Minnesota increasing screening requirements for autism and housing services providers
Starting on June 1, the Minnesota Department of Human Services will require the providers to undergo enhanced fingerprint background studies, participate in screening visits before Medicaid enrollment and when enrollment is revalidated, and allow state officials to make unannounced site visits.
The federal government sets three levels of screening for providers — limited, moderate and high risk. The state agency says these new requirements are a result of the state moving the level of screening for providers who bill Medicaid for housing stabilization services and behavioral intervention autism services to high risk.
"It's clear that these critical services need more oversight," Shrieen Gandhi, the temporary Human Services Commissioner, said in a written release on Friday. "Moving these providers into the high-risk category is only the first step. We need more staff to put eyes on these programs and make sure everyone is safeguarding resources meant to help children, people with disabilities and older Minnesotans."
Gandhi decided to increase screening requirements in March. Providers were given a 30-day notice this week, officials say.
New providers need to comply with the requirements by June 1, the agency says, and existing providers will be phased into the new requirements when they renew their Medicaid enrollment.
In December 2024, the FBI and state investigators raided autism treatment centers in Minneapolis and St. Cloud. According to the search warrant, the probe was a direct outgrowth of the investigation into the $240 million Feeding Our Future scandal.
The agency said last summer that 15 Minnesota autism centers were under investigation for fraud.
Anyone who suspects fraud or abuse of Medicaid funds is encouraged to call Minnesota's Department of Human Sevices at 651-431-2650 or submit a tip here.
Note: The above video first aired on Dec. 12, 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Physicians are working more but reimbursement isn't keeping pace, report finds
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Physicians are working more than ever, but reimbursement isn't rising in tandem. It's a worrying mismatch that could translate into access problems for patients down the line, according to a new report. Physician productivity, as measured by a metric of how much work goes into providing a specific service, has grown 11% over the last two years, according to the report from consultancy Kaufman Hall. However, patient revenue per each work relative value unit dropped 7% over that time — and provider compensation per work relative value unit dipped 2%, Kaufman Hall found. Dive Insight: Physicians have been sounding warning bells for years about unsustainable reimbursement. Medicare reimbursement for physician services fell 29% from 2001 to 2024 when adjusted for inflation, according to the American Medical Association. The reimbursement shortfall stems from the fact that Medicare's payment to doctors isn't adjusted for inflation, and year-to-year adjustments are required to be budget neutral. Regulators say this makes it impossible for them to bump reimbursement to the level doctors say they need. Meanwhile, Medicaid rates for physician services are even lower than in Medicare — and higher reimbursement from commercially insured patients often fails to make up the difference, according to doctors. Reimbursement pressures have recently coincided with sharp inflation and rising labor expenses, resulting in winnowing margins for physician practices. That's led many to sell, often to large corporate buyers like hospitals or insurance companies, or close altogether. Other physicians are leaning more into expensive elective care or switching to concierge medicine to entice wealthier patients into their practices. But either way, access to physicians is shrinking for many Americans, experts say. 'Revenue has increased because physicians and providers are working more, but the data also show that reimbursement is not keeping pace. In the coming months if more patients lose insurance coverage, this trend will likely get worse,' Matthew Bates, the managing director and physician enterprise service line leader at Kaufman Hall, said in a statement alongside the release of the report Monday. Roughly 10 million Americans are expected to lose health insurance coverage as a result of the GOP's mammoth tax and policy law passed last month. Another 4 million should lose coverage if more generous subsidies for Affordable Care Act plans expire at the end of this year, according to estimates from nonpartisan scorekeeper the Congressional Budget Office. Some lawmakers in Congress have expressed support for reforming doctor reimbursement in hearings and in public letters. One policy, to link annual Medicare reimbursement updates to a measure of cost inflation, is backed by physician associations, an influential congressional advisory group and legislators on both sides of the aisle. (A bipartisan group of representatives introduced a bill in the House two years ago making the change, but it's seen little movement.) A recent CMS rule overhauling the physician payment system includes a Medicare base rate hike of 2.5% for doctors next year. But other policies in the rule means its impact on reimbursement will vary wildly based on a physician's specialty and site of practice. As such, it was met with mixed reactions from doctors. Recommended Reading CMS proposes rule aligning Medicare physician payment with 'Big Beautiful Bill,' MACRA Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans respond to data showing 10M will soon lose Medicaid coverage
(The Center Square) – Democrats are sounding the alarm over a new analysis showing that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will cause millions of Medicaid recipients to lose their current coverage. According to the Congressional Budget Office's newest estimate, Medicaid reforms in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will result in roughly 10 million people losing eligibility for their current health care plan by 2034. 'This latest analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirms that the deeply unpopular One Big Ugly Law is also deeply unfair,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said in a response statement. 'The American people deserve better than this cruel Republican budget scam.' Republicans, however, have pointed out that the breakdown of the numbers offers a different perspective. Out of the 10 million affected, 5.3 million are able-bodied adults without dependents. Under the OBBBA, they could still remain on Medicaid, so long as they participate in work-related activities at least 80 hours per month. The work requirements would not apply to pregnant women; minors and seniors; foster youth under 26; Tribal members; the medically frail; those already meeting TANF or SNAP work requirements; caregivers with young dependents; or the currently and recently incarcerated. Another 3.7 million current Medicaid recipients set to lose coverage will still have access to some other form of government-sponsored health insurance. These individuals are primarily dual enrollees in Medicare and Medicaid, or those who are erroneously enrolled in Medicaid in more than one state. The former group would lose Medicaid but could retain Medicare, while the latter would be eligible to claim their Medicaid coverage only in their actual state of residence. The remaining 1 million impacted individuals are noncitizens who do not meet immigration status requirements for Medicaid enrollment. Those noncitizens have nonetheless received coverage under taxpayer-funded, state-sponsored Medicaid programs. 'The prolonged lie exacerbated by Democrats that 17 million individuals will lose health care coverage from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act has finally been dispelled,' House Committee on Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., said Monday. 'It's easy to scare people with coverage loss estimates, but the facts are clear – the vast majority of these individuals are either choosing to lose coverage or aren't actually eligible for Medicaid, and nearly all are eligible for other forms [of] coverage.' Overall federal spending on Medicaid will still grow by 30% over the next decade, provided that Republicans refrain from further enrollee-reducing changes in another 'big, beautiful bill,' which GOP leaders are considering. Solve the daily Crossword
Indianapolis Star
20 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Texas AG sues Eli Lilly for allegedly bribing medical providers to prescribe Lilly drugs
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Eli Lilly, alleging the Indianapolis pharmaceutical company offered kickbacks to medical providers in exchange for prescribing more than a dozen of the company's drugs, including blockbuster GLP-1 weight loss drugs Mounjaro and Zepbound. Eli Lilly offered illegal incentives to Texas medical providers, including a "free nurse" program and reimbursement support services, to steer providers to provide the company's drugs, Paxton alleges in a lawsuit filed August 11 in a Texas district court. Lilly, one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies, denied the allegations in an August 12 statement to IndyStar. The Lilly programs mentioned in the suit offered free trainings for nurses and medical providers, which helped Lilly market their drugs when they launched, the suit says. According to Paxton's office, many Texas residents prescribed these drugs were on state Medicaid, so these actions violated the Texas Health Care Program Fraud Prevention Act. 'Big Pharma compromised medical decision-making by engaging in an illegal kickback scheme,' Paxton said in a news release. 'Eli Lilly fraudulently sought to maximize profits at taxpayer expense and put corporate greed over people's health. I will not stand by while corporations unlawfully manipulate our healthcare system to line their own pockets.' A spokesperson for Eli Lilly said the company denies the allegations and plans to defend against them in court. It's not the first time Paxton has taken a stab at Lilly in the courts. In October, Paxton sued insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers, including Lilly, Express Scripts and CVS, for allegedly concocting a conspiracy to increase insulin prices. Health Choice Alliance LLC, a New Jersey based company, joined Texas as a plaintiff. Health Choice has sued Lilly in the past, alleging the company engages in kickbacks. 'Multiple courts and the federal government have rejected claims by this same corporate relator against Lilly as meritless," a Lilly spokesperson said in a statement. "In fact, the United States government determined that 'the relators' allegations lack sufficient factual and legal support' in a prior case, explaining that 'federal healthcare programs have a strong interest in ensuring that, after a physician has appropriately prescribed a medication, patients have access to basic product support relating to their medication.' We intend to vigorously defend against these allegations.' At the heart of the Texas lawsuit is a class of drugs named GLP-1s prescribed for diabetes and weight loss. Named for the gut hormone receptor the drug targets, injectable GLP-1s have exploded in popularity since Zepbound hit the market in late 2023. Weight loss drugs: Eli Lilly closer to breakthrough weight loss drug; shares tumble as some question results The kickback lawsuit against Lilly is one way Paxton is protecting Texas patients "from corporate schemes that undermine the integrity of the healthcare system," according to his office.
