logo
Trump deploys National Guard to Washington DC: What does the law say on this?

Trump deploys National Guard to Washington DC: What does the law say on this?

First Post4 days ago
Donald Trump took unprecedented steps on Monday, deploying the National Guard and seizing control of the police force in Washington, DC. The reason: he wants to 'rescue the capital from crime and bloodshed'. But is the US president allowed to do so? read more
A demonstrator holds a sign during a protest near the White House, as US President Donald Trump announced he is placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control and deploying National Guard troops to Washington, DC. Reuters
Almost a week ago, US President Donald Trump had threatened a federal takeover of the country's capital, Washington DC, after a prominent employee of Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) was beaten up in an attempted carjacking.
On Monday (August 11), he turned his threat into reality as he deployed the National Guard to the capital and took control of the city's police force as he pledged to crack down on crime and homelessness in the city.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse,' Trump said during a news conference in which he was flanked by US Attorney General Pam Bondi, who will lead the city's police force while it is under federal control.
More from Explainers
History Today: How archaeologists found the world's largest dinosaur fossil
'This is liberation day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back,' he said.
But what does all this mean? Why has Trump moved in the National Guard to Washington, DC? What happens now? And why is Trump's move unprecedented?
What did Trump announce?
On Monday, Trump declared a 'public safety emergency' and deployed 800 National Guard troops in the nation's capital. He also announced that the federal government would also seize control of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department.
In explaining his move, the US president said, 'it's becoming a situation of complete and total lawlessness', adding that his actions would 'rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse'.
He pointed out that Washington DC had been 'taken over by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals' as well as 'drugged out maniacs and homeless people'.
US President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference to discuss crime in Washington, DC, in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington. AFP
Is Trump's takeover of the police legal?
Trump's announcement has raised many eyebrows with some asking if he's permitted by law to do so.
But experts note that his move to federalise the police is allowed within limits. The Home Rule Act of 1973 allows the president to take control of the city's police for 48 hours if he 'determines that special conditions of an emergency nature exist,' which requires the department's use for federal purposes.
The president can retain control of the department for a longer period if he notifies the chairs and ranking members of the congressional committees that handle legislative matters pertaining to DC, which Trump indicated he intends to do. Any request of control over the city's police department for more than 30 days must be passed into law.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, herein lies the issue. Most analysts note that there's there is 'no crime emergency' that would justify the president's actions. In fact, crime in Washington, DC is at a low. Local data reveals violent crime has decreased in recent years after a crime wave in 2023, which authorities described as a post-pandemic spike.
Moreover, the Department of Justice in January said violent crime was down 35 per cent on the previous year, and had hit a 30-year low.
What about Trump's deployment of the National Guard?
Trump is authorised to deploy the National Guard and it is reminiscent of what he did in Los Angeles back in June. In fact, the National Guard, a military reserve force within the United States Armed Forces, reports only to the president. Governors have the power to call in the Guard in their states, but the DC mayor needs federal authorisation to do so because of DC's status without statehood.
Historically, the National Guard has been called on by the president or governors to respond to domestic emergencies or participate in overseas combat and civilian missions — not to assist in routine crime-fighting.
This isn't the first time that the National Guard is being brought into the capital. In his first term, Trump had deployed the troops in June 2020 to clear Black Lives Matter protesters from Lafayette Park, across from the White House.
National Guard troops reinforce the security zone on Capitol Hill in Washington. File image/AP
What happens in Washington, DC now?
It seems that Trump's decision came as a shock to the mayor and residents of Washington. In fact, Mayor Muriel Bowser called the president's move 'unsettling and unprecedented'.
She further disputed Trump's justification for declaring a crime emergency, calling it a subjective 'so-called emergency' and noting that the crime has been trending down in the city after spiking in 2023. 'We're not experiencing a spike in crime but a decrease in crime,' Bowser said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But what happens now?
According to a BBC report, of the 800 National Guard troops being deployed, 100-200 will be deployed and supporting law enforcement at any given time. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the National Guardsmen would arrive by the end of the week.
Meanwhile, the Washington police is trying to figure out what their role will be after Trump's announcement. As CNN reported, Trump's announcement has led to confusion over who now leads the police, how their policing strategy will change and in what ways federal agents – many who aren't trained for community policing – are going to interact with local officers.
Mayor Muriel Bowser also said that she was trying to hold a meeting with Attorney General Pam Bondi on the same. But, she maintained that Chief of Police Pamela Smith would still run the department and report to Bowser up through the deputy mayor.
Law enforcement officials have said that it's too early to tell what would be the full extent of Trump's takeover, but for now it does mean more uniformed officials on the streets. Additionally, Trump has also called for the homeless to be evicted from the city and said that police will be 'allowed to do whatever the hell they want,' raising the prospect of an increasingly unaccountable police presence in DC.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Women display signs as people protest at Dupont Circle after US President Donald Trump announced he would deploy the National Guard to the nation's capital and place DC's Metropolitan Police Department under federal control, in Washington, DC. Reuters
What happens next?
Trump's move has been slammed by Democrats and activists with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, saying the aim was to 'further the personal and political agenda of a wannabe king'.
Richard Stengel, a former undersecretary of state in Barack Obama's administration, wrote on X, 'Throughout history, autocrats use a false pretext to impose government control over local law enforcement as a prelude to a more national takeover.'
'That's far more dangerous than the situation he says he is fixing.'
And even as Trump was making his announcement, demonstrators gathered outside the White House, protesting the move. 'There is absolutely no need for the National Guard here,' 62-year-old retiree Elizabeth Critchley, who brandished a sign with the slogan 'DC says freedom not fascism', to AFP.
There's also bigger fears that Trump could replicate this move across different cities in the US. He, in fact, said that he planned to roll out the policy to other cities, spotlighting New York and Chicago.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Snipers in Anchorage': Commentator faces flak amid Putin assassination row ahead of Trump meeting
'Snipers in Anchorage': Commentator faces flak amid Putin assassination row ahead of Trump meeting

Hindustan Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Snipers in Anchorage': Commentator faces flak amid Putin assassination row ahead of Trump meeting

Commentator and social media influencer Brian Krassenstein faced flak on Friday after posting about having 'snipers in Anchorage', where Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump are meeting. Several users alleged that Krassenstein was calling for the Russian president's assassination. President Donald Trump (R) greets Russian President Vladimir Putin as he arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson(Getty Images via AFP) At the time of writing this story, a meeting between Presidents Trump, Putin, and other officials was underway. Just before the summit, Krassenstein posted a video of the two leaders shaking hands on the tarmac. 'They should have had snipers in Anchorage, Alaska, ready to take him out as soon as he shrugged,' he posted on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: 'Stop Killing Civilians?' Putin dodges Ukraine ceasefire question at Alaska Airport This came after reporters yelled at Putin, asking him 'When will you stop killing civilians in Ukraine?'. The Kremlin boss shrugged and gestured that he couldn't hear the question. Social media users, including pro-Trump accounts, were quick to slam Krassenstein. 'Brian Krassenstein is now calling to ass*ssinate Putin on American soil,' one person tweeted. 'You really didn't suggest that we kill Putin?' another person asked. Krassenstein quickly replied: 'I did.' He did not stop there. 'Correction. We should poison him instead. Make it less obvious,' he wrote in a follow-up tweet. Read More: B-2 Bomber roars overhead as Putin lands in Alaska for Ukraine talks with Trump | Video 'Weird. Lots of Russian bots are reporting me to the FBI and Kash Patel for saying that I think the US policy should be to try and end Putin's life. It's almost as if there is no free speech in Russia.' 'In my opinion the US government should have taken care of him,' he further said. Brian and Ed Krassenstein are American twin brothers who are writers, entrepreneurs, and social media personalities. 'This will will be remembered as one of the most disgraceful moments in U.S. presidential history. In Anchorage, Alaska, Putin brushes off a question about killing civilians. Trump smirks, then drapes his arm around him while they both stand on the literal red carpet the Trump administration rolled out for him. I like presidents who don't roll out the red carpet for war criminals,' Ed posted.

Historic handshake, warm smiles and a ride together in ‘The Beast': What happened when Trump met Putin
Historic handshake, warm smiles and a ride together in ‘The Beast': What happened when Trump met Putin

Indian Express

time19 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Historic handshake, warm smiles and a ride together in ‘The Beast': What happened when Trump met Putin

The summit meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin is underway at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. Wearing a dark suit, white shirt and red tie, US President Donald Trump descended the stairs from Air Force One at 11:08am local time, and he walked along a red carpet. He stopped and, as Russian President Vladimir Putin approached, applauded him before offering a handshake and a tap on the arm. Putin appeared to make a joke, prompting smiles from both leaders. They walked together toward a platform marked 'Alaska 2025,'where again the two leaders exchanged a handshake, posed for photographs; but as reporters shouted questions at Putin about a ceasefire and civilian casualties, the Russian president shrugged as if indicating he couldn't hear them. American military aircraft—including fighter jets and what appeared to be a B-2 stealth bomber—thundered overhead. WATCH : Stealth bombers fly over as Trump greets Putin in Alaska#TrumpPutinSummit — The Indian Express (@IndianExpress) August 15, 2025 Putin then joined Trump in the presidential limousine, 'The Beast'. The two could be seen laughing inside. When not travelling aboard Air Force One or by helicopter on Marine One, US presidents are chauffeured in a heavily armoured presidential limousine known as 'The Beast.' President @realDonaldTrump and President Putin riding in The Beast together 🇺🇸🇷🇺 — Margo Martin (@MargoMartin47) August 15, 2025 'The Beast,' weighing 20,000 pounds and equipped with advanced security and communications systems, debuted during Trump's first term in 2018 and reportedly cost $1.5 million to build. While it resembles an elongated Cadillac XT6, its chassis comes from a Chevrolet Kodiak truck. Security features remain classified, but a report by NBC, suggests the vehicle has night-vision, tear gas launchers, electrified door handles, 3-inch-thick windows, and 8-inch armor plating—making it one of the most secure vehicles in the world.

B-2 stealth bomber roars overhead as Trump, Putin arrive at Alaska base; internet debates whether it was a show of honor or a veiled warning
B-2 stealth bomber roars overhead as Trump, Putin arrive at Alaska base; internet debates whether it was a show of honor or a veiled warning

Time of India

time23 minutes ago

  • Time of India

B-2 stealth bomber roars overhead as Trump, Putin arrive at Alaska base; internet debates whether it was a show of honor or a veiled warning

A dramatic flyover by a US B-2 stealth bomber , flanked by four F-22 Raptor fighters, greeted Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin as they stepped off their planes at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday, August 15. As per ABC, the Pentagon confirmed two B-2s had been flown into the base ahead of the high-stakes summit, the same aircraft type used in June's Operation Midnight Hammer to strike Iran's nuclear sites. The scene, complete with a red carpet and F-22 Raptors lined along the tarmac, is the B-2's status as a symbol of US military might , capable of flying around the world without refueling and delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. But the flyover sparked a split online. Some saw it as an extraordinary diplomatic salute . 'B-2 flyover is absolutely the highest honor. I cannot think of a visiting leader who got one of those in recent years,' posted a user, Old Lion, on X. Others called it provocative. 'Stupid provocation, likely breaking security protocol for summit. USA can't be trusted is the message,' wrote jjunio007. Live Events 'Was that a compliment or a warning?' wondered another, while one user summed up the other side of the argument: '0% power play, 100% honor.' Alaska Summit News First posted on X that, 'With jets flying overhead, Trump turns to Putin and says, 'This is for you.' About the B-2 bomber The B-2 Spirit stealth bomber ranks among the most expensive aircraft ever made, with each unit costing over $2 billion when factoring in 1997 adjustments. According to Britannica, the development program for 21 aircraft totaled around $44 billion, and maintaining one costs roughly $40 million annually. By comparison, as per SlashGear, the F-22 Raptor, prized for its stealth and air-superiority capabilities, has a unit cost of about $143 million and annual operating costs exceeding $10 million per jet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store