
6 Takeaways From Trump's Meeting With Putin
That's about as much as could be gleaned of what took place in their closed-door session, which ended faster than expected and without the cease-fire Mr. Trump had been insisting was necessary to secure a peace deal.
Here are six takeaways from the summit in Anchorage.
The leaders did not reveal an agreement.
After meeting for nearly three hours, Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin left Alaska without announcing any deal or any specific areas where they made progress. Though Mr. Putin said the leaders reached an agreement to 'pave the path towards peace in Ukraine,' Mr. Trump made clear there were still areas of disagreement.
'There's no deal until there's a deal,' he said.
In a brief joint appearance before departing, both leaders alluded in vague terms to making headway, but they did not provide any clarity about what issues they discussed or where they found agreement. Mr. Trump also did not specify where the leaders still disagreed.
'Many points were agreed to, and there are just a very few that are left,' Mr. Trump said. The two men took no questions from reporters, who had been expecting to quiz the two leaders. Several had their hands in the air during what turned out to be Mr. Trump's closing remarks.
Putin secured wins before and after the summit.
Mr. Putin scored a win even before he arrived in the United States. After years of being ostracized by the West, he returned to American soil for the first time in a decade, welcomed by American fighter jets, a red carpet and a ride in the Beast, Mr. Trump's armored car.
And Mr. Putin secured another victory when it concluded, departing the United States without making any major concessions while maintaining a warm rapport with Mr. Trump. During the last several months, the American president had been growing frustrated with Mr. Putin, seeing the Russian leader as the hurdle to a cease-fire and an eventual peace deal to end the war in Ukraine.
'He's very nice to us all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless,' Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House in early July.
But on Friday, he offered no hint of frustration with his Russian counterpart, even as Mr. Trump acknowledged they had not reached an agreement.
'I've always had a fantastic relationship with President Putin, with Vladimir,' Mr. Trump said.
Trump showed deference to Putin.
Despite the fact that the meeting took place on U.S. soil, Mr. Trump allowed Mr. Putin to speak first at their joint appearance. The Russian leader used the opportunity to offer his own view of the conflict in Ukraine and what he claimed were the 'root causes' of Russia's invasion.
His remarks went unchallenged by a smiling Mr. Trump, who has long favored authoritarian leaders — 'the strong ones,' as he has put it.
Mr. Trump, who is determined to get a Nobel Peace Prize, made no mention of his previous insistence that there needed to be an immediate cease-fire as the outcome of the meeting.
If not, Mr. Trump told reporters days ago, 'there will be very severe consequences.' It remains to be seen if such consequences, such as the secondary sanctions he has threatened, will be realized.
Trump got fodder for his grievances.
Mr. Trump did not appear to come away with much — at least, not much that was clear when their meeting ended far earlier than anticipated — but he did get two things he valued.
One was the chance to once again, and with the world watching, denounce the investigation into whether his campaign conspired with Russians in 2016, when, according to the U.S. intelligence community, Russians interfered in the election. Standing feet from Mr. Putin, Mr. Trump proclaimed it a 'hoax,' and a shared and unfair torment for both men.
For his part, Mr. Putin praised his counterpart and said that he could 'confirm' something Mr. Trump has repeatedly claimed: that Russia's incursion into Ukraine in early 2022 would not have happened were Mr. Trump in office at the time.
Left unanswered was why Mr. Putin is pressing ahead with his war — and demand for land — now that Mr. Trump is back in power and calling for it to stop.
Trump appears open to visiting Russia.
When the hasty planning began for the historic summit in Alaska, some observers wondered whether — given the state's proximity to Russia of less than 60 miles — Mr. Trump would make a ceremonial visit by stepping into the neighboring country.
It was not to be. But one person close to Mr. Trump indicated days before the trip that a Moscow visit might be possible down the road. So perhaps it wasn't simply a joke when, in their final moments at the podium, Mr. Putin suggested that the two leaders next meet in his capital city.
Mr. Trump seemed amenable. 'Oooh, that's an interesting one,' he said, raising his eyebrows. 'I don't know, I'll get a little heat on that one. But I could see it possibly happening.'
The last time a U.S. president traveled to Russia was in 2013, when President Barack Obama visited for the Group of 20 summit in St. Petersburg. That year also appears to be the last year that Mr. Trump was in Russia, as well, when he visited to host the Miss Universe pageant.
Ahead of the pageant, Mr. Trump, who over several decades sought building projects in Russia, tried to drum up interest in the event, posting on social media, 'Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant in November in Moscow — if so, will he become my new best friend?'
Mr. Putin did not attend, although he reportedly sent a gift.
Zelensky was left on the sidelines for now.
The person with the most at stake on Friday, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, was left watching on television with the rest of the world.
Mr. Zelensky was not invited to the summit, though Mr. Trump said he would call him and NATO leaders after he left Alaska to give them a readout of his meeting. In an interview with the Fox News host Sean Hannity after the meeting, Mr. Trump insisted he believed that there would be a meeting between Mr. Zelensky and Mr. Putin, and that the American leader may join as well.
Without a deal in hand, Mr. Zelensky and his country are enmeshed in a debilitating war with Russia, without the robust assurances of ongoing U.S. military support that they received under the Biden administration. In recent days, Mr. Zelensky has criticized Moscow for continuing its attacks against Ukraine as a sign that Mr. Putin has no interest in a cease-fire or a long-term peace deal.
'The war continues, and it is precisely because there is neither an order nor a signal that Moscow is preparing to end this war,' Mr. Zelensky said in a video just before Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin met. 'On the day of negotiations, they are killing, as well. And that speaks volumes.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"If You're Trying To Erase History, You're On The Wrong Side Of It": It's Been A Wild, Wild, Wild Week In Politics, So Here Are All The Best Tweets
Editor's Note: While we can't endorse what X has become, we can bring you the worthwhile moments that still exist there, curated and free of the surrounding chaos. American politics — well, frankly, global politics — is chaos right now, but I find it comforting to know I'm not alone in thinking the world has gone bananas. So, here are 27 of the best, most relatable, and sometimes funny political tweets from the last week: 1. 2. Related: 3. Paramount / Twitter: @brndxix 4. 5. Note: The images in the original tweet were replaced due to photo rights. 6. 7. 8. 9. Related: 10. 11. Twitter: @Liv_Agar 12. 13. Note: The images in the original tweet were replaced due to photo rights. 14. Related: 15. Twitter: @LilithLovett 16. 17. 18. 19. The Katie Miller Podcast / Twitter: @Enddumbness 20. 21. Twitter: @GovTimWalz Related: 22. 23. Fox News / Twitter: @jamestalarico 24. Disney / Twitter: @conorjrogers 25. Meidas Touch / Twitter: @mehdirhasan 26. 27. And finally: India Today Global / Twitter: @WUTangKids See you next week! For more political tweets, check out our most recent roundup: "Cool They're Just Doing Nazi Propaganda Now": 28 Political Tweets Of The Week That Are So Brutal But So True Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Wall Street Journal
8 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
National Guard Soldiers Prepare to Carry Weapons in Washington, D.C.
National Guard troops deployed to Washington, D.C. are preparing to carry weapons in the coming days, according to people familiar with the change, a shift that comes days after President Trump said he was sending them to 'take back' the capital from what he described as violent criminals. Defense officials had previously said the 800 National Guard soldiers deployed to the city wouldn't be armed, unlike many federal law enforcement agents sent to the capital. They also weren't to have weapons in their vehicles. 'Weapons are available if needed but will remain in the armory,' the U.S. Army said in a press release Thursday.


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone,' Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though President Trump's recently signed tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in CBP facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.