logo
How school choice policies evolved from supporting Black students to subsidizing middle-class families

How school choice policies evolved from supporting Black students to subsidizing middle-class families

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)
(THE CONVERSATION) School voucher programs that allow families to use public funds to pay tuition to attend private schools have become increasingly popular.
Thirteen states and the District of Columbia currently operate voucher programs.
In addition, 15 states have universal private school choice programs that offer vouchers, education savings accounts and tax credit scholarships.
More states are considering school choice and voucher programs as the Trump administration advocates for widespread adoption.
School vouchers have a long history in the U.S.
The first vouchers were offered in the 1800s to help children in sparsely populated towns in rural Vermont and Maine attend classes in public and private schools in nearby districts.
After the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, in which justices ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional, segregationists used vouchers to avoid school integration.
More recently, school voucher programs have been pitched as a tool to provide children from low-income families with quality education options.
As a scholar who specializes in education policy, law and politics, I can share how current policies have strayed from efforts to support low-income Black children.
History of school voucher programs
Research from education history scholars shows that more recent support for school choice was not anchored in an agenda to privatize public schools but rooted in a mission to support Black students.
Over time, as school voucher policies grew in popularity, they evolved into subsidies for middle-class families to send their children to private and parochial schools.
School choice policies have also expanded to include education savings account programs and vouchers funded by tax credit donations.
Vouchers can redirect money from public schools, many of which are serving Black students.
Impact on public schools
States looking to add or expand school choice and voucher programs have adopted language from civil rights activists pushing for equal access to quality education for all children. For example, they contend that school choice is a civil right all families and students should have as U.S. citizens. But school voucher programs can exclude Black students and harm public schools serving Black students in a host of ways, research shows.
Since the Brown v. Board ruling, school voucher programs have been linked to racial segregation. These programs were at times used to circumvent integration efforts: They allowed white families to transfer their children out of diverse public schools into private schools.
In fact, school voucher programs tend to exacerbate both racial and economic segregation, a trend that continues today.
For example, private schools that receive voucher funding are not always required to adopt the same antidiscrimination policies as public schools.
School voucher programs can also negatively impact the quality of public schools serving Black students.
As some of the best and brightest students leave to attend private or parochial ones, public schools in communities serving Black students often face declining enrollments and reduced resources.
In cities such as Macon, Georgia, families say that majority Black schools lack resources because so many families use the state's voucher-style program to attend mostly white private schools.
Moreover, the cost of attending a private or parochial school can be so expensive that even with a school voucher, Black families still struggle to afford the cost of sending children to these schools.
Vouchers can siphon school funding
Research from the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank based in Washington, D.C., shows that voucher programs in Ohio result in majority Black school systems such as the Cleveland Metropolitan School District losing millions in education funding.
This impact of voucher programs disproportionately affects schools in predominantly Black communities across the U.S. with lower tax bases to fund public schools.
Another example is the Marion County School District, a South Carolina system where about 77% of students are Black.
Marion County is in the heart of the region of the state known as the ' Corridor of Shame,' known for its inadequate funding and its levels of poor student achievement. The 17 counties along the corridor are predominantly minority communities, with high poverty rates and poor public school funding because of the area's low tax base due to a lack of industry.
On average, South Carolina school districts spent an estimated US$18,842 per student during the 2024-25 school year.
In Marion County, per-student funding was $16,463 during the 2024-2025 school year.
By comparison, in Charleston County, the most affluent in the state, per-student funding was more than $26,000.
Rather than focus on school choice and voucher programs that take money away from public schools serving Black students, I argue that policymakers should address systemic inequities in education to ensure that all students have access to a quality education.
Establishing restrictions on the use of funds and requiring preferences for low-income Black students could help direct school voucher policies back toward their intent.
It would also be beneficial to expand and enforce civil rights laws to prevent discrimination against Black students.
These measures would help ensure all students, regardless of background, have access to quality education.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is 4,700 federal troops a big deployment?
Is 4,700 federal troops a big deployment?

New York Times

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Is 4,700 federal troops a big deployment?

About 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines have been sent to Los Angeles as of Tuesday morning, after President Trump bypassed California leaders who said federal forces were not needed to respond to mostly peaceful protests. Here's how the deployment compares to past military activations on domestic soil responding to social unrest. 2021: Attack on the Capitol In 2021, officials in Washington initially requested 340 National Guard members to help respond to planned protests on Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, according to the military. As the protests on Jan. 6 against the 2020 presidential election results deteriorated, with a violent mob attacking police officers and the Capitol, the mayor of Washington D.C., Muriel Bowser, requested assistance, and 1,100 D.C. National Guard members were sent. Later that night, the acting defense secretary at the time, Chris Miller, mobilized 6,200 more National Guard members from other states to ensure peace in the days leading up to former President Joseph R. Biden's inauguration. 2020: George Floyd Protests After protests sprung up around the United States in response to the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, National Guard members were deployed to several states. As of June 3, 2020, the National Guard had deployed more than 18,000 members in 28 states to respond to civil unrest related to Mr. Floyd's murder at the request of the states' governors. Another 42,000 National Guard members were activated at the same time for the coronavirus pandemic response. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Newsom Warns Trump May Use Soldiers on Immigration Raids
Newsom Warns Trump May Use Soldiers on Immigration Raids

Bloomberg

time40 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Newsom Warns Trump May Use Soldiers on Immigration Raids

Gavin Newsom is warning that Donald Trump's use of troops where state and local officials don't want them is actually a test, one the Republican president may seek to replicate across other American towns and cities as part of his mass deportation effort. 'We're getting word that he's looking to operationalize that relationship and advance significantly larger-scale ICE operations in partnership and collaboration with the National Guard,' the Democratic governor said on the podcast Pod Save America. Such a move would likely be illegal for reasons similar to those Newsom has cited in litigation to stop Trump's use of the military in Los Angeles. Legal experts have said that, as with many of Trump's emergency declarations since he took office, there is no legal basis for the Republican's move to take control of the California National Guard. State and city officials have reported that protests against Trump and his immigration raids have been largely peaceful during the day with minor skirmishes at night, while limited to a few parts of a city that spreads over several hundred square miles. With no reported deaths and few injuries—some among journalists shot with plastic rounds by local police —protests have begun spreading across the country. Demonstrations have been held in New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Texas and Washington. Meanwhile, Trump's federalization of 4,000 members of California National Guard and his ordering of 700 active duty Marines to Los Angeles will reportedly cost $134 million for 60 days.

Trump's invasion of California marches on
Trump's invasion of California marches on

Politico

time43 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump's invasion of California marches on

Presented by Health Justice Action Fund ALL ANGLES: California leaders are bracing as Donald Trump's administration continues its multi-pronged attack on the state. The president is considering cutting federal education funds to California, which could cost the cash-strapped state billions of dollars, our Rebecca Carballo, Juan Perez Jr. and Eric He report today. The development comes as Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass grapple with Trump's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Southern California. The governor is awaiting a Thursday afternoon hearing on a request for a restraining order over the deployment of the National Guard and Marines. (The federal judge assigned to the case is the younger brother of retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.) Trump claimed he called Newsom 'a day ago' and that Los Angeles 'would be burning' if not for the federal government's intervention. Newsom is fact-checking him in real time … 'There was no call. Not even a voicemail,' Newsom said in an X post responding to Trump's Oval Office comments. 'Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to.' Meanwhile, Bass today told reporters that she has 'no idea' what the 700 Marines sent to Los Angeles by U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth are for, and that coordination between the city and the federal government has not been strong. 'People have asked me, what are the Marines going to do when they get here? That's a good question.' she said. She said the National Guard's only assignment was to guard federal buildings. Bass said she plans to call the president later today to tell him to stop the raids that she says have the potential to 'devastate the economy of the city of Los Angeles.' 'Don't you want the World Cup to be a success, a success for you? Well, if that's what you want, give us help. Give us the $130 million that is being used for no reason,' Bass said, referencing what Hegseth said could be a 60-day effort from the federal government. The mayor said the Los Angeles Police Department has the situation under control and that assistance from the federal government is not needed. 'The violence that has happened has required LAPD to ask for additional assistance, but not from the federal government,' she said. Bass said there might be another rally today and that she would be attending an interfaith prayer service to call for peace. Norman reported from Los Angeles. IT'S TUESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY GETTING THE BOOT: State Sen. Caroline Menjivar — who has been vocal about her opposition to cutting Medi-Cal benefits for undocumented immigrants — will no longer serve on a legislative budget subcommittee, our Rachel Bluth reports for POLITICO Pro subscribers. Menjivar's removal from the panel by outgoing Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire comes after the Legislature released a budget proposal that includes some of the cuts to the insurance program that Newsom put forth in a plan to close a $12 billion budget hole. According to Menjivar, she was briefed about the Legislature's budget proposal over the weekend as her home district of Los Angeles was thrown into chaos over immigration raids and violent confrontations between protesters and police. With the subcommittee scheduled to vote on the cuts at a meeting Tuesday evening, she said she let McGuire know ahead of time that she planned to vote against them. Then, Monday evening, Menjivar's chief of staff got a call from McGuire's office with word that she was being removed from her post. Menjivar said she tried to get an explanation from McGuire but her calls to him went unanswered. 'I'm disappointed,' Menjivar said. 'I really wish I could have recorded my concerns.' IN OTHER NEWS TRAFFICKING DEBATE CONTINUES: The Assembly's embattled sex trafficking bill advanced from the Senate Public Safety Committee today, even as some members called for major changes as it moves through the second house. The legislation from Assembly Public Safety Chair Nick Schultz would increase penalties for people soliciting sex from 16- and 17-year-olds and would criminalize loitering with the intent to buy sex. State Sen. Scott Wiener had strong words about the second provision, which undoes part of a bill he authored three years ago that decriminalized loitering with the intent to commit prostitution. He and others who oppose that element of the bill say it could be used to target people of color and the LGBTQ+ community. Wiener voted to move the bill forward, but he said the loitering element 'needs to come out before it comes to the floor.' 'I've already spent years repealing the loitering law,' Wiener said. 'I'm not going to be introducing the bill and having to go through that again and have all the death threats and calling me a pedophile.' Assemblymember Maggy Krell — who originally authored the legislation — plunged her house into chaos by working with Republicans to restore the stronger sentences for soliciting older teens after Democrats removed the provision. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas then stripped the bill from Krell and gave it to Schultz, who committed to continuing discussions about the legislation as it heads to the Senate Appropriations Committee. POSTING THROUGH IT: As tensions between Trump and California have escalated, so has the intensity and, to some eyes, cringiness, of the governor's social media presence. Newsom's team this morning posted a Taylor Swift-themed Instagram reel showing Trump's Truth Social posts and photos of Newsom and the president to the soundtrack of 'You Need to Calm Down.' A Star Wars-style X post from the governor's press office account features another Truth Social post being read by a villainous-sounding voice with movie images in the background. (This newsletter writer must admit her colleagues had to tell her the voice is supposed to belong to Emperor Palpatine.) WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — National Guard units blocked roadways near the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and Courthouse in Santa Ana on Tuesday after the city's downtown saw clashes between protesters and law enforcement. (Orange County Register) — San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie is treading lightly over Los Angeles's clash with the Trump administration, saying his priority is 'keeping San Franciscans safe.' (San Francisco Chronicle) AROUND THE STATE — The San Diego city council approved a $43.60 monthly fee for trash collection at single-family homes. (San Diego Union Tribune) — Sacramento Police Chief Kathy Lester said that she did not violate policy when she flew first-class to ten conferences in a one year period because she reimbursed the city for the difference between a coach and first-class ticket. (Sacramento Bee) — compiled by Nicole Norman

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store