US will take part in Putin's knock-off Eurovision song contest, Russia says… competing against Iran and China
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE US will compete against China and Iran in Putin's rip-off Eurovision song contest, according to Russian state media.
Mad Vlad's mouthpiece media made the bizarre claim that Americans would sing in the Intervision 2025 Song Contest, Russia's bootleg version of the iconic competition.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
6
Vladimir Putin mocked up as last year's Eurovision winner Nemo of Switzerland
6
Intervision ran between 1965 and 1968, and later between 1977 and 1980
Credit: East2West
6
Intervision is Putin's knock-off version of the iconic Eurovision Song Contest (pictured)
Credit: The Mega Agency
It comes after the bitter tyrant announced the revival of the Soviet answer to Eurovision in February this year.
Putin's country was booted out of the official Eurovision Song Contest following his bloody invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Propaganda outlet Tass claimed "sources" had told them that "representatives from the United States" would take part in the knock-off event.
Their so-called source said: "Indeed, the United States has confirmed its participation in the Intervision.
READ MORE WORLD NEWS
DRONE WARS Vladimir Putin starts using AI kamikaze drone that 'chooses its own target'
"The names of the participants will be announced later."
They gave no further details on American involvement in the competition.
Earlier this year, Putin signed a decree for the Intervision Song Contest to be held in Moscow in September 2025.
More than 25 of his ally countries are set to join his contest - including North Korea, Iran, Cuba, and Venezuela.
Mad Vlad has already said his bizarre idea has been backed by his "Chinese friends".
This sad attempt at recreating Eurovision will reportedly ban LGBT performers.
Putin's Ukraine war toll tops 1 MILLION Russians dead & wounded 40 months into 'days-long operation'…with no end in sight, with Stephen Hall
In Russia, rules now ban anything deemed to promote homosexuality, and the international LGBTQ movement is seen as an extremist organisation.
Putin's move has been seen as an attempt to revive two similar flopped music contests from the Soviet era.
Communist Russia tried to set up a competition also called Intervision in the 1960s.
This was also aimed to bring together its allies in Eastern Europe and across the world, like Cuba.
Intervision ran between 1965 and 1968, and later between 1977 and 1980.
It is unclear if it will use its bizarre communist-era voting system when TV viewers turned their lights on or off to cast votes, with the results measured by electricity consumption.
The 2025 version of the competition will reportedly showcase "traditional universal, spiritual and family values".
This would be a sharp contrast to the flamboyance, art, and colour brought through Eurovision - like it's 2024 winner Nemo from Switzerland.
6
Putin's media said that Americans will compete in the contest
Credit: AP
6
The Intervision Song Contest was the Eastern Bloc's version of Eurovision
Credit: East2West
6
Russia was banned from Eurovision in 2022 after Putin invaded Ukraine
Credit: Alamy
It is believed that Putin wants to relaunch the competition to separate Russia from what he says is the West's continued lack of respect for religious values and moral attitudes.
A Russian planning document said: "Artists may not perform songs that call for violence, humiliate the honour and dignity of society, and it is required that political themes in the lyrics are completely excluded."
Intervision will also aim to be 'developing international cultural and humanitarian cooperation', according to his presidential decree.
This decree also claimed "the contest will be open for participation of all countries that wish to do so".
Intervision is reportedly set to give performers four minutes on stage to sing in whatever language they like, according to documents seen by Reuters.
The winner will get prize money and go on tour.
It is not known if Putin will seek to sing at the contest, as he famously did in 2010, performing Blueberry Hill at a live charity event in St Petersburg.
The dictator's rendition went viral, as he sang in front of guests including Hollywood stars like Goldie Hawn, Kevin Costner, and Sharon Stone.
Putin previously announced he wanted to stage the World Festival of Friendship in 2024 as an alternative to the Olympics - which Russia has also been excluded from.
The tyrant postponed the competition by one year - and then indefinitely in a humiliating U-turn.
The country has taken part in Eurovision 23 times since 1994.
Russia was banned from Eurovision in 2022 after Putin sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine.
The same year that Putin annexed Crimea from Ukraine, an Austrian drag queen popularly known as "the bearded lady," won Eurovision in 2014.
This is thought to have been a turning point in Putin's desire to fully separate his country from Western values.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Israel's bravery shames our pusillanimous Prime Minister
It would, to say the least, be helpful if we had a Prime Minister who understood even his own supposed principles. Since taking office last year, Sir Keir Starmer has been admirably strong and consistent in supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression, at least in his statements, if not in actual firepower. But his response to the Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear and military sites is not just naïve, it is pusillanimous and shows how empty a vessel he really is: 'The reports of these strikes are concerning and we urge all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently. Escalation serves no one in the region. Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate. Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.' Starmer grasps the need to stand up to Putin's aggression, but crumbles into spineless diplo-speak when confronted by a theocratic tyranny. For a leader with a clear understanding of the Iranian threat – of reality, in other words – there should be relief, not consternation. Just yesterday, for example, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) declared that Iran was in breach of its non-proliferation obligations, refusing to answer questions on uranium particles found in undeclared sites in the country and the stockpiling of uranium enriched to nearly weapons grade. Iran then revealed it is operating a previously secret new uranium enrichment centre. The threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon has not been theoretical but very real and increasingly imminent. According to Sir Keir, 'Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.' This is the precise opposite of what it is the time for. Diplomacy led us to the disastrous Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) which relaxed sanctions on the regime, handed it huge amounts of money from oil exports, and thus funded not just the Iranian proxies Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis but the nuclear weapons programme. In this sense Israel has been acting not only on its own behalf but on behalf of all those Middle Eastern states which have been destabilised by Iran – and on behalf of the West itself. This is a familiar story; twice before Israel has saved us all from nuclear enemies, in 1981 when it destroyed Saddam's reactor in Iraq and in 2007 when it destroyed Assad's facilities in Syria. One irony of this is that the so-called Free Palestine brigade, who will doubtless be back on the streets soon, should be cheering Israel today – if they genuinely cared about securing a Palestinian state. There are reports that the UK is on the verge of recognising such an entity next week at the special UN conference called by France. But there will never be a secure and stable Palestinian state while Iran continues to spread its malign influence through its proxies – and should it acquire a nuclear weapon the prospect of a Palestinian state would be the first casualty. Contrary to Sir Keir's spineless timidity, this is the time for action by a clear eyed state which understands the threat posed by its enemy and is willing to act to defend itself by neutering that threat. Far from stopping now as Sir Keir urges, it is essential that Israel finishes the job it began last night. Israel has not started a war – it has prevented one.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Finding yourself in Glasgow's less than salubrious watering holes
Though booze gargling does have its disadvantages, such as a tendency to make people talk pure gibberish. Diary correspondent Fergus Reid somehow found himself in one of Glasgow's less than salubrious watering holes, in the city's east end, where he overheard two scholars of international affairs in heated discussion. Said one to the other: 'See they Americans? Problem is, they're a' gum-chewers. Every single one o' em.' His colleague was not entirely won over by this passionate display of anti-Americanism, and duly retorted: 'Wit's wrang wi' bein' a gum chewer, likes? The first chap was rather taken aback, and felt the need to pause for deep and heartfelt contemplation, before finally arriving at a suitable answer: 'Well, it's pretty cruel tae the gum, int it?' Shaky scoff Culinary correspondent Russell O'Connor was enjoying a holiday in Stratford-upon-Avon, a town fabled for being the birthplace of England's greatest bard. Sitting down to breakfast in his hotel, Russell noticed the menu advertised an omelette, made with chunky hunks of ham. Perhaps inevitably, given the hotel's location, it was labelled the… Hamlette. 'Deciding whether to order it,' says Russell, 'I was left facing an existential conundrum… To nosh or not to nosh.' He answered this tricky question by ordering the Dane-inspired dish. A moment after he tucked into his feast, the waitress appeared, and with a cheeky wink, said: 'As you like it, sir?' Read more: How to keep fit and tackle those grubby worn out carpets Parental put down Father's Day fast approaches, the perfect occasion to celebrate that bloke who spends all his time pottering in the garden shed, while mum does the heavy lifting and raises the sprogs. Donna Turner asked her 16-year-old son what he was getting his dad for the Big Day. 'Why bother?' he shrugged. 'He's more dud than dad.' Message received 'I hate when people call my phone,' complains reader Wayne Reed. 'That's not what I bought it for.' Pelter prep More weather witterings. On a hot afternoon in a Glasgow train, Kim Stevenson spotted a lady with an umbrella. 'Expecting rain?' she enquired. 'Sooner or later,' replied the woman. 'This IS Glasgow.' Fast friends Energetic Jim Hutton took up training for a marathon at the age of 55, and says the intensive exercise is a terrific way to meet new people. 'Just the other day,' he says, 'I met two doctors and a cardiologist…'
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Israel strikes Iran as nuclear program talks falter
Israel has been warning for more than a decade it would attack Iran's nuclear program and energy facilities if they reached a stage where they could be weaponized. The two countries are longtime foes. The operation comes as the Trump administration has sought a deal with Iran to limit its nuclear program. International watchdogs say Iran has continued to enrich uranium to near-weapons level. President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff meet with Iranian officials for five round of talks aimed at reaching a deal. 'Constructive' and 'positive': What to know about the rare US-Iran nuclear talks It was not immediately clear if the Pentagon assisted Israel with its operation, though there were no signs it had. Israeli officials and White House spokespeople either declined comment or were not immediately available. There was no immediate diplomatic or military response from Iran. It claims its nuclear program is for civilian energy purposes only, a claim that is regarded skeptically in the international community. Ahead of the operation, the U.S. appeared to anticipate that Iran could retaliate on certain American military sites in neighboring Iraq. The State Department issued a travel advisory on June 11 that ordered non-emergency government officials to exit Iraq due to "heightened regional tensions." Trump spoke about Iran at an appearance at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. on June 11, telling reporters Americans were advised to leave the region "because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens." Trump reiterated the U.S. did not want Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. "We're not going to allow that," he said. More: Will Israel attack Iran? Trump warns of 'massive conflict' over nuclear program Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has for years argued against a nuclear pact with Iran. Israel and Iran have been sworn enemies since Tehran's 1979 Islamic Revolution. Former President Barack Obama struck a deal with Iran and world powers in 2015 that limited the scope of Iran's uranium enrichment program. Netanyahu objected to that accord, claiming Iran couldn't be trusted to abide by its terms, though the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, said it was working. Trump exited the agreement during his first term. UN nuclear watchdog: Iran in breach of non-proliferation obligations In a late May report, the IAEA estimated Iran had enriched uranium up to 60% purity. That is very close to the 90% enrichment level required to build a nuclear weapon. The IAEA declared June 12 Iran was not complying with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations and passed a resolution against the country for the first time in 20 years. Israel and Iran targeted each other with missiles and drones in October 2024 in connection with the killings of the leaders of Hezbollah and Hamas - Iranian-backed armed groups. This is a developing story and will be updated.
