logo
Be optimistic about Merz, but the spectre of the 1930s remains

Be optimistic about Merz, but the spectre of the 1930s remains

Telegraph25-02-2025

When Germany surrendered unconditionally in 1945, almost everyone assumed that the Nazis would be a threat for many years to come. Even in 1949, the first Secretary General of Nato, Lord Ismay, summed up its purpose as 'to keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down'.
But the Nazi revival never happened. For 75 years the Federal Republic was conspicuous as Europe's most successful economy and an exemplary civil society, giving the lie to Spenglerian prophecies of doom.
Until now, that is. Sunday's election saw the first serious threat to German democracy emerge since the defeat of the Third Reich.
That threat goes by the name of the Alternative for Germany (AfD). Despite the fact that it echoes Putin's propaganda and is classified as an extremist party by the German equivalent of MI5, the AfD has just become the official opposition, with 10.3 million votes, more than a fifth of the electorate. In the new Bundestag, 152 seats out of 630 will be AfD: not quite enough to take over parliamentary committees, but enough to sabotage the system.
Since the invasion of Ukraine three years ago, the AfD have been the dominant party in the former East Germany, but now they are the most popular choice for younger voters right across the country. For now, the oldies have saved German democracy. Still: if this trend continues, the AfD could be the largest party by the next election in 2029.
This is a party that tells Germans they have been enslaved since 1945 by a 'guilt cult' imposed by the Allies. They quibble over how many of the SS should be seen as war criminals, or whether the Holocaust was just a 'speck of birdshit' on their nation's otherwise spotless history. The AfD is so openly pro-Russian, anti-Ukrainian and authoritarian that even Marine Le Pen and Giorgia Meloni will have nothing to do with them. The AfD's leader Alice Weidel is not just a Leni Riefenstahl fantasy version of Nigel Farage.
To anyone who has followed the outer fringes of German politics, this is all familiar. Surely, though, the AfD is a legitimate party? In deepest Thuringia, its mob-orator Björn Höcke is unrepentant, despite prosecutions for using banned Hitlerian slogans. But at national level Alice Weidel disdains dog whistles and gestures of dubious legality: no Sieg Heils or swastikas for her.
But sticking to the letter of the law may be just a tactic. Nearly a century ago, though, the original Nazis made their breakthrough in 1930 with an election campaign that secured 107 seats. Hitler then appeared as a witness in a Leipzig court, where three army officers were accused of disobeying orders by fraternising with the Nazis, to declare that he and his party stood 'hard as granite' on the foundation of legality. The judges agreed and an exuberant Joseph Goebbels told one of the defendants: 'What can they do to us now? Now we're strictly legit – and that's it.'
Now, as in the 1930s, the AfD's reassurances about the law are hollow. Once in power, these Putinversteher (Putin apologists) would follow their Tsar. Friedrich Merz, the new Chancellor, certainly doesn't trust them an inch. Quite rightly, he prefers to form a coalition with the Social Democrats, despite them having experienced the worst defeat in their history.
The latter must waste no time in replacing Olaf Scholz, the most terrible Chancellor in postwar German history, with Boris Pistorius, the highly capable defence minister. It seems likely that Pistorius will become vice chancellor in the new coalition, perhaps charged with rebuilding the military and the arms industry.
At his press conference yesterday, Merz said that for Europe, it is 'five minutes to midnight'. He understands that the transatlantic relationship is now on a knife-edge. Unlike some of his predecessors at home and allies abroad, though, this staunch Atlanticist loathes Putin.
Though the reckless wooing of Alice Weidel by vice president Vance and Elon Musk had little impact, Merz has no choice but to take their meddling seriously. Yesterday he told the press that Ms Weidel had no policies on the economy or migration, only false or exaggerated criticisms. But he also conceded that the established parties are in the last chance saloon. His own Christian Democrat Union failed to win a single seat in the former Communist East. The Social Democrats, whose working-class vote has just been cannibalised by the AfD, were a key part of the German democratic system, he said. 'I have no interest in seeing [them] destroyed.'
Yet Merz now has a chance to restore the kind of resolute, reasonable and responsible leadership that made the Federal Republic of the postwar era so much admired. Helmut Schmidt (1974-82) and Helmut Kohl (1982-98) were bitter rivals, but seen from London, Washington or Moscow, it hardly mattered that one was centre-Left, the other centre-Right. Both Chancellors worked with Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan to win the Cold War and bring down the Iron Curtain.
Having covered Germany during part of that period for this newspaper and played a walk-on part in the fall of the Berlin Wall, I am confident that Merz and Pistorius are cut from the same cloth as Kohl and Schmidt. But Alice Weidel and the other AfD demagogues, like their far-Left counterparts Sahra Wagenknecht and Heidi Reichinnek, are unfit to hold high office.
The crisis that the West faces today is at least as serious as that of 1989. Then we faced Gorbachev and Deng Xiaoping; now we face Putin and Xi Jinping. Germany, at least, has chosen leaders of real calibre, not charlatans who would betray Western civilisation to its enemies.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When a radical performance artist has command of an army
When a radical performance artist has command of an army

Economist

timean hour ago

  • Economist

When a radical performance artist has command of an army

In the 1960s the Yippies had a theory about how to transform America. The system, they thought, was rotten, and the best way to show it was to create a spectacle for TV. They scattered dollar bills in the New York Stock Exchange and held a mass meeting to levitate the Pentagon. Some also thought that if armed police or soldiers attacked protesters, Americans would realise they were living in a fascist state and revolt. It backfired: the silent majority saw these stunts and voted for Richard Nixon. The Yippies had got on the wrong side of a fundamental political divide: who stands for order?

US will take part in Putin's knock-off Eurovision song contest, Russia says… competing against Iran and China
US will take part in Putin's knock-off Eurovision song contest, Russia says… competing against Iran and China

Scottish Sun

timean hour ago

  • Scottish Sun

US will take part in Putin's knock-off Eurovision song contest, Russia says… competing against Iran and China

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE US will compete against China and Iran in Putin's rip-off Eurovision song contest, according to Russian state media. Mad Vlad's mouthpiece media made the bizarre claim that Americans would sing in the Intervision 2025 Song Contest, Russia's bootleg version of the iconic competition. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 Vladimir Putin mocked up as last year's Eurovision winner Nemo of Switzerland 6 Intervision ran between 1965 and 1968, and later between 1977 and 1980 Credit: East2West 6 Intervision is Putin's knock-off version of the iconic Eurovision Song Contest (pictured) Credit: The Mega Agency It comes after the bitter tyrant announced the revival of the Soviet answer to Eurovision in February this year. Putin's country was booted out of the official Eurovision Song Contest following his bloody invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Propaganda outlet Tass claimed "sources" had told them that "representatives from the United States" would take part in the knock-off event. Their so-called source said: "Indeed, the United States has confirmed its participation in the Intervision. READ MORE WORLD NEWS DRONE WARS Vladimir Putin starts using AI kamikaze drone that 'chooses its own target' "The names of the participants will be announced later." They gave no further details on American involvement in the competition. Earlier this year, Putin signed a decree for the Intervision Song Contest to be held in Moscow in September 2025. More than 25 of his ally countries are set to join his contest - including North Korea, Iran, Cuba, and Venezuela. Mad Vlad has already said his bizarre idea has been backed by his "Chinese friends". This sad attempt at recreating Eurovision will reportedly ban LGBT performers. Putin's Ukraine war toll tops 1 MILLION Russians dead & wounded 40 months into 'days-long operation'…with no end in sight, with Stephen Hall In Russia, rules now ban anything deemed to promote homosexuality, and the international LGBTQ movement is seen as an extremist organisation. Putin's move has been seen as an attempt to revive two similar flopped music contests from the Soviet era. Communist Russia tried to set up a competition also called Intervision in the 1960s. This was also aimed to bring together its allies in Eastern Europe and across the world, like Cuba. Intervision ran between 1965 and 1968, and later between 1977 and 1980. It is unclear if it will use its bizarre communist-era voting system when TV viewers turned their lights on or off to cast votes, with the results measured by electricity consumption. The 2025 version of the competition will reportedly showcase "traditional universal, spiritual and family values". This would be a sharp contrast to the flamboyance, art, and colour brought through Eurovision - like it's 2024 winner Nemo from Switzerland. 6 Putin's media said that Americans will compete in the contest Credit: AP 6 The Intervision Song Contest was the Eastern Bloc's version of Eurovision Credit: East2West 6 Russia was banned from Eurovision in 2022 after Putin invaded Ukraine Credit: Alamy It is believed that Putin wants to relaunch the competition to separate Russia from what he says is the West's continued lack of respect for religious values and moral attitudes. A Russian planning document said: "Artists may not perform songs that call for violence, humiliate the honour and dignity of society, and it is required that political themes in the lyrics are completely excluded." Intervision will also aim to be 'developing international cultural and humanitarian cooperation', according to his presidential decree. This decree also claimed "the contest will be open for participation of all countries that wish to do so". Intervision is reportedly set to give performers four minutes on stage to sing in whatever language they like, according to documents seen by Reuters. The winner will get prize money and go on tour. It is not known if Putin will seek to sing at the contest, as he famously did in 2010, performing Blueberry Hill at a live charity event in St Petersburg. The dictator's rendition went viral, as he sang in front of guests including Hollywood stars like Goldie Hawn, Kevin Costner, and Sharon Stone. Putin previously announced he wanted to stage the World Festival of Friendship in 2024 as an alternative to the Olympics - which Russia has also been excluded from. The tyrant postponed the competition by one year - and then indefinitely in a humiliating U-turn. The country has taken part in Eurovision 23 times since 1994. Russia was banned from Eurovision in 2022 after Putin sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine. The same year that Putin annexed Crimea from Ukraine, an Austrian drag queen popularly known as "the bearded lady," won Eurovision in 2014. This is thought to have been a turning point in Putin's desire to fully separate his country from Western values.

Hungary's government to privatise majority of its stake in the defence industry
Hungary's government to privatise majority of its stake in the defence industry

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Hungary's government to privatise majority of its stake in the defence industry

BUDAPEST, June 12 (Reuters) - Hungary's government plans to sell a large slice of its stake in its defence industry, which includes a holding in Rheinmetall's local factory, to 4iG Group, the Economy Ministry said late on Wednesday. The move comes as nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban's government gears up for an election next year, where he is facing his strongest challenge since he returned to power in 2010. Under the terms of the plan, state-owned N7 Holding, which owns stakes in nine defence industry companies, will transfer ownership of the assets to a newly established subsidiary, N7 Defence Zrt. 4iG ( opens new tab subsidiary 4iG SDT will then buy a 75% plus one vote majority in N7 Defence Zrt. The rest of the shares will still be owned by the Hungarian government. The government said it estimates the sale to be worth up to 82.8 billion forints ($238.4 million). The deal includes the government's stake in German defence contractor Rheinmetall's Hungarian subsidiary, the Airbus Helicopters factory, and a firearms factory. Hungary announced a programme to modernise and rearm its military in 2017. Since then, it has bought tanks, helicopters and air defence systems, and invited foreign companies to invest and set up manufacturing plants on its territory. Germany's Rheinmetall ( opens new tab started the production of its new Lynx infantry fighting vehicle in Hungary in 2023. Hungary is a NATO member state that shares a border with Ukraine where Russia's February 2022 invasion started the deadliest war on European soil in more than 70 years. 4iG has in recent years become Hungary's dominant information and communications technology group through acquisitions, lucrative state contracts and organic growth. Its CEO Gellert Jaszai accompanied Orban to Mar-a-Lago in December 2024 where, according to his LinkedIn page, he met U.S. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. 4iG's share price was up 6.4% by 0722 GMT on Thursday. Opposition leader Peter Magyar said in a statement that the privatisation plan was "tantamount to treason" and urged the government to halt the transaction. According to several polls, Magyar's centre-right Tisza party is ahead of Orban's Fidesz. ($1 = 347.32 forints)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store