logo
Does AI Make Technology More Accessible Or Widen Digital Inequalities?

Does AI Make Technology More Accessible Or Widen Digital Inequalities?

Forbes7 days ago

A person has a conversation with a Humanoid Robot from AI Life, on display at the Consumer ... More Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas, Nevada on January 10, 2024. (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP) (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)
For users with disabilities, the opportunities for AI to enhance accessibility to digital products and workflows are tantalizing, provided that principles of inclusivity are baked into its design from the outset.
There are significant crossovers with how AI is being deployed today and some of the core precepts associated with digital accessibility. For many consumers, AI is all about productivity and efficiency hacks – making tasks simpler through automation and high levels of personalization. The same ideas can often be applied to accessibility as well.
Nowadays, AI can make significant inroads into tasks such as generating automatic alt text and audio descriptions for the visually impaired as well as real-time captions for those with hearing loss, summarizing and simplifying web content and documents for those with learning or cognitive differences and voice or gesture-controlled home automation systems for those with movement disorders. Very soon, building on research and products available today, AI-powered brain-computer interfaces may help users bypass sensory limitations, while robotic systems could assist with daily tasks and lower the cost of care.
These are just some of the ways that artificial intelligence can supercharge accessibility now and, in the future, but what about the accessibility of the interfaces themselves?
As large language models like OpenAI's GPT–4o, Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude rely on conversational interfaces, input/output communication modalities are key to accessibility in this context. For tools utilizing direct voice input, this may include being able to recognize non-typical speech, such as from individuals with a speech impediment. Equally, people with autism and other forms of neurodiversity may both frame the questions they pose to LLMs in different ways and require responses with personalized formatting and levels of detail.
Additional pain points may include the absence of disability inclusive language and concepts in the model's training data and a lack of codesign and user testing with the disability community before launching new products. Something as simple as poor screen reader accessibility can still dog LLMs, despite their sophistication and advanced capabilities, in just the same way as those with sight loss encountered static web pages more than two decades ago.
Speaking of web pages, what is just as important but often flies below the radar when contrasted with more intriguing futuristic aspects, such as brain-computer interfaces and robotics, is the capacity of AI to complete much of the heavy lifting when it comes to coding the websites and apps of the future. During an earnings call at the end of last year, Google CEO Sundar Pichai revealed that over 25%of Google's new code was generated by artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, in a recent podcast interview with Dwarkesh Patel, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg suggested that most of the company's code will be completed by AI in the next 12-18 months further adding that very soon AI agents will be capable of surpassing the tech giant's elite coders.
In recognition of this impending brave new reality, Joe Devon, the co-founder of Global Accessibility Awareness Day, which is celebrated annually on the third Thursday of May, has devised an innovative new LLM accessibility checker, which was launched in conjunction with this year's GAAD. The open-source initiative is known as AIMAC, which stands for AI Model Accessibility Checker and involves a collaboration between the Global Accessibility Awareness Day Foundation and user interface and digital workflow specialists ServiceNow.
AIMAC allows testers to evaluate how different models respond to different prompts, such as those related to web page design, layout, and semantic structure, by analysing and benchmarking the accessibility parameters of the returned HTML code relative to what other LLMs are able to produce.
'When you ask an AI to write code for you, it can be accessible or inaccessible,' Devon explains during an interview.
'Moving forward, because the systems are going to be doing so much of the code, I felt that it was really important to be able to compare how accessible different models are. We've got the support from ServiceNow to build this out and to open source it, which is so key because, for accessibility, if this is closed source, then you'd have one company using it internally for themselves, to do a better job of the accessible code that they would produce. Instead, by making this open source, it's going to be possible to democratize the entire landscape of accessibility coding for LLMs.'
ServiceNow has introduced new AI capabilities into its product offerings over the past few months, including more advanced voice features. The company's VP and Global Head of Accessibility, Eamon McErlean, is a long-term collaborator with Devon, and the pair co-host the Accessibility and Gen AI Podcast.
McErlean firmly believes that though the relative accessibility intricacies of the input/output mechanics of Generative AI models are key, it is within the bigger picture of AI development wherein the greatest threats to accessibility and equality lie.
'Accessibility was an afterthought for many years within the .com world,' says McErlean.
'Thankfully, a lot of companies have since jumped on to resolve and to catch up. But the speed that Gen AI is going right now, accessibility can't be an afterthought because playing catch-up in that arena is going to be exponentially more difficult, and that could end up being dangerous.'
Back in the latter stages of the .com era, what helped move accessibility away from being viewed as an onerous burden was its dual establishment as both a legally protected human right as well as being a competitive advantage for those willing to invest in it. Hopefully, regardless of the breakneck pace of current AI developments, those same principles will hold once more. For our AI-driven future to be truly inclusive, accessibility must not only serve as a design principle but also be a foundational requirement — embedded into the very code powering the digital world.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple Prepares To Cancel The Classic MacBook Pro
Apple Prepares To Cancel The Classic MacBook Pro

Forbes

time40 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Apple Prepares To Cancel The Classic MacBook Pro

New MacBook Pro laptops are displayed during Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference 2023. (Photo by ... More JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty Images) As Tim Cook prepares to open the Worldwide Developer Conference next week, countless Apple fans are getting ready for new life to be breathed into their hardware. There will be something for everybody, from iPhones and iPads to Apple Watches and MacBook Pro laptops. Yet there will be some let down by the next version of macOS. It's worth noting that Apple is refreshing the numbering system across all of its operating systems, so the next version of macOS will be macOS 26, and the moniker naming looks set to continue with macOS Tahoe. Apple continues to offer multi-year support across its hardware, including the Mac platform in general and the MacBook laptops in particular. And this is where things get awkward for the laptop owners. The support window for the MacBook Pro is expected to reach back as far as the 2019 MacBook Pro. That passes an important rubicon. At that point, the Mac family was still running on x86-based Intel hardware. The ARM-based Apple Silicon arrived at the end of 2020, with the M1 MacBook Pro, M1 MacBook Air, and M1 Mac Mini. Apple Silicon offered a significant leap in performance, power and efficiency. That Apple can support the M1 chipset some five years down the line and bring the full range of new tools, including the latest generative AI suite, should not come as a surprise. Yet Apple still plans to support the older, slower and inefficient Intel MacBook Pro models. How much can Apple offer the older laptops? It's clear for MacBook Air owners still running Intel-powered Airs. The MacBook Air from 2020, the last with the Intel Core chipset, will be dropped, leaving only Apple Silicon powered MacBook Air models supported by macOS Tahoe and the versions that follow. It's less clear for the MacBook Pro. At the very least, Apple should offer security updates to the laptops, but whether the latest apps and utilities are offered remains to be seen. Given the demands placed on the hardware, it's likely to be a limited subset of those available to Apple Silicon Macs. Consumers using third-party apps will already be familiar with the 'unsupported' error messages on apps that are exclusively for Apple Silicon Macs) a list that is growing longer by the day), and more demanding apps such as Photoshop are asking for so much that the Intel Mac are being left behind, no matter what Cupertino is offering. It's unfortunate that no laptop can last forever. While Apple's support window is rarely specified for Macs, six years of updates is welcome, yet feels short for an Apple product. This is the downside of the 2020 move from Intel to ARM; Apple gained a much more powerful platform, but was left having to support the older platform for a polite number of years. That support is coming to an end. The consumer-focused MacBook Air has a hard stop coming up. At the same time, the professionally focused MacBook Pro will squeeze out another year or two, which will be welcomed by those using the laptop in a production environment, but Tim Cook has put the platform on notice. The MacBook Pro that many knew and loved is coming to the end of its story. Now read the latest MacBook Pro, macOS and WWDC headlines in Forbes' weekly Apple news digest...

Week in Review: Why Anthropic cut access to Windsurf
Week in Review: Why Anthropic cut access to Windsurf

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Week in Review: Why Anthropic cut access to Windsurf

Welcome back to Week in Review! Got lots for you today, including why Windsurf lost access to Claude, ChatGPT's new features, WWDC 2025, Elon Musk's fight with Donald Trump, and lots more. Have a great weekend! Duh: During an interview at TC Sessions: AI 2025, Anthropic's co-founder had a perfectly reasonable explanation for why the company cut access to Windsurf: 'I think it would be odd for us to be selling Claude to OpenAI,' Chief Science Officer Jared Kaplan said, referring to rumors and reports that OpenAI, its largest competitor, is acquiring the AI coding assistant. Seems like a good reason to me! Everything is the same: Chinese lab DeepSeek released an updated version of its R1 reasoning AI model last week that performs well on a number of math and coding benchmarks. Now some AI researchers are speculating that at least some of the source data it trained on came from Google's Gemini family of AI. WWDC 2025: Apple's annual developers conference starts Monday. Beyond a newly designed operating system, here's what we're expecting to see at this year's event, including a dedicated gaming app and updates to Mac, Watch, TV, and more. This is TechCrunch's Week in Review, where we recap the week's biggest news. Want this delivered as a newsletter to your inbox every Saturday? Sign up here. Business in the front: ChatGPT is getting new features for business users, including connectors for Dropbox, Box, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Google Drive. This would let ChatGPT look for information across your own services to answer questions. Oh no: Indian grocery delivery startup KiranaPro was hacked, and all of its data was wiped. According to the company, it has 55,000 customers, with 30,000 to 35,000 active buyers across 50 cities, who collectively place 2,000 orders daily. Artsy people, rejoice! Photoshop is now coming to Android, so users of Google's operating system can gussy up their images, too. The app has a similar set of editing tools as the desktop version, including layering and masking. Let's try that again: Tesla filed new trademark applications for "Tesla Robotaxi" after previous attempts to trademark the terms 'Robotaxi' and 'Cybercab" failed. Rolling in dough: Tech startup Anduril just picked up a $1 billion investment as part of a new $2.5 billion raise led by Founders Fund, which means Anduril has doubled its valuation to $30.5 billion. On the road again: When Toma's founders realized car dealerships were drowning in missed calls, they hit the road to see the problem firsthand. That summer road trip turned into a $17 million a16z-backed fundraise that helped Toma get its AI phone agents into more than 100 dealerships across the U.S. Fighting season: All gloves were off on Thursday as Elon Musk and President Trump took to their respective social networks to throw jabs at each other. Though it might be exciting to watch rich men squabble in public, the fallout between the world's richest person and a sitting U.S. president promises to have broader implications for the tech industry. Money talks: Whether you use AI as a friend, a therapist, or even a girlfriend, chatbots are trained to keep you talking. For Big Tech companies, it's never been more competitive to attract users to their chatbot platforms — and keep them there. This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at

China Tariffs Already Mean Fewer, More Expensive Dolls for American Kids
China Tariffs Already Mean Fewer, More Expensive Dolls for American Kids

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

China Tariffs Already Mean Fewer, More Expensive Dolls for American Kids

Carly has auburn hair, blue eyes and stands 18 inches tall. Like most dolls sold in the U.S., she is made in China. That is now a problem for her maker, William Su, who sells tens of thousands of dolls and their accessories a year to Americans through Amazon, Walmart and Target. When President Trump raised tariffs on China to 145% in April, Su, who is based in New York and Taiwan, stopped production because he and his buyers couldn't afford the tariffs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store