5 security cameras you should buy instead of Google Nest ones
It's hard to blame anyone for feeling fed up with Google Nest cameras right now. The latest Nest Aware price hike means users will soon be paying up to $200 a year, with zero new features to show for it. That's on top of already pricey hardware, limited local storage options, and a system that some feel might actually be getting worse rather than better.
Maybe you're already planning to cancel like some of these angry Redditors. Maybe you're just Nest-curious but don't love the idea of hefty recurring fees for the functionality you expect. Either way, there's good news: there are plenty of excellent security camera alternatives out there that don't lock you into a monthly bill — or at least cost a whole lot less than Google's subscription.
We've rounded up five of the best options that either ditch the subscription entirely or offer way better value than Google Nest Aware. Whether you're replacing an indoor camera or an outdoor one, every option is a respectable brand with solid features. We've also gone for simpler setups, though the likes of UniFi and Reolink are good options for more DIY inclined users.
Which Google Nest camera alternative would you choose?
0 votes
TP-Link Tapo C225
NaN %
EufyCam 2C Pro
NaN %
Blink Outdoor 4
NaN %
Wyze Cam v4
NaN %
Arlo Essential (2nd Gen)
NaN %
Other (let us know in the comments)
NaN %
TP-Link Tapo C225
If you're ditching Nest because you're tired of paying for features you don't really need, the TP-Link Tapo C225 should be high on your list. This compact indoor pan-and-tilt camera hits the sweet spot between price, performance, and privacy without tying you into any particular ecosystem.
The C225 is all about flexibility. It supports microSD storage, so you don't need to pay for cloud recording if you don't want to. But it also plays nicely with Synology NAS systems (via ONVIF) or third-party alarm setups (thanks to RTSP support), giving you backup options that Google simply doesn't offer. There's even a manual privacy shutter — something you won't find on Nest cams.
You still get AI-powered person detection, night vision, two-way talk, and smart alerts.
Despite the lack of a subscription requirement, you still get AI-powered person detection, night vision, two-way talk, and smart alerts. It's also compatible with Google Home, though it won't appear in the Favorites tab. Still, it works well in routines and voice commands. Also, the camera itself is extremely budget-friendly.
Rita El Khoury is one of our resident smart home fans, and she swears by the Tapo C225. In addition to the features, she enjoys the peace of mind that comes from keeping her video data local. As she put it, 'Being in control of my videos inside my own home was more important to me. Also, not paying a monthly sub when I have storage.'
EufyCam 2C Pro
The EufyCam 2C Pro is a dependable, wire-free outdoor security camera with a strong reputation for doing the basics well and not charging for the privilege. With 2K video, color night vision, AI-powered person detection, and two-way audio, it delivers many of the features you'd typically expect to find locked behind a subscription.
One of its biggest advantages of this smart home addition is that most system variants come with the Eufy HomeBase 2, which handles local video storage and smart alerts. You get up to 16GB of encrypted storage built in, and no ongoing fees are required to access your recordings or AI features. Make sure you grab one with the HomeBase 2, as the camera is much less effective on its own.
Battery life is rated at up to 180 days per charge, and the whole system is designed to be as hands-off as possible. You can optionally add Eufy's cloud storage plan if you want off-site backup, but most people don't find it necessary. It's not the cheapest choice, but compared to a Google Nest Aware subscription, it's a more privacy-conscious and wallet-friendly setup.
Blink Outdoor 4
For a no-fuss outdoor camera with flexible storage and a gentle price tag, the Blink Outdoor 4 is a great place to land. It's compact, weather-resistant, and completely wire-free, with battery life that can last up to two years on a pair of AAs — something that puts most Nest cameras to shame.
Amazon's camera gives you storage options. You can use it with a Blink subscription plan ($3 per month for each device or $10 per month for unlimited), which gives you 60 days of cloud storage and extra features like person alerts. Or you can skip the plan and use local video storage via the Sync Module 2 and a USB drive.
The camera supports HD video, motion detection, night vision, and two-way talk, and setup is refreshingly simple through the Blink app. It's not as feature-packed as some pricier systems — there's no local AI detection, and you won't find advanced integration with Google or Apple platforms. However, for the price, it covers the basics well.
Compared to a Google Nest setup, Blink offers a much lower cost of ownership over time, and it's ideal for anyone who wants a dependable security camera without diving into a whole new ecosystem.
Wyze Cam v4
The Wyze Cam v4 keeps things simple and affordable, while still delivering features that punch well above its weight. It records in sharp 2.5K resolution, handles color night vision, and has a 160-degree field of view. That's not bad for a camera that costs about as much as dinner for two.
On the storage side, you can drop in a microSD card and get continuous recording, time-lapse footage, and event playback without a subscription. There's an optional Cam Plus plan for things like person detection and cloud storage, but you're never forced into it.
It's primarily an indoor camera, but with a weatherproof case (sold separately), many users mount it outside without issues. The app is intuitive, setup is quick, and you can build a full home setup piece by piece without breaking the bank. Google Nest might offer deeper smart home integration, but for basic video coverage, Wyze is way more forgiving on your wallet and easy to scale if you want to add more cams later.
WYZE Cam v4
WYZE Cam v4
Easy setup • Multiple storage options • 2.5k resolution
MSRP: $35.98
Wyze Cam v4 offers 2.5K clarity, weather-resistant versatility, enhanced color night vision, and a motion-activated spotlight with a siren for improved security indoors and out.
See price at Amazon
Arlo Essential (2nd Gen)
Arlo makes some high-end security cameras with sharper video, advanced features, and longer battery life — and if you're happy to spend a bit more, those are solid options. But the Essential (2nd Gen) strikes a great balance between capability and cost, making it a strong pick if you want reliable protection without the premium price tag. It's compact, weatherproof, and wireless, with a built-in spotlight, color night vision, and 1080p HD video. For everyday home monitoring, it more than holds its own.
Arlo has a subscription model that undercuts Nest's offering. While you'll need an Arlo Secure plan to unlock cloud storage and smart detection features, it starts at just $3.99 per month per camera, or $12.99 per month for unlimited cameras. And if you're willing to go a little deeper, you can pair the camera with an Arlo SmartHub to add local storage and avoid the cloud altogether.
Setup is straightforward, and the camera works with Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Home, and IFTTT, so it fits into most smart home setups without much fuss. It may not have the razor-sharp 2K resolution or advanced tracking of Arlo's higher-end models, but it covers the basics exceptionally well at a price with which it's hard to argue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
5 minutes ago
- CNBC
China releases AI action plan days after the U.S. as global tech race heats up
SHANGHAI — The tech race between the world's two largest economies just intensified. China on Saturday released a global action plan for artificial intelligence, calling for international cooperation on tech development and regulation. The news came as the annual state-organized World Artificial Intelligence Conference kicked off in Shanghai with an opening speech by Premier Li Qiang, who announced that the Chinese government has proposed the establishment of a global AI cooperation organization, according to an official readout. Days earlier, U.S. President Donald Trump announced an American action plan for AI that included calls to reduce alleged "woke" bias in AI models and support the deployment of U.S. tech overseas. "The two camps are now being formed," said George Chen, partner at the Asia Group and co-chair of the digital practice. "China clearly wants to stick to the multilateral approach while the U.S. wants to build its own camp, very much targeting the rise of China in the field of AI," Chen said. He noted how China may attract participants from its Belt and Road Initiative, while the U.S. will likely have the support of its allies, such as Japan and Australia. In his speech, Premier Li emphasized China's "AI plus" plan for integrating the tech across industries and said the country was willing to help other nations with the technology, especially in the Global South. The category loosely refers to less developed economies, especially countries outside the U.S. and European orbits. Since 2022, the U.S. has sought to restrict China's access to advanced semiconductors for training AI models. Earlier this month, U.S. chipmaker Nvidia said the U.S. was allowing it to resume shipments of a less advanced H20 chip to China after a roughly three-month pause. However, China has been developing homegrown alternatives, which Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang both praised and described as "formidable" during his third trip to China this month. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt met with Shanghai Party Secretary Chen Jining on Thursday in the city ahead of the AI conference, according to a city announcement. Schmidt did not immediately respond to a CNBC request for comment.
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Microsoft's Critical Password Warning — Users Have 5 Days To Act
Unsaved Microsoft Authenticator passwords will be deletd on August 1. Passwords: You can't live without them, despite the advance of passkey technology, but unless you act before August 1, the passwords you have generated using Microsoft's Authenticator app will be deleted. Yes, deleted. This should not come as a surprise, not least as Microsoft has been warning users for the longest time of the password changes to come: In June no new passwords could be added to the app, during July the autofill feature ceased to work and, in just five days time on August 1, your saved passwords won't be accessible via the app anymore. All of this, seemingly in the name of better security, and with password hacking such a cyber-epidemic, that might not be a bad thing. Or at least it wouldn't be if I actually believed that to be the case. Here's what you need to know and do. Microsoft Passwords Deadline — What You Need To Know The whole password deletion and usage debate revolves around one simple act: Microsoft has decided to discontinue the autofill function of the Microsoft Authenticator app as part of an update to streamline the process 'so you can use saved passwords easily across devices.' The reasoning behind this seems, dare I say, a little spurious to me. After all, Microsoft readily admits that 'autofill in Microsoft Authenticator has been a way to securely store and autofill passwords on apps and websites you visit on your phone,' and that hasn't changed. What has changed is the desire to get users to move to the more secure passkey technology and, perhaps more pertinently, to move to the Microsoft Edge web browser. There's nothing wrong with the password management functionality of the Edge browser, nor the Chrome browser, nor most any browser. From my perspective, however, a dedicated password manager app is a much better option when it comes to password security and management. Removing that option, unless you have set up passkeys for your Microsoft Account as Authenticator will still support these and disabling Authenticator in these circumstances will disable your passkeys, just serves to complicate matters. As the whole passkeys thing I've just mentioned goes to prove. How convoluted is it all? Here's what Microsoft said: 'Your saved passwords (but not your generated password history) and addresses are securely synced to your Microsoft account, and you can continue to access them and enjoy seamless autofill functionality with Microsoft Edge.' Microsoft Passwords Deadline — What You Need To Do Before August 1 Let's start with the Edge browser requirement, which Microsoft has stated you are welcome to ignore and use a different provider, such as Google Password Manager, iCloud Keychain, or any other password management app. Microsoft said that once you set Microsoft as your default autofill provider on your phone, you will need to export passwords from Microsoft Authenticator and then import them into the new service. 'For security reasons, you will need to manually recreate your payment info,' Microsoft added. However, your time is fast running out to do this if you haven't already. Although your passwords that have already been saved in Microsoft Authenticator will be visible to Microsoft Edge, from August 1 they will no longer be accessible in the app and, therefore, you won't be able to export them anywhere. And, of course, any generated passwords that have not been saved from the app generator history into the saved passwords category will be deleted. If you are happy to use Edge as your password autofill provider, then Microsoft has easy-to-follow instructions on its support pages.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The S&P 500 Is Going to Plunge at Least 30%, Based on What a Forecasting Tool With a 100% Historical Success Rate Has to Say
Key Points The S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average have endured a roller-coaster ride of highs and lows since the year began. A time-tested valuation tool capable of providing the closest thing to an apples-to-apples comparison as investors can get is offering one of its loudest warnings ever. Time in the market has consistently trumped trying to time the stock market's downturns. 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index › It's been a roller-coaster ride for Wall Street and investors through nearly seven months of 2025. In early April, the wheels fell off the wagon, with the benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), growth-inspired Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC), and iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI) plunging. In a two-day period (the close of April 2 to the end of April 4), the S&P 500 registered its fifth-worst two-day percentage drop (-10.5%) since 1950. One week after this chaos began, all three major stock indexes recorded their largest single-day point gains in their respective histories -- and they haven't looked back. The broad-based S&P 500 has rallied by more than 25% in just three months for only the sixth time in its history and surged to a record high. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite has surpassed 21,000 for the first time, with the Dow just 4 points away from an all-time closing high, as of July 23. Between the hype surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and President Donald Trump's administration working out a couple of key trade deals, it would appear nothing can slow down the stock market. But looks can be deceiving... Wall Street's benchmark index is primed for a history lesson Let me preface any and all discussion regarding forecasting tools with this warning: Nothing is guaranteed on Wall Street. Even predictive tools and correlative events that have, historically, been 100% accurate in the past can't concretely guarantee what'll happen in the future. With the above being said, a 100% historical success rate in forecasting future stock returns is generally something investors should pay attention to. At any given time, there are one or more headwinds threatening to drag the stock market lower. Uncertainty regarding President Trump's tariff and trade policy, the potential for the prevailing rate of inflation to pick back up, and Moody's downgrade of the U.S. credit rating to AA1 from AAA are all examples of downside catalysts that can spark a stock market correction, bear market, or crash. But among this laundry list of potential problems for stocks, perhaps nothing is more worrisome than valuations. Most investors rely on the time-tested price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio when quickly assessing the relative cheapness or priciness of a given stock. A company's P/E ratio is calculated by dividing its share price by its trailing-12-month earnings per share (EPS). It's a handy tool for evaluating mature businesses, but it often falls short with growth stocks and during recessions when corporate earnings are temporarily disrupted. The valuation tool with an uncanny track record -- i.e., 100% success rate -- of forecasting future stock returns is the S&P 500's Shiller P/E Ratio, which is also known as the cyclically adjusted P/E Ratio, or CAPE Ratio. Rather than accounting for 12 months of trailing EPS, the Shiller P/E is based on average inflation-adjusted EPS over the trailing-10-year period. Accounting for a decade of EPS and adjusting it for inflation minimizes the impact of economic shock events, which allows for the closest thing to an apples-to-apples comparison as investors can get. As of the closing bell on July 23, the S&P 500's Shiller P/E Ratio stood at 38.79, which is just fractionally below its high for the current bull market of 38.89, set in December. To put this figure into context, it's the third-priciest continuous bull market when back-tested to January 1871. The only higher readings were observed prior to the dot-com bubble (an all-time peak of 44.19 in December 1999), and immediately prior to the start of the 2022 bear market (just above 40 during the first week of January 2022). When back-tested 154 years, the Shiller P/E has surpassed a multiple of 30 just six times, including the present -- and this is where historical precedent comes into play. Following the previous five occurrences where the Shiller P/E topped 30, the S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and/or Dow Jones Industrial Average fell between 20% and 89% (this latter figure is a Great Depression outlier). What this signals is that extended valuations aren't well tolerated by Wall Street over an extended period. Furthermore, none of these five 20% (or greater) pullbacks in the broader market found their respective bottoms with the S&P 500's Shiller P/E higher than 27. In other words, the minimum historical expectation is for the Shiller P/E to retrace to 27. Were this to occur, the broad-based S&P 500 would need to lose about 30% of its value. Based solely on what this valuation forecasting tool tells us, Wall Street's benchmark index can lose 30% of its value at some point in the presumed not-too-distant future. Time in the market consistently trumps trying to time the market Thankfully, history is a pendulum that swings (disproportionately) in both directions. Although sizable moves lower in the S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Dow Jones Industrial Average can play on the emotions of investors, time and perspective have a way of rewarding those who exercise patience and focus on the horizon. Every year, the analysts at Crestmont Research refresh a published data set that examines the rolling 20-year total returns (including dividends) for the S&P 500 that dates back to the start of the 20th century. Despite the S&P not officially being incepted until 1923, researchers were able to tabulate total return data by tracking the performance of its components in other major indexes back to 1900. This yielded 106 rolling 20-year periods (1900-1919, 1901-1920, 1902-1921, and so on, to 2005-2024). What Crestmont's calculations show is that all 106 of these rolling 20-year periods produced a positive total return. Hypothetically (because an S&P 500 index fund has only existed since 1993), if an investor had purchased an S&P 500 index fund at any point between 1900 and 2005 and simply held this position for 20 years, they would have generated a profit, including dividends, 100% of the time. What's particularly powerful about Crestmont's analysis is these positive returns occurred despite numerous recessions, a few economic depressions, two pandemics, and multiple wars. No matter how dire things seemed for Wall Street at any given moment, investors who held for 20 years always came out ahead. To build on this point and demonstrate how important time in the market is relative to trying to time its inevitable downturns, let's take a closer look at another data set published by Bespoke Investment Group on X (formerly Twitter) in June 2023. The data set you see above represents a comparison of the calendar-day length of every S&P 500 bull and bear market since the start of the Great Depression in September 1929. The 27 bear markets in the broad-based index spanning nearly 94 years (until June 2023) lasted an average of 286 calendar days, or less than 10 months. In comparison, bull markets have averaged 1,011 calendar days, or approximately 3.5 times longer than the typical bear market. Further, the longest S&P 500 bear market since the Great Depression endured for 630 calendar days in the mid-1970s. Including the current bull market (extrapolated to present day), more than half (14 out of 27) of S&P 500 bull markets have lasted longer than 630 calendar days. If the Shiller P/E correctly forecasts a 30% decline in the benchmark S&P 500, long-term-minded investors should use it as an opportunity to invest for their future, knowing that time and history are firmly in their corner. Should you invest $1,000 in S&P 500 Index right now? Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,040% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Moody's. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The S&P 500 Is Going to Plunge at Least 30%, Based on What a Forecasting Tool With a 100% Historical Success Rate Has to Say was originally published by The Motley Fool
