Lea heirs seek judge's ruling that new road to Cheekwood, Percy Warner would violate deed
The descendants of Luke Lea — the man who deeded the land that became Percy Warner Park to Nashville in 1927 — are asking a judge to rule that building a new access road through the park would violate a restrictive covenant of the deed.
Lea served as a U.S. senator and founded The Tennessean. On June 9, his heirs announced that they're asking a Davidson County Chancery Court judge to rule on their 'petition for declaratory relief.' A declaratory judgment states the rights of the parties in a case without ordering any specific action, in an effort to avoid damages and further lawsuits.
In this case, the family is aiming to halt any potential that an access road from Highway 100 to nearby Cheekwood Estate and Gardens could run through the park. The ask stems from the Belle Meade Highlands Design and Mobility Study, produced by the city's Planning Department and adopted by the Planning Commission in January, which includes several access road options intended to reduce traffic in the neighborhood around Cheekwood and the park.
'We know that no final decision has been made about the proposed access road,' David Bridgers, an attorney who filed the petition on behalf of the Lea family, said in a news release. 'However, we are asking for a ruling that such a road through the park to Cheekwood would be for 'any other use' than for a park. The covenant in the deed states that the land would be used for a public park, and specifically prohibits 'any other use.''
Here's what to know about what prompted the petition.
That no final decision has been made about the proposed access road is indeed true. In fact, the Nashville Department of Transportation has yet to make any recommendation on the location for a new access road.
Cortnye Stone, NDOT's director of strategic communications and policy, previously told The Tennessean that NDOT will make a recommendation to the Metro Nashville Council, the Metro Parks Board and Mayor Freddie O'Connell's office by August.
Cheekwood's president and CEO, Jane MacLeod said she supports the effort to improve access to both Cheekwood and the park.
'Cheekwood supports Metro Planning's work to explore improved access for Warner Parks and Cheekwood to better accommodate our neighborhood and visitors to these two Nashville treasures,' MacLeod said in a statement to The Tennessean. 'This is an NDOT and Metro project, and we are confident that Metro decision makers will determine the best path forward for our city.'
MacLeod added that Cheekwood isn't a party in the Lea family's legal action — any exploration of improved traffic access in Belle Meade is "solely a Metro matter over which Cheekwood has no authority."
However, some Nashvillians have been sounding the alarm about one option in the plan — an access road running along the northern edge of park property — since February, including a group that says it could cut through the park's mountain biking trails.
The family's petition states that this road option would violate the deed, and the title of the 868 acres Lea gifted to the city would revert to the heirs — an outcome that family members say they don't want.
'We, the heirs of Luke Lea, do not want the park to 'revert and revest' to our family, as the covenant requires,' Leah Rubino, Lea's granddaughter, said in the release. 'We do not want to take possession of this land; we simply want the terms of the covenant to be honored.'
Cheekwood, the park's next door neighbor, is in the middle of an effort of its own to mitigate on-site parking capacity issues — though it's not quite as directly tied to the study's recommendations.
Cheekwood's recently announced $25 million parking project seeks to help the gardens transition off of adjacent city property used for overflow parking by the end of 2027. That partnership has been reflected in a long-standing parking agreement between the city and Cheekwood, which was most recently renewed in March.
The most recent version of the agreement comes with milestones the city wants Cheekwood to achieve as it works toward parking independence, including conducting its own feasibility study of access road options to the gardens and coordinating with NDOT's analysis.
"Cheekwood's large investment in a new parking facility is in complete compliance with Metro's desire that Cheekwood transition parking to Cheekwood's property, and is an express condition of the memorandum of understanding unanimously approved by the Metro Parks Board," MacLeod said. "Cheekwood's new parking pavilion simply relocates parking from Metro Parks property that had been utilized for this purpose for decades to Cheekwood property and uses the same access on Forrest Park Drive as it has for decades."
Austin Hornbostel is the Metro reporter for The Tennessean. Have a question about local government you want an answer to? Reach him at ahornbostel@tennessean.com.
Get Davidson County news delivered to your inbox every Wednesday.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Lea heirs seek ruling that Percy Warner Park road plan violates deed
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
MTSU announces potential changes, cuts to comply with new anti-DEI law, Trump order
Middle Tennessee State University announced it is making changes to comply with Tennessee's new "Dismantling DEI Departments Act," along with an executive order by President Donald Trump. The measures bar public institutions of higher education from maintaining, authorizing or supporting programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion, also known as DEI. "While MTSU has not functioned in a way that discriminates against students, faculty, staff or our overall community, the parameters of the president's executive orders and Tennessee law requires us to reevaluate our operations to ensure that we remain in compliance around how we support students, nonacademic programs and some academic support programs," MTSU President Sidney McPhee said in an email sent to the university community on June 10. The public university, located about 35 miles south of Nashville in Murfreesboro, is home to around 20,000 students. To comply with the order and the new state law, McPhee said, the university must do the following: Restructure or eliminate programs that explicitly focus on DEI Remove DEI references from the university website and publications Adjust scholarship programs with criteria structured around DEI Eliminate sponsorships and support of any initiatives, programs and services related to DEI, both internally and externally McPhee said the university is conducting a "comprehensive review" of its programs and services, which may lead to further cuts, including laying off some employees. He said he and his team are working to meet the new requirements while making sure students feel supported and minimizing disruptions in the university's operations. It was not immediately clear if any changes have been enacted, or what impact those changes may have on programs, scholarships, services, student and faculty. University spokesperson Andrew Oppman told The Tennessean that he did not have any specifics as of June 11. He said McPhee wanted the email to alert the university community that a "thorough review" was underway and to give a sense of the scope of the possible changes. Oppman said once final decisions are made, they will be shared with the public. "We understand that these actions may raise questions and concerns," McPhee wrote. "Our administration is actively working to ensure that our university employees and students continue to feel supported as we address these challenges. We are aware that these laws will impact our community in a way that will cause angst and frustration, and we want to assure you that our commitment to serving all students has not changed." Rachel Wegner covers education and children's issues for The Tennessean. Got a story you think she should hear? Reach her via email at RAwegner@ You can also find her on Twitter or Bluesky under the handle RachelAnnWegner. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: MTSU: Change ahead to comply with anti-DEI law, Trump order
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
TN Republicans' bill would oust officials who release 'confidential' immigration enforcement details
Top Tennessee Republican lawmakers have proposed a bill that would make it a felony and grounds for removal if public officials jeopardize the safety of federal law enforcement officers or disrupt federal immigration enforcement by revealing confidential operation details. The bill, filed by House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson on June 9, comes after a weeklong operation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Nashville in early May. The operation led to hundreds of traffic stops, in coordination with the Tennessee Highway Patrol, and nearly 200 arrests. Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell has been under scrutiny from state and federal Republican leaders over his response to the arrests. During the operation, O'Connell updated an existing executive order that requires city departments to report communications with federal immigration officials to the mayor's office, tightening the timeline for those reports. Even in its original version, the executive order included a provision that those communications be posted online for transparency. When O'Connell's office posted that list in late May, it originally included the names of some officials who called. Those names have since been removed from the version of the spreadsheet posted online. During the sweeps in Nashville, O'Connell also repeatedly asked federal officials to release the names and charges of the people arrested, but to no avail. Some community members, meanwhile, were outspoken in their opposition to the operation. Immigrant rights groups and other Nashvillians showed up to protest at Nashville's ICE office not long after the sweeps began on May 4. That opposition extended to further protests several weeks later, an appearance from New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker and a volunteer effort to monitor and verify ICE activity. U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles and other D.C. Republicans have since called for a federal investigation into O'Connell, which was officially initiated on May 30. Meanwhile, Sexton called for O'Connell to rescind his executive order, saying it risks the safety of federal immigration agents. "The people of Tennessee expect their elected leaders to protect law enforcement — not endanger them," Johnson said in a June 9 news release. "When a public official like Mayor O'Connell chooses political activism over public safety, especially by interfering with federal immigration enforcement, he has no business holding office in this state." Johnson said he hopes the legislation "sends a message" to O'Connell and other "blue city" leaders that may act similarly. 'Mayor O'Connell's public refusal to rescind his executive order makes the need for this legislation unmistakably clear to prevent future political defiance that undermines the rule of law and puts law enforcement at risk,' Johnson said in the release. Sexton and Johnson did not provide any examples of O'Connell's interference with immigration enforcement operations. The bill would make it a Class E felony for state or local officials to "negligently release" information that identifies officers tasked with immigration enforcement and paves the way to oust those who violate the law, according to the release. Additionally, it expands provisions under the Tennessee Public Records Act to protect undercover officers and sensitive enforcement activity and beefs up penalties for unauthorized disclosures of protected law enforcement information. The bill is backed by top Senate Republicans, including Lt. Gov. Randy McNally, Speaker Pro Tempore Ferrell Haile, Republican Caucus Chair Ken Yager and Finance Committee Chair Bo Watson. It is set to be taken up in the 2026 legislative session. O'Connell's office had not responded to The Tennessean's request for comment by 11 a.m. on June 10. The move by Tennessee Republicans comes a few days after U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tennessee, introduced legislation to make it illegal to 'dox' federal law enforcement officials. She said the bill is a direct response to the spreadsheet published by O'Connell's office detailing recent communications between city departments with federal immigration agents. Blackburn filed the Protecting Law Enforcement From Doxxing Act on June 4, explicitly naming O'Connell as the impetus. That bill would make it illegal to 'publish the name of a federal law enforcement officer with the intent to obstruct a criminal investigation or immigration operation.' An individual found guilty of doing so would face a fine and imprisonment of five years. In their joint news release on June 9, Sexton and Johnson praised Blackburn's efforts and say their proposed legislation complements her proposal. "Tennessee has always stood with law enforcement and we will not allow politically motivated actors to put officers' lives in danger simply to score political points with the far left," Sexton said in the release. "Tennessee will not become California, and Nashville will not become LA or San Francisco on our watch." Typically, "doxxing" refers to the act of publicly providing personally identifiable information about an individual or organization, usually via the internet, such as their home addresses, private contact information and names of family members. As for the public availability of law enforcement officers' names, they are not typically considered private information. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: TN bill would punish officials who reveal immigration enforcement details
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Lea heirs seek judge's ruling that new road to Cheekwood, Percy Warner would violate deed
The descendants of Luke Lea — the man who deeded the land that became Percy Warner Park to Nashville in 1927 — are asking a judge to rule that building a new access road through the park would violate a restrictive covenant of the deed. Lea served as a U.S. senator and founded The Tennessean. On June 9, his heirs announced that they're asking a Davidson County Chancery Court judge to rule on their 'petition for declaratory relief.' A declaratory judgment states the rights of the parties in a case without ordering any specific action, in an effort to avoid damages and further lawsuits. In this case, the family is aiming to halt any potential that an access road from Highway 100 to nearby Cheekwood Estate and Gardens could run through the park. The ask stems from the Belle Meade Highlands Design and Mobility Study, produced by the city's Planning Department and adopted by the Planning Commission in January, which includes several access road options intended to reduce traffic in the neighborhood around Cheekwood and the park. 'We know that no final decision has been made about the proposed access road,' David Bridgers, an attorney who filed the petition on behalf of the Lea family, said in a news release. 'However, we are asking for a ruling that such a road through the park to Cheekwood would be for 'any other use' than for a park. The covenant in the deed states that the land would be used for a public park, and specifically prohibits 'any other use.'' Here's what to know about what prompted the petition. That no final decision has been made about the proposed access road is indeed true. In fact, the Nashville Department of Transportation has yet to make any recommendation on the location for a new access road. Cortnye Stone, NDOT's director of strategic communications and policy, previously told The Tennessean that NDOT will make a recommendation to the Metro Nashville Council, the Metro Parks Board and Mayor Freddie O'Connell's office by August. Cheekwood's president and CEO, Jane MacLeod said she supports the effort to improve access to both Cheekwood and the park. 'Cheekwood supports Metro Planning's work to explore improved access for Warner Parks and Cheekwood to better accommodate our neighborhood and visitors to these two Nashville treasures,' MacLeod said in a statement to The Tennessean. 'This is an NDOT and Metro project, and we are confident that Metro decision makers will determine the best path forward for our city.' MacLeod added that Cheekwood isn't a party in the Lea family's legal action — any exploration of improved traffic access in Belle Meade is "solely a Metro matter over which Cheekwood has no authority." However, some Nashvillians have been sounding the alarm about one option in the plan — an access road running along the northern edge of park property — since February, including a group that says it could cut through the park's mountain biking trails. The family's petition states that this road option would violate the deed, and the title of the 868 acres Lea gifted to the city would revert to the heirs — an outcome that family members say they don't want. 'We, the heirs of Luke Lea, do not want the park to 'revert and revest' to our family, as the covenant requires,' Leah Rubino, Lea's granddaughter, said in the release. 'We do not want to take possession of this land; we simply want the terms of the covenant to be honored.' Cheekwood, the park's next door neighbor, is in the middle of an effort of its own to mitigate on-site parking capacity issues — though it's not quite as directly tied to the study's recommendations. Cheekwood's recently announced $25 million parking project seeks to help the gardens transition off of adjacent city property used for overflow parking by the end of 2027. That partnership has been reflected in a long-standing parking agreement between the city and Cheekwood, which was most recently renewed in March. The most recent version of the agreement comes with milestones the city wants Cheekwood to achieve as it works toward parking independence, including conducting its own feasibility study of access road options to the gardens and coordinating with NDOT's analysis. "Cheekwood's large investment in a new parking facility is in complete compliance with Metro's desire that Cheekwood transition parking to Cheekwood's property, and is an express condition of the memorandum of understanding unanimously approved by the Metro Parks Board," MacLeod said. "Cheekwood's new parking pavilion simply relocates parking from Metro Parks property that had been utilized for this purpose for decades to Cheekwood property and uses the same access on Forrest Park Drive as it has for decades." Austin Hornbostel is the Metro reporter for The Tennessean. Have a question about local government you want an answer to? Reach him at ahornbostel@ Get Davidson County news delivered to your inbox every Wednesday. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Lea heirs seek ruling that Percy Warner Park road plan violates deed
