China's Top Diplomat To Visit EU, Germany, France Next Week
China's top diplomat Wang Yi will head to Europe next week for talks with counterparts from the European Union, Germany and France, Beijing said on Friday as it seeks to shore up fraught ties with the bloc.
Beijing has sought to improve relations with Europe as a counterweight to superpower rival United States, though frictions remain over trade and China's close ties with Russia despite its war in Ukraine.
China and the European Union will also host a summit next month marking 50 years since Beijing and Brussels established diplomatic ties.
Wang's trip will take him to Brussels, France and Germany and last from next Monday to Sunday, Beijing said.
"The world is undergoing an accelerated evolution of a century-old change, with unilateralism, protectionism and bullying behaviour becoming rampant," foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said -- a thinly-veiled swipe against the United States under President Donald Trump.
China's top diplomat will meet with EU counterpart Kaja Kallas at the bloc's headquarters in Brussels for "high-level strategic dialogue", he said.
In Germany he will hold talks with Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on diplomacy and security -- his first visit since Berlin's new conservative-led government took power in May.
China looks forward to "strengthening strategic communication, enhancing pragmatic cooperation, and promoting new developments of the China-Germany comprehensive strategic partnership," Guo said.
Ties between Berlin and Beijing, he added, were "injecting certainty, stability, and positive energy into a turbulent world".
In France, Wang will meet minister for Europe and foreign affairs Jean-Noel Barrot, who visited China in March.
"Foreign Minister Wang Yi will exchange views with the French side on the international situation, China-France ties and China-Europe relations," Guo said.
And in Brussels Wang will also hold talks with Belgium's Prime Minister Bart De Wever and Deputy PM and Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot, Beijing said.
Ties between Europe and China have strained in recent years as the bloc seeks to get tougher on what it says are unfair economic practices by Beijing and the yawning trade imbalance between them.
Last week, the European Union banned Chinese firms from government medical device purchases worth more than five million euros ($5.8 million) in retaliation for limits Beijing places on access to its own market.
The latest salvo in trade tensions between the 27-nation bloc and China covered a wide range of healthcare supplies, from surgical masks to X-ray machines, that represent a market worth 150 billion euros ($176 billion) in the EU.
In response, China accused the EU of "double standards".
Another tricky point has been rare earths.
Beijing has since April required licences to export these strategic materials from China, which accounts for more than 60 percent of rare earth mining production and 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency.
The metals are used in a wide variety of products, including electric car batteries, and there has been criticism from industries about the way China's licences have been issued.
China has proposed establishing a "green channel" to ease the export of rare earths to the European Union, its commerce ministry said this month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
44 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tariff Rollbacks Won't Bring Instant Price Relief
The recent U.S.–China trade agreement brought down tariffs from their peak highs—U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports now sit at about 55%, with China's tariffs at roughly 10%. While these numbers are lower than the previous peaks of 145% and 125%, respectively, the economic reality on the ground is far from a simple rollback. According to experts cited by Al Jazeera, businesses and consumers should not expect immediate or dramatic price drops. The tariff cuts are just one factor in a complex web of costs that continue to drive prices up. Supply Chain Rebuilding: A Slow, Costly Process Over the last few years, many companies have restructured their supply chains to avoid the worst of the trade war's impacts, shifting manufacturing to countries like Vietnam, Mexico, and India. These changes involve new contracts, investments in different infrastructure, and learning curves that cannot be reversed overnight. As noted by a logistics specialist interviewed by The Scottish Sun, "Even with tariffs reduced, many companies can't simply return to their old suppliers because the costs of switching again are prohibitive." Consumers Will Feel the Pinch for a While What does all this mean for everyday shoppers? Price reductions on imported goods—electronics, appliances, and even clothing—are likely to be gradual. High tariffs acted like hidden taxes that increased costs at every step of the supply chain, and those increased costs have been passed down to consumers. As explained by analysts in the Times of India, the legacy of these tariffs is still embedded in the price tags, and inflationary pressures worldwide only amplify the effect. The Bigger Picture: A Temporary Pause, Not a Full Reset While the tariff reductions are being presented as a win, the current arrangement includes a 90-day review window, meaning tariffs could rise again if further negotiations stall. This temporary nature leaves businesses in a cautious stance, hesitant to fully commit to long-term supply chain strategies involving China. Experts quoted by Al Jazeera point out that this deal represents more of a tactical pause than a true resolution—highlighting the lingering uncertainty and costs in global trade. Lower tariffs provide some breathing room but don't erase years of economic shifts and financial burdens. For consumers, price relief will be slow to come. For businesses, the supply chain landscape remains complex and costly to navigate. The U.S.–China trade deal's tariff rollback is a step forward—but a cautious one that still carries a heavy price.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Orban to continue anti-Ukrainian course after 'referendum' – DW – 06/27/2025
As part of his ongoing hostile stance on Ukraine, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban organized a non-binding referendum on Ukraine's EU bid. He sees the result as a mandate to continue his anti-Ukraine policies. The trunk of the car is opened. Inside, a tied and bound young man struggles theatrically. Standing by the car is a woman. This is Alexandra Szentkiralyi, former government spokeswoman and now the best-known social media propagandist for Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. Speaking to the camera, she says, "I don't think you'd like this kind of thing to happen to you. Because with the fast EU accession of Ukraine come the organ dealers, the arms dealers, the drug dealers and the human traffickers." The reel, which was posted on Facebook and TikTok, is just 10 seconds long. People in Hungary have been bombarded with content such as this for over two months now — not only on the Internet, but also on pro-government Hungarian television channels. A steady stream of anti-Ukraine ads was broadcast on the radio, too, and in public spaces, billboards featured grim and sinister-looking images of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. This was not simply just another one of Orban's many hate campaigns; it was the first to target an entire country and declare it a "mafia state." It was also the first Orban campaign to collectively dehumanize the citizens of a whole country and defame them as dangerous, merciless criminals who are allegedly out to destroy Hungary by trading in people, human organs, drugs and arms, by flooding the market with genetically modified foods, and by taking jobs, income, pensions and healthcare from Hungarian citizens. The objective of the consultation dubbed (Vote 2025) was that Hungarians would voice their opposition to Ukraine joining the EU. The vote ended on Saturday. On Thursday, Viktor Orban himself announced the result just before the EU summit in Brussels. He said that 2.27 million Hungarians had taken part, which is about a third of the Hungarian electorate, and that 95% had voted against Ukraine joining the EU. The prime minister said that he had come to Brussels "with a strong mandate," adding that "with the voice of over two million Hungarians" he could say that he does not support Ukrainian EU accession. As with all previous campaigns orchestrated by Orban — such as the one against migrants or the one against George Soros, a US billionaire with Hungarian Jewish roots — it is not possible to verify whether this result is real or not. The Hungarian government did not permit independent monitoring of the voting process or an independent public vote count. In a similar survey, which was recently organized by Hungary's largest opposition party, Tisza (Respect and Freedom), 58% declared their support for Ukraine joining the bloc. Many responses in Hungary seem to indicate that a considerable proportion of the population see the campaign as excessive, false, dishonest or a diversionary tactic. Some videos — including the car trunk video featuring Alexandra Szentkiralyi — have been used for hundreds of ironic or sarcastic memes on social media that attack the Orban system, its propaganda and the corruption scandals in which it is implicated. Countless social media posts — including critical comments on Victor Orban's Facebook and TikTok channels — also show that many Hungarians find the prime minister's anti-Ukraine campaign morally reprehensible and dishonest. Just a few days ago, a group of 50 well-known academics, artists, writers, former politicians and high-ranking civil servants — including former Foreign Minister Geza Jeszenszky and former head of the National Bank Peter Akos Bod — published a "letter to the people of Ukraine" in which they condemned Orban's propaganda and declared their solidarity with Ukraine. Despite such responses, it seems extremely unlikely that there will be a U-turn in the anti-Ukraine policy of Orban and his government. It is also barely conceivable that Orban's power and propaganda apparatus would moderate its tone even a little or stop peddling certain narratives — such as its claim that the war crimes committed in Bucha were staged by the Ukrainian army. The reason for this is that Ukraine has already become a major issue in the campaign for the parliamentary election that is due to take place in spring 2026. The ruling majority has alleged that the opposition Tisza party, which is way ahead of Orban's Fidesz party in the polls, is funded by Ukraine and Brussels. It also claims that Tisza's goal is to assume power in Hungary, sell out the country and plunge it into a war with Russia. Government propaganda also regularly refers to Peter Magyar, the leader of Tisza, as "Ukraine Pete." The Hungarian government also accuses another well-known Tisza politician, former Chief of the Hungarian Defense Forces Romulusz Ruszin-Szendi, of being a Ukrainian spy. It has not provided any evidence to back up this claim. Pro-government media even claim that the Ukrainian salute "Slava Ukraini!" (Glory to Ukraine!) is being used as a Tisza party slogan. With this policy, Orban has unquestionably done irreparable damage to Hungarian–Ukrainian relations for as long as he remains in power. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian government have thus far made either no comment on Orban's policy or only issued carefully worded, diplomatic statements. But this recently changed. In his first interview with a Hungarian media outlet, the independent conservative portal Valasz Online, Zelenskyy in early June criticized Orban's use of Ukraine for his election campaign. "He does not understand that this will have much more serious and dangerous consequences: the radicalization of Hungarian society and its anti-Ukrainian sentiment," said Zelenskyy, adding that by not helping Ukraine, Orban is doing Russian President Vladimir Putin a favor, which, said Zelenskyy, is a "serious, historic mistake." The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry also issued its first explicitly critical statement on Tuesday. In it, the ministry referred to the "manipulative intention" behind the "Vote 2025" initiative, adding that during the campaign, which lasted several months, "Hungarian officials have been inventing non-existent threats allegedly coming from Ukraine in order to unjustifiably intimidate Hungarian citizens." The goal of this "anti-Ukraine hysteria" was, it said, to divert attention away from the failures of the government's socio-economic policy. However, the Ukrainian ministry said it was "confident that the overwhelming majority of Hungarian citizens are capable of recognizing this primitive manipulation."
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Not Quite A Victory Lap: Rethinking The US–China Trade Agreement
The newly announced trade deal between the United States and China is being described as a breakthrough moment in what has been a rocky and prolonged economic standoff. Both sides are scaling back tariffs and promising a more stable trading relationship. But look a little deeper, and the picture becomes less about resolution—and more about damage control. This agreement isn't the end of a conflict. It's more like a timeout. Tariffs Rolled Back, But Still High One of the headline changes is that U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods are being lowered to 55%, while China has agreed to reduce its own import duties to around 10%. While these are improvements compared to the highs seen during the peak of the trade war, they're still steep by historical standards. As reported by CNBC, the long-term consequences of earlier tariff hikes—including supply chain disruption and sourcing shifts—have already reshaped how U.S. companies operate. Many manufacturers have moved operations to countries like Vietnam, Mexico or India. The latest deal doesn't undo that shift, and many industry analysts argue it likely won't. The Rare-Earth Factor: Strategic Access or Strategic Risk? A central pillar of the agreement is China's pledge to expand exports of rare-earth elements—critical materials used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, and most modern electronics. On the surface, this appears to be a major win for the U.S., which has been grappling with access to these minerals due to export restrictions and a lack of domestic processing capability. But the deal also underscores just how dependent the U.S. remains on China for these resources. According to a report by The Australian, China's decision to allow rare-earth exports comes with no long-term guarantees and no change in control over the global supply chain. In effect, the U.S. is securing short-term access without reducing its strategic vulnerability. No Real Fix for the Structural Divide What this agreement does not include is just as important as what it does: No binding framework on intellectual property protection No enforcement mechanism for subsidy transparency No tariff freeze beyond the next 90 days This lack of structural depth raises questions about the durability of the deal. As reported by Finance Magnates, many economists see the announcement as a political maneuver designed to calm markets ahead of further negotiations, rather than a resolution to long-standing economic tensions. What It Means for Businesses and Consumers For American consumers, this deal might bring a modest reprieve from price hikes on certain imported goods—especially electronics, tools, and industrial inputs. For businesses, the effects are more nuanced. Companies that rely on Chinese components could benefit from reduced tariffs, but the continued volatility and short time horizon (tariffs are up for reassessment in 90 days) mean long-term planning is still risky. Supply chain diversification efforts that began during the height of the trade conflict are unlikely to reverse. Instead, many firms may continue sourcing from alternative markets to hedge against future uncertainty. Final Word: A Deal, Yes—But Not a Resolution This deal represents a cooling-off period, not a cure. It de-escalates tensions and offers temporary relief, but leaves the deeper economic rifts between the U.S. and China unresolved. With additional trade discussions scheduled with India and the EU in July, and tariff reviews just weeks away, this agreement is best seen as a fragile pause—not a permanent peace.
