I traded booze for THC drinks. But are there hidden risks?
For most of my adult life, alcohol has been my preferred way to take the edge off. But, like a lot of other people, I got older and realized regular drinking was not doing me any favours. Last year, I experimented with 'intermittent sobriety', taking months off here and there. It helped, but it was also easy to slip back into bad habits.
This year, I've jumped on the California-sober bandwagon, trading booze for the hemp-derived THC drinks that are rapidly growing in popularity. (THC stands for tetrahydrocannabinol, which is the psychoactive component of cannabis.) I've never had any interest in smokable or edible THC in the past – as a green card holder, I reckon I should make that very clear to any immigration officers reading. But these new drinks have been a game-changer. The dosage is clearly marked and the effects are felt almost as quickly as alcohol thanks to a technology called nanoemulsification, which turns the THC into tiny water-soluble droplets that are more rapidly absorbed by the body than traditional edibles.
Having a 5mg THC seltzer or infused cocktail in the evening scratches the 'I need to unwind' itch for me with seemingly no short-term negative effects, like a hangover. While I find THC doesn't deliver quite the dopamine rush alcohol does, low doses give me a relaxing warm fuzz, and have been great for my anxiety. Most importantly, it's helped me kick the alcohol habit; I've never felt healthier. Apart from the hefty price tag (one can costs $5-$7), these drinks feel a little too good to be true. So are they?
***
The short answer is: sort of. First, their legality is a little … hazy. Marijuana is still a controlled substance under federal law in the US, although some states have legalized it for recreational and/or medicinal purposes. But under the 2018 Farm Bill, any cannabis plant with less than 0.3% delta-9 THC by dry weight is considered hemp and is no longer a controlled substance.
This loophole has birthed a booming market: THC beverages are expected to be a $4bn industry by 2028, according to Euromonitor International. (Even comedian Seth Rogen has jumped in with his own line of drinks, called Houseplant.) Depending on the state, you might find these drinks in grocery or liquor stores. Some brands sell online, but while hemp-derived THC is federally legal, this is a grey area, and some states have imposed restrictions on products containing it.
Whether birthing a THC product industry was an intention of the Farm Bill is unclear. 'Some independent attorneys argue it was,' says Hilary Bricken, a lawyer who specializes in cannabis. 'Others say absolutely not: the bill was meant to promote things like textiles, not consumer-facing drugs. But ultimately, it's enforcement, or the lack of it, that's allowed this market to develop the way it has.'
Related: California sober: what does it mean and is it good for you?
'There's no federal regulation unless a particular state steps in,' says Bricken. 'Some states, like Minnesota, regulate these products. Others, like California, have banned them entirely.' (In California, these unregulated hemp-derived THC products are banned, but THC products that comply with the state's cannabis regulations can legally be sold at cannabis dispensaries.)
But there are other risks to be aware of. 'Practices vary wildly between operators,' says Bricken. 'For the consumer, it's hard to tell what's actually in the drink. There's no federal standard, so it's essentially dealer's choice on the operator side. While the original hemp might have tested under the 0.3% THC threshold, post-harvest it can be transformed in ways that technically still comply with federal law. But many believe that most of what's being sold is synthetically derived, and potentially contains toxic compounds.'
Even in a best-case scenario where you're buying from a responsible operator, THC isn't as harmless as many believe. A recent study led by researchers at the University of California at San Francisco found people who regularly used marijuana in either smokable or edible form had reduced blood vessel function comparable to tobacco smokers. This is associated with a greater risk of heart attack and other cardiovascular issues.
'We saw a 42% reduction in vascular function in marijuana smokers and 56% in THC edible users,' said lead study author Leila Mohammadi. 'The effect was dose-dependent: the more someone used per week, the worse their vascular function.' Worryingly, even relatively small doses of 2.5mg multiple times a week seemed to have a harmful effect. The study didn't look at drinkable THC; a single can typically contains 2.5-10mg, though some products have considerably more. But Mohammadi notes there's no reason to think drinkable products would be significantly different.
THC can also affect cognitive function, especially in adolescents, whose endocannabinoid systems – which interact with cannabinoids like THC and regulate critical bodily functions – are still developing. The long-term effects are complex, and research is ongoing, but one clearly documented risk of THC use in adolescence is in how the body handles fat, says Daniele Piomelli, a neuroscientist and leading cannabis researcher at the University of California at Irvine.
'In adolescents who use cannabis heavily, the fat in their bodies becomes dysfunctional. Normally, during times of stress or intense cognitive effort, the brain uses glucose for energy but can also tap into energy derived from fat. But frequent cannabis users often lose that ability,' notes Piomelli. That means they might find concentrating more difficult.
'There's a large body of evidence suggesting a link – not necessarily causation, but a strong association – between cannabis use in adolescence and increased risk of psychosis,' says Piomelli. And while these drinks are only supposed to be consumed by people over 21, adolescence for men is longer than women and 'really continues until 25 or 26'.
Even if you're an old crone like me, there are risks. A low-dosage THC drink now and again probably won't do much harm, but it's easy to accidentally go overboard. 'The real problem is that, like many things in the US, we don't do moderation well,' says Piomelli. 'Some of these seltzers now contain up to 100mg of THC. That's enough to send even an experienced user to the hospital if they're not expecting it. Not because THC is deadly – you can't overdose fatally on THC, even if you tried. But the experience can be incredibly unpleasant and disorienting, and recovery might take a couple of days.'
It doesn't help that the category is bringing in lots of inexperienced THC users, and dosage guidelines and risks often aren't made particularly clear. In states like New Jersey, you can find THC-infused beverages containing 25mg of THC (not a negligible amount!) in the grocery store, stocked next to seltzers and energy drinks. You can very easily imagine a scenario where someone downs one of these without knowing exactly what they're getting themselves into.
***
If you are intrigued by these beverages, experts say education and a slow start are critical. Start with 2.5mg or less and work your way up incrementally. While it's hard to generalize about effects, Piomelli notes that 'for a person in their 20s to 40s, weighing anywhere from 50-80kg (110-175lbs), 10-20mg of THC per serving would be enough to produce a noticeable buzz – definitely not enough to cause a full-blown high for someone who isn't a regular user.'
'I always say: know before you go,' says Harvard neuroscientist Staci Gruber, who directs the longest-running study of medical cannabis use in the United States. 'What's your goal? Are you looking for mild relaxation or trying to manage chronic pain? Your intention should guide your choice of product.'
Many of these THC drinks also include CBD, which is one of the main non-intoxicating components of cannabis, and alters the experience. 'Some research suggests CBD can mitigate some of THC's negative effects, like anxiety or paranoia,' Gruber explains. No matter the ratio, the dose of THC is what's really important. 'THC at low doses is often anxiolytic: it can reduce anxiety and make people feel more relaxed,' says Gruber. 'But at higher doses, it becomes anxiogenic – it can actually cause anxiety. The problem is, what counts as a 'low dose' varies widely from person to person.'
Related: The wellness drink for sober people that some say they can't stop drinking
THC may have its risks but, just asking for a friend: is going California-sober still healthier than drinking alcohol? After all, alcohol heightens the risks of at least seven types of cancer and the World Health Organization has said no level of consumption is safe.
Unfortunately, scientists don't give black-and-white statements that affirm your life choices; they qualify things. And the answer to whether going California-sober is a harm-reduction strategy is: it depends.
'It really depends on the person,' says Ziva Cooper, director of the University of California at Los Angeles Center for Cannabis and Cannabinoids. Factors like someone's age, individual vulnerability and what they're doing while intoxicated can influence the effects, as can frequency and dose of ingestion. 'Some people may have a family history of psychosis or mood disorders,' says Cooper. 'Others may be using very high doses regularly.' But there are risks either way: 'Some are associated with frequent use, and others with being a novice user. One unexpected risk we're now seeing is cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome – basically, heavy users presenting to the ER with severe nausea and vomiting. That was completely off the radar a few years ago.'
Cooper notes that scientific research is still lagging behind the market. 'We need better data, more funding and more research, especially because half the adult population is using cannabis products in some form now,' she says.
***
Many THC startups, and their new users, are on a high, but they might be headed for a comedown. 'A lot of these hemp companies are acting like they're too big to fail, like they can't be touched,' says Bricken. 'Maybe that'll end up being true. But right now, nobody really knows how it will play out.' Hemp-derived THC is receiving a lot more scrutiny, and increased regulation – even possible prohibition – is on the horizon.
Last month, a key US House committee approved a spending bill, championed by the representative Andy Harris, a long-term prohibitionist, that walks back the legal definition of hemp. The bill still has to pass the House and Senate. But if it does get signed into law, the loophole these hemp-derived THC drink companies rely on will close, and they will have to stop operating in their current form.
Separately, Congress generally renews the Farm Bill, a mammoth piece of legislation that funds major agriculture and food programs in the US, every five years. The current bill, which contains the hemp loophole, expired in October 2023 and Congress has since passed two one-year extensions. While they could potentially extend for another year, there's a strong possibility that a new version will be debated later this year. When this happens, Bricken thinks, we'll see the hemp-derived THC loophole either get closed or distilled into some kind of regulatory framework.
'Hemp companies are scrambling to gain ground before anything changes,' notes Bricken. 'They're surprisingly well-organized from a lobbying perspective, and some factions in the alcohol industry support them. But prohibitionist groups are also lobbying hard.'
Xander Shepherd, co-founder of THC aperitif brand Artet (his 86-year-old grandmother's art adorns the bottles), says that flux in this sector is nothing new: 'I've almost become numb to the constant changes, whether it's the Farm Bill or state-level regulations. I try to remind myself it's kind of like two steps forward, one step back. But overall, I really believe the industry is moving in the right direction.'
While all of this is playing out, I'm going to continue sipping legal THC drinks – albeit with a little more caution than before. Going California-sober is clearly not the healthiest choice in the world but, speaking from a purely personal level, the highs currently outweigh the lows.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
23 minutes ago
- Medscape
PCPs as Frontline in Dyspnea
When a patient calls a primary care provider due to shortness of breath symptoms, recommending an in-office examination is generally warranted. Your patient may explain how they are out of breath from everyday activities like using stairs, getting winded from walking the dog, or just not being able to catch their breath. 'All new episodes of shortness of breath should be evaluated in real time by a clinician, ideally in person,' said Panagis Galiatsatos, MD, a pulmonologist and associate professor in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore. 'The only time I can see foregoing an immediate clinic visit is if a known cardiopulmonary diagnosis exists.' For example, if a diagnosis is already known (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) and their dyspnea (shortness of breath) is in accordance with prior episodes of similar breathlessness, a phone call or virtual discussion could be enough. Such episodes could also be managed by an action plan that has already been discussed at prior clinic visits, Galiatsatos said. If a patient, already in the office for another concern, casually mentions episodes of shortness of breath, how should the primary doctor proceed? Even if dyspnea is mentioned nonchalantly, it warrants a thorough history and focused physical exam, especially if this is new or worsening. This could be an early sign of a more serious problem, according to Lijo Illipparambil, MD, a pulmonologist and assistant professor of clinical thoracic medicine and surgery at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia. When discussing symptoms, Illipparambil recommends these questions: • Start the discussion related to context: When do episodes occur — exertion or rest? • How long have these symptoms been occurring? • Inquire about associated symptoms such as fatigue, chest tightness, wheezing, cough, or swelling. • Review exercise limitations: are they able to climb stairs, and if so, how many? Is walking across a room or doing daily chores causing them to be dyspneic? How can primary care doctors serve as frontline partners in managing patients' shortness of breath? Primary care doctors are essential in identifying early signs of cardiopulmonary disease. 'Generally, they are the first physicians who meet the patients and do most of the work-up initially,' said Illipparambil. 'They coordinate care, especially with specialists, provide lifestyle counseling, and monitor chronic conditions like COPD, asthma, and congestive heart failure.' In many ways, they are the real central component for care for patients with dyspnea, he said. 'They also have the advantage of longitudinal relationships, allowing them to notice changes over time and engage in shared decision-making to create sustainable health strategies and earlier intervention if needed,' Illipparambil explained. Assessment Protocol Usually, a thorough physical exam, including checking vital signs (especially oxygen saturation and heart rate) is next, according to Illipparambil. Additional testing should also be considered, including chest x-ray, EKG, and laboratory work-up, as well as referral to specialists if necessary. Red flags that warrant further testing include: • Dyspnea at rest: This is always a reason for further testing, according to Illipparambil. 'It is not normal to be short of breath at rest; it is most often a sign of significant impending decompensation,' he said. Worsening shortness of breath over days or weeks can demonstrate a progressive process, Illipparambil added. Difficulty walking short distances or performing basic activities (eg, walking in the supermarket, pushing a stroller), especially as a change from their baseline, can be a sign of an active problem. • Orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea are signs of heart failure that need further investigation. • Unilateral leg swelling should always have a differential that includes deep venous thrombosis and, when a patient is short of breath, possible pulmonary embolism, Illipparambil said. Expert Assessments and Symptoms Consider the shortness of breath assessments below, according to Galiatsatos with Johns Hopkins. Airway diseases. COPD or asthma are examples. 'I would recognize due to inability to walk incline or when holding groceries, not walking through the grocery store, but once their arms are engaged, their breathlessness is noticeable,' he said. Cardiac rhythm issues. Especially at low heart rates, most people notice this breathlessness even after walking just a few dozen feet on a flat surface, he noted. Pulmonary embolism (lung blood clot). This tends to occur more acutely, and patients often describe a heaviness and discomfort in their chest. 'This is often accompanied by something that provoked the blood clot — long hours of sitting (for example, during a long flight) — or trauma to the legs,' Galiatsatos said. Heart failure. The key symptom here is the inability to lay down flat. Patients will note having to sleep with several pillows — propping their head and upper torso in an upright position — or abandoning their bed altogether in favor of a recliner, he explained. How can a primary doctor discuss lifestyle changes, medications, or strategies to reduce shortness of breath? The key is to be empathetic, collaborative, and goal oriented. 'This is indeed a delicate yet vital conversation,' Illipparambil said. There are several causes for shortness of breath and approaching patients this way can encourage openness and discussion. One thing that helps is the use of motivational interviewing techniques. For instance, Illipparambil recommends asking permission to discuss weight, tobacco use, or other lifestyle habits that may be affecting shortness of breath. Another approach is to focus on functions, such as walking without getting winded and changing habits toward a healthy lifestyle, rather than just the number on the scale. Offering resources and referrals for issues like nutrition, sleep, and physical therapy can also go a long way, Illipparambil said. 'Medications, of course, can help, especially inhalers in COPD and asthma patients,' he said. 'Antihypertensives, other medications that help modify heart disease, and goal-directed medical therapy have been shown to improve symptoms in patients with heart failure.' How does obesity affect with shortness of breath? Obesity is often linked to cardiopulmonary deconditioning, according to Trishul Siddharthan, MD, a pulmonologist and associate professor of medicine with the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, and the University of Miami Health System. 'Extra weight is a significant cause of shortness of breath in the general population and interacts with respiratory diseases, like asthma, to worsen symptoms,' Siddharthan said. 'I think most patients understand how weight can impair respiratory status, particularly if they are having shortness of breath. Lifestyle changes and other strategies to cope are a shared decision. I ensure I address the underlying medical condition while addressing enablers and barriers to weight loss.'


Fast Company
23 minutes ago
- Fast Company
3 signs you suffer from ‘hyper-ambition' (and how to overcome it)
It's true that personal ambition fuels success. But we can reach a dangerous tipping point when healthy drive becomes 'hyper-ambition'—a compulsive cycle of excessive striving that becomes self-defeating. Unlike healthy ambition that energizes you, hyper-ambition can leave you perpetually unsatisfied, overextended, and grinding to exhaustion. The cost isn't just personal—hyper-ambition eventually undermines the very professional success it promises. Here's how to recognize if you've crossed into the danger zone—and take practical steps to realign toward healthy ambition. 1. You Feel Like You've Never Achieved Enough and Are Never Satisfied Are you on a professional achievement treadmill, immediately shifting focus to your next goal after hitting a milestone? While accomplishments and rewards can provide short-term satisfaction, the challenge to getting into such a rhythm is that you may pursue goals without considering what you truly want. This can catch up to you when you realize you've met external expectations but never connected to your internal motivation, leaving you dissatisfied. Putting all your attention against the pursuit of professional validation can also lead to ignoring key areas of one's life that affect long-term happiness and well-being, such as your personal relationships, your health, and activities that fulfill and restore you. To realign to healthy ambition, orient your goals toward internal motivation first—it's a better predictor of engagement and success. Research has shown that putting attention and focus on personal success linked to fulfillment, satisfaction, and happiness begets external success, while the opposite focus doesn't hold true. Start with your values: test if a goal is aligned with what is important and matters to you, rather than solely meeting external expectations. Academic studies have shown that aligning our goals with our values leads to more satisfaction, higher persistence, and more goal attainment. Expand your ambition to include meaningful life goals and challenge what success truly means in your life. Studies confirm that once our basic needs are met, more income, wealth, or possessions don't correlate with lifelong happiness. Plus, Gallup research finds that well-being isn't tied just to career or finances, but also encompasses physical, social, and community well-being. 2. You Feel Constantly Over-Extended and Frustrated You Can't 'Do It All' Do you say yes to every opportunity without strategic prioritization, then feel stretched thin and frustrated by your inability to pursue them all effectively? This suggests you either think more is always better, leading to overload and overwhelm, or you may not have an approach to help you choose where to put your time and attention when faced with seemingly equally valid goals. To shift toward focusing on what matters, use strategic methods to make conscious choices. Create and visualize a goal system by identifying your core priorities and mapping how other goals connect. This can reveal if you're pursuing too much, show how aligned actions serve multiple goals, and reduce perceived friction between supposedly competing goals. You can maximize goal attainment by creating these positive connections, minimizing conflicts, and better understanding trade-offs you may make. When faced with choices, apply the urgency–energy filter. Ask, 'What has urgency, and do I have energy for it?' This reveals several strategies: Prioritize: Commit to high-urgency, high-energy ambitions Reinterpret: For high-urgency, low-energy goals, find ways to achieve the same outcome with less time and effort Postpone: Back-burner lower-priority ambitions Let go: With self-compassion, release goals that no longer serve you Learn to compromise wisely by focusing on what matters at this time rather than trying to do everything. 3. You're Grinding Hard All the Time Without Recovery How often do you find yourself compulsively working, putting in excessive hours without recovery time, leaving you exhausted? Operating in a persistent high-performance mode leads to unproductive stress, causing your physical and mental health to suffer. Ironically, your productivity declines and your work suffers, too. To break this pattern, be strategic about managing your effort and prioritizing recovery. Our ambitions aren't created equal. Be discerning about the effort put against your goals by asking three key questions: Aspiration: How good do I want to be at this? Determination: What is worth the hard work? Motivation: How much effort do I want to put in and what's required? Additionally, manage perfectionism. Be conscious about where you apply excellence and give yourself permission to say 'this is good enough' for lower-stakes areas. Finally, make recovery a leadership imperative. Doris Kearns Goodwin, the celebrated presidential biographer, has said: 'The most underappreciated leadership strength is the ability to relax and replenish energy.' Research shows we paradoxically neglect recovery practices when we need them most. We need a deliberate plan to sustain ourselves for the work that matters and to prioritize time to psychologically disconnect from work. Sustainable success comes from strategic ambition, not hyper-ambition. The idea that you have to choose between being ambitious and being well is a false choice. The goal shouldn't be to eliminate ambition, but to keep it in a healthy zone where it energizes rather than depletes you—allowing you to achieve what you really want both professionally and personally.


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Ovarian Cancer Risk Rises Soon After IBS Diagnosis
TOPLINE: Women with a new diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have a significantly higher risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months and 6 months post-diagnosis, but this risk is no longer elevated beyond 8 months. METHODOLOGY: Ovarian cancer often presents with nonspecific symptoms overlapping those of IBS. The frequency of misdiagnosis remains unknown, and not all IBS guidelines recommend screening for ovarian cancer. Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study using US administrative claims data to compare ovarian cancer incidence in adult women with and without a new IBS diagnosis. Diagnostic codes were used to identify cases of IBS and ovarian cancer. TAKEAWAY: The cohort comprised 9804 women with IBS and 79,804 women without IBS, identified between January 2017 and December 2020. Women with IBS had a significantly higher risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; P = .02) and 6 months (HR, 1.43; P = .02), but not beyond 8 months post-diagnosis. Women with both IBS and endometriosis had an even greater risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months (HR, 4.20; P = .01), 6 months (HR, 3.52; P = .01), and after 1 year (HR, 2.67; P = .04). Increasing age was significantly associated with higher ovarian cancer incidence only in women younger than 50 years (HR, 1.07; P < .01), regardless of IBS status. IN PRACTICE: 'Identifying patient-specific risk factors, such as chronic pelvic pain or endometriosis, could help develop tailored risk profiles and improve the approach to personalized care in women with IBS-type symptoms,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Andrea Shin, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles. It was published online in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. LIMITATIONS: The use of diagnostic codes for identifying IBS may have led to misclassification or reflected symptoms rather than confirmed and validated diagnosis. DISCLOSURES: This study received support from the National Institutes of Health. Some authors reported serving as consultants, advisors, and/or receiving research support from pharmaceutical and healthcare companies; one author reported having stock options. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.