Texas bill, a trucking priority for tort reform, dies in House committee
But another piece of legislation backed by the industry, SB30, and its companion bill, HB 4806, are still considered alive as the Texas state legislative session races toward its Monday conclusion.
The companion House bill to SB39, approved in April, was HB 4688. It was referred to the Committee for Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence. While the House of Representatives' docket for the legislation shows several steps at the committee, including public hearings, there is no vote on the list of developments.With no action taken on the bill in recent days, barring a miraculous turn of events, the bill is considered dead in the Texas Legislature, which meets every two years.
When the bill passed in the Senate, it was hailed by the Texas Trucking Association. In a prepared statement released at the time, TTA President John Esparaza said the legislation 'marks a significant step forward in protecting the integrity of our legal system and Texas trucking industry.'
'This bill introduces much-needed reforms to how commercial motor vehicle collision cases are handled in Texas courts,' he said at the time. 'These reforms will establish fair, consistent, and statewide standards, helping to ensure that justice is applied equally across the state.'
But in a statement released to FreightWaves Thursday, Esparaza conceded defeat for this session.'SB 39 was an important piece of our tort reform package …,' he said in the statement. 'As a priority…we are disappointed that SB 39 died in the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Committee and will not become law this session.'
In a commentary about what SB39 and its companion House bill would have accomplished, attorneys for the law firm of Lewis Brisbois touched on several key points.
One change would have minimized questions about the background of the driver, according to the law firm. 'Where defendant trucking companies have already stipulated to their drivers being in the course and scope of employment, plaintiffs' attorneys can no longer inflame juries with arguments about the trucking companies' actions when they have no causal/legal relationship with the harms alleged,' Lewis Brisbois said. 'In other words, if a case goes on to trial, then the jury should solely be focused on the actions of the drivers involved in the incident.'
SB39 also was the vehicle that the TTA spoke of last year in trying to complete the unfinished work of HB 19, passed in 2021 but generally seen as not providing the relief in litigation that trucking attorneys had expected.
In an interview last year with FreightWaves, Lee Parsley, general counsel for Texans for Lawsuit Reform (TLS), said one of the goals of HB 19 was to give new emphasis to the 'admission rule.'
Last year, Parsley said of that rule: 'It basically says that if I, as the employer, agree to accept responsibility for my employees' actions that may have caused the injury, it is supposed to simplify the trial. You don't need to go down the rabbit hole of figuring out things like negligent hiring and negligent training. It's supposed to simplify it so that in the trial, you're just focused on who actually caused the accident and what the damages are at that point.'
The Lewis Brisbois commentary said SB39 would have 'recognized the admissions rule by eliminating key exceptions.' Quoting a precedent involving Werner Enterprises (NASDAQ: WERN), the attorneys said the admission rule clarifies that an 'employer's admission that an employee was acting in the course and scope of their employment when the employee allegedly engaged in negligent conduct bars a party allegedly injured by the employee's negligence from pursuing derivative theories of negligence against the employer.'
That citation quoted by the attorneys is from the case of Blake vs. Werner, the nuclear verdict initially handed down in 2018 and which now awaits a decision by the Texas Supreme Court following oral arguments in December. The original verdict, less than $90 million, has ballooned to more than $100 million with interest.The case involves the death and injuries in a family that crossed the median strip in bad winter weather in West Texas and collided with a Werner truck headed the other direction. The jury verdict that the Werner driver should have been going slower in that weather and would therefore not have been in position to slam into the oncoming vehicle has been a particular source of anger within trucking. But the Blake family involved in the crash won at trial and on appeal before it headed to the state's highest court.
The Lewis Brisbois commentary said the critics of SB39 'have voiced concerns that this change will further stifle plaintiffs' abilities to ensure that juries consider all parties and trucking companies' own liability in the harms by alleged company misdeeds.'
There is still hope at the TTA for SB30, which seeks to limit various types of payouts in crashes involving trucks through a variety of steps. Like SB39, SB30 passed the Senate. It is considered to have life as HB 4806 before the end of the legislative session.
'We will continue to pursue tort reform in SB30, however, as we head into the weekend and our final day of session on Monday, June 2,' Esparaza said.
HB 4806, is still listed as being in committee in the House.
In a blog post from the law firm of Varghese Summersett, which among other activities represents plaintiffs suing trucking companies, the firm summed up the key points in the legislation.
It would place caps on economic damages, the firm said. It restricts payouts only to amounts paid by the plaintiffs rather than what was billed by the providers of health care services to the plaintiffs. It makes changes in rules of evidence and also changes various liability standards. A jury must be unanimous in settling on noneconomic standards. There is also a shift in defining interest charges.
In a summary of SB30 published by TLS, the organization said the combined SB30/HB 4806 'guides jurors with fair and consistent rules for awarding noneconomic damages, ensuring they are truly compensatory.'
Among the provisions in the bill, according to TLS, are that the legislation 'gives jurors understandable definitions of pain and suffering and mental anguish and clear instructions that those damages should be based on the plaintiff's injury — not the defendant's conduct that is unrelated to the incident being litigated — and cannot be used to punish a defendant.'
More articles by John Kingston
Georgia tort reform aims to change practices in judicial 'hell hole'
A Lego approach helps prepare Manhattan Associates' TMS for tariff chaos
BMO's Q2 earnings show no improvement in credit conditions for trucking
The post Texas bill, a trucking priority for tort reform, dies in House committee appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
House Republicans back up Trump on DC crime push
But it will be difficult to get actual legislation to the president's desk. House Republicans moved quickly Monday to follow President Donald Trump's lead as he took unprecedented action to target Washington's locally elected government — further heightening the GOP's scrutiny of the capital city and its Democratic elected leaders. Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said he would haul Mayor Muriel Bowser, Council Chair Phil Mendelson and Attorney General Brian Schwalb to Capitol Hill next month for a hearing. The public grilling is likely to come as Trump's takeover of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department approaches a 30-day expiration date, requiring congressional action to continue. 'For years, the D.C. Council's radical, soft-on-crime agenda has emboldened criminals and put public safety at risk in our nation's capital,' Comer said in a statement.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republican Matt Hall leads Michigan House in tumultuous period of divided government
When Michigan House GOP Leader Matt Hall took the stage in May 2024 at a campaign rally for President Donald Trump, Republicans in the state found themselves in the political wilderness, navigating a historic period of full Democratic control of state government for the first time in decades. As his voice blared through the crowd at a Saginaw County airport, Hall urged those gathered to not just send Trump back to the White House. "This election in November, we need to elect Republicans to the Michigan House, so we can take the House back and put a check and balance on Gov. Whitmer," he said, adding that Republican victories would help support Trump's policy agenda in Michigan. Less than a year later, Hall had ascended to House speaker with the support of Republicans who flipped enough blue seats red to deliver a GOP majority in the chamber, and, in his new post, he joined Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in the Oval Office to meet with Trump to advocate for Michigan's federal priorities. The two have claimed some wins, including a new fighter jet mission for Selfridge Air National Guard Base, a push by Trump to protect the Great Lakes from invasive Asian carp and a disaster declaration from the president to support ice storm recovery efforts in northern Michigan. But back in Lansing, Hall's tenure as speaker has coincided with a tumultuous new era of divided state government, with a GOP-controlled Michigan House and Democratic-controlled Michigan Senate. Gridlock has come to define Lansing, with a Legislature that hasn't sent many bipartisan policies Whitmer's way. The logjam has Hall pointing his finger at Democratic lawmakers who, in turn, have routinely blasted Hall as uncooperative. In his job as House speaker, Hall pulls strings or pushes buttons, depending on which side of the aisle someone sits. Since taking the speaker's gavel, Hall has helped broker major bipartisan compromises on Michigan's minimum wage and sick leave policies, held back bills that the Legislature before him approved but failed to forward to Whitmer for signature and has yet to emerge from state budget negotiations with a deal after blowing past the July 1 deadline for approving a plan. Hall, 42, of Richland Township outside Kalamazoo, has publicly embraced political partnerships with some Democrats, including Whitmer, whose willingness to collaborate with Trump has received Hall's praise. Whitmer, in turn, has commended Hall for putting forward a road funding plan after years of legislative inaction. But Hall has also angered Democrats who castigate his Trump-like penchant for lobbing insults across the aisle. "It's an unserious approach that's going to lead to dangerous consequences," said House Minority Leader Ranjeev Puri, D-Canton, in a May interview about Hall's leadership style. Hall, who doesn't typically shy away from the news media when his legislative priorities are the topic, declined to be interviewed for this profile. A spokesperson for Hall initially agreed to an in-person interview with the Detroit Free Press for this profile but the offer was later rescinded. Asked why he wouldn't go through with an interview, Hall told the Free Press during an April 2025 event that he disagreed with a fact-check the newspaper published in 2021 that found he made a misleading claim, as a state representative, about Michigan's voter rolls. Lansing insiders frequently describe Hall as a creature of politics. "This is what he lives and breathes," said former state Rep. Andrew Beeler, R-Port Huron, in a November 2024 interview after Republicans flipped the state House and the GOP caucus tapped Hall as the next House speaker. Beeler — who chaired the House Republicans' campaign committee during the last election cycle — described Hall then as the hardest working person in Lansing and said he received frequent late-night calls from the GOP leader to strategize. Democratic legislative leaders, however, have complained about Hall's communication with them, saying he had ignored their attempts to negotiate ahead of the July 1 budget deadline. Bipartisan discussions eventually took place as the clock ticked, but when it struck midnight, a deal was nowhere to be found and budget negotiations appear to have reached a standstill. Michigan's next fiscal year begins Oct. 1. During a news conference Aug. 6, Hall again blasted Senate Democrats and their spending plan, saying it doesn't reflect current fiscal realities. He said he does routinely talk to Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks, D-Grand Rapids, and outlined plans to produce a House budget soon but didn't specify a deadline. Brinks declined a request to comment on Hall for this profile but speaking generally about the legislative session in a May interview, she bemoaned the lack of bipartisan action in Lansing and cast blame on Hall. "So I would say it's easy to be the party of opposition if you have to be, but you know he's got a chamber, he's in the majority and he has an opportunity to actually be productive, so it's unfortunate that he's not taking us up on working together on anything," she said. Hall, on his end, has repeatedly during news conferences blamed Democrats for inaction and touted his ability to bring House lawmakers together across party lines to pass policies to fund police and roads. Still, bipartisan cooperation hasn't always appeared to be Hall's goal. In March, Hall made a last-minute addition to the House's daily agenda that put his Democratic predecessor on the hot seat. He put a bill up for vote, introduced by state Rep. Joe Tate, D-Detroit, who served as House speaker during the previous legislative session. Tate's bill proposed providing driver's licenses for immigrants in the United States illegally. Hall and every House Republican opposed the bill, yet Hall put it up for a vote anyway, likely knowing it would fail. If Hall's goal was to underscore Democratic divisions on immigration — a key issue in the 2024 election — he succeeded. Six Democrats broke from their party to join every Republican lawmaker to vote against the bill. Before the vote, Tate in a speech on the House floor, called Hall's move "nothing but a political ploy." Hall has continued to rile Democrats but his ability to unite Republicans has also faced a test. During a July 24 House session, Hall couldn't cobble together enough Republican members to advance legislation to restrict students' phone use at school and extend the timeline to prosecutors to pursue resentencing hearings to seek life sentences for convicted murderers who committed their crimes when they were 19 or 20 years old. Hall said Democrats reneged on commitments they made to support the bills. Among them was state Rep. Alabas Farhat, D-Dearborn, according to Hall who said the Democratic lawmaker promised to vote for the resentencing legislation. Farhat has denied that he made a deal to vote for the bill. During the House session, Hall ousted Farhat as the Minority Vice Chair on the powerful House Appropriations Committee and during a news conference immediately after the votes, Hall said that he needs a partner to achieve a bipartisan budget deal and said Farhat wasn't up to the job. Hall has rejected Puri's recommendation to reinstate Farhat as the Democratic appropriations chair, made in a letter that blasted the speaker's approach to budget negotiations. On Hall's side of the aisle, state Rep. Matt Maddock, R-Milford, who serves as majority vice chair on the House Appropriations Committee, has praised Hall's speakership. "I'm glad he is where he is, he's been nothing but impressive to me," he said during a July appearance on WKAR's "Off the Record." "He knows what he's doing, he's a fighter and I got his back." Hall makes his way to Lansing Hall grew up in Rochester Hills but he didn't stay in metro Detroit. He attended Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, worked as former Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette's west Michigan liaison from 2011 to 2015 and received his law degree from WMU Cooley Law School in 2017. Hall fought some of his early political battles with members of his own party, according to Republicans who encountered him as an emerging political force. In 2016, when the Michigan GOP met to choose delegates for the Republican National Convention, it wasn't clear Trump would secure enough delegates to win on the first ballot, which could have seriously threatened his nomination, according to former Michigan GOP Executive Director Jeff Timmer. Trump had won most of the Michigan delegates but U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and then-Ohio Gov. John Kasich each won delegates, too, so their Michigan supporters had some level of bargaining power at the gathering. Former Michigan GOP Chair Saul Anuzis served as the lieutenant for Cruz's presidential campaign, Hall represented the Trump campaign and Timmer helmed the faction for Kasich, and they all cut deals with one another related to which delegates would serve on key committees at the convention, according to Timmer. Ultimately, Timmer said he and Hall sidelined Anuzis, reneging on the deals they made with him. Timmer, who has become a vocal critic of the Republican Party under Trump, said the episode left a lasting negative impression of Hall on him. Anuzis did not respond to a request for comment. In 2018, Hall launched his first bid for the state House with a campaign to take on GOP incumbent state Rep. David Maturen, R-Vicksburg, who represented the 63rd District at the time. On the day of the deadline for candidates to file to run, Maturen said Hall asked to meet him outside the Michigan House chamber, where Hall told the GOP lawmaker that he had launched a campaign to challenge him. The last-minute primary fight in 2018 wasn't pretty, according to Maturen, who said his opponent's campaign operatives portrayed him as evil. Maturen described himself as a moderate Republican running against a "Trumper" and said that he struggled to mitigate the president's influence in the race. "It was a national election based on him," Maturen said of Trump. He recounted questions on the campaign trail seeking his thoughts on the president to which Maturen said he responded by saying he sought a seat in the state House, not Congress. Maturen lost to Hall by 20 percentage points. Hall then won the general election. Republicans tap Hall to lead Hall honed his combative style in his first term when he led hearings as chair of the Joint Select Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic, challenging Whitmer's handling of the public health crisis. In 2022, Whitmer won reelection and Democrats flipped control of both chambers of the Michigan Legislature, delivering a Democratic governing trifecta for the first time in 40 years. Hall worked tirelessly to seize opportunities to assert Republicans' power as the minority party. When Democrats temporarily lost their majority to a tied House after a pair of special elections in 2023, Hall insisted that the two parties come together to broker an agreement to share power, essentially asking Tate to relinquish some of his authority as House speaker. Tate didn't budge and Hall proceeded to put on stunning displays of GOP unity. For instance, Beeler — the former GOP state representative — said Hall encouraged every House Republican to stick together to vote against the budget Democrats crafted in 2024, despite funding included for GOP districts. "It was a master class in leadership," Beeler said in November. After Republicans selected Hall to serve as the next House speaker, he led every GOP lawmaker in the state House in a walkout of the 2024 lame duck session, the period of lawmaking after the election when defeated and outgoing Democratic lawmakers still held power. Hall helmed the GOP boycott with the stated goal of forcing a vote on legislation to stop pending changes to Michigan's minimum wage and paid sick leave laws, opposed by business groups. The move infuriated Democrats, who characterized the Republican protest led by Hall as a dereliction of duty by elected representatives. "Republicans aren't here. So how can we have a conversation if they're not here and decided to, you know, go make snow angels in front of the Capitol, I guess?" Tate told reporters in December 2024 on the day Republicans stormed off the House floor. The fallout from the last legislative session has continued to linger over the current one, with an ongoing lawsuit from the Michigan Senate against Hall for refusing to send bills passed in the previous legislative session to the governor's desk. When he took the gavel as House speaker at the start of 2025, Hall expressed hope that Michigan would not transform into a mirror image of politics at the national level. "You know, we've been able to keep all that Washington, D.C. stuff out of here," he said. Yet Hall quickly proceeded to use his speakership to bring Trump's policy fights to the Michigan House. Republicans have passed resolutions, which were nonbinding, supporting the president's efforts to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education, encourage county sheriffs and local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement and ban transgender girls from competing on girls' sports teams in Michigan. Hall has modeled his quest to slash state government spending after former Trump aide Elon Musk's cost-cutting "Department of Government Efficiency." Michigan's U.S. Senate race: Who's winning — and losing — the fundraising sweepstakes While Hall has reshaped policymaking in Lansing, he has also brought a cutting communication style to the Capitol. He has said one Democratic lawmaker — state Rep. Mai Xiong, of Warren — has a low IQ for calling out Hall for being away from Lansing when he was in Macomb County with Trump for his announcement of a new fighter jet mission at Selfridge Air National Guard Base. Xiong condemned Hall's comment as evidence that he seems more intent on bullying than working together to solve Michigan's challenges. Hall's regular and lengthy news conferences as House speaker, in which he blasts Democrats one minute and then outlines why they should support his policy demands in the next, have become a fixture in the Michigan Capitol. During them, he has advocated for new mandates for state employees to work in-person and a permanent cut to Michigan's income tax. He has also used the forum to take a victory lap, once displaying a photo of him and Whitmer at the Oval Office with Trump in April. In a July statement, Whitmer said she has been consistent in her willingness to work in a bipartisan manner to deliver results for Michigan. "That's no different this term. We have a productive relationship and I appreciate Speaker Hall's willingness to work together," she said. Michigan's economy: Gretchen Whitmer? Donald Trump? We all lose in semiconductor plant blame bingo. | Opinion John Sellek, chief strategist and CEO of Lansing-based public relations and affairs firm Harbor Strategic, said Hall has set the terms of debate in the Capitol and shown he won't shy away from sharing his conversations with other legislative leaders, publicly to praise or pressure them. Sellek and Hall both worked for Schuette when he was attorney general. Sellek tied Hall's approach back to his path to the state House. "He is not somebody who very carefully ran for school board and then ran for city council and then ran for House. He actually moved and challenged a sitting representative and beat him," Sellek said. "And he carries that same swagger and fearlessness into what he's doing now." Contact Clara Hendrickson: chendrickson@ or 313-296-5743. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Republican Matt Hall's path to Michigan House Speaker
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
House Republicans want another megabill. One GOP senator says it could be ‘damaging.'
And Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) said he's open to considering as many as 200 tax proposals from his members that were ultimately not included in the first megabill. But most senators have questions about what could go into another reconciliation package — and they're casting doubts on whether it's even politically possible to do this all over again. 'You have to have a reason to do it,' said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.). 'It's not easy to do, so you have to have a purpose for doing it in the first place.' That unifying purpose for Republicans the first time around was a desire to deliver Trump a major legislative victory early in his second term and prevent a tax hike that they feared would weaken the economy. Republican leaders' decision to throw in a debt limit extension through 2026 as Treasury warned the nation would soon exceed its borrowing authority added a do-or-die incentive. 'Without the pressure, I don't see how you get it done,' said one Republican senator, granted anonymity to speak freely, about prospects for passing a second reconciliation bill without an existential impetus for action. 'I don't think I see what the pressure is here.' At the same time, despite the White House's enthusiasm for another reconciliation bill, administration officials have not yet told lawmakers what policies they want considered, according to three people speaking on condition of anonymity. Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — chairs of the committees on Armed Services and Budget, respectively — also said before leaving for recess they have not received guidance from the White House. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, said he still hadn't heard from the administration about its broader set of legislative priorities heading into the fall. At this point, the loudest reconciliation push in the Senate is coming from deficit hawks like Sen. Ron Johnson, who wants to use another bill to cut spending further than what conservatives were able to achieve in the first package. 'Leadership is telling us we'll do one or two more reconciliations in this Congress,' the Wisconsin Republican told reporters earlier this summer. 'So the clock's ticking' While Senate Majority Leader John Thune has left the door open to doing a second reconciliation bill, he hasn't provided a specific timeline for doing so. One of the three people waiting to hear from Trump said the push for another party-line package is coming not as much from the administration as from the House. There, Budget Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) has said lawmakers should try to rework policies cut from the first reconciliation bill to comply with Senate rules. But there's skepticism in the Senate that the House will be able to successfully relitigate those proposals. 'My sense is that there's more enthusiasm in the House than in the Senate, and that makes sense,' said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.). 'They can do things with 51 votes anyway, most of what we have to do requires 60. And that means that senators, if you have a desire to actually legislate, need to find ways to legislate — and reconciliation is damaging to that relationship.' But House Republicans are also navigating their own slim margins and ideological divides. Conservatives and centrists clashed over cuts to Medicaid and clean energy tax credits in the 'big, beautiful bill,' and lawmakers could have a diminished appetite for further battles over hot-button issues, especially heading into an election year. Some House GOP aides were alarmed earlier this week when a hard-line think tank, the Economic Policy Innovation Center, pitched an extended moratorium on Medicaid funding for large abortion providers in a Republican Study Committee staff briefing. RSC leadership has stressed its megabill working group is designed at this point to generate ideas and put down markers, but EPIC's recommendation could be a harbinger of other disputes to come. Meanwhile, Republicans are already struggling to sell voters on the first megabill back in their home states and districts, where town halls and other constituent events in the early weeks of recess have so far been rocky. One House Republican, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said there would be some 'hesitancy' to dive back into reconciliation. 'We did so much in the first,' the member said. 'It's going to be harder to do a second one.'
