logo
Why is Israel bombing Syria and and who are the Druze?

Why is Israel bombing Syria and and who are the Druze?

Independent17-07-2025
Syria is facing a fresh and dangerous escalation in violence, with Israel launching its most intense airstrikes on Damascus in years amid deadly clashes between Druze factions and government forces in the south.
The renewed conflict, centred on the province of Suwayda in the south, threatens the country's fragile post-war political transition and has already left hundreds dead, including civilians and soldiers.
The immediate trigger for the violence was the abduction of a Druze merchant in Suwayda on 13 July, which quickly spiralled into armed confrontations between Druze militias and Sunni Bedouin tribes. The situation worsened when government troops attempted to restore order but ended up clashing with local Druze fighters – and in some cases, were accused of targeting civilians.
By 15 July, Israel intervened militarily, citing its responsibility to protect the Druze population in Syria, a minority it considers a potential ally. This intervention marked the beginning of a dramatic escalation.
In Israel, the Druze are seen as a loyal minority and often serve in the military. In Syria, the Druze have been divided over how to deal with the country's new leaders, with some advocating for integrating into the new system while others have remained suspicious of the authorities in Damascus and pushed for an autonomous Druze region.
On Wednesday the Israeli military launched multiple airstrikes hitting central Damascus, including the Ministry of Defence headquarters and areas near the presidential palace, saying it is warning against attacks on Druze.
Further attacks were carried out in the southern city of Suwayda, a Druze-majority area close to the Jordanian border.
According to Syrian officials, the strikes on Damascus killed three people and injured 34. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK -based war monitor, reported that more than 300 people had been killed in Suwayda since 13 July, including eight women, four children and 165 soldiers.
The strikes represent Israel's most serious military escalation in Syria since December 2024, when it bombed hundreds of military sites following the fall of former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad in a rebel-led offensive.
That offensive had ended Syria's 14-year-long civil war and ushered in a new, Islamist-leaning leadership under interim president Ahmad al-Sharaa.
Israel has been accused by some Druze figures in Syria and Lebanon of stoking sectarian divisions to advance its own expansionist aspirations in the region.
Syria's new leadership under pressure
President al-Sharaa, a former militant who was once a member of al-Qaeda and now heads Syria's transitional government, addressed the nation on Thursday, describing the Druze as an integral part of Syria. 'We affirm that protecting your rights and freedoms is among our top priorities,' he said, specifically addressing Druze in Syria.
'We reject any attempt – foreign or domestic – to sow division within our ranks. We are all partners in this land, and we will not allow any group to distort the beautiful image that Syria and its diversity represent.'
He said Syrians did not fear renewed war but sought the path of Syrian interest over destruction. 'We assigned local factions and Druze spiritual leaders the responsibility of maintaining security in [Suwayda], recognising the gravity of the situation and the need to avoid dragging the country' into a new war, he said.
'We are not among those who fear war,' he said. 'We have spent our lives facing challenges and defending our people, but we have put the interests of the Syrians before chaos and destruction.'
Dr Mohamad Elmasry, a professor of media studies at the Doha Institute, called the speech a 'significant departure' from earlier stances. 'It was a clear warning to Israel that Syria doesn't want war, but it won't back down either,' he told Al Jazeera. 'We're at a potentially dangerous tipping point.'
The Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the Israeli strikes as a 'flagrant assault' and accused Israel of pursuing a 'deliberate policy' to spread chaos and destabilise the region. Several Arab governments, including Egypt, Qatar, and Lebanon, echoed Syria's condemnation. Saudi Arabia described the strikes as 'blatant attacks,' and Turkey warned they risk sabotaging Syria's efforts to restore peace.
Israel's rationale and regional implications
Israel claims that its military campaign is a response to attacks on the Druze and an attempt to prevent Islamist militias from entrenching themselves near its border, especially around the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. It has also accused Syrian forces of carrying out summary executions of Druze civilians.
Israeli defence minister Israel Katz declared after the Damascus strikes: 'The warnings in Damascus have ended - now painful blows will come.' He also threatened that Israel would increase its military pressure if Syrian forces remained in Suwayda.
The strike on the Syrian military headquarters was captured live by Syria TV, whose studios sit opposite the building, showing the moment a presenter fled the set while still live on air.
Ceasefire attempts falter
Following days of airstrikes and clashes, Syria's Ministry of Interior on Wednesday announced a new ceasefire and confirmed that army convoys had begun withdrawing from Suwayda. The ceasefire had been brokered with some Druze leaders, but prominent cleric Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri quickly rejected it, raising doubts about its viability.
Previous attempts to broker peace had also failed. A ceasefire declared on Tuesday had collapsed within hours. As Israel's military strikes continued, fears of further bloodshed and displacement grew.
Who are the Druze?
The Druze are an Arabic -speaking ethno-religious group with roots in 10th-century Ismailism, a branch of Shia Islam. While their faith incorporates Islamic elements, it is considered a distinct religion. There are about one million Druze worldwide, with half living in Syria and others spread across Lebanon, Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.
In Syria, they constitute roughly three per cent of the population. While the Druze community in Israel is often seen as loyal to the state, including through military service, the Druze in Syria have historically maintained a delicate balance between cooperation with and resistance to state authorities.
Following the fall of Assad, many Druze factions have resisted the authority of the new government, preferring to rely on local militias for security. This resistance, combined with past accusations of government abuses, has fuelled their mistrust toward the state.
Eyewitness accounts of horror
Grim reports of violence have surfaced from within Suwayda. Videos on social media showed government-affiliated fighters shaving the moustaches of Druze clerics – a symbolic act of humiliation – and desecrating Druze religious symbols. Others showed Druze fighters beating captured government troops and posing with corpses.
The Syrian Observatory reported at least 27 summary executions. The Associated Press said its journalists in the region had witnessed widespread looting and arson in Druze neighbourhoods.
Personal accounts add to the growing human cost. In Jaramana, near Damascus, 20-year-old Evelyn Azzam said she feared her husband, Robert Kiwan, had been shot by security forces during a phone call. 'They shot my husband in the hip, from what I could gather,' she said. 'Since then, we have no idea what has happened.'
A Druze woman in the United Arab Emirates said her family was hiding in their basement near Suwayda's hospital. 'I heard them cry. I have never heard them this way before,' she said.
Another woman said a house containing her relatives had been burned down with them inside, evoking memories of a deadly 2018 Isis attack on the city.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain is ready to fight if conflict breaks out over Taiwan, says Defence Secretary John Healey
Britain is ready to fight if conflict breaks out over Taiwan, says Defence Secretary John Healey

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Britain is ready to fight if conflict breaks out over Taiwan, says Defence Secretary John Healey

Defence Secretary John Healey has said Britain is ready to fight if conflict breaks out over Taiwan. The island nation has long been at loggerheads with China, strongly rejecting Beijing 's claim to sovereignty over it after the countries separated in the late forties. China's president Xi Jinping has previously said he would not rule out using force in the 'reunification of the motherland'. And now Mr Healey, when asked what the UK is doing to help countries like Taiwan prepare for potential Chinese escalation, has said Britain would fight in the Pacific. He was speaking on a visit to the HMS Prince of Wales, docked in the Australian city of Darwin, with the country's deputy prime minister and defence minister Richard Marles. He told The Telegraph, during the carrier group's nine-month Pacific deployment: 'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. 'We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.' These are some of the strongest words ever issued by the British government on the topic of potential engagement in any conflict in the region. The island nation has long been at loggerheads with China, strongly rejecting Beijing's claim to sovereignty over it after the countries separated in the late forties. Pictured: From second left, Mr Healey, Australian deputy prime minister and minister for defence Richard Marles, British foreign secretary David Lammy and Australian foreign minster Penny Wong on the visit to the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier today But the minister emphasised he was talking in 'general terms' - and the UK would prefer any disputes there were resolved 'peacefully' and 'diplomatically'. 'We secure peace through strength, and our strength comes from our allies', he added. Experts have previously warned an invasion of Taiwan could cause a large-scale conflict, pulling in nations from across the world. It is because the country manufactures most advanced computer chips. Mr Healey said 'threats' in the Indo-Pacific region are on the rise. It follows the Chinese military taking control of contentious reefs - and was accused of intimidating its neighbours there. The Defence Secretary's remarks also come as the HMS Prince of Wales carrier group sails with advanced F-35 fighter jets from Singapore to northern Australia for the first time in nearly 40 years. The fleet will continue on to Japan, likely coming close to Taiwan. The Defence Secretary's remarks also come as the HMS Prince of Wales carrier group (pictured on the visit today) sails with advanced F-35 fighter jets from Singapore to northern Australia for the first time in nearly 40 years Deploying the strike carrier group, which is the UK's largest of its kind, in the Pacific for nine-months shows Britain is aware of increasing threats in the region. Sending it to Darwin in particular indicates close ties between the UK and Australia - key to any potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific. Indeed, Mr Healey noted such a partnership was especially important currently, as threats in the region increase. The defence secretary emphasised the UK's interest in international rules, stability and security, as well as both freedom of the seas and navigation in the area. British officials have previously not commented on whether the UK would intervene in any conflict in the region. This is in line with the United States' stance, which has been dubbed 'strategic ambiguity' - and most other nations follow it too. Two Royal Navy patrol vessels are stationed permanently in the region. The UK government recognised, in its National Security Strategy published earlier this year: 'There is a particular risk of escalation around Taiwan.' Former defence secretary Gavin Williamson (pictured in 2019) said the UK is probably becoming more candid on its stance on the matter as threats in the Indo-Pacific increase. Former defence secretary Gavin Williamson said the UK is probably becoming more candid on its stance on the matter as threats in the Indo-Pacific increase. 'I think there's a realisation that by being completely silent it doesn't make it more or less likely', he explained. Deterrence, he added, involves making clear the consequences that will come if others act dangerously or maliciously. Mr Williamson, who led the MoD from 2017 to 2019, added it is important someone as prominent as the British defence secretary is clear actions have consequences. Former US president Joe Biden has previously broken strategic ambiguity on several occasions, saying the US would support Taiwan against China. His successor Donald Trump has not done this - but Pentagon officials are said to be preparing for conflict. His government has said it will review its membership of the AUKUS security agreement, between the US, Australia and the UK. It comes as part of Mr Trump's 'America first' approach. Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese has also not spoken out whether the nation would join the US and other allies to fight China in any conflict in the region. He refused to comment on the matter last week. The UK and Australia have made a renewed commitment to each other in recent times. The two nations signed the Geelong Treaty this weekend - a 50-year agreement cementing their commitment to the AUKUS pact. It also commits them to building a new fleet of nuclear-powered submarines. The HMS Prince of Wales anchoring in Darwin marks the first time a British carrier strike group has docked in Australia. It is also the first time a non-US carrier has taken part in Australia's annual military drills, the so-called Talisman Sabre. The event this year was the largest it has ever been. While the UK is turning more of its attention to the Indo-Pacific, Mr Healey (pictured on the visit today) confirmed there would be no change to its level of engagement with Taiwan Foreign secretary David Lammy also boarded the HMS Prince of Wales, on the same day as and just before his colleague Mr Healey. He has previously said Britain plans to undertake more freedom of navigation operations in the Taiwan Strait. Last month, a Royal Navy patrol ship, the HMS Spey, moved through the strait - which was praised by Taiwan but frowned upon by China. Britain does not comment on the future movements of its vessels. But it is thought the HMS Prince of Wales will soon also travel through the strait on its way to South Korea and Japan. While the UK is turning more of its attention to the Indo-Pacific, Mr Healey confirmed there would be no change to its level of engagement with Taiwan. Mr Williamson said Britain would likely only alter this stance if China got increasingly aggressive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store