
It's the economic end times, so obviously I'm thinking about my takeaway coffee
Most of us, confronted with daily forecasts of recession and economic downturn, have an emotional response that expresses itself in a range of behaviours. Big purchases may be deferred or cancelled. Travel plans are revisited. We might review our childcare spend and wonder if we should go out less – all rational decisions in the face of the rising cost of living. Then there are the irrational gestures, those that have little meaning financially but offer us, via small acts of self-denial, an opportunity to feel we're doing something morally rigorous. It's these, in my case, that have lately been triggered.
For me, the barometer has always been coffee, a small but ineradicable source of guilt that has only grown as the price of a single flat white creeps up towards £4. Forgoing this small pleasure neither damages my day, nor, on the other hand, does anything significant towards improving my finances. Assuming a one-coffee-a-week spend, the choice to wait until I get home to make coffee will save me about £200 a year. And yet, each time I pass Caffè Nero and keep walking, I'm so proud of myself you would think I'd donated a kidney.
Some of this back-patting, I'm aware, is a long-range hangover from the time that Aussie real estate mogul accused millennials of not owning a home because they had spent all their money on avocado toast. Kevin O'Leary, a wealthy investor who appears on Shark Tank, the US version of Dragons' Den, also said that he never bought a coffee from a cafe, a boast he made to admonish feckless non-millionaires frittering away their tiny salaries. Both men were being obnoxious while grasping at a partial truth. The fact is you can scrape the deposit for a house in a major city on a teacher's salary – even, I'd suggest, in a downturn – but it's not coffee or brunch you'll have to give up: it's everything.
I've seen this kind of person in action – the type of hyper-saver who can hit levels of self-deprivation most of us can't. My late aunt was one. She raised three children on her own, never had a cent of help from anyone, and wound up owning a modest house with a yard, the mortgage for which – I still boggle at this – she paid off in 10 years flat on a bookkeeper's salary. She did this by eating the proverbial beans, never going out, wearing clothes until they fell apart and espousing a hardline philosophy of self-denial. Long before the mortgage was paid off, it had stopped being about the money. Instead, the thrilling masochism of 'doing without' became a kind of addiction, and her fanaticism was admirable and horrifying. It raised questions about what we're here for, if not at least to allow ourselves a little enjoyment. O, reason not the need.
For most of us with more regular spending habits, the difficulty is in accurately assessing the gravity of a turndown, and therefore what scale of sacrifice to meet it with. Markets have rallied before and, unless we're going to take our money out of the bank and invest it under the bed, we must assume they will rally again. Between 1929 and 1932, 90% was wiped off the value of Wall Street. Stocks in the US plunged 37% during the pandemic. By far the biggest crash in most of our lifetimes was in 2008, when the sub-prime mortgage collapse took 57% off the S&P 500 index – the main takeaway from which, apart from the obvious one about borrowing more than a certain multiple of our salaries, was that we should all have bought Microsoft then.
As the economic climate worsens and recession starts to take hold, it may be that at least some of our resolve to cut back is helped by the kind of vibe shift that disguises cost-cutting as aesthetic choice. The imposition of tariffs by the US on Europe and China is likely to send the cost of luxury brands in the US soaring, so that, as with the 2008 recession, logos and other examples of conspicuous spending will quietly fall out of fashion.
Anyway, I've done the maths – moral, emotional and actual – and on balance have decided that £200 a year is worth it for the small ping of happiness I get from buying a coffee. With a bit of reaching, I can even convince myself that it's a shrewd investment relative to the potential cost of not buying coffee. We all have our version of this: you take the emotional capital from denying yourself something that costs £5 and use it to justify dropping £500. Let's not be miserable. Buy the coffee.
Emma Brockes is a Guardian columnist

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Young Aussie woman exposes the brutal reality of using Afterpay
A young Aussie has exposed the dark reality of 'buy now, pay later' services after she spent an eye-watering $19,000 using Afterpay in just two years. Hobart woman Shyneka Long, 21, was so horrified by her Afterpay 'addiction' she made a TikTok video urging others to check what they were spending. 'This is your sign to literally delete Afterpay or go and look at your bank statements and see how much you've spent on Afterpay in the last two years,' she said. 'I could've bought a car... I'm really about to expose myself but in the last two years I have spent $19,000 on Afterpay. What the f***. 'I could have had a f***ing car. Is there an addiction anonymous for Afterpay? Because where do I sign my whole family up. This is bad, this is so bad.' Afterpay is a popular buy now, pay later (BNPL) service that allows customers to pay for items in four interest-free installments over six weeks. But Ms Long wasn't the only one guilty of overspending using BNPL services with others quick to confess their Afterpay sins in the comments of her video. 'I'm going to hold your hand when I tell you, mine since 2023 is $62,815,' one said. 'I think I might take the cake - $122,502,' a second commented. 'My mum had to get Centrelink loans to pay hers back,' a third said. '45k in 2 years, but I've had it since like 2018.. I'm actually ashamed,' a fourth wrote. 'Omg I just checked mine and thought I'd be the same but it's only at $5,885. I'll keep the app,' another shared. 'I got banned from Afterpay when I bought too much and couldn't pay it all off on time, eventually paid it all just way later than they wanted,' a woman commented. Others shared their advice for keeping BNPL spending at a minimum. 'I have a rule for Afterpay: only one at a time, and always wait a month before buying something new/starting a new one,' one person wrote. 'Afterpay can be a really good tool for getting things you want. I've been investing in slow fashion with Afterpay + stuff I've needed like quality luggage etc,' a second said. Data collected in late 2024 found (BNPL) services like Afterpay, Klarna or Zip Pay were used by two in five Australians in the last six months. They are the most popular credit product in Australia, behind credit cards and home loans. Research found Millennials make up 38 per cent of users of BNPL services followed by Gen Z at 13 per cent. Up to 15 per cent of Gen Z BNPL customers didn't believe lenders would check their credit score as part of eligibility for loans. New laws to shift the regulations of BNPL services in line with credit cards came into effect on Tuesday. The new laws require BNPL providers to hold an Australian credit licence, perform mandatory checks on customers' credit scores and financial status, and enforce stricter spending limits. Customers with existing BNPL accounts will not be required to undergo a credit check, only new customers. BNPL loans will also have a larger impact on credit scores, a status used to check eligibility for credit cards, personal loans and mortgages. Moving forward, late and skipped repayments will lower customers' credit scores and outstanding repayments will be considered as debt.


Time Out
6 hours ago
- Time Out
Revealed: The shocking income you need to buy a house in Australia
Despite sky-high house prices, many Aussies can't let go of the dream of owning a home one day – even if it's just a shoebox with good natural light. The unfortunate news is that aspiring home buyers in almost every capital city now need to earn almost double what they did in pre-pandemic times to afford a house. In March this year, the ABS revealed that the average price of residential dwellings in Australia passed $1 million for the first time ever. Eeek! If you're still holding onto hope, a new Canstar analysis has unveiled the minimum annual salary you need to comfortably buy a median-priced house (defined as spending less than a third of your household income on mortgage repayments). As expected, Sydneysiders top the list when it comes to the income required to buy a home. With the city's median price jumping from $950,000 in 2020 to a whopping $1,460,000 in 2025, purchasing a house is now only realistic for those earning a gross household income of $272,737. That's $150,000 more pay than you would have needed five years ago (gulp). The Sunshine State follows close behind, with Queenslanders now needing to earn around $100,000 more a year than they did before the pandemic to afford a typical home. The study reveals that to buy a median-priced house ($920,000) in Brisbane, you'd need an annual income of $171,862 – a huge jump from $72,628 back in 2020. Like Queensland, Melbourne buyers now need to earn nearly $100,000 more per year – bringing the total to $160,000 – to comfortably afford the same home they could have snapped up in 2020. The median-priced house has climbed $61,000 in the past five years to $855,000. Sorry, South Australia – you'll need to have boosted your income by $90,000 over the past five years to comfortably afford loan repayments on a house. Even our two smallest states, Tasmania and the Northern Territory, aren't immune, with the income needed to buy almost doubling in both. Rather than buying property, how about taking a holiday instead (to cheer you up)? Here are our favourite places to go. The gross income needed to buy a house in Australia: RECOMMENDED FOR YOU: 👧🏻 🌳 The 10 Aussie regional hotspots everyone wants to move to in 2025


Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
McDonald's Australia is set to release a mouthwatering menu item following 'secret' trial
McDonald's Australia is set to release a mouthwatering menu item nationwide. From Wednesday June 11, customers around the country will be able to get their hands on crispy deep-fried Chicken McWings. Earlier this year the fast food chain secretly trialled the product at selected locations and the results on social media showed it was a hit among customers. This ultimately lead to the decision to release the offering on the permanent menu. The tasty wings are made using 100 per cent RSPCA approved Aussie chicken wrapped a golden coating that's crispy with every bite. Diners will be able to order either three wings or five wings alongside the choice of a new creamy ranch sauce or spicy buffalo sauce. News of the return of the cult-favourite menu item will likely set fans racing to the nearest McDonald's. Amanda Nakad, Marketing Director of Menu and Brand for McDonald's Australia, said: 'It's been a while since we have added something new to the permanent menu, but the response to Chicken McWings during the trial made it clear: Aussies want more chicken options with their order. Diners will be able to order either three wings or five wings alongside the choice of a new creamy ranch sauce or spicy buffalo sauce 'Chicken McWings are now claiming their spot next to other legends like the McChicken, McSpicy, McCrispy and Chicken McNuggets. It's the golden era of chicken at Macca's - and we're just getting started,' she continued. Foodie influencer Nectorious Papi added: 'There's a lot of wings on the market, but Chicken McWings have totally won me over, and they're even better with Ranch Sauce and Spicy Buffalo Sauce. 'I love that Macca's is a one-stop shop now - you can grab all your faves in one order. My go-to combo is Chicken McWings with Ranch Sauce and a McFlurry to finish - it's seriously so good.'