
Marion County schools bracing for property tax overhaul
Marion County school districts stand to lose millions under the House Republicans' property tax reform proposal, which was amended yesterday to cut even more.
The big picture: Lawmakers have struggled to strike a balance between relief for homeowners who say they're struggling to keep up with skyrocketing property tax bills and the local units of government — cities, counties, school districts and more — that rely on those tax dollars to fund essential services.
Driving the news: House Republicans amended Senate Bill 1 this week to give the average homeowner a $300 credit toward their property tax bill next year — more than the $200 credit they introduced last week.
It also includes new credits for veterans and seniors, saving taxpayers more than $1 billion over the next three years.
House Speaker Todd Huston said the bill ensures most homeowners will pay less next year than this year, while controlling "unsustainable" local government spending.
Yes, but: The new SB 1 also gives municipalities a tool to offset those losses — the ability to raise local income taxes.
"This plan encourages local governments to raise their local income tax rate, so you'll get more money in your right pocket but have to pay more out of your left," said Rep. Greg Porter (D-Indianapolis).
State of play: Most local units of government will still bring in more property tax revenue next year than they will this year, just less than they would have without SB 1.
Without the bill, revenue is projected to grow by more than 5% next year. With it, that growth slows to less than 3%.
Under the earlier proposal, Marion County was projected to take in $50 million more next year than it will this year, but that's about $20 million less than it would have without SB 1.
A new fiscal impact based on the larger credit adopted yesterday hasn't been released yet.
Zoom in: The effect on schools would be wider ranging and likely to grow with the larger credit.
Under the smaller credit, the county's 11 public school districts would see property tax revenue growth between 1% and 4% next year.
Two districts — Wayne Township and Beech Grove City Schools — are projected to see year-over-year losses by 2028.
What they're saying: Beech Grove superintendent Laura Hammack said she is "profoundly concerned about the long-term implications" of SB 1.
"These reductions could force incredibly difficult decisions that may affect staffing, student programs and overall day-to-day operations," she told Axios. "Our ability to attract and retain talent, maintain safe and functional facilities, and offer opportunities that enrich student learning will all be jeopardized."
Washington Township Schools are projected to receive at least $10 million less over the next three years than they would have taken in without SB 1.
"Districts may need to revisit previously planned operations, capital improvements and other strategic initiatives to align with more modest revenue growth expectations," said Ellen Rogers, spokesperson for Washington Township.
The new version of SB 1 also incorporates language from Senate Bill 518, which would require districts to start sharing some property tax dollars with charter schools.
An Indianapolis Public Schools preliminary analysis of the bill said it will cost the district nearly $100 million over the next seven years.
The other side: Charter school advocates say all public schools should be funded equally.
What's next: The deadline for Senate bills to pass out of the House is Tuesday.
The Senate will need to vote on the changes made in the House, but Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray (R-Martinsville) told reporters last week he thinks his caucus will support them.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Two House Republicans issue megabill threats as Senate ponders changes - Live Updates
Two House Republicans drew firm red lines Friday on changes to the House GOP megabill, threatening to vote 'no' if the Senate made any changes whatsoever to key provisions. Rep. Nick LaLota of New York warned GOP senators against lowering the House's $40,000 cap on the state-and-local-tax deduction, while Rep. Chip Roy of Texas vowed to oppose any attempt to delay or otherwise water down the phaseout of clean-energy tax credits provided for in the House-passed megabill. 'If the Senate waters it down by a dollar, I'm a no,' LaLota posted on X, arguing that the SALT cap as it stands is 'unfair' to his constituents. Roy was equally strict about GOP senators' hesitations on quickly phasing out clean-energy tax credits signed into law under former President Joe Biden — even calling out skeptical Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) by name in a floor speech Friday. Tillis has been critical of the phaseouts, saying the House bill is 'void of any understanding of just how these supply chains work.' 'You backslide one inch on those IRA subsidies and I'm voting against this bill,' Roy said. 'Because those god-forsaken subsidies are killing our energy, killing our grid, making us weaker, destroying our landscape, undermining our freedom. I'm not going to have it.'


Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at

Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Primary election 2025: Berks officials certify election results
Berks County election officials have finalized the tally of results from the primary election. During a special meeting Friday, the elections board voted unanimously to certify the vote totals and authorize the submission of the results to the secretary of the commonwealth. There is now a clear picture of which Democratic and Republican candidates will be on the November ballot for municipal, school, county and judicial races. In addition to those candidates who appeared on the primary ballot, nearly 100 candidates were added to the fall election through successful write-in campaigns. Independent and third-party candidates still have a chance to petition to be on the ballot before the lineup is finalized. Elections Director Anne Norton told the elections board that her term performed the required reviews and audits of the May 20 primary, finding no variations or discrepancies with the official tally. The official results of the election will be posted on the county elections website. Overall, just over 21% of registered Democrats and Republicans voted. Voter turnout was slightly lower than recent, similar elections. In the 2023 municipal primary, for example, turnout was about 24%. The elections board thanked the election services team as well as those who worked the polls and handled mail ballots for the hard work and long hours they put into making sure every vote was counted. 'A huge thank you to everyone involved,' Commissioner Michael Rivera said. Commissioner Dante Santoni Jr. also commended those who ran to represent their fellow residents in local positions. 'When you run for office it takes time away from other things,' he said. 'You stick your neck out for your community at all levels of government and I give kudos to everyone who participated in the democratic process.'