Spending Review appeal for Devon railway link
Rail campaigners are battling for £1.5m government cash in the upcoming Spending Review to make a business case for a railway link in Devon.TavyRail campaign group would like to see a five-mile (8km) section of track between Tavistock and Plymouth reinstated.Services to Tavistock ended in the 1960s during the cuts by Dr Richard Beeching when the railways were restructured.The Department of Transport (DfT) said it was "committed" to delivering transport infrastructure to "boost growth and opportunity".
'Value for money'
It added: "The Government inherited an extremely challenging financial position, and these projects will be considered as part of the upcoming Spending Review."TavyRail said only £1.5m of the project's £150m budget was needed to complete its business case and obtain necessary reports, with the remainder not required until construction in 2028.Richard Searight, Tavyrail chairman, said the initial outlay would pay for experts to consider whether the line to Plymouth via Bere Alston would be "practical and value for money".He said by 2028 the government would hopefully be in a "more secure" financial position.
The previous Conservative government said savings from scrapping the northern leg of the HS2 project could be used to reopen the line between Plymouth and Tavistock.Devon County Council (DCC) submitted a business case for restoring the line in 2022, with hourly trains to Plymouth via Bere Alston.In 2024, the Labour government outlined plans to cancel or shelve a number of rail projects because they were promised without funding or a plan to deliver them. Deputy mayor of Tavistock, Anne Johnson, who is also vice-chairman of TavyRail, said housing plans had been agreed "off the back of the railway" and there was a "desperate need" for it to go ahead.
Steve Hipsey, Mayor of Tavistock, said: "The current estimate is that we have about 1,600 people commuting into Plymouth every day along the A386, and that can't be a good thing in terms of sustainability and carbon emissions." "I think the whole thing makes a lot of sense in terms of economy, sustainability and social aspects as well."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Rachel Reeves announces funding boosts for NHS and housing
Rachel Reeves has announced an extra £29bn per year for the NHS, along with funding boosts for defence and housing, as she set out her spending plans for the coming years. Speaking in the House of Commons, the chancellor outlined how much each department would have for day-to-day spending between 2026-29 and investment projects up until 2030. Departments that will see squeezes in their day-to-day spending include the Foreign Office and the environment department. Reeves said her Spending Review would deliver security, economic growth and "an NHS fit for the future", but Conservative shadow chancellor Mel Stride said it was a "spend now, tax later review". He predicted "a cruel summer of speculation" ahead of the autumn Budget, when he said the chancellor would announce tax rises. The spending review was the cumulation of weeks of discussions between Reeves and her cabinet have been particularly drawn out with Housing Secretary Angela Rayner and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, with agreements not being reached until Sunday and Monday respectively. Rayner's department secured £39bn across 10 years for social housing in England. Reeves said the "spending power" of police forces would rise by 2.3% by 2029 - which is likely to include money from council tax bills - and pledged to end the use of hotels to accommodate asylum seekers by the end of the Parliament, expected in 2029. The NHS budget increased by 3% per year across three years for day-to-day running departments have lost out, including the Foreign Office which loses 6.9% a year, mainly in aid spending; Transport, which loses 5% a year over the next three years, and the Environment department which loses 2.7%.Other policies announced ahead of the spending review include £86bn for science and technology projects, £15bn for transport and an expansion of the number of children receiving free school meals at a cost of £1bn.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves's spending plans were very popular with one key group: Labour MPs
Labour MPs liked it, and perhaps that should tell us everything we need to know about Rachel Reeves's spending review announcement in the Commons. Their enthusiastic shouts of 'More!' as the chancellor reached her peroration sounded genuine enough. And why wouldn't they? No chancellor of the exchequer ever became less popular by announcing large amounts of dosh for public services. Reeves painted a rosy picture of the future, a far cry from her and her boss, Keir Starmer's initial outings at the despatch box in the aftermath of last year's general election, when made Private Frazer from 'Dad's Army' sound like a ray of sunshine. They've since taken the hint and decided that a return to Labour's traditional practice of throwing loads of cash at everything helps cheer everyone up – particularly stressed Labour back benchers. One of the few cash saving schemes within her statement was perhaps not so popular with Labour MPs, and certainly not with party activists listening at home: the asylum backlog will be cut (but there was no indication of the likely scale of this cut or whether the threshold for achieving official refugee status will be lowered in order to reduce the official numbers of asylum seekers), more appeal cases will be heard and those who have no right to be here will be returned. A manifesto commitment to end the use of hotels by asylum seekers will be met by the end of the parliament, saving a billion pounds for the Treasury. But the biggest cheers from the government benches came in response to Reeves's announcement of £39 billion for new social and affordable house building. The deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, looked especially pleased at this, which is unsurprising since her own department has responsibility for meeting her party's promise to build 1.5 million new homes by the time of the next election. But the £39 billion pledged today was not for spending in the next three or four years left of this parliament: it was for the next 10 years, which means, assuming broadly equal levels of spend each year, less than £16 billion to be spent on the project before the deadline mandated by Labour's own manifesto looms. Oddly, for a party with only five MPs, Reform UK and its leader came in for a disproportionate amount of attention from Reeves. Nigel Farage was targeted for having expressed support in the past for Liz Truss's disastrous 'fiscal event' and the unfunded tax cuts that accompanied it. It seemed odd that Reeves and her allies thought there was still mileage left in an event that happened three years ago. Maybe they'll fight next year's May elections by attacking Margaret Thatcher's poll tax. And by the time the chancellor got round to announcing the inevitable 'record' budget increases for the NHS – three per cent in each of the years covered by the spending review – she had come up with another zinger, reminding the House that Farage had once expressed support for an insurance-based health system. This might not be as productive a line of attack for the government as it blithely assumes. Given the consistently poor performance of the NHS over many years, and given that no one seriously expects things to improve, however much extra cash is thrown at it, it is not inconceivable that the kind of angry and disillusioned voter that Reform has successfully attracted to its ranks could be persuaded that maybe a different approach is, after all, worth considering. After all, most EU countries have some sort of insurance element within their funding models, yet they also manage to provide medical care free at the point of need. And aren't Labour MPs fans of everything Europe does (apart from regularly electing far-Right parties to government, of course)? The real success of fiscal events like today's can never be accurately judged until hours after everyone has left the chamber and headed to the tearoom to chat about it and stock up on publicly-subsidised calories. But even before the economics experts have had a chance to go over the details, Chancellor Reeves can congratulate herself for at least sounding more like a cheerleader for the government, rather than an undertaker. Baby steps, chancellor. Baby steps.
BreakingNews.ie
27 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
UK government pledges €59m for Casement Park rebuild
The UK government has allocated £50 million (€59 million) to support the redevelopment of Casement Park in west Belfast. The money was included in the Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' spending review, which outlines the UK government's spending plans over the coming years. Advertisement Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill said it is now time to get the GAA stadium built. Plans for a 34,000-capacity stadium have been mired in uncertainty because of a major funding gap of around £150 million (€177 million). The Government announcement includes £50 million (€59 million) to support the stadium being developed over four years. Ms O'Neill said: 'Casement Park is an Executive flagship project and is more than just a sporting venue — it will serve as an economic driver for the surrounding communities and region, creating jobs and attracting investment. Advertisement 'Today's commitment of substantial funding from the British Government marks an enormous step forward. It is time for all of us to pull together to now get Casement built.'
