Satellite images reveal destruction after Iran port explosion kills at least 46
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Satellite images analyzed by The Associated Press on Monday showed the devastation of an explosion that rocked one of Iran's main ports as the death toll rose to 46 people with over 1,000 injured.
The photos from Planet Labs PBC came as local news reports from the site raised more questions about the cause of the blast Saturday at the Shahid Rajaei port near Bandar Abbas. The port reportedly took in a chemical component needed for solid fuel for ballistic missiles — something denied by authorities though they've not explained the source of the power that caused such destruction.
The blast Saturday disintegrated a building next to the blast site, which appeared to be in a row where other containers once stood, the satellite photos showed. It also shredded the majority of another building just to the west.
The force of the blast also could be seen, with what appeared to be two craters measure some 50 meters (165 feet) across. Other containers nearby appeared smashed and distended by the explosion and the intense fire that followed.
The fire still burned at the site Monday, some two days after the initial explosion that happened just as
Iran began a third round of negotiations with the United States
over its rapidly advancing nuclear program.
Authorities still haven't offered an explanation for the explosion.
Private security firm Ambrey says the port received missile fuel chemical in March. It was part of a shipment of ammonium perchlorate from China by two vessels to Iran, first reported in January by the Financial Times. The chemical used to make solid propellant for rockets was going to be used to replenish Iran's missile stocks, which had been depleted by its direct attacks on Israel during
the war with Hamas
in the Gaza Strip.
The Iranian military denied receiving the chemical shipment.
Social media footage of the explosion saw reddish-hued smoke rising from the fire just before the detonation. That suggests a chemical compound being involved in the blast, like in
the 2020 Beirut port explosion
.
Late Sunday, Iran's semiofficial ILNA news agency quoted Saeed Jafari, the CEO of marine services company working at the port, as saying there were false statements about the cargo that detonated, which he called 'very dangerous.'
'The incident happened following a false statement about the dangerous goods and delivering it without documents and tags,' Jafari said.
Another report by the semiofficial ISNA news agency claimed the cargo that caused the blast was not reported to customs authorities as well.
Only high-level authorities in Iran, such as its paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, could circumvent normal procedures at the port.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tucker Carlson slams ‘warmongers' Sean Hannity, Rupert Murdoch amid Israel-Iran strikes
Political pundit Tucker Carlson doubled down on his criticism of Israel's strikes against Iran, rebuking several media figures, including his former colleagues at Fox News, over what he described as their push for President Trump to engage in the region. 'Who are the warmongers? They would include anyone who's calling Donald Trump today to demand air strikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran,' Carlson wrote in a post on the social media platform X. 'On that list: Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson. At some point they will all have to answer for this, but you should know their names now,' he continued. Hannity and Levin both work for Fox News, which is owned by Murdoch. Perlmutter is the former CEO of Marvel, and Adelson is a well-endowed GOP donor who co-hosted a January reception with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg in honor of Trump's campaign win. Carlson said on Friday that the right is divided between those who encourage Trump to wage war and those who do not. 'The real divide isn't between people who support Israel and people who support Iran or the Palestinians. The real divide is between those who casually encourage violence, and those who seek to prevent it — between warmongers and peacemakers,' Carlson, who left Fox in 2022, outlined in the post. Levin, a radio host, has railed against Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, since early May when he accused the official of negotiating a nuclear deal with a 'warmonger Iranian terrorist regime.' Politco reported earlier this week that Levin ramped up his criticism of Iran alongside GOP insiders, including Perlmutter, who urged Trump to support Israel's attack during a private lunch at the White House. On Friday, Levin responded to Carlson, denying that he advised Trump to 'bomb' Iran. 'You're a reckless and deceitful propagandist, and that's the best I can say,' he wrote on X. 'You promote antisemitism and conspiracy nuts.' Iran lost three top military leaders, six nuclear scientists and dozens of senior commanders as a result of Israel's attack on their nation late Thursday. Iran responded with a round of ballistic missiles sent toward Israel after Trump said the U.S. would increase the pressure on Iran if a nuclear deal wasn't soon reached. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end…,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come — And they know how to use it,' he continued. In recent weeks, Carlson alongside Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, have warned of the threat of nuclear warfare. 'While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night's event,' Carlson wrote earlier in the day. 'Washington knew these attacks would happen. They aided Israel in carrying them out. Politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
41 minutes ago
Why thousands of NCAA athletes might wait over a year for share of $2.8 billion settlement
The attorney who negotiated the $2.8 billion legal settlement for the NCAA said Friday that thousands of former athletes due to receive damages could have to wait months or maybe more than a year to get paid while appeals play out. Rakesh Kilaru, who served as the NCAA's lead counsel for the House settlement that was approved last week, told The Associated Press an appeal on Title IX grounds filed this week will hold up payments due to around 390,000 athletes who signed on to the class-action settlement. He said he has seen appeals take up to 18 months in the California-based federal court where this case is playing out, though that isn't necessarily what he expects. 'I will say that we, and I'm sure the plaintiffs, are going to push,' Kilaru said. A schedule filed this week calls for briefs related to the appeal to be filed by Oct. 3. Kilaru doesn't expect anyone on the defendant or plaintiff side to file for extensions in the case 'because every day the appeal goes on is a day damages don't go to the student-athletes.' He said while the appeal is ongoing, the NCAA will pay the money into a fund that will be ready to go when needed. The other critical parts of the settlement -- the part that allows each school to share up to $20.5 million in revenue with current players and set up an enforcement arm to regulate it -- are in effect regardless of appeals. 'I think everyone thought it was important and good for this new structure to start working because it does have a lot of benefits for students,' Kilaru said. 'But it's very common for damages to be delayed in this way for the simple reason that you don't want to make payments to people that you can't recover' if the appeal is successful. A group of eight female athletes filed the appeal. Their attorney, Ashlyn Hare, said they supported settlement of the case 'but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law.' "The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion,' Hare said. Kilaru agreed with plaintiff attorneys who have argued that Title IX violations are outside the scope of the lawsuit. Other objections to the settlement came from athletes who said they were damaged by roster limits set by the terms. One attorney representing a group of those objectors, Steven Molo, said they were reviewing Wilken's decision and exploring options.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gold and oil prices have a message for investors about Iran tensions
Tensions between the U.S. and Iran have been rising, but the big moves in gold and oil prices can help gauge just how serious the situation has become — and hint at what's next for global financial markets. 'Gold and oil are two of the most geopolitical-sensitive market barometers we have,' said John Caruso, senior market strategist at RJO Futures. Given that, they are the 'first places I look when geopolitical risks arise in the Middle East.' My husband is in hospice care. Friends say his children are lining up for his money. What can I do? These defense stocks offer the best growth prospects, as the Israel-Iran conflict fuels new interest in the sector Walmart's stock looks like it's in trouble. What the chart says may come next. Why bonds aren't acting like a safe haven for investors amid the Israel-Iran conflict My mother-in-law thought the world's richest man needed Apple gift cards. How on Earth could she fall for this scam? And those risks have certainly been climbing. On Thursday, Iran said it would soon open a third uranium-enrichment site, even as negotiations with the U.S. over a nuclear deal are expected to continue Sunday. President Donald Trump has said he is less confident about reaching a deal with Tehran and that he could take military action against Iran if negotiations fail, according to the Wall Street Journal. Israel appears to be preparing an attack on Iran's nuclear sites, the New York Times reported Wednesday, and fears of potential retaliation across the region by Tehran appeared to prompt the U.S. to withdraw diplomatic personnel from Iraq and authorize the departure of U.S. military family members from the Middle East. What sets this escalation apart from prior flare-ups is that 'it's being taken more seriously by the market — evidenced by the U.S. decision to relocate nonmilitary personnel from the region, which suggests this is more than just rhetorical posturing,' said Rebecca Babin, senior energy trader and managing director at CIBC Private Wealth in New York. 'Israel is more emboldened to act unilaterally,' she told MarketWatch. 'Unlike in previous years, there's a real risk that Israel could strike Iran without direct U.S. support if talks collapse.' Geopolitical risk premium in crude had been 'minimal' until recently, Babin said, with markets having been 'increasingly optimistic that an interim deal would be reached, and analysts had started softening [oil] balance forecasts under the assumption that Iranian exports might remain stable.' At the same time, crude sentiment has remained 'deeply bearish,' with many investors short oil as a 'broader play on weakening global demand,' Babin added. 'This combination of low embedded risk premium and high geopolitical uncertainty creates a fragile setup where even modest escalation could cause outsized market reactions.' Against that backdrop, prices for both gold and oil have been making some big moves. On Thursday, the August gold contract GCQ25 GC00 gained $58.70, or 1.8%, to settle at $3,402.40 an ounce on Comex, nearing the record settlement for a front-month contract of $3,425.30 from April 21, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Oil, meanwhile, saw U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude for July delivery CLN25 CL.1 edge down by 11 cents, or 0.2%, to settle at $68.04 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange on Thursday, after a 4.9% rise on Wednesday. Global benchmark Brent crude for August delivery BRNQ25 BRN00 lost 41 cents, or 0.6%, to end at $69.36 on ICE Futures Europe, a day after climbing 4.3%. In energy markets, the developments tied to Iran were priced in almost immediately, said Ahmad Assiri, research strategist at Pepperstone, in a recent note, with Brent crude climbing Wednesday from its 50-day moving average near $66 a barrel. Traders are concerned about the risk of oil supply disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz, he said. That's the world's most important oil transit chokepoint, with 20.9 million barrels per day of crude oil and petroleum liquids transported through the strait in 2023, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. 'The geopolitical premium remains pronounced,' said Assiri. Brent prices eased back Thursday, but only modestly from Wednesday's rise, and prices are 'undeterred by broader headwinds such as trade tariffs and their dampening effect on global growth, or OPEC+ production increases led by Saudi Arabia, which appears intent on boosting market share,' he said. 'Taken together, these factors signal genuine concern over a potential resurgence of instability in the Middle East,' Assiri said. 'Geopolitical risk has been vaulted back to the forefront after a period of relative easing following earlier positive developments in the region.' For oil, future performance hinges on two primary drivers, he noted. First, the 'inherently unpredictable geopolitical dynamic, now leveraged as a bargaining chip by the U.S. administration, demands close monitoring since shift in diplomatic posture or regional tensions could alter the supply outlook,' said Assiri. The economic backdrop is the second primary driver, as oil demand appears stronger than anticipated a month ago, 'supported by ongoing signals of global growth and only muted inflationary impact from tariffs,' he said. The direct effects of tariffs on inflation have so far been limited, 'reducing the odds of a recession scenario relative to prior forecasts,' he added — underpinning continued growth in oil demand that outstrips consensus expectations. Overall, the 'interplay' between geopolitical maneuvering and underlying demand strength suggests that oil-market dynamics will remain 'prone to swings and traders should factor in the likelihood of volatility tied to shifts in regional risk,' said Assiri. For gold, of course, it's a 'flight-to-safety trade,' RJO Futures' Caruso said. If there is 'military action [instead of] diplomacy' on Iran, then gold, as well as oil, could go much higher. Geopolitical concerns are tailwinds for gold, along with falling Treasury yields BX:TMUBMUSD10Y and a sharp drop in the U.S. dollar DXY, said Michael Armbruster, co-founder and managing partner at futures brokerage Altavest. He warned, however, that Middle East tensions have a tendency to 'come and go quickly, and if that happens again, gold's spike may be short-lived.' Armbruster said he 'would not buy gold just because of Iran.' The Middle East is a 'nice narrative for gold, but investors are likely to buy at tops if they are chasing headlines,' he noted. Altavest believes a better buying opportunity could emerge in gold in the coming weeks, he added, as data forecast a 'reflationary environment' in June — with reflation equaling a reacceleration in growth and inflation. Long term, Armbruster said the firm is still bullish on gold and is 'simply on the lookout for a dip for our clients to add to their long gold position.' Taking a look at the bigger picture, Caruso said he's not seeing much of a 'risk-off' play in the markets at this point — but if the U.S.-Iran dispute escalates, 'we'll surely see the risk-off, safe-haven trade in effect.' 'He failed in his fiduciary duty': My brother liquidated our mother's 401(k) for her nursing home. He claimed the rest. Gundlach says gold is no longer for lunatics as the bond king says wait to buy the 30-year 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal? I'm in my 80s and have 2 kids. How do I choose between them to be my executor? 'It might be another Apple or Microsoft': My wife invested $100K in one stock and it exploded 1,500%. Do we sell? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
