Broome County Executive reflects on COVID-19 five years later
BROOME COUNTY, N.Y. (WIVT/WBGH) – Five years ago this week, the world turned upside down with the declaration that COVID-19 was an international pandemic.
One week, later, everything was in lockdown.
During the first months of the shutdown, many Broome County residents turned to County Executive Jason Garnar for daily updates online. Today, he reflects back on those early days.
For Jason Garnar, he had been briefed about COVID-19 in the months leading up to March, but had no idea how quickly things would change. It didn't even warrant a mention in his State of the County address in mid-February of 2020.
'It went from me not mentioning it at all in my county address and three weeks later, just about everything is shut down,' said Garnar.
Once the lockdown mandates came from the state, it was all systems go with his executive team working closely with the county health department and the Office of Emergency Services on the response. An early challenge was a lack of tests.
'I remember there was a road patrol deputy that would drive up to Albany if we could find 50 tests. We'd send him up to Albany and he would grab the tests and bring them back,' said Garnar.
The overriding concern was over hospital capacity, with fears that medical institutions would become overwhelmed with patients. As then Governor Andrew Cuomo would hold daily online briefings each morning, Garnar and his staff would digest the information, try to determine how the new edicts would be implemented and then hold a briefing of his own to disseminate the important information. Garnar says it was vital to get accurate info out
'There was one rumor that black helicopters were coming and landing on the top of hospitals and taking all of the ventilators. And certainly, that wasn't happening. So, part of it was to kind of dispel some of those rumors that did understandably scare people. Get the factual information out to people,' said Garnar.
Garnar's briefings informed residents about what was and wasn't allowed, where to get personal protective equipment or PPE, where to get free food, where to get testing and eventually where to get vaccinated. He also gave guidance to businesses and non-profits on how to safely reopen. The County Exec would start his briefing with data, the number of cases reported and sadly, the number of deaths in the county.
'I often took very personal responsibility for it because I felt like I was the person who was supposed to be managing this epidemic. So, when somebody would die and we would get a report of the death, it was a hard thing to take. It was not an easy thing to take,' said Garnar.
Garnar says there was a lot of suffering: nursing home residents who couldn't see loved ones, students who fell behind on their school work and socialization and disabled kids who missed out on services. Garnar says his role was often that of messenger. He says many other folks behind the scenes helped to organize and coordinate the response.
'The other thing that I would say that we saw is county employees stepping up and doing things that they'd never done before. One of the big things they had to do is contact tracing,' said Garnar.
Garnar says the daily briefings definitely increased his public profile and made him much more recognizable in the community. And he says the pandemic also educated people about the important work that the county does.
Garnar says the county learned a lot from the experience. He believes we're better prepared to respond should there be another pandemic.
Watch the full interview below.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
17 minutes ago
- Axios
D.C. schools are banning cellphones, joining almost half of the nation
D.C.'s public schools will enforce a cell phone ban starting next school year, the district said on Friday. Why it matters: D.C. joins nearly half the country in the bipartisan push to limit students' cellphone use in the classroom. D.C. middle schools and several of its high schools already implemented the ban, the district said. Catch up quick: Phone bans have gained momentum across Democratic and Republican state legislatures in recent years. Arizona, Arkansas and New York 's governors signed bills into law this year to implement bans. By the numbers: As of April, 11 statewide phone bans or restrictions were implemented and seven states issued policy recommendations, according to health nonprofit KFF. An additional 17 states introduced legislation to ban or restrict cellphone use in schools. State of play: The phone bans are aimed at boosting students' attention during class as they struggle to recover from COVID learning loss. Screen time is also partially at fault for a youth mental health crisis, research has found. What they're saying: "Piloting a phone-free program in our middle schools demonstrated that storing students' personal devices throughout the school day enriches academic, social, and emotional learning," Lewis Ferebee, D.C. schools chancellor, said in a statement. "From increased classroom engagement to reduced anxiety and stronger student relationships — DCPS is ready to scale the program so we can keep driving outcomes that positively impact our students." What we're watching: Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) reintroduced a bipartisan bill in February to study the effects of cellphones in schools, but the legislation has not seen movement since. The bill proposes $5 million annually for five years for a pilot program to provide schools with secure containers for the phones. It would allow exceptions for students with health conditions, disabilities and non-English speakers.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You're Confused by the New COVID Vaccine Guidelines for Kids & Pregnant People, Read This
Confused about the new COVID-19 vaccine guidelines for children and pregnant people? Trust us, you're not alone. It all started on May 27, when Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that the U.S. would no longer recommend COVID-19 shots for healthy children over 6 months or healthy pregnant people — a move that shocked most healthcare providers. Not only did the announcement upend the typical vaccine recommendation process, it also targeted a vaccine with good safety and efficacy data. Then, just a few days later, the CDC walked back part of RFK's statement regarding children's vaccines. The agency announced COVID shots would stay on the schedule for healthy children 6 months to 17 years old, as long as the children and their caregivers consulted with a doctor or provider — a caveat even doctors found confusing. 'My neck still hurts from the whiplash,' Dr. Molly O'Shea, MD, FAAP, an official spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and a faculty at the Children's Hospital of Michigan General Pediatrics Continuity Clinic, said on a briefing hosted by the non-profit HealthyWomen this week. More from SheKnows Elon Musk's Daughter Vivian Reveals One of Their Last Tense Interactions - Nearly 5 Years Ago RFK is a known vaccine skeptic, but it's highly unusual for the Health Secretary to make such decisions unilaterally, as multiple experts pointed out during the briefing. So ultimately, what does this mean for children and pregnant people when it comes to getting vaccinated for COVID? Are these shots still necessary, and will insurance still foot the bill for them if without this government backing? Here's what we know so far, according to experts in the briefing. The COVID vaccine is still considered very effective for children and pregnant people, with lower risks than the infection itself. Early in the pandemic, pregnant people and children often suffered significant outcomes from COVID, explained Dr. Margot Savoy, MD, MPH, FAAFP, senior vice president of education, inclusiveness and physician well-being at the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). 'For pregnant people, in particular, the risk of ending up in the ICU, the risk of ending up on a ventilator, and the risk of death were just remarkably high, much more than you would expect,' she explained during the briefing. Once the vaccine became available, 'those rates declined,' Dr. Savoy said. In fact, the serious outcomes that many worried would be side effects from the vaccine — things like miscarriage, preeclampsia, blood clots, or premature delivery — were actually more likely to happen as side effects from COVID itself, not the vaccine. 'If you find yourself vaccinated, the rates of all of those things actually go down to almost none,' Dr. Savoy explained. Plus, there's the fact that vaccinated pregnant people pass their immunity to their fetus. That means that the vaccine protects the pregnant person themselves; their fetus, against stillbirth and premature delivery; and the baby, once they're born, by conferring protection in their first six months, Dr. Savoy explained. That's a good thing, because 'babies are very high risk' when it comes to respiratory infections like COVID, added Dr. Alice Sato, MD, PhD, an assistant professor at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and a member of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Advocacy Task Force at the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. 'Because they have such small airways… just a little bit of inflammation can make a baby get into trouble with their breathing a lot faster,' Dr. Sato explained. '[Babies] had very high hospitalizations, even with the last wave [of COVID-19.]' Children of any age can also experience long COVID — Dr. Sato said the most recent estimate was that 6 million children in the US were suffering from it — leading to symptoms like fatigue and fussiness. COVID can also lead to missing crucial periods of time from school or preschool. Getting vaccinated can help shorten those periods and protect them from those kinds of complications. 'In my vaccinated patients who get COVID, they get mild COVID, if they get it at all — and they aren't as apt to get long COVID,' Dr. O'Shea said. The vaccines are also still considered safe, the doctors agreed. In short, 'the recommendations have changed, but the science hasn't changed,' said Kate Connors, senior director of public affairs at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. So what are those new recommendations? The CDC no longer recommends COVID vaccination during pregnancy, which 'seems to be following a unilateral decision from the HHS Secretary,' Connors noted, referencing RFK Jr. 'It was made without any of the input of the experts at the CDC, the members of ACIP [the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices], certainly without feedback from organizations like ACOG, and so we're very concerned about this.' She noted that ACOG continues to recommend COVID vaccination for pregnant people. For children, the new recommendations are less cut-and-dry. After initially saying the US no longer recommends COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children over 6 months (with exceptions for children with certain medical conditions), the CDC now says it recommends a 'collaborative decision-making [approach] with your pediatrician,' explained Dr. O'Shea. 'Healthy children with no underlying health conditions can, in collaboration with their pediatrician, make a decision about whether or not they want to have their child vaccinated this coming fall against COVID-19.' However, this unusual caveat leaves the door open for insurance companies to rescind coverage of the vaccine, possibly forcing parents to pay out of pocket to vaccinate their children (more on that below). For Dr. Savoy, the 'really deeply troubling' part of these decisions is the lack of evidence to support them. 'I actually don't know what data was used to make the decisions that we're talking about today,' she said. 'The data that I have been able to see most recently continues to mark pregnant people as being incredibly high risk. There would be no situation in the data that I saw that would make me think that it makes sense to remove that recommendation.' The same goes for children, she added. COVID-19 remains a threat, Dr. Savoy emphasized. 'We keep having new variants show up. We keep having people end up in the hospital. We keep running out of beds in the ER. There's things that are still happening, even though they don't show up on the news.' This is one thorny question to come out of the changing guidelines. 'We don't know what's going to happen with insurance coverage, and we're very, very worried about it,' Connors said. That's because there's a direct connection between government vaccine recommendations and insurance coverage of those vaccines, Dr. Savoy explained. Insurance companies typically use government recommendations as a sign that a vaccine is safe and essential; when those recommendations are removed or weakened, the companies may see it as a sign (or an opportunity) to stop covering that vaccine. Connors also pointed out that we're only a few months from flu and RSV season, when vaccines become all the more essential for public health. 'This is a really tough time for these conversations, for these unanswered questions,' she said. All four experts continue to recommend COVID-19 vaccines for everyone, including pregnant people and children. Dr. Sato cited the 'incredible, robust' data that shows that the COVID-19 is safe, effective, and presents fewer risks of complications than an infection itself. 'The science has not changed,' added Connors. 'The COVID vaccine is safe and it is effective… [It's] the best tool that we have to prevent severe outcomes associated with COVID infection.' Dr. Savoy agreed. 'I would still strongly recommend that if you're a pregnant person, that you get vaccinated, not just to protect yourself, but… to protect the fetus and to protect your newborn infant on the other side of that delivery,' she stressed. 'I'm still willing to stand on that hill… And if you were bringing your child in for their visit, I would still say that your child needs to have at least that primary series as a routine recommendation.' Before you go, shop these products to soothe your child's cold symptoms: Best of SheKnows Amanda Seyfried, Megan Fox, & More Celebrities Who Have OCD 18 Baking Soda-Free Natural Deodorants That Won't Irritate Your Sensitive Pits 24 Celebrities Living With Autoimmune Disorders
Epoch Times
44 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Filmmaker Explains Why Media Outlets Are Silent on the CCP's Abuses
An award-winning filmmaker has offered her insights into why Western media outlets seem to fall silent when telling the story of China's human rights problems. China observers have noted that media outlets once vocal on issues like the persecution of Falun Gong and repression in Xinjiang and Hong Kong, have largely gone silent. Kay Rubacek, a filmmaker, writer, and human rights advocate from Australia, and who was once 'If they report on issues that are sensitive to the regime, they will be kicked out, and their visas will be banned. That has happened so many instances,' she told ABC Radio Brisbane. Rubacek explained that sometimes it was a case of being covering the 'wrong thing at the wrong time.' Some reporters were expelled by CCP officials because they covered sensitive issues like the Falun Gong spiritual movement, or even corruption in a small town, or environmental abuse. Related Stories 11/17/2024 6/4/2025 'Or if they want you as a pawn to play tit-for-tat with, they will target the [reporting] journey throughout. [There've been] so many instances of that, so media are very, very cautious to an extreme.' A local example of this is the arbitrary detention of CGTN reporter and Australian citizen, Cheng Lei, who was detained during the pandemic in retaliation for the then-Australian government calling for an investigation into the origins of COVID-19. Australian journalist Cheng Lei observes a signing ceremony by China's Premier Li Qiang and Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the Australian Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, on June 17, 2024. Lukas Coch/POOL/AFP via Getty Images Meanwhile, Rubacek pointed to another factor and that was the advertising dollars from China. 'For example, China Daily has included inserts in some American media, and that provides a large sum of advertising dollars directly from the CCP. And there's many examples of that from radio to television to print to movies, Hollywood, you name it,' she said. China Daily is one of the CCP's largest state-owned English-language newspapers. 'China has a very large influence and pull, and they do it in a way that is usually targeting the people who tend to be fearful, and they know how to push those buttons.' In 2024, two U.S. senators 'From whitewashing the genocide of Uyghurs in Xinjiang, to excusing the CCP's continued bankrolling of Russia's war against Ukraine, China Daily's mission is to propagate the goals of the party,' the senators wrote. 'By continuing to do business with China Daily, your outlet is disseminating CCP propaganda to an American audience.' In the same year, China Daily CCP Leader Xi Jinping, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Colombian President Gustavo Petro with leaders of the G20 members as they pose for the photo of the Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty at the G20 summit at the Museum of Modern Art in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on Nov. 18, 2024. Stefan Rousseau -Meanwhile, Rubacek also noted the distinction between China, the Chinese people, and the CCP in her interview. 'I've been to China. It's a wonderful place, and it is a wonderful country with a marvellous history, and the people are absolutely beautiful human beings, as we would expect in any country when we respect each other,' she said. 'But the Communist Party itself really has become kind of a rogue entity when you look at how it operates.'
