Kennedy Center guts social impact team; more layoffs expected
The Kennedy Center on Tuesday terminated at least five members of its small social impact team, including its artistic director Marc Bamuthi Joseph, according to multiple staff members with direct knowledge of the firings, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.
The team's focus was reaching new and diverse audiences beyond those who regularly attend symphony and opera performances, and 'to advance justice and equity' through art, according to its website.
These programs take many forms, such as an effort to commission new works by Black composers and librettists from across the nation, along with other projects.
Recent performances include 'Traumedy,' a stand-up show in which comedians discuss their personal struggles, followed by a question-and-answer session with the comedians and mental health therapists. 'Poetry & Art as Liberation: Stories of Hope and Resilience in the Prison System' featured poetry and visual art from formerly incarcerated artists. 'The Cartography Project' seeks to 'encourage meaningful dialogue about the future of anti-racism' through classical music.
Kennedy Center staffers were told that this is part of an overall reduction in workforce and that more layoffs are forthcoming, though they received no further details.
The reason for the terminations is unclear. Roma Daravi, the center's head of public relations, did not respond to The Washington Post's request for comment.
It is the center's first major reduction in workforce since President Donald Trump last month ousted Kennedy Center President Deborah F. Rutter and Chairman David M. Rubenstein, along with all Biden-appointed members of the board of trustees, which he then replaced with his own, who voted him in as chair.
The new leadership promptly fired three other staff members, including its previous head of public relations, general counsel and a vice president who worked in development. Since then, at least 10 staffers have resigned.
New leadership also directed the programming team to 'shut down all social impact programming,' according to a staffer with knowledge of the conversation. The directive left the staff confounded, because the social impact team touched on much of the center's programming, including the free shows on Millennium Stage.
One Kennedy Center staffer felt flabbergasted and suggested the new leadership doesn't understand how the organization works, since shutting down social impact programming would affect a broad swath of events.
The social impact team produces its own programming and consults throughout the center on programming. It also runs the Millennium Stage, which hosts free performances four nights a week and free weekly movie screenings.
The members that remain all work directly with the Millennium Stage.
The social impact team grew out of the Millennium Stage, which offered comedy, jazz, hip-hop and other performances, making it the Kennedy Center's primary lever for lowering barriers of entry and reaching beyond its traditional audiences.
However, despite the diverse programming and gratis entry, getting to the Kennedy Center for a 6 p.m. performance was still a challenge. In 2019, after the Kennedy Center opened the Reach — the $250 million campus expansion recently disparaged by Trump — the cultural center expanded its Millennium Stage division and gave it a broader mission.
The idea was to use the new architecture to develop a 'culture of invitation,' according to one social impact staffer who was fired on Tuesday, who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to violate a non-disparagement agreement with the center.
'There have been hyperlocal impacts and also really broad impacts,' said the former staffer. 'Our trajectory was extraordinarily positive.'
It is unclear whether the social impact team is being fully dissolved.
The Trump administration has had impacts on other arts organizations in Washington, including the National Gallery of Art and the Smithsonian Institution, which shuttered their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) offices following an executive order signed by Trump that clamped down on DEI programs across the federal government.
Last year, the Kennedy Center program received permanent funding: an $8 million endowment from Shelley and Allan Holt.
'This was a program that was paying for itself, expanding audience, creating new levels of belonging and confidence and communities, across the cultural landscape of D.C. and beyond,' said the former social impact staffer, who had direct knowledge of the unit's funding and resources.
The dismissals come two days after the center's first major event under new leadership, the Mark Twain Prize, which was given to comedian Conan O'Brien.
During his speech, O'Brien gave 'a special thanks to all the beautiful people who have worked here at the Kennedy Center for years and who are worried about what the future might bring. My eternal thanks for their selfless devotion to the arts.'
The audience gave them a standing ovation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Misty Copeland broke barriers in ballet. Now she's retiring and moving to ‘the next stage'
NEW YORK (AP) — Ten years ago this month, Misty Copeland sat in front of a hastily arranged news conference at American Ballet Theatre, fighting back tears of pride over her new role: principal dancer. 'This is it,' she said, with emotion. 'This has been my dream since I was 13.' The occasion was highly unusual — normally, when a dancer is promoted, a brief press release is issued. But this was Copeland, a crossover star with fame far beyond the insular world of ballet. And now she was becoming the first Black female principal in the company's 75-year history — just days after her New York debut as the lead in 'Swan Lake' brought a refreshingly diverse, packed audience to the Metropolitan Opera House. Now, a decade and many accomplishments later, Copeland is retiring from the company she joined as a teenager. 'It's been 25 years at ABT, and I think it's time,' Copeland, 42, told the Associated Press last week ahead of Monday's official announcement of her move. 'It's time for me to move to the next stage.' The company is planning a splashy farewell on Oct. 22, featuring performances by Copeland — for the first time in five years — and other dancers. There will be speeches and film clips. And Copeland, who's been heavily involved in the planning, will get a chance to venture one more time onto that balcony in Verona; she'll dance again in the beautiful 'Romeo and Juliet' pas de deux. Honorary chairs for the evening will be Caroline Kennedy and Oprah Winfrey. A lot has happened in a quarter-century. Copeland, whose success brought new energy to an art form that has always been overwhelmingly white, has authored a number of books, including a memoir and and several works for young people. The second installment of 'Bunheads' arrives in September, and more are already planned in a series she calls 'a reflection of my journey, showing the range of cultures and types of people that can be a part of the ballet world.' Copeland has also made a short film with her production company. And her philanthropic organization, The Misty Copeland Foundation, works on increasing diversity in the dance world and giving more kids who grew up economically disadvantaged, like she did, the chance to dance. 'It was so important for children growing up and seeing somebody like Misty and saying, 'Oh my gosh, she looks like I do,'' says Susan Jaffe, ABT's artistic director, who is overseeing the farewell performance. 'Through her books, through her lectures, even her endorsements, she has really been a trailblazer." Still, progress moves slowly. When Copeland exits ABT, there will no longer be a Black female principal dancer at the company — nor at many ballet companies around the globe. Copeland discussed that continued challenge in the dance world, among other topics, in the AP interview last week. Remarks have been edited for clarity and brevity. AP: What does this moment mean? Is ballet a chapter that's now ending for you? COPELAND: You know, I've become the person that I am today, and have all the opportunities I have today, because of ballet, (and) because of American Ballet Theatre. I feel like this is me saying thank you to the company. So it's a farewell. (But) it won't be the end of me dancing. … Never say never. AP: You've told your story over the years, in multiple ways, of how you rose from difficult circumstances to this unique position in dance. What impact have you seen? COPELAND: I've noticed that the conversation is not something we shy away from anymore in terms of the lack of equity, the lack of diversity in this (dance) world. That's one of the biggest shifts I've seen … a lot of young people that just can imagine being part of it in some way. They can imagine stepping into Lincoln Center and being at the Metropolitan Opera House. AP: You became the first Black female principal at ABT in 2015. But there haven't been any more named since then. Does it concern you that progress has maybe been slow in that area? COPELAND: It's definitely concerning, and I think I've just gotten to a place in my career where there's only so much I can do on a stage. There's only so much that visual representation like that can do. I feel like it's the perfect timing for me to be stepping into a new role, and hopefully still shaping and shifting the ballet world and culture. AP: Who are some of the partners you've most enjoyed working with? COPELAND: I think about my partnership with (former ABT principal) Roberto Bolle and him giving me so many opportunities to travel the world with him … (Former ABT principal) Marcelo Gomes, he's been such a such a big part of my journey, and of course Herman Cornejo. We've had a beautiful partnership throughout my career and I'm excited to dance with him again (at the October farewell,) AP: Three years ago you became a parent (to son Jackson). How has that changed your perspective? COPELAND: It's made me even more patient. I just have a lighter and brighter outlook on life because it's just such an incredible thing to experience and witness... I think ballet has prepared me for being a mother in so many ways. I think it's ... prepared me for life and being resilient and patient and sensitive and empathetic and strong, and all of these things. AP: Does your son know who you are? COPELAND: He doesn't understand at all! (laughs) He's seen very little of me dancing. … But he's very drawn to it. He is a mover. He's very athletic. He is so drawn to music. He started violin on Monday. We live in the museums. He really is drawn to art. I think he's definitely on the artist's track. AP: So you've got the foundation, you've got the writing career, the production company. Which of those areas do you think you'll be focusing most on? COPELAND: It's been pretty evenly split between all of then. I think it just depends on what's at the forefront and what needs my focus. ... But it's exciting to be able to utilize dance in so many different mediums, and to me, that's how you get true diversity — by giving people different entry points into learning about dance and feeling like they can be a part of it, which has been my goal. How do I bring dance to as many people as possible in a way that really works for them? AP: You've always not only spoken about, but acted on the importance of diversity, equity and inclusion, and initiatives that promote that. Are you concerned that this is getting more difficult? COPELAND: It's a difficult time. And I think all we can really do is keep our heads down and keep doing the work. … we're fortunate in that way that we've built great relationships and can continue to do the work right now through my foundation. There's no way to stop the people that feel passionate about this work. We will continue doing it. It is so necessary for the well-being of our societies and communities. I think there are times to speak out and yell from the rooftops. And for me, I feel like this is a time to keep my head down and really stay focused and do the work.
Miami Herald
41 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Biden alums could boost their House ranks in midterm elections
WASHINGTON - As a senior attorney in the Commerce Department, Eric Chung helped implement the 2022 law known as the CHIPS and Science Act, a bipartisan effort championed by President Joe Biden to boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing and scientific research. But Chung left his civil service job in April, shortly after President Donald Trump called the law a "horrible, horrible thing" in a joint address to Congress and urged lawmakers to scrap the CHIPS program. (Last week, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Senate appropriators that Trump is renegotiating some of Biden's semiconductor grants.) "With elections, there are consequences and you expect some changes,'' Chung said. "But the idea of just going after a program that's so bipartisan ... for no apparent reason, just railing against it, certainly disappointed me, and I just couldn't watch it unfold." Now Chung is running for Congress - he's one of at least four Democrats hoping to flip Michigan's 10th District - and he's highlighting his experience working on one of the Biden administration's signature legislative achievements. He isn't the only one. As Trump tries to unwind much of his Democratic predecessor's agenda, a handful of federal employees who helped carry out the Biden administration's policy priorities are seeking House seats in 2026. They are mostly competing in battleground districts and are expected to face competitive primaries. The list includes Michael Roth, a former official in the Small Business Administration vying to unseat New Jersey Republican Thomas H. Kean Jr.; Sanjyot Dunung, a former member of Biden's 2020 foreign policy working group running for an open seat in Illinois; and Cait Conley, who was director of counterterrorism on the National Security Council, then served at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and is now challenging New York GOP Rep. Mike Lawler. And career diplomat and former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bridget A. Brink is considering a run in Michigan's 7th District, which is currently held by Republican freshman Tom Barrett. Brink resigned earlier this year, citing disagreements with Trump's Ukraine policy. If successful, these Democrats would join other former Biden administration officials elected to the House, including freshman Reps. Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, a former Biden Justice Department attorney, and April McClain Delaney of Maryland, a former deputy assistant secretary in the Commerce Department. Another Biden alumnus, Rhode Island Rep. Gabe Amo, came to Congress in 2023, after winning a special election for an open seat. Other prominent Biden alumni have launched 2026 gubernatorial campaigns, including former Interior Secretary Deb Haaland in New Mexico and former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra in California. The highest-profile member of the Biden team - former Vice President Kamala Harris - is also weighing a gubernatorial run in the Golden State. Moving from an executive branch appointment to elective office isn't a new trend but the reckoning over Biden's mental acuity during his time in office, spurred by the recent publication of several books, has raised complicated questions about his legacy. Amo, who worked in the White House as a senior adviser to Biden, was recently pressed about whether he saw signs of the former president's cognitive decline. The congressman told WJAR-TV in Providence that he saw Biden "execute the functions of that job in a way that I was supportive of, as someone there in the White House." "I was proud of the work that I was able to do, and proud of the work that he did to usher in key advances for the American people," Amo said. Several of the candidates seeking seats in 2026 said they were partly motivated to run after growing increasingly distressed watching Trump dismantle Biden's legacy. Trump "is squandering America's blue star reputation,'' said Dunung, who worked on international trade and policies to strengthen small-business exports as a member of Biden's foreign policy working group during the 2020 campaign cycle. "We are losing our good reputation around the world for being a trusted ally and a trusted partner,'' she said. Dunung is running for Illinois' 8th District, which Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi - a child of Indian immigrants like Dunung - is vacating to run for Senate. While Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales rates the race Solid Democratic, Trump significantly cut into his margins in the suburban Chicago district, from a 15-point loss in 2020 to a 7-point deficit last year, according to calculations by The Downballot. Dunung, who describes herself as "a pragmatic workhorse," said she launched her bid for Congress partly as a reaction to what she called the "chaos ... and crony capitalism" of the Trump administration. "I'm also about change from within our party, the Democratic Party," she said. "I think there are better ways to do things, and we need to prioritize efficiency. We need to prioritize getting results, not necessarily being beholden to special interests." Both Dunung and Chung recently won endorsements from the political arm of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. Chung is also seeking an open House seat - Michigan's 10th District outside Detroit, where Republican incumbent John James is running for governor. Chung initially intended to stay in his position at the Commerce Department even after Trump won. "If any program was going to be safe in this administration, it should have been a program like (CHIPS),'' he said. "I was hopeful that we could work all together across the aisle. And as a career civil servant, your oath is to the Constitution, and your oath is to the country." But Chung, who grew up in Michigan as the son of Vietnamese immigrants, concluded that he had to leave. "I wasn't waking up every morning thinking I'd run for office,'' he said, "but when I saw that my community and basically every part of the American dream that I had experienced growing up in Michigan was in potential jeopardy, I wanted to do all I could." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How school choice policies evolved from supporting Black students to subsidizing middle-class families
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) (THE CONVERSATION) School voucher programs that allow families to use public funds to pay tuition to attend private schools have become increasingly popular. Thirteen states and the District of Columbia currently operate voucher programs. In addition, 15 states have universal private school choice programs that offer vouchers, education savings accounts and tax credit scholarships. More states are considering school choice and voucher programs as the Trump administration advocates for widespread adoption. School vouchers have a long history in the U.S. The first vouchers were offered in the 1800s to help children in sparsely populated towns in rural Vermont and Maine attend classes in public and private schools in nearby districts. After the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, in which justices ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional, segregationists used vouchers to avoid school integration. More recently, school voucher programs have been pitched as a tool to provide children from low-income families with quality education options. As a scholar who specializes in education policy, law and politics, I can share how current policies have strayed from efforts to support low-income Black children. History of school voucher programs Research from education history scholars shows that more recent support for school choice was not anchored in an agenda to privatize public schools but rooted in a mission to support Black students. Over time, as school voucher policies grew in popularity, they evolved into subsidies for middle-class families to send their children to private and parochial schools. School choice policies have also expanded to include education savings account programs and vouchers funded by tax credit donations. Vouchers can redirect money from public schools, many of which are serving Black students. Impact on public schools States looking to add or expand school choice and voucher programs have adopted language from civil rights activists pushing for equal access to quality education for all children. For example, they contend that school choice is a civil right all families and students should have as U.S. citizens. But school voucher programs can exclude Black students and harm public schools serving Black students in a host of ways, research shows. Since the Brown v. Board ruling, school voucher programs have been linked to racial segregation. These programs were at times used to circumvent integration efforts: They allowed white families to transfer their children out of diverse public schools into private schools. In fact, school voucher programs tend to exacerbate both racial and economic segregation, a trend that continues today. For example, private schools that receive voucher funding are not always required to adopt the same antidiscrimination policies as public schools. School voucher programs can also negatively impact the quality of public schools serving Black students. As some of the best and brightest students leave to attend private or parochial ones, public schools in communities serving Black students often face declining enrollments and reduced resources. In cities such as Macon, Georgia, families say that majority Black schools lack resources because so many families use the state's voucher-style program to attend mostly white private schools. Moreover, the cost of attending a private or parochial school can be so expensive that even with a school voucher, Black families still struggle to afford the cost of sending children to these schools. Vouchers can siphon school funding Research from the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank based in Washington, D.C., shows that voucher programs in Ohio result in majority Black school systems such as the Cleveland Metropolitan School District losing millions in education funding. This impact of voucher programs disproportionately affects schools in predominantly Black communities across the U.S. with lower tax bases to fund public schools. Another example is the Marion County School District, a South Carolina system where about 77% of students are Black. Marion County is in the heart of the region of the state known as the ' Corridor of Shame,' known for its inadequate funding and its levels of poor student achievement. The 17 counties along the corridor are predominantly minority communities, with high poverty rates and poor public school funding because of the area's low tax base due to a lack of industry. On average, South Carolina school districts spent an estimated US$18,842 per student during the 2024-25 school year. In Marion County, per-student funding was $16,463 during the 2024-2025 school year. By comparison, in Charleston County, the most affluent in the state, per-student funding was more than $26,000. Rather than focus on school choice and voucher programs that take money away from public schools serving Black students, I argue that policymakers should address systemic inequities in education to ensure that all students have access to a quality education. Establishing restrictions on the use of funds and requiring preferences for low-income Black students could help direct school voucher policies back toward their intent. It would also be beneficial to expand and enforce civil rights laws to prevent discrimination against Black students. These measures would help ensure all students, regardless of background, have access to quality education.
