddened to see slavery downplayed in a video meant to educate children. We shouldn't be trying to change history, as it's important to learn from our past, even if it's something awful. What are your thoughts?
CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Cardinal Blase Cupich celebrates 50th anniversary of Catholic ministry
Cardinal Blase Cupich is marking 50 years in the Catholic Church, including more than a decade as the leader of the Chicago Archdiocese. According to church law, Cupich had to submit his resignation when he turned 75, and he did that last year, but he's not going anywhere just yet. He'll remain in place, until Pope Leo XIV decides to replace him. Cupich said one thing from his 50 years in the Catholic Church he'll never forget is seeing his friend, Robert Prevost, be elected pontiff and becoming Pope Leo XIV in June. "I think it was standing on the balcony when the pope was announced, and when he came out … because some of the cardinals shoved me up to the front, because they, you know, being from Chicago and the pope was in the next balcony over. And to look over that crowd, and it was thrilling, the gathering of all the people that were there; and then to hear him speak," Cupich said. "My friend, Robert Prevost, speaking to the crowd in perfect Italian and then Spanish, I think that that is something I'll never forget, looking out over that basilica." Given Cupich's personal relationship with the pope, does he think there's a chance he might not be in a hurry to replace him as cardinal in Chicago? "I don't want to trade on that, but I think that he seems agree with me on a number of things. We've been friends for a good decade and then worked together in the last six years. So, he knows my mind and I know his. So, I think we're suited for each other in a very good way," he said. Is Cupich ready to step aside? "Yeah. You know, I would step aside when I do, when I'm asked to do that, but I'm not going to resign from the priesthood. I'm going to continue to do work," he said. "I started off teaching high school kids, and I liked that, and so if the new archbishop comes in, and there is an opening in a high school that he'd like me to be chaplain of or do some teaching at the college level, which I've done before, I'd be happy to do that." Cupich recently traveled to Nagasaki, Japan, to mark the anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb in 1945. The cardinal made some poignant comments about the church's teachings on war and the "just war" theory, saying that historians tell us when President Harry Truman decided to use the atomic bomb, he did not find it a tough decision. What was the point that message? "I think that it was clear that, first of all, people – even those who invented this weapon – didn't know the catastrophic effects that it would have, because it had not been tested on people before," he said. "We have to make sure that we never have another nuclear explosion on this planet again; that we don't kid ourselves that we have security simply because we have atomic weapons." How did Cupich think his message in Nagasaki translated, and what did he want people to take away from that given the ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza? "War is always a failure for humanity. So we have to look for a way in which we preempt all of that by making sure that we sit down and listen to each other and talk to each other before we begin to rearm. And that, I fear, right now is happening. We're rearming across the world," he said. Does Cupich worry that there could be another nuclear weapon used? "I think so, when you have nine countries that have them. We had this recent flareup between Pakistan and India. Both of them are nuclear nations, and I think anything's possible," he said.
