TSA Screeners' Union Sues the Trump Administration for Violating Its First Amendment Rights
The largest federal government employee union is alleging in a new lawsuit that the Trump administration violated its First Amendment rights and the "hallowed" sanctity of contracts by canceling a collective bargaining agreement covering Transportation Security Administration (TSA) airport security screeners.
"This attack on our members is not just an attack on AFGE or transportation security officers. It's an assault on the rights of every American worker," said Everett Kelly, president of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), in an emailed statement announcing the lawsuit.
AFGE, alongside two unions representing airport workers and flight attendants, is suing the TSA, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, after Noem's unilateral decision last week to tear up what was supposed to be a seven-year union contract with TSA screeners.
DHS justified that action by saying the contract had allowed hundreds of TSA employees to collect government paychecks to do full-time union work. The department accused the union of failing to represent the interests of airport screeners and the flying public.
In its lawsuit, AFGE counters that DHS's decision to cancel the collective bargaining agreement is retaliation for the union's many other legal challenges against the Trump administration and its Department of Government Efficiency–inspired activities.
According to Just Security's litigation tracker, AFGE is a lead plaintiff in at least four lawsuits challenging the administration's efforts to fire federal workers, remove civil servant protections, and centralize access to government records systems.
By retaliating against AFGE for filing these lawsuits, the union alleges, DHS has violated its First Amendment right to petition to the government. It also alleges that DHS has violated the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and the Administrative Procedure Act by unilaterally and arbitrarily ripping up a binding union contract.
There are plenty of reasons to eliminate the TSA, given the ineffectiveness of its security screenings, the frequency with which it violates passengers' rights and physical dignity, and the inherent conflict of interest created by an airport security regulator providing airport security services.
Nevertheless, TSA agents likely have a strong legal claim that the Trump administration can't just unilaterally cancel a union contract.
AFGE will likely have an easier time asserting the rights of TSA screeners against their employer than the flying public has had trying to assert their rights in court against TSA screeners.
Over the years, passengers have filed multiple lawsuits against TSA agents for violating their rights.
That includes Dustin Dyer, who sued the government and individual TSA agents for violating his First and Fourth Amendment rights after they prevented him from filming his own security pat-down and then searched his cellphone.
An appellate court dismissed Dyer's case in late 2022, deciding that TSA agents have qualified immunity from lawsuits challenging their on-the-job actions.
Only since 2023 have federal appellate courts issued a string of opinions finding that TSA screeners are law enforcement officials and can, in fact, be sued in federal civil court.
While the union representing TSA agents asserts its rights in court, it might want to consider the rights of everyday air travelers who have a harder time doing the same.
The post TSA Screeners' Union Sues the Trump Administration for Violating Its First Amendment Rights appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
7 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Waymo suspends robotaxi rides near LA protests after 5 cars are set ablaze
Waymo suspended robotaxi service in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday after five vehicles were set on fire during protests against President Donald Trump 's immigration raids in the city. Photos show Waymo cars covered in anti-ICE graffiti burning in the street, engulfed in smoke. A spokesperson for Waymo confirmed to Business Insider that five vehicles had been vandalized during the protests. The company temporarily suspended service in downtown LA and doesn't think its vehicles were intentionally targeted, the spokesperson said. Waymo is working with the Los Angeles Police Department, they added. On Sunday night, the LAPD said on X that "burning lithium-ion batteries release toxic gases." Electric vehicles often use lithium-ion batteries. The spokesperson told BI that Waymo, which Alphabet owns, operates more than 300 vehicles in LA and is continuing operations in other parts of the city. It's not the first time that Waymo vehicles have been targeted in California. Last year, a crowd in San Francisco set one of the robotaxis on fire during Lunar New Year celebrations amid a wave of distrust about driverless vehicles. The protests broke out on Friday after an immigration raid in the city. Over the weekend, Trump bypassed California Gov. Gavin Newsom 's authority and ordered 2,000 National Guard members to the LA area. Despite the dramatic images, the protests have largely been peaceful, according to multiple reports. The demonstrations have become a political lightning rod between Newsom and Trump, and the governor has announced that he's suing the administration. They may, however, serve as an olive branch between the president and Elon Musk, who had an ugly falling out last week.
New York Times
8 minutes ago
- New York Times
Mayor Bass of Los Angeles Blames Immigration Raids for Inflaming Tensions
Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles said on Monday that the Trump administration and its immigration raids were to blame for inflaming tensions in the city. In a televised interview, Ms. Bass sought to downplay the protests of the last few days. 'This is not citywide civil unrest,' she said on CNN. 'A few streets downtown, it looks horrible.' She noted that most Angelenos have been living life as normal, away from the clashes focused in a relatively small area outside a federal office building and detention center downtown. She promised that protesters who destroyed cars and threw things at police officers would be prosecuted, and said that the police were combing through video images of the clashes to identify people who had committed crimes. Ms. Bass said that it was President Trump and his federal immigration authorities who had provoked the unrest by sending federal agents in tactical gear to workplaces in the city to detain and deport immigrants. 'Why were there raids?' she asked. 'We had been told that he was going to go after violent criminals. It wasn't a drug den; it was a Home Depot.' Ms. Bass was referring to one of several immigration raids conducted on Friday that prompted days of protest, including at a Home Depot in the nearby city of Paramount, Calif., where day laborers regularly gather in search of work. She said it appeared that the Trump administration was deliberately trying to sow chaos in the city, and then generating more backlash by sending in National Guard troops. 'What was the reason that the president had to take the power from the governor and federalize the National Guard?' she asked. 'The night before this action was taken, there was a protest that got a little unruly, late at night. It was 100 people. Twenty-seven people were arrested. There wasn't a reason for this.'
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump to promote $1,000 ‘Trump Accounts' for newborns at WH event
President Donald Trump is set to host a roundtable at the White House Monday to promote a key feature of the sweeping Republican domestic policy bill – a provision that would provide every American newborn with a $1,000 investment account, a White House official told CNN. The accounts, which the administration has dubbed 'Trump Accounts,' would be established for all newborn US citizen children under a pilot program included in the House-passed legislation. The government's $1,000 contribution would be placed in an index fund tied to the overall stock market and managed by the child's legal guardians. The accounts will start at $1,000 per child and guardians or other private entities can contribute up to $5,000 additional dollars every year throughout the child's life. 'The passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill will literally change the lives of working, middle class families across America by delivering the largest tax cuts in history, increasing the child tax credit, AND by creating this incredible new 'Trump Account' program, which will put the lives of young Americans on the right financial path' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Monday's event, taking place in the State Dining Room at the White House, will feature top executives from Dell, Uber, Altimeter Capital, ARM Corp, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Robinhood and Goldman Sachs. According to the White House official, the CEOs are expected to pledge billions of dollars in investments into Trump Accounts for the children of their employees. 'The creation of investment accounts for every child will compound into substantial nest eggs providing support for education, home ownership, and starting families. Dell Technologies will proudly match dollar for dollar the government's seed investment into these accounts for all the children born to Dell team members. This bold move to an ownership society for all included in the Reconciliation Bill will have profound and far-reaching benefits for the country,' said Dell Technologies CEO Micheal Dell, who will attend the roundtable Monday. The roundtable comes as the Trump administration intensifies its push to secure Senate passage of the president's domestic policy package ahead of the Fourth of July. NBC News was first to report.
