Latest from CNBC
CNBC
34 minutes ago
- Business
- CNBC
How we must divorce our personal politics from our investment decisions
The following is the prepared text from Jim Cramer's address to members of the CNBC Investing Club at Friday's third annual meeting from the New York Stock Exchange. It's time to do something that so many are loath to do, and to do it here because you deserve the truth. The vast majority of my friends, both in and out of business, refuse to allow even a sentence uttered, maybe not even a word, that is positive about President Donald Trump. I get that. There are myriad reasons to dislike the man. I know from my time as a judge on "The Apprentice," he is so very changed. Gone is the droll sense of humor. Vanquished is the notion of civility. There's nothing to like here, at least if you were at all brought up the way I was, where I could expect my mom to break out the bar of Ivory soap and shove it in my mouth, to express her disgust at my name-calling. But I have to admit that when it comes to the stock market, Trump is either the luckiest president in the world or he has somehow unleashed the animal spirits among individual investors that is driving stock prices higher. Think about it. For months now, we have witnessed more institutional selling pressure than any other time since 2008. During that same period, we have seen more individual buying power, and it has overwhelmed the institutional selling, something I find hard to fathom. Still, it's happening. That's what matters. Now in an earlier, more tortured draft of this speech, I tried to justify actions the president has taken as reasons for the market's resiliency. Perhaps, for example, Trump, despite his capricious lack of certainty, despite his boldfaced meanness, has an economic ethos that's working? Maybe there is a method to his madness that traditional Wall Street is missing? Maybe he is creating an environment that begets higher prices? Yes, at the agency level, for certain. But, frankly, other than in the business giveaways in the "Big Beautiful Bill," it's difficult to align the president's views with qualities that define a traditional bull market. So as an intellectual compromise, because we know that stock prices are rising, I have come up with this view: The president may be destructive in how he approaches his agenda, or any agenda, but he can be viewed as constructive when it comes to our investments because for the first time since I have been in this business, we are rallying on the backs of individual investors putting their money to work even if, as many professional money managers believe, stocks should be headed down, not up. The pros believe we should be in a bear market; but we are very much in a bull market. The individuals are putting money to work furiously, in individual stocks, demonstrating faith not in Trump, but in business, and it is being requited and will continue to be requited with higher stock prices. What do the individuals know, or see, that the institutions don't? Perhaps they are far less worried about traditional orthodoxy than the professionals? Maybe they don't think that tariffs are all that harmful, even as we know, historically, they have been, at least if taken to ridiculously high levels; and we are certainly bordering if not exceeding those. Or perhaps individuals are quite taken by the contrast between the previous president who was considered incredibly anti-business, and this man who is so comfortable in the CEO world? It could be that, although it is always worth remembering that stocks did incredibly well under old Joe Biden. Maybe these individual buyers believe that our country has been abused and taken advantage of by our so-called trading partners, and they cheer his moves against allies like Canada or Brazil or Vietnam or Mexico by buying stocks? There, let's call it, affectionate buying of stocks, coupled with forces in the business world that are so positive for stocks, may be the real reasons behind this rally's staying power. So, in the time we have, let's do this. Let's at least attempt to justify these gains in light of the White House's views and discern how much is policy and how much might be just plain luck. Tariff impact Let's go first to what Trump seems genuinely obsessed about even to the blinding of his own judgment: tariffs. We all presume they are inflationary. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has said that many a time. And, it is true that, short-term they are almost always inflationary. But not in the longer term. Longer term they almost always cause companies to do what we did when we fell victim to tariffs from other countries in the 1980s and 1990s. When we were shut out by tariff, we built plants in the countries doing the tariffing and created jobs for them, while wiping out our jobs. We got almost no business in return. Now, because of Trump's tariffs and the vociferous way he espouses them, foreign companies will have to build in the U.S. Once they have built their plants, ensuring a steady supply of jobs, prices caused by the tariffs will come down. Meanwhile, as you shall hear, other prices will go down harder, obscuring the pain that tariffs herald. It is difficult to forecast how soon the foreign inspired industrial renaissance will take. But the idea that Fed interest rates have to stay high because we need to wait and see what happens is not a long-term prognosis. I think that tariff inflation will be contained and regarded as one-time, as temporary, and less embedded than people are thinking about right now. I do not believe we will have to wait much longer after the July Fed meeting to see rate cuts. No matter what, I am certain we will not have to wait until May 2026, when Powell's term is up, for short rates to hit 3% and change. (The current level of the fed funds overnight bank lending rate is 4.25% to 4.50%). More important, as long as rate cuts are in front of us, we stand to make good money in the stock market. That's been a given in history. Am I minimizing the pernicious impact of tariffs? We import about 15% of our gross domestic product. So, tariffs can't derail this economy, something that is often forgotten about. Our economy is too big. Tariffs can impact food and beverage prices and that will be a negative, and they will hit the CPI (consumer price index) even as soon as next Tuesday. However, there are other forces that we must examine, that can explain why this tariff intensity, some would say, insanity, with its obvious inflationary bent, hasn't caused the bear market in stocks that so many professionals keep insisting it must happen. At the heart of the individual bullishness that has smashed so much orthodoxy, is the spring's bounce back from Liberation Day (when Trump announced "reciprocal" tariffs on April 2) and Armageddon week, which was nothing short of miraculous and does not get talked about enough. Why did the bounce back rally occur? One reason is that the president got quiet. He let Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent do the talking and the talking was soothing and smart. Unemotional. Bessent played a big role in creating a bottom. He is a pleasant surprise, a wise rudder in a pretty stormy time. Artificial intelligence But a bigger reason may be the prospective deflation the market smells that is caused by artificial intelligence. It's noteworthy for us in his room that Club name Nvidia crossed the $4 trillion market cap mark. I hope you made money with us. The rise of Nvidia is more than just a story of the ascendance of semiconductors over all other sectors. I think Nvidia's supremacy is a sign, a symbol for an industrial revolution happening right now, that is going to be incredibly deflationary, well in excess of any inflation caused by Trump's tariffs, and it is incredibly bullish. Generative AI, the kind powered by Nvidia, is pervading every business and will lead to lower prices for many goods and services not by 2030 and not by 2029, but by next year. I think there is an acceptance that the president's laissez faire attitude toward generative AI is leading to incredible benefits for business and, most importantly, for profits. By this point in the process, I think our previous president might have tried to call a halt to Gen AI to try to figure it out. Instead, this president is an accelerant. The computers will begin to shrink white collar labor forces. Humanoids will do the same to blue collar jobs. Whereas we once feared inflation caused by a declining birthrate and a lack of immigrants to do the work others won't do, we can now see lower wages and plenty of workers trying to take them. Think of it like this microcosm: Club name Amazon's commitment to robots is rather incredible. As is FedEx's. The new factories and distribution centers they have do not employ many people. These are places that used to employ tens of thousands of expensive people who had bountiful benefits. The biggest warehouses in Amazon's system are in Shreveport, Louisiana and in Massachusetts. They require almost no people. Same with the giant FedEx depot in Boston where robots do the unloading. These robots cost $60,000 and do not get hurt and do not require health insurance or incentives. These are the kinds of jobs that we would have had to have a huge amount of immigration to fill. But they are not necessary. So, labor costs will be coming down while immigration ceases to be a factor. I don't know a soul who saw that coming even two years ago. It's the definition of deflation and deflation will hold inflation down despite Trump's tariffs. It might even keep the price of U.S. government debt down, as any increase in the amount of bonds that need to be sold may be met with buying from those who do not fear inflation. Again, that's incredibly bullish. Similarly, the white-collar jobs lost will cause downward wage pressure on all sorts of professions. Right now, I am working to book a private company on "Mad Money" called Harvey AI, which has a program that will take care of a gigantic percentage of what law firm associates currently do. Armed with Nvidia's most current chips, Harvey AI can reason at a level that we might have expected from a third- or fourth-year associate. This is not a "free up people for important work," story. It is about how law firms, three years from now, will not have to hire many new people. Similarly accounting firms, chronically short staffed, will no longer need to recruit much at all. The machines can do a better job. And advertising? There will only be five channels of any importance: Instagram (owned by Club name Meta Platforms, Amazon, Alphabet's YouTube, Google, and TikTok; and you do not need ad firms to place ads with them. The costs of reaching people are plummeting and the percentage of the right people reached is dramatically elevated as long as you do not use people and do use their machines. AI will end up reducing friction that is a pure deadweight cost in every one of those highly paid professions. The changes are happening now, and the Trump stock market will be the lucky beneficiary. Let's just consider some other wonders of the AI world that I have seen that I think will be commonplace in five years. Right now, at the Stanford Robotics Center there are robots that are able to clean a hospital or hotel room including making beds and picking up dirty clothes. I saw them do it. These robots should be mass produced in three years' time. I have seen robots from IX Technologies, a Norwegian company, powered by Nvidia technology, that are capable of doing pretty much every household chore, from folding laundry and vacuuming to making you a cup of tea. I think these are the kinds of robots Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said would be for sale from Amazon within the next four years. The prototypes are ready now; they just have not yet been mass produced yet. The demand for these kinds of robots will be extraordinary. It gives me total faith that costs are about to come down for many of the more service-oriented professions. Let's not rule out the sudden embrace of self-driving cars. Last night, (Thursday night on "Mad Money") we showed data that reveals a level of acceptance of Waymo over the last year that could bring about deflationary change in ride sharing that was inconceivable two years ago. What I have mentioned so far is simply the luck of Trump. He's not playing a role in much of what I described other than letting it happen unimpeded. Dealmaking Let me tell you what he is doing, though, behind the scenes, that is incredibly powerful when it comes to stocks: his changing of the guard through the federal agencies. One of the things I learned when I was in the boring hell that was law school was the power of the administrative agencies of the federal government. We see a lot of high profile actions by the president that institutions don't like, but the real dirty work of any regime is at the agency level, and that level is the most pro-capitalist I can ever recall. Consider these changes. We are beginning to see the fruits of an Federal Trade Commission and a Justice Department that don't really care about concentration of power when it comes to deals. The impact is amazing. The fact that the government is turning a blind eye to Charter, a cable company, buying another cable company, Cox in a $34 billion deal, or that this spring Club name Capital One was allowed to close on its buy of Discover, or that this very Friday morning, we learned that T-Mobile will be allowed to acquire substantially all of US Cellular's wireless business after T-Mobile scrapped its DEI program, is just extraordinary. I think at the very end the Biden administration would have chosen to block anything cable or cellular because of concentration, and it would have never let two subprime entities merge. To me, these are harbingers of what's to come; I just can't see this administration blocking anything but the most highly anti-competitive of deals and that may be the single most positive thing that can happen for the market. Deals shrink the supply of stock. They embolden other deals. They create tremendous wealth. And, we have been devoid of them under the previous regime. For years, for example, major pharma bought minor pharma. Under Biden, this kind of transaction ground to a halt. This past week, Merck bought Verona Pharma for $10 billion. I do not expect much scrutiny at all because there's nothing anti-competitive about this deal. But I think the Biden FTC would have found a reason, or made up a reason, to try to block it as it did to so many pharma deals in the past four years. If you allow these kinds of transactions the ever-shrinking price to earnings multiples of pharma will reverse and the sector away from Club name Eli Lilly could become investible again. Deregulation The agencies in charge of banks did everything they could to stack the deck against them. The agencies required thousands of people to be hired to comply with anything that they came up with, no matter how draconian, and here I am talking about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Again, the regulators crushed the P/E multiples of the banks. The P/Es are now coming back as the banks have been able to shed many of these deadweight internal compliance people, and the government changed the stress tests to make them easier and more realistic. I can see their 14 times multiples go to a 16 or even 17, which is a good reason why we are going against the wisdom of Wall Street and keeping our banks despite their dramatic gains. The agencies are now working actually working for private industry to increase profits. Consider the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. It is trying to fast-track any pipeline expansion — most had high hurdle rates — that will allow our natural gas abundance to be used at far greater distances. Why is this so important? Because right now the only way we will be able to add to our 13.5 million barrels a day of oil that we currently produce is if we can move the natural gas byproduct out of the Permian. The pollution from flaring is too horrible even for this administration. Additional pipe will allow that to happen including export pipe that the Biden administration chose to block. The increase in the amount of oil and gas being pumped should lead to continued downward pressure on the price of all fuels, another force of deflation to counter the tariffs. Let's not forget. I think we have seen the end of the hectoring of the hyperscalers. The days when agencies would just sue them for the sake of making their lives miserable are over. The days when foreign countries are allowed to use our tech companies as honeypots may be over, too, if Trump gets his way. Do not underestimate how important this change will be. The CEOs of these companies lived in fear and angst every day because of the governments around the world. Whenever you talked to them offline, you sensed that they expected a subpoena during your interviews. Those days are over. Big Beautiful Bill The last reason why the individuals may be right and the institutions wrong, is the Big Beautiful Bill just signed into law. It will produce a firehose of economic activity that will create a huge amount of profits that will feed right into the stock market. The big ones: Immediate expensing for capital investments. That will produce a huge windfall in profits that will be plowed back to shareholders in the form of higher dividends and bigger buybacks. Businesses can deduct the cost of new investments including manufacturing facilities immediately instead of depreciating them overtime. This change, which we have seen periodically, has historically produced an explosion of manufacturing to occur. There will be immediate deduction of research and development, which sounds like a snoozer but historically has brought about a gigantic geyser of money toward the creation of new products, which need lots of equipment to test and build. So positive. There's a new and dramatic increase in deduction of business interest. That will spur the buying of all sorts of new equipment. Many of these breaks will be applied retroactively. When these kinds of changes were used before it led to dramatic increases in profit and an increase in profits means an increase in stock prices. What do all of these mean for our portfolios? We have done our best to stay invested in the best of the tech companies, which will benefit from the Big Beautiful Bill more than most companies and from their own internal actions that we speak about so often. We can also expect a huge premium to be put on cyclical growth stocks like GE Vernova, of which we must buy more, or Eaton, Dover, Honeywell, Linde and Dupont. The banks could have several years where they put up excellent numbers. You will hear us speak more about these stocks as the meeting goes on. Bottom line I think in the end, we are seeing a wholesale revolution in favor of employment, business expansion and profits. All three are remarkably positive for stocks and I believe that Trump will, despite his tariff obsession, continue to press for more jobs, greater expansion and bigger profits. He will do it so snarly and ham-handedly, though, that he will obscure his own success and the success that generative AI is giving him. I think he is going about things so negatively and so darkly, that no firm on Wall Street will come out and say it. It will be whispered but never spoken aloud lest too many clients will be alienated. Maybe here's the best way to put it: Even if you hate Donald J. Trump you are going to pay more for our stocks as this presidency goes on. The easy downgrades, the institutions who flit out and can't get back in, the deals that do get done easily, the IPOs of good companieslike an MNTN or a Hinge Health, are starting to work, to make you money. These are the stuff of a bull market the likes of which could make it so we will have to buy every dip, including the ones he creates with his loutishness and impetuous behavior. Do I wish it were done in a more admirable fashion? Do I wish he'd stop his darned postings and rants? Yes. Can he still derail things? Absolutely, if he spends the next three years doing nothing but raising tariffs instead of governing. Or if he appoints a Fed chief while he already has one. Or, if he just decides that there's no amount of spending that is too much for our country. Anyone of these is possible. He just can't seem to help himself. He's a living reminder, perhaps, as I write at the end of "Confessions of a Street Addict," it is better to be lucky than good. But here's something I learned a long time ago when I came to Wall Street. When you go to the bank to cash in your stock market winnings, here's something they don't ask you. "Did you vote for President Trump? If you didn't, you are not allowed to make money." That, ladies and gentlemen, however happy or sad you may be at the turn of events in Washington, is for me, in this room, what really matters. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
CNBC
3 hours ago
- Sport
- CNBC
Jannik Sinner beats 2-time defending champion Carlos Alcaraz to win his first Wimbledon title
Jannik Sinner defeated two-time defending champion Carlos Alcaraz 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 on Sunday to win his first Wimbledon championship and reverse the result of their epic French Open final five weeks ago. The No. 1-ranked Sinner earned his fourth Grand Slam title overall, moving him one away from No. 2 Alcaraz's total as the two young rivals separate themselves from the rest of the pack in men's tennis. This victory also allowed Sinner, a 23-year-old Italian, to put an end to several streaks for Alcaraz, a 22-year-old Spaniard. Alcaraz had won the past five head-to-head matches between the pair, most recently across five sets and nearly 5 1/2 hours at Roland-Garros on June 8. Sinner took a two-set lead in that one, then held a trio of match points, but couldn't close the deal. That made Alcaraz 5-0 in major finals. In addition to ending that piece of perfection, Sinner asserted himself in a match that featured moments of terrific play by both men, but also the occasional lapses. Alcaraz stepped into the sunlight bathing Centre Court as the owner of a career-best 24-match unbeaten run. He had won 20 matches in a row at the All England Club, including victories against Novak Djokovic in the 2023 and 2024 finals. The last man to beat Alcaraz at Wimbledon? Sinner, in the fourth round in 2022. So this served as a bookend win for Sinner, who proved what he kept telling anyone who asked: No, there would be no carryover from his heartbreak in Paris. Hard to imagine, though, that that collapse wasn't on his mind at least a little on Sunday, especially when he faced two break points while serving at 4-3, 15-40 in the fourth set. But he calmly took the next four points to hold there, and soon was serving out the win. When it ended, Sinner put both hands on his white hat. After embracing Alcaraz at the net, Sinner crouched on court with his head bowed, then pounded his right palm on the grass. Yes, Sinner put the French Open behind him in the best way possible and demonstrated that his matchups with Alcaraz could delight tennis fans for years to come. They have divvied up the past seven Grand Slam trophies, and nine of the last 12. Fittingly, this marked the first time the same two men faced off in the title matches on the clay at Roland-Garros and the grass at the All England Club in the same year since Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal did it in 2006, 2007 and 2008. It hadn't happened for more than a half-century before that trilogy. Sinner has participated in each of the last four major finals, a stretch that began with a triumph at the U.S. Open last September and was followed by another at the Australian Open this January. Wearing the same tape job and white arm sleeve to protect his right elbow that he has been using since falling in the opening game of his fourth-round win on Monday, Sinner never showed any issues, just as he had not while eliminating 24-time major champion Novak Djokovic in the semifinals.
CNBC
3 hours ago
- Business
- CNBC
Amid Air India probe, U.S. FAA, Boeing notify fuel switch locks are safe, document, sources say
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing have privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The FAA's Continued Airworthiness Notification on July 11 came after a preliminary report on Friday into last month's Boeing 787-8 crash, which killed 260 people, raised questions over engine fuel cutoff switches. The FAA's notification to Civil Aviation Authorities, seen by Reuters, said: "although the fuel control switch design, including the locking feature, is similar on various Boeing airplane models, the FAA does not consider this issue to be an unsafe condition that would warrant an Airworthiness Directive on any Boeing airplane models, including the Model 787." When asked for comment, the FAA stated that it had nothing to add beyond the notification. Boeing also referred to FAA's notification in a Multi-Operator-Message sent to the airlines in the past few days, which said the planemaker is not recommending any action, two of the sources with direct knowledge said. When asked for comment, Boeing referred Reuters' questions to the FAA. The preliminary investigation report into the crash by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), referred to a 2018 FAA advisory, which recommended, but did not mandate, operators of several Boeing models, including the 787, to inspect the locking feature of the fuel cutoff switches to ensure it could not be moved accidentally. The report said Air India had said it had not carried out the FAA's suggested inspections as the FAA 2018 advisory was not a mandate. The report noted "all applicable airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins were complied on the aircraft as well as engines." ALPA India, which represents Indian pilots at the Montreal-based International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations, in a statement on Saturday rejected the presumption of pilot error and called for on a "fair, fact-based inquiry." "The pilots body must now be made part of the probe, at least as observers," ALPA India President Sam Thomas told Reuters on Sunday. ALPA India, in a letter posted on X, said the preliminary investigation report referred to the 2018 FAA advisory "concerning the fuel control switch gates, which indicates a potential equipment malfunction." In the flight's final moments, one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. "The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said. It said fuel switches had almost simultaneously flipped from run to cutoff just after takeoff. The report did not say how the switches could have flipped during the flight. Two U.S. safety experts said on Saturday they backed ALPA India's request to be observers in the probe, but said the investigation report did not suggest a bias toward pilot error. John Cox, a pilot and former ALPA representative, said AAIB's report seemed objective and fair.
CNBC
4 hours ago
- Business
- CNBC
The EU is delaying retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in hopes of reaching a deal by Aug. 1
The European Union will suspend retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods scheduled to take effect Monday in hopes of reaching a trade deal with the Trump administration by the end of the month. ″This is now the time for negotiations,″ European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters in Brussels on Sunday, after President Donald Trump sent a letter announcing new tariffs of 30% on goods from the EU and Mexico starting Aug. 1. The EU — America's biggest trading partner and the world's largest trading bloc — had been scheduled to impose ″countermeasures″ starting Monday at midnight Brussels time (6 p.m. EDT; 22:00 GMT). The EU negotiates trade deals on behalf of its 27 member countries. Von der Leyen said those countermeasures would be delayed until Aug. 1, and that Trump's letter shows ″that we have until the first of August″ to negotiate. ″We have always been clear that we prefer a negotiated solution,″ she said. If they can't reach a deal, she said that ″we will continue to prepare countermeasures so we are fully prepared.″ Europe's biggest exports to the U.S. are pharmaceuticals, cars, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments and wine and spirits. Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani was heading to Washington for talks Monday with the U.S. administration and Congress. In a statement, Tajani's office said that in his talks with EU allies before the meetings, he stressed the need to "negotiate with one's head held high." The right-wing government of Premier Giorgia Meloni, the only EU leader to attend Trump's inauguration, has sought to position itself as a " bridge" between Brussels and Washington. Trump has said his global tariffs would set the foundation for reviving a U.S. economy that he claims has been ripped off by other nations for decades. Trump in his letter to the EU said the U.S. trade deficit was a national security threat. Trump isn't satisfied with some of the draft agreements on trade, White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said on ABC News Sunday. "The bottom line is that he's seen some sketches of deals that had been negotiated with Howard Lutnick and the rest of the trade team, and the president thinks that the deals need to be better, and to basically put a line in the sand, he sent these letters out to folks. And we'll see how it works out," he said. U.S. trade partners — and companies around the world from French winemakers to German carmakers — have faced months of uncertainty and on-and-off threats from Trump to impose tariffs, with deadlines sometimes extended or changed. The tariffs could have ramifications for nearly every aspect of the global economy. The value of EU-U.S. trade in goods and services amounted to 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in 2024, or an average of 4.6 billion euros a day, according to EU statistics agency Eurostat. Trade ministers from EU countries are scheduled to meet Monday to discuss trade relations with the U.S., as well as with China. Speaking alongside Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, von der Leyen said the trade tensions with the U.S. show the importance of ''diversifying our trade relationships.″ Announcing closer cooperation between the EU and Indonesia, she stressed the need for ''predictable'' trading partnerships based on ''trust.'' The Indonesian leader said, ''I think the United States will be always a very important leader in the world,'' but also stressed the need for multilateral relationships, adding, ''We would like to see a very strong Europe.''
CNBC
5 hours ago
- Business
- CNBC
Trump ‘certainly' can fire Fed chair Powell ‘if there's cause': Hassett
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Sunday that whether the Trump administration has the authority to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is "being looked into." "But certainly, if there's cause, he does," Hassett said on ABC News' "This Week" of Trump's authority to remove Powell before his term is up next spring. President Donald Trump has said that he does not want to fire Powell, but Hassett's comments suggest the White House is still considering — and potentially moving towards — the possibility. Top Trump administration officials have escalated their criticisms of Powell in recent days, in particular by targeting the Federal Reserve's $2.5 billion renovation project, which Hassett said has gone over budget by $700 million. Taxpayers are not paying for the renovations. The Fed is self-funded through interest it makes on securities held by the institution and through fees charged banks. Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought last week accused Powell of having "grossly mismanaged the Fed," and said he would seek an investigation into the ongoing project to renovate the Fed's headquarters. Vought's remarks suggested that the Trump administration may be laying the groundwork to find a cause to remove Powell — a frequent target of the Trump administration — before his term is up. In an escalation, Vought sent a list of questions to Powell last week demanding answers about the renovation project. Hassett on Sunday said the answers to Vought's questions may determine how the administration proceeds. "I think that whether the president decides to push down that road or not is going to depend a lot on the answers that we get to the questions that Russ Vought sent to the Fed," he said. The Federal Reserve quietly rebutted many of Vought's questions last week with an updated webpage on the Fed website that addresses some of the questions. "No new VIP dining rooms are being constructed as part of the project," the FAQs page on the website states, directly responding to one of Vought's questions. While Trump suggested as recently as Friday that he does not want to fire Powell, he has said in recent weeks that he has a few people in mind for the post for when Powell's term expires next May. Hassett is reportedly a top contender to replace Powell. One other possible contender is former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, according to The Wall Street Journal. Warsh was on Fox News' "Mornings with Maria" on Sunday, appearing to subtly pitch himself for the position. He called the renovation project "outrageous" and said that "the Fed has lost its way." "It's lost, lost its way in supervision, it's lost its way in monetary policy, and all this big money on big, fancy buildings is just another indication," he said.
