
How Editing Apps Make Perfect Body Image Among Young People: Study
Like many of her peers, Abigail (21) takes a lot of selfies, tweaks them with purpose-made apps, and posts them on social media. But, she says, the selfie-editing apps do more than they were designed for:
You look at that idealised version of yourself and you just want it - you just want it to be real [...] the more you do it, the better you get at it and the more subtle your editing is the easier it is to actually see yourself as that version.
Abigail was one of nearly 80 young people my colleagues and I interviewed as part of research into selfie-editing technologies. The findings, recently published in New Media & Society, are cause for alarm. They show selfie-editing technologies have significant impacts for young people's body image and wellbeing.
Carefully curating an online image
Many young people carefully curate how they appear online. One reason for this is to negotiate the intense pressures of visibility in a digitally-networked world.
Selfie-editing technologies enable this careful curation.
The most popular selfie-editing apps include Facetune, Faceapp, and Meitu. They offer in-phone editing tools from lighting, colour and photo adjustments to "touch ups" such as removing blemishes.
These apps also offer "structural" edits. These mimic cosmetic surgery procedures such as rhinoplasty (more commonly known as nose jobs) and facelifts. They also offer filters including an "ageing" filter, "gender swap" tool, and "make up" and hairstyle try-ons.
The range of editing options and incredible attention to details and correction of so-called "flaws" these apps offer encourage the user to forensically analyse their face and body, making a series of micro changes with the tap of a finger.
A wide range of editing practices
The research team I led included Amy Dobson (Curtin University), Akane Kanai (Monash University), Rosalind Gill (University of London) and Niamh White (Monash University). We wanted to understand how image-altering technologies were experienced by young people, and whether these tools impacted how they viewed themselves.
We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 33 young people aged between 18-24. We also ran 13 "selfie-editing" group workshops with 56 young people aged 18-24 who take selfies, and who use editing apps in Melbourne and Newcastle, Australia.
Most participants identified as either "female" or "cis woman" (56). There were 12 who identified as either "non-binary", "genderfluid" or "questioning", and 11 who identified as "male" or "cis man". They identified as from a range of ethnic, racial and cultural backgrounds.
Facetune was the most widely-used facial-editing app. Participants also used Snapseed, Meitu, VSCO, Lightroom and the built-in beauty filters which are now standard in newer Apple or Samsung smartphones.
Editing practices varied from those who irregularly made only minor edits such as lighting and cropping, to those who regularly used beauty apps and altered their faces and bodies in forensic detail, mimicking cosmetic surgical interventions.
Approximately one third of participants described currently or previously making dramatic or "structural" edits through changing the dimensions of facial features. These edits included reshaping noses, cheeks, head size, shoulders or waist "cinching".
Showcasing your 'best self'
Young people told us that selfie taking and editing was an important way of showing "who they are" to the world.
As one participant told us, it's a way of saying "I'm here, I exist". But they also said the price of being online, and posting photos of themselves, meant they were aware of being seen alongside a set of images showing "perfect bodies and perfect lives".
Participants told us they assume "everyone's photos have been edited". To keep up with this high standard, they needed to also be adept at editing photos to display their "best self" - aligning with gendered and racialised beauty ideals.
Photo-editing apps and filters were seen as a normal and expected way to achieve this. However, using these apps was described as a "slippery slope", or a "Pandora's box", where "once you start editing it's hard to stop".
Young women in particular described feeling that the "baseline standard to just feel normal" feels higher than ever, and that appearance pressures are intensifying.
Many felt image-altering technologies such as beauty filters and editing apps are encouraging them to want to change their appearance "in real life" through cosmetic non-surgical procedures such as fillers and Botox.
As one participant, Amber (19), told us:
I feel like a lot of plastic surgeries are now one step further than a filter.
Another participant, Freya (20), described a direct link between editing photos and cosmetic enhancement procedures.
Ever since I started [editing my body in photos], I wanted to change it in real life [...] That's why I decided to start getting lip and cheek filler.
Altering the relationship between technology and the human experience
These findings suggest image-editing technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI) filters and selfie-editing apps, have significant impacts for young people's body image and wellbeing.
The rapid expansion of generative AI in "beauty cam" technologies in the cosmetic and beauty retail industries makes it imperative to study these impacts, as well as how young people experience these new technologies.
These cameras are able to visualise "before and after" on a user's face with minute forensic detail.
These technologies, through their potential to alter relationship between technology and the human experience at the deepest level, may have devastating impacts on key youth mental health concerns such as body image.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Neuroscientist explains why people perceive colours differently
Neuroscientist Emily McDonald reveals that individual color perception is unique due to genetic variations, eye color, and personal experiences. A study by the University of Tokyo and Monash University supports this, finding that color-neurotypical individuals perceive red similarly, while colorblind individuals experience it differently. This highlights the subjective nature of color perception. When your mum tells you, 'You are one of a kind,' trust her. She is right (as always)! You are so unique that even the colours you see may not appear the same way to anyone else in the world. Yes, that's right. Your red is not someone else's red. Emily McDonald is an Arizona-based neuroscientist and mindset coach, has explained the science behind this. Do we all see colours the same way? The neuroscientist explains that no two people see colour the same way. 'If you've ever wondered whether other people see colour the same way as you, according to current scientific understanding, the percent chance that anyone else sees colour the same way as you is essentially zero,' she says. The scientist shared that she was researching the topic and found some interesting aspects of why this happens. 'We all see colours differently, and I used to do research on this. So I'll tell you why. I used to work in a research lab doing something called a quantum catch, where we would take the genotype of the colour-detecting cells in different monkeys' eyes, and then we could map on a colour plot how they would perceive fruits in the rainforest, and you could see how different monkeys would perceive the same colour fruit differently, and humans are the same way. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo ' She added , 'And genetic code is only one reason that colour of your eye, like brown versus blue, can also change how you see colour. And our personal experiences can also shape how we perceive colours. Neural circuits in the brain that are involved in colour processing can adapt based upon our experiences.' Science behind the colour A recent study led by researchers from the University of Tokyo and Monash University in Australia explored whether two people's subjective experiences might differ when it comes to colour. They introduced a novel experimental and computational paradigm called the qualia structure paradigm, which looks at relational structures of our experiences, called qualia structures, and then compares qualia structures across individuals on a structural basis, as opposed to comparing colors one-on-one. 'Kahin Bada, Kahin Chhota': Ravi Kishan Uses Samosa Analogy To Demand Regulation Of Food Prices 'Using massive online experimental data from both color-neurotypical and colorblind participants, we empirically found that color similarity judgment data derived from color-neurotypical participants can be correctly aligned at the group level, such that red correctly mapped to the same red or similar reddish colors. In contrast, those of colorblind participants could not be aligned with those of color-neurotypical participants, implying that color-neurotypical red is relationally equivalent to other color-neurotypical's red, but not to colorblind people's red,' the researchers said.

Hindustan Times
5 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Independence Day 2025: How to add the Indian flag to your WhatsApp, Instagram, profile pictures- Har Ghar Tiranga
As India celebrates its 79th Independence Day, the government's Har Ghar Tiranga 2025 campaign is inspiring citizens to proudly display the national flag at their homes. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has once again called upon every household to participate, reinforcing the importance of national pride. Beyond physical displays, many Indians also express their patriotism online by adding the tricolour to their social media profile pictures on platforms such as WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, and X (formerly Twitter). This guide explains how to update your profile photo quickly and easily. Independence Day 2025: Show your patriotism online with the Indian tricolour on your profile picture this Independence Day. (Raj K Raj/HT Photo) Adding the Indian Flag to Your Facebook Profile Picture Facebook provides a simple method to overlay the Indian flag using its Frames feature on the mobile app. Begin by opening the Facebook app and tapping your profile icon. Select a new profile picture and choose the Add Frames option. Navigate to the Flags category and select the Indian flag. The tricolour will now appear over your profile image. Tap Next to confirm and set it as your profile picture. To use this image on other platforms, save it to your device. View your profile photo, tap the three dots, and select Save to phone. The image can now be uploaded to Instagram, WhatsApp, or X without further modification. Adjusting Your Profile Picture for Different Platforms Each social media platform has its recommended image dimensions. For the best results, resize your image before uploading. Facebook profile photos are best at 170 x 170 pixels, X (Twitter) uses 400 x 400 pixels, Instagram recommends 180 x 180 pixels, and WhatsApp works well with 500 x 500 pixels. Correct sizing ensures the flag is displayed clearly without cropping. Updating Your Profile Picture on Various Platforms On Instagram, go to Profile, tap Edit Profile, select Change Profile Photo, choose New Profile Photo, select the image, and confirm. For WhatsApp, open Settings, tap your profile picture, select the Camera icon, choose the saved image, and tap Done. On X, navigate to Profile, click Edit profile, upload your image, and save. Alternate Methods Without Facebook If you do not use Facebook or prefer a different approach, several apps and online tools can overlay the Indian flag onto your profile photo. Apps such as Snapseed or dedicated tools like Flag Stickers for Picture and Flag Face allow you to add the tricolour with custom positioning. Websites like and provide similar functionality for those who prefer a browser-based solution. These tools offer flexibility in style and placement, letting you create a personalised patriotic profile image for Independence Day. By following these steps, you can showcase your support for Har Ghar Tiranga 2025 and express your patriotism across all major social media platforms. Mobile Finder: Google Pixel 10 Pro LATEST specs, features, and price

NDTV
02-08-2025
- NDTV
Just One Diet Soda a Day May Spike Your Diabetes Risk by 38%: Study
A new Australian study has found that drinking just one can of diet soda a day may raise the risk of developing type 2 diabetes by 38%. The study shows that the risk from artificially sweetened soft drinks is even greater than that from regular sugary drinks, which were linked to a 23% higher risk. Researchers from Monash University, RMIT University, and the Cancer Council Victoria tracked over 36,000 Australian adults for nearly 14 years. The study was led by Distinguished Professor Barbora de Courten, Associate Professor Allison Hodge, and PhD student Robel Hussen Kabthymer. Published in the journal Diabetes & Metabolism, the findings raise new concerns about the health effects of both sugar-sweetened and diet drinks. The research adds to growing global evidence that artificially sweetened beverages are not a safe alternative to sugary drinks. "Drinking one or more of these beverages each day, whether sweetened with sugar or artificial substitutes, was linked to a significantly higher chance of developing type 2 diabetes," said Mr. Hussen Kabthymer. Professor de Courten, senior author of the study, said the findings challenge the common assumption that artificially sweetened beverages are a safer choice. "Artificial sweeteners are often recommended to people at risk of diabetes as a healthier alternative, but our results suggest they may pose their own health risks," she said. While the link between sugary drinks and diabetes could largely be explained by obesity, the connection between artificially sweetened drinks and type 2 diabetes remained strong even after adjusting for body weight, suggesting a potentially direct effect on metabolism. Professor de Courten said the findings have important implications for public health policy. "We support measures like sugary drink taxes, but our study shows we also need to pay attention to artificially sweetened options. These are often marketed as better for you, yet may carry their own risks. Future policies should take a broader approach to reducing intake of all non-nutritive beverages." The study analysed data from the long-running Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, also known as Health 2020, involving participants aged 40-69 years, and adjusted for diet, exercise, education, and health history. Type 2 diabetes affects around 1.3 million Australians and more than 500 million people worldwide, with the vast majority of cases linked to diet and lifestyle.



