Airbus orders dominate Paris Air Show as Boeing takes backseat — again
Airbus orders and new models have taken center-stage at this year's Paris Air Show, as its U.S. rival Boeing spends yet another major industry event keeping a low profile due to turmoil at the business.
Airlines and manufacturers use air shows as an opportunity to make splashy aircraft purchase announcements following months of negotiations, some of which will be wrapped up at the event. Airbus had racked up nearly $21 billion as of Thursday morning, per a Reuters calculation.
That included 132 firm orders on Monday, from customers including Saudi leasing firm AviLease, Japan's ANA and Poland's LOT, versus 41 for Boeing and 15 for Brazil's Embraer, according to a tally by aviation advisory IBA.
The following two days saw Boeing hold back from announcements completely, while Airbus splashed a 150-aircraft Memorandum of Understanding with VietJet Air focused on its single-aisle 100 A321neos, and orders with EgyptAir and Starlux Airlines for its wide-body A350s.
Air Asia chief Tony Fernandes told CNBC on Thursday that he was in discussions at Paris about expanding the firm's existing order for the Airbus XLR — the Toulouse-based planemaker's flagship new long-range, narrowbody aircraft — and expected an announcement within the next month or so. The model, which entered service last year, is set to allow airlines to offer medium- and long-haul routes at lower rates due to reduced fuel costs.
Embraer also secured a key win Wednesday with 60 firm orders for the E175, along with further options.
Boeing's relatively quiet presence in Paris isn't indicative of a wider demand crisis in the sector. The manufacturer sealed plenty of orders during U.S. President Donald Trump's May trip to the Middle East, including a 210-jet deal with Qatar Airways.
Both Boeing and Airbus meanwhile have aircraft backlogs of more than 5,000 and 8,000 aircraft, respectively, figures that have barely budged for nearly a decade as industry supply challenges — exacerbated in the wake of the pandemic — leave airlines struggling to renew their ageing fleets.
John Plueger, chief executive officer of Air Lease Corp, told CNBC earlier this week that the backlog meant it was always expected to be a subdued show in Paris compared to those past, including the post-pandemic boom year of 2023. "Both Airbus and Boeing are all sold out to 2031 and '32 anyway. So how many follow-on orders into the '33, '34, '35 time frame are you really going to see? ... But overall, the demand environment remains very robust," Plueger said.
However, this does mark yet another year in which Boeing has refrained from the aircraft flypasts or major promotional activities. Starting in 2019 in the wake of the two fatal crashes of its B737-Max model, followed by the pandemic which threw the industry into turmoil, and then with fresh crises delivered via an emergency exit door blowout, allegations of widespread quality control issues, and increasingly-disgruntled customers over delivery delays — Boeing has had a difficult time.
Just as 2025 appeared like it may represent a tentative turning point for the company, with CEO Kelly Ortberg due to attend Paris, the first-ever crash of a Boeing Dreamliner in last week's Air India disaster threw that into disarray. Ortberg pulled out of attending the event, and the firm has made few press announcements while it says it is focused on its customers and the investigation into the causes of the crash.
"Demand for new aircraft remains unprecedented, matched only by passenger demand for air travel," said Tony Payne, partner at law firm DLA Piper.
He added that orders remain strong despite a "sombre and reflective environment" in the wake of the Air India crash, as stakeholders are "well aware of the impact" any relaxation of standards can have.
"Orders for new aircraft and engines remains strong but alongside a sombre and reflective environment, where stakeholders are well aware of the impact of any relaxation of standards can have."
"Muted" has therefore become the word of the week in terms of commercial aviation, while defense — making up nearly half of the show's content this year — takes on a bigger-than-ever role amid roiling Middle East conflict, the Russia-Ukraine war and an upcoming NATO summit at which higher national security spending will be high on the agenda. Deals in this space have included Thales' contract to build 48 of its new remote-operated artillery systems for the French government.
"The consequences, the impact of the accident of Air India" are hanging over Paris, Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury told CNBC on Monday. "Still, the momentum in the industry is very strong," he continued, noting particular demand for widebody aircraft which had more catching up to do following the pandemic than the narrowbody market.
Dan Taylor, head of consulting at IBA, told CNBC that the split between Boeing and Airbus this year was "more about context than competition."
"Boeing's recent orders in the Middle East, helped by U.S. diplomatic engagement, and its quiet stance post-Air India likely influenced its lower visibility at the Paris Air Show. This isn't a sign of weakening demand, but rather a deliberate pause amid a volatile geopolitical backdrop and possible tariff uncertainties," Taylor said.
"Airlines are likely busy reassessing fleet strategies given the latest crisis, but strong profitability, ageing fleets, easing debt levels, and continued GDP and travel demand growth across many regions all point to a sustained long-term appetite for new aircraft."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
19 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Some US restaurants and servers oppose President Trump's ‘no tax on tips' budget proposal
Some segments of the U.S. restaurant industry don't support President Donald Trump's proposal to eliminate federal taxes on tips, saying it would help too few people and obscure bigger issues in the way tipped workers are paid. The Independent Restaurant Coalition, which represents nearly 100,000 restaurant and bars, has appealed to Congress to reconsider the proposal, which is part of the president's spending bill. Even some workers who rely on tips say they oppose making them tax-deductible. 'I think there's a huge hole in this concept of 'no tax on tips' because a lot of restaurant workers aren't receiving tips in the first place,' said Elyanna Calle, a bartender in Austin, Texas, and president of the Restaurant Workers United union. 'It's not helping most kitchen workers, and oftentimes those are the people who are being paid the least.' For now, making tips tax-free appears to have broad support among lawmakers. Both Trump and his Democratic rival in last year's U.S. presidential election, former Vice President Kamala Harris, campaigned on the concept. The House included it in a tax cuts package approved last month. The bill would eliminate federal income taxes on tips for people working in jobs that have traditionally received them as long as they make less than $160,000 in 2025. The Senate Finance Committee passed a modified version on Monday. Senators capped deductions at $25,000 and want to phase them out for individuals whose income exceeds $150,000. Eligibility would be based on earnings as of Dec. 31, 2024. Both the House and Senate committee measures would apply through the 2028 tax year. The Finance Committee specified that 'cash tips' qualify but said the term applied to tips paid in cash, charged to credit cards or received from other employees under a tip-sharing arrangement. Wary of wading into politics, many restaurant chains contacted by The Associated Press about tax-free tips didn't respond or referred questions to the National Restaurant Association, including Waffle House, The Cheesecake Factory, First Watch and the parent companies of Olive Garden, Applebee's and Chili's. The National Restaurant Association, a trade organization that represents nearly 500,000 U.S. restaurants and bars, applauded the House's passage of Trump's spending bill and said it wants to see tax-free tips. The association estimates the measure would benefit more than 2 million servers and bartenders. But the U.S. restaurant industry has more than 12 million workers, including dishwashers and chefs, according to government data. The Independent Restaurant Coalition says the 'no tax on tips' proposal leaves out too many of those workers. The coalition wants Congress to eliminate taxes on service charges, which are being used to compensate employees at an increasing number of restaurants. Around 15% of U.S. restaurants add some form of service charge to customers' bills, according to the National Restaurant Association. George Skandalos, a pizza restaurant owner in Moscow, Idaho, was tired of seeing servers count out hundreds of dollars of tips at the end of the night while people in the kitchen scrubbed the floor on their hands and knees. So he started experimenting with different compensation models. Skandalos tried pooling servers' tips and distributing them but ran into rules preventing that. He tried raising his menu prices and explaining that a percentage of each order was going to employee compensation, but customers didn't understand and kept tipping. Skandalos now has a gratuity-free policy at his restaurant, Maialina. He charges a 20% service fee that is distributed to all employees and helps pay for benefits like paid vacation and parental leave. The vast majority of customers appreciate the effort, he said. Skandalos said 'no tax on tips' doesn't acknowledge restaurants like his that are trying to distribute pay more equally. He would like to see service charges exempted from taxes. 'This bill is a very good start in terms of trying to leave more money in people's pocketbooks, but now let's finish what we started and make it a great thing for the restaurant industry overall,' he said. But Ted Pappageorge, the secretary-treasurer of the Culinary Workers Union Local 226 in Las Vegas, said restaurants should just pay their kitchen workers more to compensate for servers earning tips. ''No tax on tips' is an opportunity for Republicans and Democrats to deliver something to working class folks,' he said. Pappageorge wants Congress to take up a separate bill introduced by Nevada Democrat Steven Horsford that would eliminate taxes on tips but also require restaurants to pay workers at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. In 43 states, restaurants are currently allowed to pay tipped workers as little as $2.13 per hour. Yolanda Garcia, a barista at Resorts World in Las Vegas and a member of the Culinary Workers Union, also supports Horsford's bill. Garcia said she makes $33,000 a year, including up to $600 per month in tips. Tips are never guaranteed, she said, but if they were tax-free, it would help make up for that uncertainty. 'It would help me get more groceries. Right now, the price of everything has gone up,' Garcia said. Calle, the Austin bartender and union leader, said she also benefits from tips, but they're inconsistent. She suspects tipping would decline if the tax-free provision passes, because customers will resent it. For Calle, the underlying problem that must be solved is low base pay. 'I think that if we continue to make the shift into relying on tips for people, it gives incentives for companies to not raise wages,' she said.
New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Beware ‘belonging' — the sneaky word companies use to keep up their DEI discrimination
Since President Donald Trump took office in January and announced his intent to dismantle divisive diversity, equity and inclusion policies nationwide, many companies leaped to claim that they, too, have rejected the once-trendy movement. But in truth, a large number are not actually ending their DEI activities — they're simply rebranding them with the pleasant-sounding term 'belonging.' Workplace DEI policies base hiring, promotions and other key decisions solely on race, gender and sexual orientation. Such discriminatory practices are illegal — and harmful, prioritizing a person's immutable characteristics over his or her hard work and achievements. But for the committed woke activists burrowed into countless HR departments, the power to push identity politics on everyone around them is hard to give up. That's why my organization, Consumers' Research, predicted this widespread rebranding maneuver about a year ago, when public backlash against DEI began gaining momentum. In fact, 'belonging' is one of the words we suggested companies might use, after it got a test-run on many college campuses. The only surprise is just how many corporations are taking the same lockstep approach to the effort. Kohl's, for example, declared in March that it had dropped DEI from its messaging. But in fact the company just swapped out its 'Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion' web page for an 'Inclusion and Belonging' page instead. Michelle Banks, Kohl's former chief DEI officer, is still there doing the very same work — now under her new title of Chief Inclusion and Belonging Officer. For Kohl's, DEI has not waned, merely disguised itself. Amid pressure from Trump, insurance company Nationwide removed all mentions of DEI from its website and rolled out the phrase as 'Belonging, respect and fairness' in its place. But despite shedding its skin, DEI's vital organs are very much present there, including Nationwide's Associate Resource Groups that 'offer allyship' based on race. Disney has been attempting to camouflage its former DEI webpage with the same 'belonging' fig leaf — but still publishes 'workforce' and 'content' representation data broken down by race and sex. That drew the notice of the Federal Communications Commission, which has launched an investigation into Disney's DEI programming. 'I want to ensure that Disney ends any and all discriminatory initiatives in substance, not just name,' wrote FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr. Trump has made it crystal clear that discriminatory practices like DEI must be swept from our public institutions, and he has directed federal departments to identify private-sector targets for enforcement action. Understandably, C-suite executives are eager to avoid potential litigation — and are all too aware that consumers have become weary of DEI-obsessed corporations' efforts to appease woke activists. But too many of these companies are trying to have it both ways, either because corporate officers remain committed to the morally bankrupt DEI ideology, or because they're still intimidated by leftist employees or left-leaning activist organizations. Ultimately, the motivation behind the cowardice doesn't matter: It's an insult to the intelligence of consumers, shareholders and public officials for companies to imagine that a mere DEI name change is going to be enough. Are they so arrogant to believe they can fool the American public with a cosmetic cover-up? It looks that way. DEI, by 'belonging' or any other name, is still divisive, discriminatory and often outright illegal. Corporate America needs to stop trying to deceive its customers, and start focusing on expunging radical political ideologies from businesses that serve Americans of all ideological persuasions. Consumers also have a role to play. We must let companies know we won't stand for these deceptive antics by withholding patronage from businesses that use our hard-earned dollars to advance DEI and other manifestations of extreme wokeness. Only after they make real and substantive changes should we let them off the hook. Finally, any CEO who knowingly continues to oversee the deliberate violation of federal civil-rights laws should be on notice: Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, the relentless culture warrior who now heads the Civil Rights Division of the US Department of Justice, is an excellent lawyer. She may be reaching out soon. Will Hild is executive director of Consumers' Research.
an hour ago
Some US restaurants and servers oppose Republicans' 'no tax on tips' budget proposal
Some segments of the U.S. restaurant industry don't support President Donald Trump's proposal to eliminate federal taxes on tips, saying it would help too few people and obscure bigger issues in the way tipped workers are paid. The Independent Restaurant Coalition, which represents nearly 100,000 restaurant and bars, has appealed to Congress to reconsider the proposal, which is part of the president's spending bill. Even some workers who rely on tips say they oppose making them tax-deductible. 'I think there's a huge hole in this concept of 'no tax on tips' because a lot of restaurant workers aren't receiving tips in the first place,' said Elyanna Calle, a bartender in Austin, Texas, and president of the Restaurant Workers United union. 'It's not helping most kitchen workers, and oftentimes those are the people who are being paid the least.' For now, making tips tax-free appears to have broad support among lawmakers. Both Trump and his Democratic rival in last year's U.S. presidential election, former Vice President Kamala Harris, campaigned on the concept. The House included it in a tax cuts package approved last month. The bill would eliminate federal income taxes on tips for people working in jobs that have traditionally received them as long as they make less than $160,000 in 2025. The Senate Finance Committee passed a modified version on Monday. Senators capped deductions at $25,000 and want to phase them out for individuals whose income exceeds $150,000. Eligibility would be based on earnings as of Dec. 31, 2024. Both the House and Senate committee measures would apply through the 2028 tax year. The Finance Committee specified that 'cash tips' qualify but said the term applied to tips paid in cash, charged to credit cards or received from other employees under a tip-sharing arrangement. Wary of wading into politics, many restaurant chains contacted by The Associated Press about tax-free tips didn't respond or referred questions to the National Restaurant Association, including Waffle House, The Cheesecake Factory, First Watch and the parent companies of Olive Garden, Applebee's and Chili's. The National Restaurant Association, a trade organization that represents nearly 500,000 U.S. restaurants and bars, applauded the House's passage of Trump's spending bill and said it wants to see tax-free tips. The association estimates the measure would benefit more than 2 million servers and bartenders. But the U.S. restaurant industry has more than 12 million workers, including dishwashers and chefs, according to government data. The Independent Restaurant Coalition says the 'no tax on tips' proposal leaves out too many of those workers. The coalition wants Congress to eliminate taxes on service charges, which are being used to compensate employees at an increasing number of restaurants. Around 15% of U.S. restaurants add some form of service charge to customers' bills, according to the National Restaurant Association. George Skandalos, a pizza restaurant owner in Moscow, Idaho, was tired of seeing servers count out hundreds of dollars of tips at the end of the night while people in the kitchen scrubbed the floor on their hands and knees. So he started experimenting with different compensation models. Skandalos tried pooling servers' tips and distributing them but ran into rules preventing that. He tried raising his menu prices and explaining that a percentage of each order was going to employee compensation, but customers didn't understand and kept tipping. Skandalos now has a gratuity-free policy at his restaurant, Maialina. He charges a 20% service fee that is distributed to all employees and helps pay for benefits like paid vacation and parental leave. The vast majority of customers appreciate the effort, he said. Skandalos said 'no tax on tips' doesn't acknowledge restaurants like his that are trying to distribute pay more equally. He would like to see service charges exempted from taxes. 'This bill is a very good start in terms of trying to leave more money in people's pocketbooks, but now let's finish what we started and make it a great thing for the restaurant industry overall,' he said. But Ted Pappageorge, the secretary-treasurer of the Culinary Workers Union Local 226 in Las Vegas, said restaurants should just pay their kitchen workers more to compensate for servers earning tips. ''No tax on tips' is an opportunity for Republicans and Democrats to deliver something to working class folks,' he said. Pappageorge wants Congress to take up a separate bill introduced by Nevada Democrat Steven Horsford that would eliminate taxes on tips but also require restaurants to pay workers at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. In 43 states, restaurants are currently allowed to pay tipped workers as little as $2.13 per hour. Yolanda Garcia, a barista at Resorts World in Las Vegas and a member of the Culinary Workers Union, also supports Horsford's bill. Garcia said she makes $33,000 a year, including up to $600 per month in tips. Tips are never guaranteed, she said, but if they were tax-free, it would help make up for that uncertainty. 'It would help me get more groceries. Right now, the price of everything has gone up,' Garcia said. Calle, the Austin bartender and union leader, said she also benefits from tips, but they're inconsistent. She suspects tipping would decline if the tax-free provision passes, because customers will resent it. For Calle, the underlying problem that must be solved is low base pay.
