US critical networks are prime targets for cyberattacks. They're preparing for Iran to strike.
Virtually every critical infrastructure sector is on high alert amid a deepening conflict between Iran and Israel, though no major new cyber threat activity has been publicly reported so far.
As these groups proactively step up their defenses, it's unclear whether Washington is coordinating with them on security efforts — a change from prior moments of geopolitical unrest, when federal agencies have played a key role in sounding the alarm.
'Iranian cyber activity has not been as extensive outside of the Middle East but could shift in light of the military actions,' said John Hultquist, chief analyst for Google Threat Intelligence Group.
As the conflict evolves — and particularly if the U.S. decides to strike Iran directly — 'targets in the United States could be reprioritized for action by Iran's cyber threat capability,' he said.
During previous periods of heightened geopolitical tension, U.S. agencies, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, stepped up to warn the operators of vital U.S. networks about emerging threats. Ahead of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, CISA launched its 'Shields Up' program to raise awareness about potential risks to U.S. companies emanating from the impending war.
Anne Neuberger, who served as deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging tech at the White House under President Joe Biden, coordinated with CISA and other agencies, including the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, to support critical infrastructure sectors before Russia attacked Ukraine. She stressed that the government is crucial in helping these companies step up their defenses during a crisis.
'The government can play a very important role in helping companies defend themselves, from sharing declassified intelligence regarding threats to bringing companies together to coordinate defenses,' Neuberger said. 'Threat intel firms should lean forward in publicly sharing any intelligence they have. ODNI and CISA should do the same.'
Spokespersons for CISA, the White House and the National Security Council did not respond to requests for comment on increasing concerns that cyber adversaries could target U.S. critical networks.
Beyond federal resources, thousands of the nation's critical infrastructure operators turn to information sharing and analysis centers and organizations, or ISACs, for threat intelligence.
The Food and Ag-ISAC — whose members include the Hershey Company, Tyson and Conagra — and the Information Technology ISAC — whose members include Intel, IBM and AT&T — put out a joint alert late last week strongly urging U.S. companies to step up their security efforts to prepare for likely Iranian cyberattacks. In a joint statement from the groups provided to POLITICO on Monday, the organizations cautioned that even if no U.S.-based companies were directly targeted, global interconnectivity meant that 'cyberattacks aimed at Israel could inadvertently affect U.S. entities.'
ISACs for the electricity, aviation, financial services, and state and local government sectors are also on alert. Jeffrey Troy, president and CEO of the Aviation ISAC, said that in the past, companies in the aviation sector had been impacted by cyberattacks disrupting GPS systems, and that as a result, 'our members remain in a constant state of vigilance, sharing intelligence in real time and collaborating on prevention, detection, and mitigation strategies.'
Andy Jabbour, founder and senior adviser for the Faith-Based Information Sharing and Analysis Organization, said his organization is monitoring potential efforts by Iranian-linked hackers to infiltrate the websites of U.S. religious groups or spread disinformation.
Jabbour said his organization is working with the National Council of ISACs on scanning for these threats, and noted that the council had stood up a program following the first strikes by Israel on Iran late last week to monitor for specific threats to U.S. infrastructure.
The National Council of ISACs did not respond to a request for comment on whether they are preparing for evolving Iranian threats.
Concerns about attacks on U.S. critical infrastructure linked to conflicts abroad have grown in recent years. Following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by militant group Hamas, Iranian government-linked hacking group Cyber Av3ngers hacked into multiple U.S. water facilities that were using Israeli-made control panels.
The intrusions did not disrupt water supplies, but they served as a warning to utility operators about devices that could be easily hacked and potentially targeted first in a cyber conflict with Iran.
'If anti-Israeli threat actors make good on any claim of impacting critical infrastructure at this time … they're going to look for the low-hanging fruit, easily compromised devices,' said Jennifer Lyn Walker, director of infrastructure cyber defense at the Water ISAC.
Walker said that while her team has not yet detected any enhanced threats to member groups since last week, the Water ISAC would be sending out an alert this week, encouraging organizations to stay vigilant.
'We don't want to cause any undo panic, but for those members that aren't already watching and aren't already vigilant, we definitely want to amplify the message that the potential exists,' Lyn Walker said.
Some of these groups noted that the lack of federal support so far in preparing for Iranian cyberattacks may be due to widespread changes across agencies since President Donald Trump took office. CISA, the nation's main cyber defense agency, is expected to lose around 1,000 employees, and many of its programs have been cut or put on pause, including funding for the organization that supports the ISACs for state and local governments. CISA has also been without Senate-confirmed leadership since former Director Jen Easterly departed in January.
'CISA is in a state of transition,' Jabbour said, noting that while 'CISA is still accessible,' there had been no outreach to strengthen defenses against Iranian hackers since tensions erupted last week.
It isn't a complete blackout. Lyn Walker said that the Water ISAC has 'received reporting from DHS partners who are striving to maintain continuity of operations and valuable information sharing during this challenging time.'
There could also be another reason for the less visible federal response: 'Shields Up' advisories are still available from 2022, when CISA worked with organizations to prepare for an onslaught of Russian cyberattacks tied to the war in Ukraine. Kiersten Todt, who served as chief of staff at CISA when the program was stood up, said that its legacy has heightened awareness of potential cyber pitfalls across the nation's critical operations.
'Because the [cyber] threat is so serious, all of those things ended up sustaining,' Todt, current president of creative company Wondros, said. 'That 'Shields Up' mentality has now become part of the culture of critical infrastructure.'
The enhanced level of vigilance reflects concerns that the threats from Iran could change quickly. Jabbour noted that a lot is in the hands of Trump as he weighs how heavily to assist Israel.
'The next 24-48 hours will be interesting in that sense, and his decisions and his actions could certainly influence what we see here in the United States,' Jabbour said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Iran Turns to China for Missile Boost: Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new report from Israeli media has warned of increased military cooperation between Iran and China, particularly in the production of surface-to-surface missiles. Yedioth Ahronoth cited intelligence findings that Beijing may be helping Tehran rebuild missile capabilities damaged in the recent June war. The concerns surfaced as Israel's military chief, Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, said the army is ready to launch further strikes on Iran if necessary, following what he described as a successful preemptive campaign. Newsweek has reached out to the foreign ministries of Israel, China and Iran for comment. Why It Matters The reported cooperation between Beijing and Tehran is viewed by Israel as a significant security challenge. Israel fought a 12-day, United States-backed war against Iran in June and is now watching for any moves that could restore Iran's missile capacity. Israeli authorities have stated that Chinese involvement in missile development or supply could directly undermine Israel's defense efforts. Iranians drive past missiles during a rally marking the 42nd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, at Azadi Square in Tehran on February 10, 2021. Iranians drive past missiles during a rally marking the 42nd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, at Azadi Square in Tehran on February 10, 2021. Ebrahim Noroozi/AP Photo What To Know Officials told Yedioth Ahronoth that China has not confirmed any plans to supply weapons to Iran, but its actions suggest it is "actually rebuilding the Iranian capabilities." The outlet reported that European intelligence agencies have recently tracked closer cooperation between China and Iran. Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Yechiel Leiter, said in late July that there were "troubling" indications China was aiding Iran in rebuilding its missile arsenal. Speaking to Voice of America, he expressed concern over the possible transfer of materials that could "reconstitute a ballistic missile program." Iran-China Ties Last month, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visited China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit, highlighting Tehran's growing ties with Beijing. Around that time, reports from Middle East Eye and Israel Hayom indicated Iran received Chinese-made surface-to-air missiles paid for in oil. China has denied arms sales to nations "engaged in warfare." Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz at the Pentagon for a meeting with U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on July 18, 2025. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz at the Pentagon for a meeting with U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on July 18, 2025. Mark Schiefelbein/AP Photo Rising War Rhetoric The latest Yedioth Ahronoth report comes amid public discussion in Israel about the possibility of renewed conflict with Iran. On June 27, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said he had instructed the military to prepare an "enforcement plan" targeting Iran's nuclear and missile programs. Tehran has stated it will continue nuclear enrichment and maintain a peaceful nuclear energy program. What People Are Saying Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Yechiel Leiter, told Voice of America in July: "There's no reason why we couldn't have good relations with the people of China. But we certainly don't want to see China acting alongside those who threaten our very existence." Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, at a meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi in July: "China will continue to support Iran in safeguarding its national sovereignty and dignity, resisting power politics and bullying, defending its legitimate rights and interests through political negotiation." What Happens Next Israeli officials have said they will act to prevent Iran from restoring its missile capabilities. At the same time, Iran has emphasized its right to pursue nuclear enrichment and strengthen its defenses, signaling readiness to respond to threats. China's growing military and economic cooperation with Tehran adds further complexity, as Israel continues monitoring Beijing's role in supporting Iran's missile and defense programs.


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
It's the Age of Trump — and he's forging a new political era
If you had to sum up President Donald Trump's second term so far in one word, you could do worse than 'epic.' Trump may be on the path to the most consequential presidency since Ronald Reagan's. We don't know how it will end — an unforeseen crisis could upend everything — but the emphasis has been on governing ambition from Day 1. Advertisement Even if Trump's second term ended tomorrow, he would have left a significant mark. Consider his signature issues of trade and immigration. Advertisement For all the talk about how he doesn't have core convictions, Trump has favored tariffs for decades and has instituted a tariff regime that — absent discrediting economic turmoil — is likely to endure. This would have seemed almost unthinkable when Trump descended the elevator in 2015, and a relatively free-trade consensus prevailed in US policy. He's brought border crossings to a historic low, and the United States could experience negative net migration for the first time in 50 years. Advertisement Again, this is a big change, and one that it's hard to imagine anyone besides Donald Trump effecting. He's dealt a blow to DEI programs in the federal government and is making it harder for colleges and universities to pursue race-conscious policies. His election coincided with the beginning of a pullback from DEI in the private sector, one that his administration has encouraged. DEI was the culmination of a half-century campaign by the left for quotas in hiring and admissions and other racialized policies. Trump's counteroffensive could represent an inflection point. Advertisement Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters He's signed a tax and spending bill that makes permanent the tax cuts from his first term, funds a large-scale investment in immigration enforcement and includes a meaningful reform of Medicaid. He bombed the Iranian nuclear program, at the very least setting it back for years. He cajoled commitments for greater defense spending out of NATO countries. Almost any one of these items would be a notable first-six-months accomplishment, but he's done them all, with lots of other activity besides. His environmental and energy officials are rolling back the left's climate agenda. Trump defunded public broadcasting and kneecapped the Department of Education (for now). His administration has taken important steps to protect female sports and to keep minors from being subjected to 'gender-affirming care.' Advertisement He's pushed universities into adopting reforms and probably upended forever the assumption that billions of federal dollars would flow to top universities as a matter of course. His election was both a symbol of, and a catalyst for, the woke tide's receding. Trump has what is, in recent memory, an unprecedented grip on his party and has remade it in his image over the last decade. If a Trump-endorsed GOP nominee wins the general election, he would be the George H.W. Bush to Trump's Reagan. Advertisement In sum, the rise of Trump in 2016 represented a break with what had been the post–Cold War consensus, although it was incompletely realized and seemingly a political fizzle when voters ousted him in the COVID election of 2020. Biden was a partial return to a more conventional politics. Now, with his second term, Trump is more fully effecting a transition to a new era — which alone makes him a highly consequential figure. The usual caveats apply: Again, a catastrophe could scramble all of this, and to say Trump is important is not to endorse everything he's doing, whether big (e.g., the tariffs) or small (e.g., firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner). Advertisement Since he's done so much unilaterally, it's subject to relatively easy reversal if a Democrat is elected in 2028. But there's little doubt we are witnessing something historic. Steve Hayward called his volumes on the Republican giant of the 1980s 'The Age of Reagan' — and Arthur Schlesinger wrote both 'The Age of Jackson' and 'The Age of Roosevelt.' Advertisement The equivalent of Hayward or Schlesinger decades from now will probably be justified in continuing the trope: All indications are that we are living in the Age of Trump. Twitter: @RichLowry

Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
Ukraine says its forces bombed a Russian ship carrying Iranian ammo as it ramps up deep-strike operations
The Ukrainian military said on Friday that it carried out an attack against a Russian ship carrying Iranian ammunition, marking one of the latest deep strikes far behind the front lines. Separately, Ukraine said that it struck an oil refinery that supplies fuel to the Russian military. The two attacks are the latest in a string of long-range strikes deep into Russian territory and come as Ukraine continues to target critical military and energy facilities. Kyiv hopes this campaign will put additional strains on Moscow's war machine. Ukraine's Special Operations Forces said they struck the vessel Port Olya 4 in Russia's Astrakhan region, which borders the Caspian Sea, during an operation on Thursday. It said the ship was loaded with parts for one-way attack drones and ammunition from Iran, adding that the results of the attack are still under investigation. SOF said Russia uses the port as a logistics hub to transport military supplies from Iran. They said in a statement that "hitting this vessel disrupts a critical supply chain." The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces said SOF was behind another long-range attack on Friday, this time striking an oil refinery in Russia's Samara region, which borders Kazakhstan. It said in a statement that the Syzran refinery produces various fuels, including some for aircraft, and supplies the Russian military. It added that the attack caused fires and explosions. It's unclear what weapons Ukrainian forces used in the attacks. Business Insider was unable to independently verify all the details of the two deep-strike operations. Ukraine previously faced restrictions on using its limited arsenal of Western-provided cruise and ballistic missiles for strikes inside Russia, restrictions that hamstrung the Ukrainian military until they were lifted last year. The main problem now appears to be munition availability. As a workaround, Kyiv began to invest heavily in locally produced long-range drones and missiles. Over the past year, it has used these weapons to carry out a range of strikes on Russian airfields, ammunition storage facilities, energy sites, and other high-profile targets. In recent weeks, Ukraine has kept up its long-range attacks. Megan Ewert, a geospatial researcher at the Institute for the Study of War, a US think tank that closely tracks the grinding conflict, found that Kyiv carried out 40 drone strikes in Russian territory between July 15 and August 10. Ewert explained to Business Insider that the number of strikes correlates with the number of sites attacked and said the number of days each week with strikes seems to have an upward trend over the timeframe. She attributed this shift to a possible increase in the intensity of drone use, though ISW does not track the exact number of drones that Ukraine launches in each attack. The number of Ukrainian drones often varies with each attack. On Monday, for instance, a source in Ukraine's internal security agency, the SBU, said at least four long-range drones struck a facility that makes parts for cruise missiles in Russia's Nizhny Novgorod region. Other attacks may use a different number of munitions. The SBU told Business Insider that facilities within Russia's military-industrial complex, which contribute to Moscow's war machine, "are absolutely legitimate military targets." "The SBU continues to work on the demilitarization of facilities that produce weapons for the terror of peaceful Ukrainian cities," the source said in translated remarks.