The F-35, Mocked by Elon Musk, Finally Shows What It Can Do
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Back in November, fresh off the presidential election, Elon Musk took direct aim at the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Calling the $100 million-a-piece aircraft "obsolete" and a "jack of all trades, master of none," Musk argued that the future belonged to drones—not manned jets.
"Manned fighter jets are outdated in the age of drones and only put pilots' lives at risk," he posted on X.
But in June 2025, those same jets are proving Musk wrong.
During Israel's ongoing offensive against Iran, F-35I Adir fighters—Israel's variant of the American-made stealth jet—have executed dozens of long-range strikes against fortified air defense systems, missile sites and nuclear facilities. Israeli officials say the aircraft flew deep into Iranian territory, encountered little resistance, and returned without a single recorded loss.
The results were immediate and visible. According to the Israeli Air Force, their F-35s neutralized critical air defense assets and gave Israeli pilots air superiority over much of Iranian airspace—a feat that unmanned systems have yet to replicate.
'We Need Both'
In interviews with Newsweek, defense experts said Musk's assertion doesn't hold up—Israel's strikes on Iran highlight exactly why manned stealth aircraft remain essential, even as drones reshape modern warfare.
"Manned stealth aircraft are the most cost-effective way to achieve results against heavily defended adversaries," said retired Lt. Gen. David Deptula, who served as deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance at U.S. Air Force headquarters and is now dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.
Deptula described Israel's deep-penetration raids—some stretching nearly 1,000 miles—as a blueprint for modern air campaigns. "These operations saw Israel's F-35s evade and dismantle Iran's Russian-supplied air defenses, and then go on to strike other key targets. That is far from easy and could not have been accomplished by today's drones," he said.
An Israeli air force F-35 fighter lands during the "Blue Flag" multinational air defence exercise at the Ovda air force base, north of the Israeli city of Eilat, on October 24, 2021.
An Israeli air force F-35 fighter lands during the "Blue Flag" multinational air defence exercise at the Ovda air force base, north of the Israeli city of Eilat, on October 24, 2021.
Photo by JACK GUEZ / AFP) (Photo by JACK GUEZ/AFP via Getty Images
Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), echoed that sentiment.
"Those who suggest that uncrewed systems alone can replace what fighter aircraft do fundamentally do not understand what makes them such a flexible and potentially decisive military tool," Bronk told Newsweek. He added that unmanned systems, while useful for surveillance and saturation attacks, still lack the resilience and adaptability to execute complex, multi-layered strikes in contested airspace.
"It's one thing to simulate uncrewed aircraft doing dogfighting in a clean, test environment," he said. "It's another to trust them in the electromagnetic chaos of modern combat, where jamming, deception, and dense airspace demand flexibility."
The Human Factor
Israel's strikes have included precision-guided bombs dropped on hardened targets such as the Natanz and Fordow nuclear enrichment sites. Defense analysts quickly noted the significance of using fifth-generation aircraft in such missions.
"There's a significant difference between today's military operations and what might be possible in 10 or 15 years," said Guy Snodgrass, a former Navy fighter pilot and Pentagon strategist.
"In today's world, manned stealth aircraft like Lockheed's F-35 are the premier tools. Their networked sensor suites, real-time battlefield awareness, and trained pilots make them unmatched for missions like these."
Smoke rises from the building of Iran's state-run television after an Israeli strike in Tehran, Iran, Monday, June 16, 2025.
Smoke rises from the building of Iran's state-run television after an Israeli strike in Tehran, Iran, Monday, June 16, 2025.
AP Photo
That's exactly what Israel's F-35s brought to the Iranian theater. Modified with extended-range fuel systems and armed with precision-guided munitions, the aircraft reached targets nearly 1,000 miles away. Israeli officials say the missions were executed without aerial refueling and with minimal radar detection—an outcome impossible without stealth and pilot-led adaptability.
"The proof is there for all to see," said Deptula, the retired general. "No drone exists today—or will in the foreseeable future—that can do what we are witnessing Israeli Air Force F-35s accomplish on a daily basis. Drones are tools that facilitate the conduct of air warfare—they don't change the fundamental elements of air warfare."
The Drone Revolution
Still, Deptula is quick to note the drone revolution is very real—just not all-encompassing. Deptula said that Israeli forces have used small lethal drones to support their strike packages, especially in suppressing Iranian air defenses. "It's a great example of taking an effects-based approach," he said. "You match the tool to the mission."
One of the clearest examples of how modern warfare is evolving came just weeks before Israel's air campaign began. In Eastern Europe, Ukraine launched "Operation Spiderweb" its most ambitious operation of the war against Russia—a sweeping drone and missile strike deep into Russian territory, damaging military infrastructure hundreds of miles from the front lines.
The attack demonstrated an effective way to strike without putting costly assets like fighter jets at risk. Snodgrass sees a future where artificial intelligence and uncrewed systems play a bigger role—but not yet. "Unmanned aircraft will one day rule the skies," he said. "But current systems like the F-35 represent the pinnacle of what is on offer today and in the near future."
A still image from footage of Operation Spiderweb published by Ukraine's security services.
A still image from footage of Operation Spiderweb published by Ukraine's security services.
SBU
Bronk agreed. "Massed one-way drones are useful for disruption and suppression," he said, "but they don't replace precision strike aircraft—especially not when facing modern missile systems and electronic defenses."
In a statement to Newsweek, a spokesperson for the defense giant Lockheed Martin, which makes the F-35, called it "combat proven."
"Its ability to combine battlefield intelligence and technology and share it instantaneously across every domain—land, sea, air, space, cyber—gives it an overwhelming edge in capability over the alternatives," the spokesperson said.
Whether that edge lasts another decade may depend on how quickly AI evolves, experts agree. For now, though, they say the skies over Iran offer a clear rebuttal to the idea that manned jets are already "relics of the past," as Musk has claimed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Tucker Carlson Confronts Ted Cruz on Iran: 'You Don't Know Anything'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Conservative commentator and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson got into a heated back-and-forth this week with Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas about the latter's views on Iran. Carlson told Cruz he doesn't know "anything about the country" whose government he seeks to "topple," in an interview set to air on Wednesday. The Context Israel ignited a new war with Iran on Thursday when it fired a series of strikes that decimated Tehran's military chain-of-command and destroyed critical nuclear infrastructure. Iran retaliated by launching missiles of its own and the conflict has rapidly escalated in the days since, with President Donald Trump said to be weighing a U.S. strike against Iran's underground nuclear stronghold in Fordow. The conflict—and America's role in it—has splintered Trump's MAGA coalition, as the movement's isolationist wing stands staunchly opposed to hawkish pro-Trump lawmakers who favor a more hard-line stance toward Iran. That split has also put Carlson—a longtime anti-interventionist who's been railing against "warmongers" in his party—directly at odds with Cruz, who has cheered Israel's strikes against Iran and said there's "no reason" a "theocratic lunatic" like Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei should possess nuclear weapons. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson is shown gesturing during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson is shown gesturing during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP What To Know Cruz appeared on Carlson's show on X, formerly Twitter, for the interview. The ex-Fox News staple posted a short clip of the conversation to X on Tuesday night, a day before it's set to air in full, in which he tore into the Texas Republican over his stance on the Iran conflict. "How many people live in Iran, by the way?" Carlson asked Cruz. "I don't know the population," Cruz replied. "At all?" Carlson said. "No, I don't know the population," Cruz repeated. Carlson continued pressing the GOP lawmaker: "You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?" Cruz then turned the question back on Carlson, saying, "How many people live in Iran?" "92 million," Carlson replied, adding: "How could you not know that?" "I don't sit around memorizing population tables," Cruz said. "Well, it's kind of relevant because you're calling for the overthrow of the government," Carlson said. Cruz fired back at the former prime-time host, asking why it's "relevant whether it's 90 million or 80 million or 100 million? Why is that relevant?" "Well, because if you don't know anything of the country—" Carlson began, before Cruz cut him off. "I didn't say I don't know anything about the country," the Texas senator said. "OK, what's the ethnic mix of Iran?" Carlson said. Cruz said that Iranians are "Persian and predominantly Shia," prompting Carlson to ask him the percentage breakdown. "OK, this is cute," Cruz said, cutting Carlson off again. But Carlson continued: "You don't know anything about Iran—" Cruz then appeared to mock Carlson: "I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran—" "You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government and you don't know anything about the country," Carlson interjected. Cruz shot back, saying Carlson doesn't "know anything about the country. You're the one who claims they're not trying to murder Donald Trump." Carlson said he never made that claim and went on to say he doesn't believe Cruz thinks Iran is trying to assassinate Trump—and that if Cruz did believe it, he would have been calling for the U.S. to carry out military strikes against Iran in retaliation. "If you really believed that—" Carlson began, but Cruz interjected, saying, "We are carrying out military strikes today." "You said Israel was," Carlson said, referring to Israel's ongoing military campaign against Iran, which has decimated Iran's military and intelligence chain-of-command, destroyed nuclear infrastructure and killed key nuclear scientists. "Right," Cruz said. "With our help. I said 'we.' Israel is leading them, but we're supporting them." Carlson latched onto Cruz's comments, pointing out that the National Security Council's spokesperson denied that the U.S. is taking an active part in Israel's attack on Iran. "We're not bombing them," Cruz said of Iran. "Israel's bombing them." "You just said 'we' were," Carlson pressed. "We are supporting Israel as they're—" Cruz said, before Carlson cut in: "This is high stakes. You're a senator. If you're saying the United States government is at war with Iran right now, people are listening." Ted Cruz on Iran. Full interview tomorrow. — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 18, 2025 Cruz is among several lawmakers, both Republican and Democratic, who support the U.S. taking on a more prominent role in the battle. South Carolina GOP Senator Lindsey Graham said this week that Trump should go "all in" on Iran and Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania said America's "commitment to Israel must be absolute." Democratic Representative Greg Landsman of Ohio also lamented that "diplomacy has been given every opportunity" and "force is now necessary." On the other side are Carlson and other right-wing figures like former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. "You think we're going to join in the offensive combat [operation]?" Bannon asked Carlson on his War Room podcast earlier this week. "Yes, I do," Carlson said. "I do." "Well, we have to—we can't—we have to stop that," Bannon said. Greene, meanwhile, scorned people in the MAGA movement who are "slobbering" for the U.S. to get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. What Happens Next The U.S. has taken a defensive posture in the conflict at the moment, intercepting some of the missiles Iran has fired toward Israel. But Israeli officials have called for the U.S. to play a larger role, including by giving Israel bunker-busting munitions, without which Israel cannot destroy Iran's main nuclear facility in Fordow. Axios reported that Trump is seriously considering launching a strike on the facility and two that Israeli officials told the news outlet that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu believes the U.S. will join the war in the coming days.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
US critical networks are prime targets for cyberattacks. They're preparing for Iran to strike.
The organizations representing critical networks that keep the lights on, the water running and transportation systems humming across the U.S. are bracing for a possible surge of Iranian cyberattacks. Virtually every critical infrastructure sector is on high alert amid a deepening conflict between Iran and Israel, though no major new cyber threat activity has been publicly reported so far. As these groups proactively step up their defenses, it's unclear whether Washington is coordinating with them on security efforts — a change from prior moments of geopolitical unrest, when federal agencies have played a key role in sounding the alarm. 'Iranian cyber activity has not been as extensive outside of the Middle East but could shift in light of the military actions,' said John Hultquist, chief analyst for Google Threat Intelligence Group. As the conflict evolves — and particularly if the U.S. decides to strike Iran directly — 'targets in the United States could be reprioritized for action by Iran's cyber threat capability,' he said. During previous periods of heightened geopolitical tension, U.S. agencies, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, stepped up to warn the operators of vital U.S. networks about emerging threats. Ahead of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, CISA launched its 'Shields Up' program to raise awareness about potential risks to U.S. companies emanating from the impending war. Anne Neuberger, who served as deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging tech at the White House under President Joe Biden, coordinated with CISA and other agencies, including the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, to support critical infrastructure sectors before Russia attacked Ukraine. She stressed that the government is crucial in helping these companies step up their defenses during a crisis. 'The government can play a very important role in helping companies defend themselves, from sharing declassified intelligence regarding threats to bringing companies together to coordinate defenses,' Neuberger said. 'Threat intel firms should lean forward in publicly sharing any intelligence they have. ODNI and CISA should do the same.' Spokespersons for CISA, the White House and the National Security Council did not respond to requests for comment on increasing concerns that cyber adversaries could target U.S. critical networks. Beyond federal resources, thousands of the nation's critical infrastructure operators turn to information sharing and analysis centers and organizations, or ISACs, for threat intelligence. The Food and Ag-ISAC — whose members include the Hershey Company, Tyson and Conagra — and the Information Technology ISAC — whose members include Intel, IBM and AT&T — put out a joint alert late last week strongly urging U.S. companies to step up their security efforts to prepare for likely Iranian cyberattacks. In a joint statement from the groups provided to POLITICO on Monday, the organizations cautioned that even if no U.S.-based companies were directly targeted, global interconnectivity meant that 'cyberattacks aimed at Israel could inadvertently affect U.S. entities.' ISACs for the electricity, aviation, financial services, and state and local government sectors are also on alert. Jeffrey Troy, president and CEO of the Aviation ISAC, said that in the past, companies in the aviation sector had been impacted by cyberattacks disrupting GPS systems, and that as a result, 'our members remain in a constant state of vigilance, sharing intelligence in real time and collaborating on prevention, detection, and mitigation strategies.' Andy Jabbour, founder and senior adviser for the Faith-Based Information Sharing and Analysis Organization, said his organization is monitoring potential efforts by Iranian-linked hackers to infiltrate the websites of U.S. religious groups or spread disinformation. Jabbour said his organization is working with the National Council of ISACs on scanning for these threats, and noted that the council had stood up a program following the first strikes by Israel on Iran late last week to monitor for specific threats to U.S. infrastructure. The National Council of ISACs did not respond to a request for comment on whether they are preparing for evolving Iranian threats. Concerns about attacks on U.S. critical infrastructure linked to conflicts abroad have grown in recent years. Following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by militant group Hamas, Iranian government-linked hacking group Cyber Av3ngers hacked into multiple U.S. water facilities that were using Israeli-made control panels. The intrusions did not disrupt water supplies, but they served as a warning to utility operators about devices that could be easily hacked and potentially targeted first in a cyber conflict with Iran. 'If anti-Israeli threat actors make good on any claim of impacting critical infrastructure at this time … they're going to look for the low-hanging fruit, easily compromised devices,' said Jennifer Lyn Walker, director of infrastructure cyber defense at the Water ISAC. Walker said that while her team has not yet detected any enhanced threats to member groups since last week, the Water ISAC would be sending out an alert this week, encouraging organizations to stay vigilant. 'We don't want to cause any undo panic, but for those members that aren't already watching and aren't already vigilant, we definitely want to amplify the message that the potential exists,' Lyn Walker said. Some of these groups noted that the lack of federal support so far in preparing for Iranian cyberattacks may be due to widespread changes across agencies since President Donald Trump took office. CISA, the nation's main cyber defense agency, is expected to lose around 1,000 employees, and many of its programs have been cut or put on pause, including funding for the organization that supports the ISACs for state and local governments. CISA has also been without Senate-confirmed leadership since former Director Jen Easterly departed in January. 'CISA is in a state of transition,' Jabbour said, noting that while 'CISA is still accessible,' there had been no outreach to strengthen defenses against Iranian hackers since tensions erupted last week. It isn't a complete blackout. Lyn Walker said that the Water ISAC has 'received reporting from DHS partners who are striving to maintain continuity of operations and valuable information sharing during this challenging time.' There could also be another reason for the less visible federal response: 'Shields Up' advisories are still available from 2022, when CISA worked with organizations to prepare for an onslaught of Russian cyberattacks tied to the war in Ukraine. Kiersten Todt, who served as chief of staff at CISA when the program was stood up, said that its legacy has heightened awareness of potential cyber pitfalls across the nation's critical operations. 'Because the [cyber] threat is so serious, all of those things ended up sustaining,' Todt, current president of creative company Wondros, said. 'That 'Shields Up' mentality has now become part of the culture of critical infrastructure.' The enhanced level of vigilance reflects concerns that the threats from Iran could change quickly. Jabbour noted that a lot is in the hands of Trump as he weighs how heavily to assist Israel. 'The next 24-48 hours will be interesting in that sense, and his decisions and his actions could certainly influence what we see here in the United States,' Jabbour said.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Carney calls Iran ‘principal source of regional instability and terror'
He says the G7 leaders 'have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.' Hostilities in Iran, and the possibility that they could lead to a larger conflict, have overshadowed work on many other issues that occurred during the summit. 'We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza,' Carney said.
