Inmates at Leeuwkop Prison finally heard in Gauteng High Court
Image: File
It was third time lucky for a group of 20 inmates who had over the past six weeks turned to court three times in a bid to be heard, but on the first two occasions nobody would lend them an ear, before a sympathetic judge agreed to take on their case.
Stephen Langa and 19 of his co-accused at Leeuwkop Prison turned to the Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg in an urgent bid to get answers as to why they have not been considered for parole.
All 20 are serving life imprisonment terms and said they have already served the time expected of them in law, before becoming eligible to be considered for parole. Yet they are not being considered by the Parole Board.
On the first two occasions judges simply removed their matter from the urgent court roll, as the applications were deemed not up to scratch by the judges. Even the office of the State Attorney, who had to act on behalf of the minister of correctional services and other related departments to defend the action, did not bother to do so.
But Judge Stuart Wilson has now decided to lend them an ear and to place the matter before himself for future case management.
While the inmates had brought the applications as lay people, without the help of a lawyer, and it was difficult from their court papers to ascertain exactly what their complaint was, Judge Wilson took the time to establish it.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
He commenced that whether or not the complaints turn out to have any merit, claims of this nature generally require the most serious and anxious consideration, because the person advancing them, being incarcerated, is inherently vulnerable.
'Save in exceptional circumstances, it is not appropriate to remove a lay litigant's application from the urgent roll. Every effort must be made to ascertain the nature of the complaint. If the complaint is urgent, it must be dealt with fairly on its merits.'
He added that a simple removal of these matters from the roll generally achieves nothing. 'It is no more than an encouragement to a lay litigant to re-enroll the matter in the next urgent court, making their case part of the next urgent judge's burden.'
While the application papers were not easy to decipher, it turned out following questions by the judge to Langa, that these prisoners complained that they had completed the non-parole period of their sentences, but were being denied the opportunity to apply for parole.
'Once the nature of the complaint has been established, it is necessary to hear from the authorities responsible for the applicant's detention. In this case, that was impossible because there was no appearance from the Minister of Correctional Services. Without input from the Minister, it is impossible to determine whether Mr. Langa has correctly identified the complaint and whether that complaint has any merit,' the judge said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘Government should hang their heads in shame': Marikana Massacre marks 13 years without justice
Government has paid more than R350 million in claims linked to the tragedy. Saturday, 16 August 2025, marked 13 years since 34 mineworkers were gunned down by police in what is now remembered as the Marikana massacre. The incident took place at the Lonmin platinum mine (now Sibanye-Stillwater) in North West, during a wage protest in 2012. Ten people were also killed in the days leading up to the Marikana massacre between 12 and 16 August. ALSO READ: Over 1,800 illegal miners arrested in Stilfontein operation, most deported Although a commission of inquiry recommended that a full investigation be conducted to hold police accountable, no officers have faced prosecution to date. Meanwhile, government has paid more than R350 million in claims linked to the tragedy. Marikana Massacre remembered On Saturday, various organisations honoured the victims and renewed calls for accountability. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) stressed that the slain miners were not criminals, but workers demanding fair wages. 'They were fathers, brothers, and sons, demanding a living wage in the face of exploitation, degradation, and hunger. 'Instead of dialogue and dignity, they were met with the barrels of guns in full view of the world,' the EFF said in a statement. READ MORE: Illegal miner says he will keep digging to survive The party also criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa, who was a shareholder in Lonmin at the time, and the ANC for failing to deliver justice. 'It is not surprising then that the ANC has refused to bring justice to the families of the Marikana victims. 'There have been no prosecutions, no reparations, and no structural change to the mining sector that continues to enrich a few at the expense of the many. 'The workers of Marikana died in vain because their demands remain unmet, their killers remain unpunished, and the system that murdered them remains firmly in place.' The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg found in July 2022 that Ramaphosa did not carry legal responsibility for the massacre The EFF's Statement on the Anniversary of the Marikana Massacre -The recent unemployment statistics paint a bleak picture: millions without work, millions without hope, and millions trapped in poverty while the political elite grow richer. Black workers, in particular, have… — Economic Freedom Fighters (@EFFSouthAfrica) August 16, 2025 'We will never forget' The Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) also reiterated demands for justice. 'The families have yet to see justice, victims have yet to be compensated, and those who gave the orders have yet to be brought to account for their criminal conduct,' the union said. AMCU President Joseph Mathunjwa said the ongoing National Dialogue disrespected the memory of the slain workers. 'The government should hang their heads in shame. This slaughter of hard-working men happened under their watch, under their command. 'These workers are not just numbers – they had names, families, and identities. Yet we are still calling for justice thirteen years later. That is a disgrace,' he said. READ MORE: Groups warn against heavy-handed raids in tackling illegal miners The union pointed out that Parliament rejected its calls for 16 August to be declared a public holiday. 'They would not even recognise it as a massacre. They want us to forget, but we will never forget.' AMCU added that, through the Marikana Massacre Trust Fund, it has built houses for the families of 34 victims. Mathunjwa said the day was more than just about remembrance, but a warning. 'That was the day the state showed its true face,' he added. Silence on NPA appeal Furthermore, the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (Seri) emphasised that true justice could only come through successful prosecutions. 'The state continues to fail the families of the deceased and the survivors of the massacre,' the NGO said. While the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has prosecuted nine police officers, Seri highlighted that that two trials ended in acquittals. 'In 2023, the NPA issued a statement detailing various personnel and resource constraints as reasons for their failure to prosecute the Marikana case. READ MORE: 'We know it's wrong, but they're trying to make a living,' say families of arrested illegal miners 'However, two more years have passed, and the families and survivors of the massacre have still not seen any progress concerning prosecutions for the massacre of 16 August 2012. 'Following the acquittals in 2024, the families were told that the NPA would consider an appeal but have heard nothing since. 'This inaction reflects a lack of commitment to ensuring the families obtain justice for the deaths of their loved ones.' Seri added that several family members of the victims had died without ever seeing accountability. Marikana Massacre a 'premeditated act of state violence' The South African Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu) declared that the Marikana massacre was not a tragic accident, but 'a premeditated act of state violence in defence of capital'. The federation said the state has ignored or failed to implement the commission's recommendations adequately. 'The state's refusal to fully implement these recommendations confirms Saftu's reluctance to participate in any so-called national dialogue. 'Dialogue without justice is a betrayal to the victims and a mockery to the working class.' NOW READ: SA opened 159 new mines in five years, creating over 15 000 jobs
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Lehae allegations are a political witch hunt
Sithembiso Zungu Zungu insists the accusations lack credible evidence and are politically driven. Image: Facebook LEHAE Phase 3 — Sithembiso Zungu, newly appointed MMC for Group Corporate and Shared Services, has firmly rejected corruption allegations related to his tenure as Ward 12 Councillor and his association with Citydev Construction. Presenting a detailed rebuttal, Zungu insists the accusations lack credible evidence and are politically driven. Responding to claims that he received illegal payments, Zungu stated unequivocally: 'There is no credible, publicly available evidence that confirms I never received any payments from Citydev Construction during my tenure as Ward 12 Councillor in Lehae Phase 3.' He emphasised that official records, including those from the Department of Correctional Services, 'have no record of me being held at their facility in relation to the Lehae community housing project case'. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ On accusations of demanding facilitation fees from contractors involved in community housing projects and school refurbishments, Zungu said: 'Why would I do that? I have consistently and strongly dismissed these claims via credible media platforms and through direct statements to journalists.' He highlighted his role as a mediator: 'My primary aim was mediation between contractors and communities, not financial gain or extortion.' He also pointed out an absence of any audit reports, financial documents, or other proof linking him to illicit payments, describing the charges as 'a witch hunt aimed at tarnishing my name and abusing media narratives for political gain'. Regarding his cooperation with law enforcement, Zungu affirmed full transparency and compliance. 'The Hawks have completed their investigation and submitted the findings to the Director of Public Prosecutions for a decision,' he noted. 'I have no judicial reprimands, contempt findings, or adverse procedural rulings against me in relation to document provision.' Addressing concerns about his recent MMC appointment in the context of these longstanding allegations and purported association with a 'Construction Mafia,' Zungu stated: 'My appointment as MMC for Group Corporate and Shared Services was made by the Executive Mayor, following internal council deliberations. The Office of the Executive Mayor would be better placed to comment on this.' Providing context to his involvement with Citydev Construction, Zungu gave a nuanced account: 'In 2017, we were introduced to this private company by the then Ward Councillor of Ward 122, as they were undertaking bond housing in Lehae. I was the chairperson of the business forum at the time. Initially, I supplied materials for them and was later appointed as a social facilitator.' Zungu explained: 'We worked very well until I was elected Ward Councillor of 122 after the previous councillor passed away. I then resigned from the business forum to focus on my councillorship. Politics within the ANC then kicked in.' He concluded with a warning about internal party conflict: 'In short, all this has been a fabrication and is meant to tarnish my name from members within the ANC.' While the Hawks investigation has been handed to the Director of Public Prosecutions, no charges have been filed to date, and Zungu's legal status remains unchanged. His comprehensive denial and claims of political targeting prompt questions about the motivations behind the allegations, suggesting a wider context of factional battles within local politics. Zungu's insistence on transparency and cooperation stands in contrast to the persistent, yet unsubstantiated claims — underscoring the need for the process to run its course before drawing conclusions about his conduct. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Fisherman faces life in prison for brutal attack on wife amid gender-based violence crisis
The Western Cape High Court found the accused wife abuser would endanger the life of the complainant, and it was not in the interests of justice to have him released. Image: File An accused wife abuser who is alleged to have violently attacked his wife on their ninth wedding anniversary, and faces possible life imprisonment, will remain behind bars after his second attempt for bail was denied by the Western Cape High Court. The 37-year-old father of four was a fisherman in Mossel Bay up until his incarceration in May last year and faces a charge of attempted murder. He sought to appeal against his bail application, which was heard and denied in the Mossel Bay Magistrate's Court. The lower court found that the man would endanger the life of the complainant, and it was not in the interests of justice to have him released. According to court documents, on May 18, last year, the couple had celebrated their anniversary, but the occasion turned sombre when the man accused his wife of infidelity and began beating her with his fists. This was then followed by him telling his wife to undress, and after she fell to the ground, he proceeded to hit her multiple times with a hammer all over her body. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The attack resulted in her arm being broken. The woman sought help from neighbours, and her husband was then arrested and charged a few days later, on May 22, last year. During his second bail hearing, the man, adamant that he could only afford R300 bail, denied the charges against him and claimed that he caught his wife in bed with another person. The man is expected to go on trial on November 7. The court documents read: 'The State led evidence that the appellant had assaulted the complainant, including by striking her with a hammer so hard that her arm was broken. The medical evidence suggested that the injuries were life-threatening, and photographs put up by the State revealed severe harm to the complainant's face and body. 'Not only this, but evidence was led to show that he had previously assaulted the complainant, and that the complainant had been raped by the appellant's brother in the presence of the appellant and thereafter he had asked the complainant to withdraw charges against his brother. The State also adduced evidence that the complainant is very afraid of the appellant.' In arriving at his decision, Judge Darryl Cooke at the high court said that while he considered the possibility of imposing bail conditions, he was not convinced that this would sufficiently reduce the risk of harm to the complainant. This was also weighed against the man's disposition to violence, as is evident from his past conduct, and the prevalence of gender-based violence in South Africa. Chief Specialist Scientist at the South African Medical Research Council, Professor Naeemah Abrahams, cited statistics that in South Africa, since 2009, three women are killed by an intimate partner per day. Commenting on gender-based violence and reforms needed, Professor Amanda Gouws previously said South Africa had one of the best national gender machineries globally, but this has since been crippled, and there is currently no coherent, active women's or feminist movement. 'Activism now takes the form of sporadic issue-driven action, such as the campaigns by #TotalShutDown and #EndRapeCulture. While this type of activism is laudable, it does not sustain pressure on the government for action. 'There is thus no simple suggestion for how to reduce gender-based violence. All interventions are contextual and political and need to address different dimensions of a multi-dimensional problem,' Professor Gouws had said.
