Voting with a disability can be a challenge, even in a country like Australia
Voting is a democratic right for all Australians, but for some people with disabilities, it can be an uncomfortable and sometimes distressing experience.
I have a physical disability called Spinal Muscular Atrophy and I use a power wheelchair to get around.
Eleanor says casting a vote with a disability can be an anxiety-inducing experience for some.
(
ABC News: Rosemary Murphy
)
Unfortunately, the only early polling location is 50 kilometres away from where I live in regional WA, and it's not listed as wheelchair accessible.
Although there were accessible booths inside, the street parking did not have access for wheelchairs to safely cross the road and there weren't ramps.
Navigating through the crowd outside is always a challenge but moving through the crowds on the inside is even harder.
Eleanor being handed how-to-vote cards while approaching the polling place in Albany.
(
ABC Great Southern: Rosemary Murphy
)
My power wheelchair is below people's eye level and pushing through is always stressful.
As I can't write for myself, I bring a carer and tell them what to put on the ballot paper for me.
Eleanor requires a carer to fill out her ballot paper.
(
ABC News: Rosemary Murphy
)
It is always noisy inside and it can be difficult for my carer to hear what I'm saying when I'm asking them to write down my voting preferences, because I have to whisper so other people don't hear my choices.
Election essentials:
Find out where your
For me, it's obvious I need that extra help. In some ways, it can be easier to have a disability as visible as mine when it comes to voting because there are no questions about the accommodations I need.
That process isn't so easy for voters with invisible disabilities, and it's made even more difficult if they are not confident to advocate for themselves.
Eleanor Beidatsch detailed her experience voting in Albany this week.
(
ABC News: Rosemary Murphy
)
For 20-year-old Gabe, who has anxiety and situational mutism, voting for the first time was an overwhelming experience.
"Being there was anxiety-inducing for me, I hyper-focused on getting it over with so I could leave," he said.
"The most difficult aspect of voting was the social interaction and navigation.
"Having severe anxiety to a point I can't talk meant even basic interactions, like telling my name, was difficult and I needed to have someone with me to speak for me.
"Then having no direct path of where to go once you've finished at the booth made it a little confusing."
Many people affected
More than 21 per cent of Australians have some type of disability, or around 5.5 million people, according to the 2022 ABS survey.
Read more about the federal election:
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on
Not every eligible voter with a disability needs assistance to cast their ballot, but there are still plenty of people who can benefit from accessible polling places.
Accessible polling places can make voting easier for those with a disability.
(
ABC News: Rosemary Murphy
)
A spokesperson from the AEC said it had increased the number of accessible polling places for the 2025 federal election by 20 per cent.
"We're constantly listening to feedback from voters and working to improve our offering at subsequent elections," they said.
"For 2025, the increase of 20 per cent for fully accessible polling places is something we're very proud to be able to offer.
"But we know that every voter is unique, and the widespread nature of Australian federal elections unfortunately means that our most convenient offering suit the requirements of [only] some voters."
'Archaic' laws need to change
Meanwhile, 75 organisations and disability advocates have signed an open letter to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, calling for changes to laws they say disproportionately prevent people with disability from voting.
A cross section of the organisations that signed the open letter.
(
ABC News: Gian De Poloni
)
Two sections of the Commonwealth Electoral Act say anyone "by reason of cognitive impairment, is incapable of understanding the nature and significance of enrolment and voting" should be stripped from the electoral roll.
Those removed need to provide medical evidence they are "capable of understanding" to be reinstated.
The groups say these provisions are "archaic and offensive" and inconsistent with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
This polling place in Albany has seen a steady stream of early voters.
(
ABC News: Rosemary Murphy
)
More than 28,000 people were removed from the roll between 2008 and 2012 due to these provisions, according to a Australian Law Reform Commission report, which also recommended they be repealed.
"It is extremely disappointing that despite significant advocacy … discriminatory laws are still in place," Down Syndrome Australia CEO Darryl Steff said.
The postal vote option
Postal voting has always been an option for anyone who can't vote in person or doesn't want to.
I don't usually bother with postal voting because I believe that people with disabilities should be seen in public.
I live in a regional area, and I can't go to the post office on my own to post my vote.
Postal voting is also difficult for Eleanor because she can't write on paper herself.
(
Supplied: Australian Electoral Commission via Twitter
)
I also can't write on paper for myself anyway, so it makes no difference if I am in a polling booth telling my carer what to write or doing it at home.
Whether you choose to vote in person or by post, voting is a human right and people with disabilities should have the same opportunity to choose our preferences based on what we want, not what is more convenient.
Additional reporting by National Digital and Disability Affairs Producer Evan Young.
Loading
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'It's crunch time': productivity puzzle must be solved
It's "crunch time" for the Australian economy. Young Australians face the prospect of being the first generation to be worse off than their parents and Treasurer Jim Chalmers' economic roundtable is crucial to ensuring that doesn't happen. The generational bargain is in peril and policymakers need to act, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood says. Now in their 30s, millennials are struggling to enter the property market, "as policy choices have contributed to house prices growing much faster than incomes for the best part of three decades", Ms Wood told the National Press Club on Monday. That's largely because successive governments have failed to adopt a "growth mindset" and encourage productivity - reaping more from the effort put into work - she said. "Productivity growth is the only way to sustainably lift wages and opportunities over time." The commission has spelled out a long list of recommendations to kickstart anaemic productivity growth in five separate reports released before the roundtable, which begins in Canberra on Tuesday. Suggestions include reforming the corporate tax system and financial incentives for workplace training. If the roundtable fails to revive productivity growth, Australia's GDP could be six per cent lower than it might otherwise be, a loss of about $6000 per person, HSBC chief economist Paul Bloxham said. "The stakes are high. It's crunch time." Mr Bloxham identified tax reform, competition and regulation as the three key areas the roundtable ought to address. Growth in the regulatory burden was symptomatic of a policy culture failing to prioritise growth, Ms Wood said. Governments have felt a need to "do something" every time an issue emerged, ending up in a system that dampened growth. An example was the Victorian government's plan to legislate at least two days a week of work from home. Ms Wood said the market had naturally found a "sweet spot", as businesses that offer more flexibility find it easier to attract and retain workers, and businesses that want stricter rules around office attendance tend to have to pay a premium. "So I guess if I was to apply a growth mindset to this, I would think what's the problem that we're trying to solve here? It's not clear to me that there needs to be a role for government in that," she said. "Regulatory hairballs" are everywhere, she argued, from 31-step approvals and licensing surveys for would-be Queensland cafe owners to "evermore stringent requirements for energy efficiency in the construction code". The Albanese government has lobbed its fair share of hairballs down Australia's regulatory gullet, contends opposition productivity spokesman Andrew Bragg. In its first term, Labor introduced 5034 new regulations and 400 fresh laws, raising the cost of compliance by $4.8 billion, according to Office of Impact Analysis figures cited by Senator Bragg. "Australia is now one of the most heavily regulated countries in the world," he said. The treasurer rubbished the claims, arguing the coalition introduced more regulations in its last term before its 2022 election loss. "If the coalition had answers on productivity, they wouldn't have presided over the worst decade for productivity growth in the last 60 years," he said. Dr Chalmers acknowledged the government had been getting in its own way with regulation that was slowing down new housing or energy projects. Some regulation, such as tying government procurement to gender equality aims, was serving a useful purpose, he said. "Where regulation is unnecessary, where it's duplicated, where it's not serving a useful purpose, we should seek to wind it back, and that's what we intend to do." It's "crunch time" for the Australian economy. Young Australians face the prospect of being the first generation to be worse off than their parents and Treasurer Jim Chalmers' economic roundtable is crucial to ensuring that doesn't happen. The generational bargain is in peril and policymakers need to act, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood says. Now in their 30s, millennials are struggling to enter the property market, "as policy choices have contributed to house prices growing much faster than incomes for the best part of three decades", Ms Wood told the National Press Club on Monday. That's largely because successive governments have failed to adopt a "growth mindset" and encourage productivity - reaping more from the effort put into work - she said. "Productivity growth is the only way to sustainably lift wages and opportunities over time." The commission has spelled out a long list of recommendations to kickstart anaemic productivity growth in five separate reports released before the roundtable, which begins in Canberra on Tuesday. Suggestions include reforming the corporate tax system and financial incentives for workplace training. If the roundtable fails to revive productivity growth, Australia's GDP could be six per cent lower than it might otherwise be, a loss of about $6000 per person, HSBC chief economist Paul Bloxham said. "The stakes are high. It's crunch time." Mr Bloxham identified tax reform, competition and regulation as the three key areas the roundtable ought to address. Growth in the regulatory burden was symptomatic of a policy culture failing to prioritise growth, Ms Wood said. Governments have felt a need to "do something" every time an issue emerged, ending up in a system that dampened growth. An example was the Victorian government's plan to legislate at least two days a week of work from home. Ms Wood said the market had naturally found a "sweet spot", as businesses that offer more flexibility find it easier to attract and retain workers, and businesses that want stricter rules around office attendance tend to have to pay a premium. "So I guess if I was to apply a growth mindset to this, I would think what's the problem that we're trying to solve here? It's not clear to me that there needs to be a role for government in that," she said. "Regulatory hairballs" are everywhere, she argued, from 31-step approvals and licensing surveys for would-be Queensland cafe owners to "evermore stringent requirements for energy efficiency in the construction code". The Albanese government has lobbed its fair share of hairballs down Australia's regulatory gullet, contends opposition productivity spokesman Andrew Bragg. In its first term, Labor introduced 5034 new regulations and 400 fresh laws, raising the cost of compliance by $4.8 billion, according to Office of Impact Analysis figures cited by Senator Bragg. "Australia is now one of the most heavily regulated countries in the world," he said. The treasurer rubbished the claims, arguing the coalition introduced more regulations in its last term before its 2022 election loss. "If the coalition had answers on productivity, they wouldn't have presided over the worst decade for productivity growth in the last 60 years," he said. Dr Chalmers acknowledged the government had been getting in its own way with regulation that was slowing down new housing or energy projects. Some regulation, such as tying government procurement to gender equality aims, was serving a useful purpose, he said. "Where regulation is unnecessary, where it's duplicated, where it's not serving a useful purpose, we should seek to wind it back, and that's what we intend to do." It's "crunch time" for the Australian economy. Young Australians face the prospect of being the first generation to be worse off than their parents and Treasurer Jim Chalmers' economic roundtable is crucial to ensuring that doesn't happen. The generational bargain is in peril and policymakers need to act, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood says. Now in their 30s, millennials are struggling to enter the property market, "as policy choices have contributed to house prices growing much faster than incomes for the best part of three decades", Ms Wood told the National Press Club on Monday. That's largely because successive governments have failed to adopt a "growth mindset" and encourage productivity - reaping more from the effort put into work - she said. "Productivity growth is the only way to sustainably lift wages and opportunities over time." The commission has spelled out a long list of recommendations to kickstart anaemic productivity growth in five separate reports released before the roundtable, which begins in Canberra on Tuesday. Suggestions include reforming the corporate tax system and financial incentives for workplace training. If the roundtable fails to revive productivity growth, Australia's GDP could be six per cent lower than it might otherwise be, a loss of about $6000 per person, HSBC chief economist Paul Bloxham said. "The stakes are high. It's crunch time." Mr Bloxham identified tax reform, competition and regulation as the three key areas the roundtable ought to address. Growth in the regulatory burden was symptomatic of a policy culture failing to prioritise growth, Ms Wood said. Governments have felt a need to "do something" every time an issue emerged, ending up in a system that dampened growth. An example was the Victorian government's plan to legislate at least two days a week of work from home. Ms Wood said the market had naturally found a "sweet spot", as businesses that offer more flexibility find it easier to attract and retain workers, and businesses that want stricter rules around office attendance tend to have to pay a premium. "So I guess if I was to apply a growth mindset to this, I would think what's the problem that we're trying to solve here? It's not clear to me that there needs to be a role for government in that," she said. "Regulatory hairballs" are everywhere, she argued, from 31-step approvals and licensing surveys for would-be Queensland cafe owners to "evermore stringent requirements for energy efficiency in the construction code". The Albanese government has lobbed its fair share of hairballs down Australia's regulatory gullet, contends opposition productivity spokesman Andrew Bragg. In its first term, Labor introduced 5034 new regulations and 400 fresh laws, raising the cost of compliance by $4.8 billion, according to Office of Impact Analysis figures cited by Senator Bragg. "Australia is now one of the most heavily regulated countries in the world," he said. The treasurer rubbished the claims, arguing the coalition introduced more regulations in its last term before its 2022 election loss. "If the coalition had answers on productivity, they wouldn't have presided over the worst decade for productivity growth in the last 60 years," he said. Dr Chalmers acknowledged the government had been getting in its own way with regulation that was slowing down new housing or energy projects. Some regulation, such as tying government procurement to gender equality aims, was serving a useful purpose, he said. "Where regulation is unnecessary, where it's duplicated, where it's not serving a useful purpose, we should seek to wind it back, and that's what we intend to do." It's "crunch time" for the Australian economy. Young Australians face the prospect of being the first generation to be worse off than their parents and Treasurer Jim Chalmers' economic roundtable is crucial to ensuring that doesn't happen. The generational bargain is in peril and policymakers need to act, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood says. Now in their 30s, millennials are struggling to enter the property market, "as policy choices have contributed to house prices growing much faster than incomes for the best part of three decades", Ms Wood told the National Press Club on Monday. That's largely because successive governments have failed to adopt a "growth mindset" and encourage productivity - reaping more from the effort put into work - she said. "Productivity growth is the only way to sustainably lift wages and opportunities over time." The commission has spelled out a long list of recommendations to kickstart anaemic productivity growth in five separate reports released before the roundtable, which begins in Canberra on Tuesday. Suggestions include reforming the corporate tax system and financial incentives for workplace training. If the roundtable fails to revive productivity growth, Australia's GDP could be six per cent lower than it might otherwise be, a loss of about $6000 per person, HSBC chief economist Paul Bloxham said. "The stakes are high. It's crunch time." Mr Bloxham identified tax reform, competition and regulation as the three key areas the roundtable ought to address. Growth in the regulatory burden was symptomatic of a policy culture failing to prioritise growth, Ms Wood said. Governments have felt a need to "do something" every time an issue emerged, ending up in a system that dampened growth. An example was the Victorian government's plan to legislate at least two days a week of work from home. Ms Wood said the market had naturally found a "sweet spot", as businesses that offer more flexibility find it easier to attract and retain workers, and businesses that want stricter rules around office attendance tend to have to pay a premium. "So I guess if I was to apply a growth mindset to this, I would think what's the problem that we're trying to solve here? It's not clear to me that there needs to be a role for government in that," she said. "Regulatory hairballs" are everywhere, she argued, from 31-step approvals and licensing surveys for would-be Queensland cafe owners to "evermore stringent requirements for energy efficiency in the construction code". The Albanese government has lobbed its fair share of hairballs down Australia's regulatory gullet, contends opposition productivity spokesman Andrew Bragg. In its first term, Labor introduced 5034 new regulations and 400 fresh laws, raising the cost of compliance by $4.8 billion, according to Office of Impact Analysis figures cited by Senator Bragg. "Australia is now one of the most heavily regulated countries in the world," he said. The treasurer rubbished the claims, arguing the coalition introduced more regulations in its last term before its 2022 election loss. "If the coalition had answers on productivity, they wouldn't have presided over the worst decade for productivity growth in the last 60 years," he said. Dr Chalmers acknowledged the government had been getting in its own way with regulation that was slowing down new housing or energy projects. Some regulation, such as tying government procurement to gender equality aims, was serving a useful purpose, he said. "Where regulation is unnecessary, where it's duplicated, where it's not serving a useful purpose, we should seek to wind it back, and that's what we intend to do."
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Younger Aussies more worried about climate change than ‘heaven or hell'
On tonight's episode of Paul Murray Live, Sky News host Paul Murray discusses the decline in religion among Australians, economic roundtable, US politics and more. 'What has replaced the overall conversations about heaven and hell … has now become more political and existential,' Mr Murray said. 'More young people are worried about climate change than they are about whether they are going to spend the rest of their time in heaven or in hell.'
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
Australians want Albanese to act now to fix the economy – but want one tax left alone
Australians want Anthony Albanese to deliver important new reforms out of the government's economic roundtable before the next election, but they draw the line at any move to lift the GST or broaden its scope. As the prime minister said he would not 'spring' ideas on voters that might come out of the roundtable that starts on Tuesday, a Resolve Political Monitor poll shows voters could be open to changes to capital gains tax and a new way to encourage businesses to invest in new technology. There has been tension between Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers over the ambitions for policies debated at the roundtable. The prime minister made it clear on Monday that while discussions would be held around the federal cabinet table, any final decision rested with the government. Chalmers began the day saying that some reforms 'will be implemented relatively quickly'. More than 40 people will participate in the roundtable this week, and issues will include tax reform, the rise of AI and ways to reduce red tape across the housing sector. Albanese and Chalmers will open the roundtable on Tuesday. The meetings will include union leaders Sally McManus and Michel O'Neil, business representatives Bran Black and Andrew McKellar, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood and NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey. There has been a push by some advocates for the government to consider a change to the GST. Independent MP Kate Chaney has suggested a lift in the GST to 15 per cent offset by a $3300 payment to all adults. But the poll shows Australians resolute in their opposition to any GST change. Just 20 per cent back a rise in the tax to 15 per cent, even with the extra revenue used to reduce personal or company taxes.
