logo
What's Driving You Crazy? – Replacing obsolete freeway signs

What's Driving You Crazy? – Replacing obsolete freeway signs

Yahoo02-06-2025

LAS VEGAS ( KLAS ) – The Nevada Dept of Transportation is making progress replacing hundreds of obsolete freeway signs around Las Vegas.
It was months ago that the maps on your phone showed US95 was renamed to include I-11, dropping I-515.
That was the easy part.
The work of replacing actual signs is a much longer process.
While many have been changed, NDOT has a lot more to go, focusing this week around the Spaghetti Bowl.
To minimize disruptions to traffic, the work is being done between 9pm and 5am.
Tonight it'll be the southbound freeway with reduced lanes between Valley View and Rancho, as well as the northbound side for that short stretch from Las Vegas Blvd up to the Spaghetti Bowl.
To see the list of all this week's work, click – – – > HERE.
Buckle up, drive carefully – and, please put down that phone!
You're welcome to join the 'Driving You Crazy' conversation at: traffic8@8newsnow.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lombardo vetoes bill seeking immigration officials to show warrant at Nevada schools
Lombardo vetoes bill seeking immigration officials to show warrant at Nevada schools

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lombardo vetoes bill seeking immigration officials to show warrant at Nevada schools

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Protests against federal immigration enforcement have ramped up across the country. In Nevada, the state faces a debate over immigration enforcement in schools. Governor Joe Lombardo recently vetoed AB 217, which would require immigration enforcement to have a warrant, or schools would not have to cooperate. According to the bill's primary sponsor, Assemblymember Cecelia Gonzalez, the intent was to help children feel safe while attending school. However, in the governor's veto message, he said although it was 'well-intentioned,' it had the opposite effect and could place school personnel in 'legally precarious situations.' UNLV Professor Ben Leffel disagreed with the Governor and told 8 News Now that vetoing the bill was a bad move for the state. 'The bill can keep teachers out of legally precarious situations, because teachers will likely feel the need to defend their undocumented students from unjust ICE removals. As a professor, I know I would,' he said. The Clark County School District's current policy is that enforcement does need to show up with a warrant. 16 new vetoes boost Lombardo total to 49; HOA limits, price fixing bill rejected Other states are experiencing a crackdown on immigration policies. In Milford, Massachusetts, 18-year-old high school junior Marcelo Gomes da Silva was arrested by ICE on May 31. According to CBS, agents were initially looking for his father, but then discovered his student visa expired. Gomes da Silva, who is originally from Brazil, was released on a $2,000 bond, following a deportation hearing last week. 'It's only a matter of time before it happens here in Nevada, which is exactly why we need to resist and why we should've passed that bill,' Leffel said. Gonzalez told 8 News Now she is frustrated with the veto, saying she did not feel the governor did his 'due diligence' thoroughly reading it. 'The people of Nevada elected you to protect them,' she said. 'They did not elect you to hold your loyalty to this authoritarian president, not Nevadans.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Lombardo rejects street vendor bill, lacrosse as veto total reaches 65
Lombardo rejects street vendor bill, lacrosse as veto total reaches 65

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lombardo rejects street vendor bill, lacrosse as veto total reaches 65

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Nine more bills vetoed by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo on Wednesday raised the total to 65, just 10 short of a record he established following the legislative session in 2023. Lombardo rejected bills related to the street vendor regulations, deletion of police recordings of traffic stops, state sanctioning of lacrosse as an interscholastic sport and changes in the state law on automatic voter registration through the DMV. A number of the bills appeared to be examples of expanded government regulation, and Lombardo has emphasized reducing state government interference. STREET VENDORS: Lombardo vetoed Senate Bill 295 (SB295), Democratic Sen. Fabian Doñate's effort to refine a street vendor law approved two years ago. The bill would have made health officials in Clark County set a standard for food carts and communicate regulations to the public via a website. Vendor restrictions that went into place in 2023 ended up severely limiting any participation by small-business entrepreneurs that the legislation tried to allow. Fewer than 10 licensed operators are on the streets in Clark County. Lombardo rejected the bill, saying it was too big of a health risk and gave street vendors advantages over other food establishments. He said the same standards should apply. 'This risk is further compounded by the bill's allowance for storing food carts in private homes,' Lombardo's veto message said. 'Unlike regulated commercial kitchens, private residences are not subject to routine sanitation or pest control measures.' HIGH SCHOOL LACROSSE: SB305 would have allowed lacrosse to become a sanctioned sport for Nevada high schools, but also would have made changes in how decisions are made about club sports at that level. A veto message was not immediately available explaining Lombardo's reasons. TRAFFIC STOP RECORDINGS: SB85 sought to prevent the deletion of recordings of police traffic stops that the state intended to use in a study. But Lombardo said the Department of Public Safety hasn't received the analysis from a third-party entity authorized to collect and review the data. 'Requiring a report that has yet to materialize undermines confidence in the effectiveness and accountability of the process,' Lombardo said in his veto message. 'Before enshrining this mandate into permanent law, we should first ensure that the system in place is actually producing its intended results. VOTER REGISTRATION: SB422 contained changes to voter registration deadlines and steps regarding ID verification. But Lombardo vetoed it, citing several concerns over election integrity and voter security. 'By permitting voters to cast provisional ballots based on a written affirmation and submit proof of residency after Election Day, the bill weakens safeguards that ensure only eligible individuals participate in elections.' In addition, he said REAL ID is not a good standard because federal law permits some non-citizens and lawful status to get one. Other bills rejected on Wednesday included: SB128, which would have barred insurance companies from using AI to automatically generate rejections to claims. Lombardo called it unnecessary micromanaging. He also attacked the bill's requirements that doctors suggest stem cell therapy. SB352, which prohibited Medicaid and private insurers from discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression. Lombardo called the bill a duplication of existing federal protections. SB378, which would have required 'free-standing emergency departments' to bill services at urgent care standards. Lombardo said the bill intended to improve access and affordability, but would likely have the opposite effect, putting facilities out of business. SB414 sought to require financial disclosures surrounding the 'inaugural committee,' but Lombardo attacked the bill as politically motivated. SB447, which would have created another way to challenge the award of a government contract. Lombardo said it would create 'a routine litigation tactic' that would lead to delays, higher costs and court injunctions. Two days remain for the governor to issue additional vetoes. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

State bar wants new crack at disbarring Clark County Commissioner Justin Jones
State bar wants new crack at disbarring Clark County Commissioner Justin Jones

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

State bar wants new crack at disbarring Clark County Commissioner Justin Jones

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — The state bar wants another shot at stripping Clark County Commissioner Justin Jones of his law license, according to documents obtained by the 8 News Now Investigators. In March, a hearing panel charged with deciding whether to discipline Jones voted to reprimand him instead of revoking or suspending his law license. The state bar urged the panel to disbar Jones for deleting text messages related to a controversial real estate development project near Red Rock Canyon. Moreover, it rejected outright the state bar's claim that Jones bribed then-county-commissioner and eventual Democratic Governor Steve Sisolak. The panel — comprised entirely of volunteers — rejected outright the notion of bribery and explained to Jones, his lawyers and the state bar counsel that they opted to reprimand him because of so-called character evidence portraying Jones in a good light. However, in recent filings with regard to Jones' disciplinary matter, the state bar counsel, Dan Hooge, requested a new hearing based on what they refer to as 'misconduct' by Jones' attorney, who Hooge wrote made 'improper closing arguments' which prejudiced the jury. Hooge also argues, in his April 28 motion, that the panel ignored instructions 'against using character evidence to determine guilt or innocence.' 'The cumulative effect of these improper arguments prejudiced the State Bar's case, denying it a fair hearing,' Hooge wrote. 'Each tactic—golden rule arguments, emotional appeals, vouching, and mocking—individually and collectively undermined the panel's ability to impartially evaluate the evidence.' Hooge also said that Jones' attorney, former Clark County District Court Judge Rob Bare spoke for too long to the panel, indicating that Bare's four-hour closing argument 'was improper.' Included in the 22 pages of memorandum and exhibits is a signed declaration by one of the three volunteer panelists, which was comprised of two volunteer attorneys and one member of the public. Attorney Rachel Wise, under the pains and penalties of perjury, wrote that the panel's deliberations were 'influenced by Respondent's counsel's improper tactics, including name-calling, crying, and golden rule violations.' Wise wrote that the one member of the public empaneled to decide Jones' disciplinary matter 'voted emotionally.' 'I believe that the improper conduct from Respondent's counsel prejudiced the panel's ability to render a fair and impartial decision,' Wise wrote. Jones did not respond to a request for comment. His attorney, Bare, did respond to the 8 News Now Investigators' request for comment, writing, 'Please review our opposition to the motion you reference. It speaks for itself.' To that end, in his own motion, Bare did not mince words. 'The State Bar's motion seems to operate in an alternate universe where the Hearing Panel somehow gave Mr. Joens a free pass for the misconduct it ultimately found him guilty of, arguing that the decision to 'impose only a reprimand' suggests the panel was 'swayed' for improper reasons,' Bare wrote, calling the motion 'litigator's remorse.' Bare also signed a written declaration under the pains and penalties of perjury, in which he took issue with some of the allegations in a separate writing from Wise's, an anonymous survey which ultimately was made public, in which she wrote Bare 'screamed' at the state bar's expert witness, UNLV Law Professor Benjamin Edwards. The hearing, Wise wrote in the survey, gave her a 'two-day migraine.' Edwards testified about whether and why, in his opinion, Jones committed bribery. 'My closing argument was reflective of the fact that I was defending two different bar complaints combined into one, which alleged various serious charges against Mr. Jones, including that he had committed a felony criminal act,' Bare wrote in his declaration. 'As the State Bar was seeking to permanently disbar Mr. Jones, I felt it was entirely necessary and appropriate to give the closing arguments that I did. It is unfortunate that Ms. Wise felt the need to resort calling me a '2 -year-old.'' This case is currently under automatic review by the Supreme Court of Nevada, with briefs due on June 19. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store