Coatbridge couple lose court case to restore Winter Fuel Payment
The Court of Session ruled to refuse the petition on Friday morning.
Peter and Flo lost their entitlement to the financial assistance and became worried about their ability to afford their heating costs.
READ MORE: Plans approved to turn Robert Burns-linked estate into whisky distillery
Peter, 73, receives a state and a work pension, while Flo, 72, receives just a state pension.
They do not meet the criteria to qualify for pension credits and decided to take action in a bid to have the benefit restored for all who previously received it.
Peter said he was going to court to "give a voice" to other pensioners.
The couple both suffer from medical conditions that are made worse by the cold. During the winter, they say they have to use their household heating daily to combat symptoms.
Peter and Flo Fanning (Image: PA) They also claimed the decision to end the £300 benefit for thousands of people across the country last year was "irrational" and breached their human rights.
Lady Hood found that neither of the governments had failed to exercise their duties under the Equality Act 2010 and neither was under a duty to consult.
In her judgment, she stated: 'This case is not a verdict, nor even an expression of opinion, on the merits or demerits of government policy as debated in the public arena.
'The purpose of the case was to test a much "narrower question", namely whether the policy decisions made by the governments were unlawful, and if so liable to be struck down by the courts.
READ MORE: Reform UK claim to have 11,000 Scottish members in challenge to Labour
'I shall therefore repel the petitioners' first to eighth pleas-in-law and refuse the petition. The question of the appropriate remedies, had I found in the petitioners' favour therefore does not arise.'
Late Alba Party leader Alex Salmond was instrumental in putting the Fannings in touch with the Govan Law Centre ahead of the action being raised.
A spokesperson from Govan Law Centre, who represented the couple, said they still felt the action had been merited and worthwhile.
They added: "While our clients have lost their case at first instance, we have no doubt that this litigation has been influential in securing the partial U-turn made by the Scottish Government last November and the major policy U-turn confirmed by the UK Government earlier this week.
"We hope that Holyrood will now follow suit and restore the Winter Fuel Payment in full for people such as our clients."
Westminster abandoned plans to withdraw the payments from all but the poorest pensioners after the scheme drew widespread criticism.
The Scottish Government had already launched its own Winter Fuel Payment in response to the original cut, which included extra support for those less well-off, but also a universal payment which is unaffected by income.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Older workers are being sent to the scrapheap
At long last, Rachel Reeves has an economic success story. One sector in Britain is displaying dizzying growth, with demand soaring year on year: the number of people claiming Universal Credit without work requirements has risen from 2.7 million last July to 3.7 million. While some portion of this growth will be explained by migration between benefits as the Government shifts claimants to Universal Credit, that cannot be seen as exculpatory. Certain claimants moving on to Universal Credit from legacy benefits can do so without a need for any fresh reassessment of their ability to work. While this will help to streamline the transfer and ensure those who need support receive it, it is a missed opportunity to look at the existing group of claimants and to reassess their fitness for work. Such an approach is sorely needed. At the moment, attention is directed towards the flow of new claims for welfare, but relatively little towards tackling the stock of existing claims, and seeing whether some may have left the workforce prematurely. Attention, moreover, does not mean action. The furious row over the relatively minor changes to disability benefits proposed earlier this year resulted in a Government climbdown, and the emboldening of backbench rebels against further potential cuts. As a result, we continue to see the numbers parked on benefits with no requirement to seek work soar, with many older workers now in what appears to be a form of tacit early retirement. This is a waste of their talents and experience that Britain can ill afford, and one which is all the more infuriating given the lay of the land internationally. A little over a year ago, the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank published a fascinating analysis on the remarkable shifts in the US workforce, with significant rises in employment rates for the over 55s. Older Americans were better educated and healthier than previous generations, and as a result willing and able to work longer. In Britain, in contrast, we are facing a health and disability benefits bill expected to rise to £100bn a year by the end of the decade, with minimal means of shifting workers off claims once they begin. It would be greatly to the benefit of the nation and the public finances if Westminster could bring itself to learn from Washington in this field.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
An emphatic 2026 win for the SNP will mean no excuses for inaction
Given that support for independence is around 50% and support for establishing a Scottish parliament was around 75%, it does not take too much imagination to believe that a significant majority can be persuaded (with the help of some serious campaigning) to vote for that parliament to have the legal authority to conduct a referendum enabling the people of Scotland to determine their own future (within or outwith a now dysfunctional Union). READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Alex Salmond 'did not read' 2014 independence paper From Tommy's words, it appears that my personal interpretation of John Swinney's intentions regarding a constitutional convention – as being consistent with the creation of a widely-inclusive citizen's convention – was wrong. However, if we wish to gain broad public support for the next step on our journey to independence then, in addition to progressing an open citizens' convention, independence parties should have the commitment to establishing the legal authority of the Scottish Parliament to conduct a constitutional referendum clearly stated as a primary clause in their manifestos, backed up by stated actions to ensure that authority is granted to Holyrood. Otherwise, unless independence can be achieved in the meantime by alternative actions, the next Westminster General Election must be declared a de facto referendum. Offering another perspective to the dilemmas confronting 'Old John' and Jim Taylor (Letters, Aug 11), and no doubt many others, the more emphatic an SNP victory, the less excuse the SNP hierarchy will have for not taking substantive actions in support of a public mandate. This approach may be considered hypocritical by some if they do not support the route to independence advocated by the current First Minister, but to vote otherwise in the knowledge that it could bring about a Labour government in Holyrood would seem a betrayal to most who are absolutely committed to independence. Better to give neither the First Minister nor the Prime Minister any excuse for not delivering, or for further delaying, the means of exercising the right of Scotland's people to determine their own future. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian TRUMP'S views on a deal with Putin over Ukraine seems like a deal between 18th-century aristocrats settling their gambling debts. Trump acts like an18th-century monarch. No consideration is given to the views of residents of the possible transfer areas, who are merely insignificant chequers in a high-stakes gambling deal. It seems reminiscent of the Act of Union, whereby the ruling elite in Scotland agreed to a union with England against the will of the general populace. READ MORE: David Pratt: Are Trump and Putin about to stitch up Ukraine? Trump will no doubt gain whatever happens, and Ukraine will suffer, being back under a modern Russian Czar. President Trump will parade as a peacemaker, and his sycophants (with usual brown envelopes pocketed) will propose him for a Nobel Peace Prize which he desires, hypocrite that he is. What's changed in politics since the 18th century? Modern democracy seems little more than a sham, with elites still in charge. Current political parties seem little more than a means for the current elites to maintain control under a pretext of democracy. Where is real limitation of elector funding? The exist many ways to get round and buy elections. If you're in the know, it seems funding is unrestricted. The current government in the UK, as well as the previous one, seem uninterested in altering the present set-up, as they both benefit from it. Drew Reid Falkirk YOUR article 'PM claims people feeling 'better off'' by Hamish Morrison (Aug 7) presents the reader with the classic case of 'the ventriloquist has died but the dummy keeps talking'! The 'dummy' tells us that his government is 'bearing down' on costs and 'putting more money into people's pockets'. Yes, the pockets of his sponsors, big businesses and fellow Labour parliamentarians, definitely NOT those of the people of the country! Since Labour came to power, the 'dummy' has increased the weekly shopping costs by as much as 40%. The facts reveal 'disposable income' is falling! It's not falling, it's PLUMMETING in an ever-increasing spiral into those same pockets that enabled Starmer to become PM. The answer is to tax the super-rich and get them to pay their fair share. Everyone knows 'Starmer the dummy' will never do that because HE is one of the super rich along with his cronies who sit beside him on the government benches. As for 'the focus will be on living standards', these are also PLUMMETING under his watch. Everybody and anybody in the 'vulnerable' category will be forced to pay more tax but not the wealthy pals, sponsors and big businesses who back this 'dummy'. I don't ever see 'Rachel from Accounts' do anything to help anyone other than herself and the 'dummy'. It's time the dummy was put back in the box and a real person with a spine and a conscience took over – or better still, let Scotland leave this Westminster pantomime. Jim Todd Cumbernauld
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Strange case of Nicola Sturgeon's recovery from amnesia over Alex Salmond sexual harassment claims
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Having been in the Scottish Parliament from the very start, I watched an introverted Nicola Sturgeon manoeuvre her way within the SNP to become the most powerful woman in the country. And what did she achieve with this untrammelled power – is Scotland a better place after 10 years of Sturgeon as First Minister? The answer is not to be found in her newly published memoirs – indeed there is little about her record of achievement. There is no explanation for why the educational attainment gap, which she pledged to eradicate, still persists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There is no excuse for the state of the NHS and the health service waiting lists that were growing long before the Covid pandemic. Never mind the stagnant economy and the lack of engagement with business. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says she still counts shamed Derek Mackay as a friend Nicola Sturgeon, seen with Val McDermid during Glasgow International Comedy Festival earlier this year, found her powers of recall had deserted her when she gave evidence to a Scottish Parliament committee investigating the government's handling of complaints against Alex Salmond (Picture: Jane Barlow) | PA Spoiler alert Instead we are told a story of a powerful woman approached by her older male mentor, Alex Salmond, who asks her to protect him, but she refuses. It's a dramatic turning point worthy of any author – which is no doubt why Sturgeon picked it to promote her book. The former First Minister may be more comfortable in a Waterstones' armchair these days than the debating chamber at Holyrood. But while I enjoy a good work of fiction as much as the next person, I was on the parliamentary committee investigating this very same episode. Spoiler alert – there's more to the story. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The committee was set up in 2021 after the Scottish Government's internal investigation into those same sexual harassment claims collapsed, costing taxpayers thousands of pounds and forcing the complainants into a spotlight they never sought. Our committee's job was to understand why this had happened and ensure that in future the Scottish Government's complaints procedures would not let women down. You would think that Sturgeon, who was famed for her attention to detail, would be focused on that task. Instead, we discovered the then First Minister's power of recall had deserted her. She could not remember. I am glad that her memory is returning. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Throughout our evidence-gathering sessions, the SNP government blocked us at every turn, at one point taking two years to deliver the documents we requested. And when they came, some were blank sheets of paper. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says Alex Salmond could have leaked probe against him and addresses conspiracy claim Swinney's role In this obstruction, Sturgeon had a key ally. Secret Scotland came into its own with our current First Minister, John Swinney. He was Sturgeon's political fixer and refused for many months to share information with the committee to the point that opposition parties forced a no-confidence vote. That culture of obfuscation and spin is Sturgeon's legacy, now carried forward by Swinney. On International Women's Day a few years ago, Sturgeon pledged 'to change for good the culture of misogyny'. With all the power she had, with a majority SNP parliament, she could have changed the country. That really would have been a legacy for Scotland's first female First Minister. In this case, actions speak louder than words.
