logo
No reset would be better than this damaging deal

No reset would be better than this damaging deal

Yahoo19-05-2025

One might be tempted to say that no reset is better than a bad one. The UK's economic reset with the EU does not produce much in the way of tangible, immediate gains for the UK. It is as much about the direction of travel.
The key to any reset is to ensure it does not tie the UK's hands in future on domestic economic or trade policy. It makes sense to have a sensible and mutually beneficial working relationship with the EU. In this reset, however, the UK will have to both pay and align in return for closer ties.
Brexit was a political event, about democracy, control of our laws and ensuring power remained with UK voters as the EU moves towards ever closer union. I agree with the former governor of the Bank of England, Lord King, who said in an interview: 'It isn't really an economic issue: it's a political issue.'
Both the Prime Minister and EU president described this deal as 'comprehensive'. It is not just about the devil being in the details, but also about what follows. The so-called Common Understanding document accompanying the reset has many references to exploratory talks and references 'dynamic alignment with EU rules' where necessary.
The Government has said it does not plan to rejoin the single market or the customs union. That's important as this will not provide a solution to the UK's economic challenge and should not be part of any pro-growth strategy.
Remaining outside the single market allows the UK regulatory autonomy in key areas of future growth such as artificial intelligence.
Being outside the customs union has allowed the Government to make a trade deal with India, to agree on tariffs with the US, and to reposition the UK in a changing global economy, including having membership of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. The major driver of future growth is the Indo-Pacific, with the EU the slow growth region.
This reset effectively sees the UK join the single market in the area of agricultural products. The post-Brexit border in the Irish Sea should go. The Government expects trade in agriculture to rise, but this will be at the expense of the UK being tied to EU rules.
The SPS agreement, for instance, covers sanitary, phytosanitary, food safety and general consumer protection rules, so effectively the UK will come under EU rules on production, which are widely seen as anti-innovation in agricultural products.
The latter ties UK agriculture's hands in gaining efficiencies with the rest of the world. The ECJ will also oversee areas of dispute.
Unfortunately, one headline-grabbing aspect is the damage it may cause to the UK fishing industry, and it will have a further painful impact on deprived parts of the UK.
The other is UK access to EU defence procurement. This could be positive, but the details and cost still need to be clarified. Seeking improved defence and security ties is understandable as the changing global landscape of geo-economics has led to national security being alongside economic prosperity in policy making.
Access to the EU energy market and emissions trading schemes is also to be explored, but again with a cost and realignment.
The reset should allow scope to address areas that, with better negotiation, should not have been in the original deal. Access to e-gates at passport control now faces 'no legal barriers', but their use is unclear. The UK wanted to address the ability of UK artists to tour, but this has not been resolved.
Youth mobility is the big unknown out of this reset. Few would want to deny opportunities to UK young people, although previously these were limited by language issues and the lack of jobs in the EU.
The genuine worry is the UK's tendency to underestimate badly how many people may wish to come, given our dynamic labour market and free health system and the high numbers of young people with EU residency permits.
The major challenges facing the UK have long predated Brexit and solutions are not reliant on being in the EU. The UK's investment shortfall dates to the 1970s, its trade deficit problem to the mid-1980s, and regional imbalances have persisted for some time.
Germany's recent recession, Italy's stagnation and France's weak growth are not blamed on Brexit, and with Britain being hit by the same global influences, our sluggish growth should not be either.
The doppelgängers that some have used to suggest we would have grown faster within the EU have been shown to be flawed, with the comparator groups changing within and across economic variables.
The inability of British politicians to articulate a coherent vision and deliver a properly thought-out economic policy have allowed figures vehemently opposed to Brexit to define the debate and helped to create an economically damaging narrative about the UK on the global stage.
While some politicians wrongly presented Brexit as transforming the country's fortunes overnight, we are still better placed to pursue a reforming, pro-growth agenda from outside the EU.
Making maximum use of the competencies that have returned to Westminster in recent years remains an opportunity, before we seek to give them away in a reset without them being used.
Though this need not necessarily rule out dynamic alignment in a few sectors, the UK needs to focus on the domestic policy levers that can be pulled to boost competitiveness.
Gerard Lyons is a senior fellow at the Centre for Policy Studies
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU's new Russia sanctions to target energy sector and banks
EU's new Russia sanctions to target energy sector and banks

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU's new Russia sanctions to target energy sector and banks

BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The European Commission has proposed an 18th package of sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, aimed at Moscow's energy revenues, its banks and its military industry, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Tuesday. The new package proposes banning transactions with Russia's Nord Stream gas pipelines as well as banks that engage in sanctions circumvention. "Russia's goal is not peace, it is to impose the rule of might ... strength is the only language that Russia will understand," von der Leyen told a news conference. The Commission has also proposed lowering the Group of Seven nations (G7) price cap on Russian crude oil to $45 a barrel from $60 barrel in a bid to cut Russia's energy revenues. Von der Leyen said that the oil price cap will be discussed at a G7 meeting this week. "My assumption is that we do that together as the G7. We started that as G7, it was successful as a measure from the G7, and I want to continue this measure as G7," she said. The proposal also lists more vessels that make up Russia's shadow fleet and oil trading companies. "The next round of EU sanctions against Russia will target Russia's energy revenues including the shadow fleet, its military industry and its banking sector," EU chief diplomat Kaja Kallas said. EU countries will start debating the proposal this week. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Welsh FM accused of doing ‘nothing' to protect pensioners from winter fuel cut
Welsh FM accused of doing ‘nothing' to protect pensioners from winter fuel cut

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Welsh FM accused of doing ‘nothing' to protect pensioners from winter fuel cut

The First Minister of Wales has been accused of doing 'absolutely nothing' to protect pensioners, following a UK Government U-turn on winter fuel payment cuts. Darren Millar, leader of the Welsh Conservatives, called for Eluned Morgan to apologise to the pensioners affected by the change last winter, arguing the Welsh Government should have stepped in to support those in need. Speaking during First Minister's Questions on Tuesday, Mr Millar said the cut had forced vulnerable people to choose between heating and eating. Baroness Morgan, leader of the Welsh Labour Government, said she was 'absolutely delighted' that the UK Government had reversed the cut for many. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners, with anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year now getting the payment automatically. The decision last July to restrict the winter fuel payment to the poorest pensioners was intended to save around £1.5 billion a year, with more than nine million people who would have previously been eligible losing out. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, announced the partial U-turn on Monday, following significant backlash from charities, opposition MPs and the Government's own backbenchers. Speaking in the Senedd, Mr Millar said: 'Yesterday we saw a screeching U-turn on the winter fuel allowance by Rachel Reeves, after considerable pressure from the Conservative Party. 'You will know that over half a million Welsh pensioners were deprived of their winter fuel payments last year, leaving some very vulnerable people with the unenvious choice of having to choose between heating and eating – it's an absolute disgrace. 'You are meant to stand up for Wales but what did you actually do in terms of this winter fuel allowance? You did absolutely nothing.' Mr Millar argued Baroness Morgan should have implemented a Welsh winter fuel payment or stood up to Sir Keir Starmer and demanded the payment be restored sooner. Baroness Morgan responded that she was 'absolutely delighted' that Sir Keir Starmer had listened to pensioners in Wales and across the country. 'I'm really pleased that because we have made representations to the Prime Minister on this issue that he has changed his mind and that will make a difference to hundreds of thousands of pensioners across Wales this winter, in a country where we do have more older people and housing which is more difficult to heat. 'I don't think that it's bad to listen to people and then to make sure that you respond to them.' Baroness Morgan had previously pushed back against the cut, having called for a 'rethink' in early May, saying it was something 'that comes up time and again'. At the time, the Government said there would 'not be a change to the Government's policy'. On Monday, Ms Reeves suggested that the 'stability we've brought back to the economy' meant the Government was able to change the eligibility threshold for winter fuel payments.

EU seeks to lower a price cap on Russian oil and discourage Nord Stream pipeline investors
EU seeks to lower a price cap on Russian oil and discourage Nord Stream pipeline investors

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU seeks to lower a price cap on Russian oil and discourage Nord Stream pipeline investors

BRUSSELS (AP) — The European Union wants to lower a cap on the price of Russian oil to deprive the Kremlin of extra profits to fund its war in Ukraine as part of a new raft of sanctions aimed at forcing Moscow to the negotiating table, senior officials said on Tuesday. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the bloc is 'proposing to lower the oil price cap from $60 to $45, which is lower than the market price, and lowering the oil price cap will hit Russia's revenues hard.' Kallas said the EU also wants to impose 'sanctions on the Nord Stream pipelines to prevent Russia generating any revenue in the future. In this way, it sends a clear signal we are not going back to business as usual.' All 27 EU member countries must all agree for the sanctions to enter force. In 2023, Ukraine's Western allies limited sales of Russian oil to $60 per barrel but the price cap was largely symbolic as most of Moscow's crude — its main moneymaker — cost less than that. Still, the cap was there in case oil prices rose. Oil income is the linchpin of Russia's economy, allowing President Vladimir Putin to pour money into the armed forces while avoiding worsening inflation for everyday people and a currency collapse. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she assumed that the price cap would be discussed and agreed among the leaders of the Group of Seven major world economic powers when they meet in Canada on June 15-17. She said the United States and its G7 partners realize 'that the oil price has lowered so much that the effectiveness of the cap is to be questioned, and therefore we all want to lower the oil price from $60 per barrel down to $45 per barrel.' The Nord Stream gas pipelines were built to carry Russian natural gas to Germany but are not in operation. They were sabotaged in 2022, but the source of the underwater explosions has remained a major international mystery. The Commission has said that it wants to impose sanctions on the operating consortium to discourage investors from trying to use the pipelines in future. The blasts happened as Europe attempted to wean itself off Russian energy sources following the Kremlin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and contributed to tensions that followed the start of the war. Von der Leyen noted on Tuesday that at the beginning of the war in 2022, 'Russia had 12 billion euros ($14 billion) of energy revenues from fossil fuels" from Europe per month. "And now we're down to 1.8 billion (euros).' The new EU sanctions would also target Russia's banking sector, with the aim of limiting the Kremlin's ability to raise funds or carry out financial transactions. A further 22 Russian banks will be hit with measures, von der Leyen said. An export ban worth some 2.5 billion euros would also be imposed, and the assets frozen of more than 20 Russian and foreign companies alleged to be providing support to the Kremlin's war machine. Von der Leyen said the sanctions are aimed at forcing Russia into serious talks about peace with Ukraine. 'We need a real ceasefire, and Russia has to come to the negotiating table with a serious proposal,' she told reporters. The EU has imposed several rounds of sanctions on Russia since Putin ordered his troops into Ukraine in February 2022. Around 2,400 officials and 'entities' – often government agencies, banks and organizations – have been hit. It's last raft of sanctions, imposed on May 20, targeted almost 200 ships in Russia's sanction-busting shadow fleet of tankers, and tightened trade restrictions to stop produce that could be used for military purposes from reaching Russia's armed forces. Lorne Cook, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store