logo
By thin margin, Assembly passes bill to provide $1.4b in tax credits for Summerlin movie studio

By thin margin, Assembly passes bill to provide $1.4b in tax credits for Summerlin movie studio

Yahoo31-05-2025
Among the 27 Democrats in the chamber, 15 voted in support and 12 voted against. Among Republicans, seven supported and eight opposed.
The Nevada Assembly on Friday night approved what will likely be the state's largest ever public subsidy: $1.4 billion in transferable tax credits over 15 years to support a movie studio in Las Vegas.
Assembly Bill 238 passed the Assembly by a razor-thin margin: 22 in support, 20 opposed. The bill now advances to the Senate for consideration in the waning days of the legislative session.
The bill would massively expand Nevada's film tax credit program to support the build out and operation of a 31-acre film studio currently referred to as the Summerlin Production Studios Project (after the Las Vegas neighborhood where it would be located). Hollywood giants Sony Pictures Entertainment and Warner Bros. Discovery are attached to the project. Howard Hughes Holdings is developing.
How transferable tax credits cost the state money: A $50 million example
Transferable tax credits sell for less than face value — a discount of about 10% isn't unusual.
Let's say the state issues Sony $50 million of tax credits. MGM Resorts International buys them from Sony for $45 million. Then, instead of paying the state $50 million in gaming taxes that it owes, MGM gives the state the tax credits it bought from Sony.
MGM gets a $5 million tax break.
Sony gets $45 million.
And the state, which otherwise would have received $50 million in tax revenue from MGM, gets nothing.
— Hugh Jackson
Nevada's film tax credit program is currently capped at $10 million per year. AB 238 would raise that cap to $120 million per year, for 15 years, beginning in 2028. The majority of those tax credits, $95 million per year, would be reserved for productions at the Summerlin studio; $25 million per year would be for productions not attached to the studio.
Altogether, that's equivalent to $1.8 billion in public subsidies for the television and film industry. If approved by the Senate and signed into law by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo, the legislation will be the largest public subsidy approved by the State of Nevada, surpassing the $1.25 billion approved by lawmakers in 2014 for Tesla Motors.
Democratic Assemblymembers Sandra Jauregui and Danielle Monroe Moreno, who sponsored the bill, have pushed back on the characterization of their proposal as a public subsidy for massive corporations, instead framing it as an investment in a new industry that will bring thousands of new jobs and new revenue to the state.
While tax credits aren't issued to companies until they prove they've met the qualifications for them, the state must treat them as 'negative revenue' when forecasting expected state revenue. That means they do impact the state budgeting process.
Opponents have argued that the return on investment is low. An independent analysis commissioned by the Governor's Office of Economic Development, which houses the Nevada Film Office, determined that AB238 would stimulate the state economy but not enough to offset the massive expansion of the film tax credit program.
An analysis commissioned by the backers of AB 238 offered a rosier projection, but even that acknowledged that most of the projected economic activity is indirect or induced.
An amendment adopted by the Assembly will create a special tax zone around the Summerlin film studio that captures some of the local taxes generated and diverts it to the Clark County School District to fund pre-k programs in East Last Vegas. Additional guardrails were also amended into the bill.
Support in the Assembly did not fall across party lines. Among the 27 Democrats in the chamber, 15 voted in support and 12 voted against. Among Republicans, seven supported and eight opposed.
The Summerlin studio bill received less support in the Assembly than the bill two years ago that approved $380 million in public assistance for a proposed baseball stadium for the Oakland A's on the Las Vegas Strip. That bill passed the Assembly 25-15. (Two lawmakers were excused from that vote.)
The razor-thin film tax credit bill vote was not the only dramatic moment in the Assembly Friday. Earlier in the floor session, Assembly Bill 500 fell short of the required two-thirds approval it needed to pass the chamber. The bill would have allowed for payment banks, a new type of financial institution that focuses solely on payment processing rather than lending.
Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, who sponsored that bill, believes the bill will create competition in the financial services industry and lower costs for businesses by cutting out financial middlemen.
The Assembly vote was 25-17, a simple majority but three short of the two-thirds it needed because it would raise state revenue. Six Democrats and 11 Republicans opposed the bill. Four Republicans and 11 Democrats supported the bill.
Immediately after the bill failed, a motion was made to reconsider the vote and move the bill to the chief clerk's desk.
Yeager said afterward he wasn't surprised by the outcome, adding that he wasn't sure he had the votes it needed but decided 'to put it out there and see.'
He dismissed the notion that some Democrats may have withdrawn support after learning that the Nevada Firearms Coalition PAC was privately urging Republicans to support the bill, something Yeager and others in his caucus apparently did not know until it was reported by The Nevada Independent days earlier.
Yeager chalked up the vote to lawmakers being hesitant about complex financial banking legislation. He added that he plans on having 'a few more conversations' about the bill on Saturday to see if another vote is possible.
Because of procedural rules, AB500 needs to pass the full Assembly on Saturday in order to have a chance at making it to the governor's desk.
The 2025 Legislative Session adjourns Monday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas can't require Ten Commandments in some districts, judge rules
Texas can't require Ten Commandments in some districts, judge rules

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Texas can't require Ten Commandments in some districts, judge rules

A district judge ruled Wednesday that Texas can't require posters of the Ten Commandments to go up in certain school districts where parents have challenged the move. U.S. District Judge Fred Biery sided with a group of families fighting against a new law set to take effect Sept. 1 that would have put posters of the Ten Commandments in easily readable letters in every public school classroom in Texas. 'They just want to be left alone, neither proselytized nor ostracized, including what occurs to their children in government run schools,' the judge wrote in his decision. While this lawsuit only affects 11 districts, another legal challenge to the law is working its way through the courts. 'Today's ruling is a major win that protects the constitutional right to religious freedom for Texas families of all backgrounds,' said Tommy Buser-Clancy, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas. 'The court affirmed what we have long said: Public schools are for educating, not evangelizing.' The Hill has reached out to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's (R) office for comment. Texas is the third state to suffer a court loss over laws for the Ten Commandments to be hung in public school classrooms, following Louisiana and Arkansas. Critics say Republicans are hoping to take these cases to the Supreme Court. 'I don't think anybody is surprised that these policies, these laws in the states that seek to put the Ten Commandments back in schools, have been challenged in court. They're making their way through the proper channels, and we still are very confident that at the end of the day, when these cases get to the Supreme Court, that they're going to uphold them based on the new history-and-tradition test,' Matt Krause, of counsel with the First Liberty Institute, previously told The Hill.

Trump's Smithsonian criticism contrasts with 2017 praise
Trump's Smithsonian criticism contrasts with 2017 praise

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's Smithsonian criticism contrasts with 2017 praise

President Trump has changed his tune on the Smithsonian's depiction of America's past since he visited the National Museum of African American History in 2017. Following that visit to the newly opened museum, Trump was full of praise. 'It's a new, beautiful Smithsonian Museum that serves as a shining example of African Americans' incredible contributions to our culture, our society, and our history,' Trump said months into his first term. 'It also tells of the great struggle for freedom and equality that prevailed against the sins of slavery, and the injustice of discrimination. The work and love of the people who helped create such a masterpiece is a testament to the legacy of so many leaders,' he added. The president added in the February 2017 remarks that 'nothing' was more importnat than his promise to continue 'freedom for African Americans and for every American.' 'This tour was a meaningful reminder of why we have to fight bigotry, intolerance and hatred in all of its very ugly forms,' he added. Those comments returned to the spotlight on Tuesday after Trump announced a review of the Smithsonian's museums for what he called a 'woke' lens on American history. 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future,' the president wrote in a Tuesday Truth Social post. 'We are not going to allow this to happen, and I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made,' Trump wrote. 'This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE.' Trump has declared museum exhibitions must be brought into 'alignment' with his objective to 'celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History removed an exhibit earlier this month referencing Trump's two impeachments, drawing fire from Democrats. Trump also forced out National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet, the first woman to helm the institution. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) slammed Trump's latest comments during a Tuesday appearanc e on CNN. 'Is he a publicist for slavery, like a lobbyist on behalf of slavery?' he asked. 'It doesn't make any sense that he would want to erase one of the ugliest things that's ever happened in America and educate our children, especially about how we make sure it doesn't happen again.' David Axelrod, a former top Obama advisor, remarked on the notable contrast between first-term and second-term Trump. 'I find myself weirdly nostalgic for the @POTUS Trump who once recognized 'the great struggle for freedom and equality that prevailed against the sins of slavery,' and the value and importance of enshrining that history at the Smithsonian,' Axelrod wrote on X. 'Now he wants to expunge it.'

MAGA erupts after Israeli official charged in child sex ring flees U.S.
MAGA erupts after Israeli official charged in child sex ring flees U.S.

Axios

time20 minutes ago

  • Axios

MAGA erupts after Israeli official charged in child sex ring flees U.S.

MAGA is pushing the Trump administration to explain why an Israeli official who was arrested in an undercover child sex sting in Nevada was allowed to leave the U.S. after posting bail. Why it matters: The outrage marks the latest fissure between Israel and MAGA, which already faces a generational divide over how much the U.S. should support Israel amid the war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Driving the news: Tom Artiom Alexandrovich, a senior Israeli cybersecurity official, was arrested during an undercover operation in Nevada targeting "child sex predators," the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department announced Friday. Alexandrovich posted a $10,000 bail without appearing before a judge and quickly fled to Israel, raising questions about why his passport was not confiscated. Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that the handling of the case was "standard," and the State Department denied that the U.S. government intervened. But acting U.S. Attorney Sigal Chattah, whose jurisdiction covers Nevada, posted on social media: "The individual who fled our country should have had his passport seized by the state authorities. He must be returned immediately to face justice." Chattah said that Attorney General Pam Bondi was "outraged" and placed calls to both her and FBI Director Kash Patel. What they're saying: MAGA influencers are up in arms, demanding the Trump administration push Israel for Alexandrovich's swift extradition to the U.S. to stand trial. "DOJ should file federal charges and demand immediate extradition," podcaster Jack Posobiec wrote on X. Two House Republicans known for their criticism of Israel — Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) — also posted about the case. "What is going on here? Why would the United States allow a foreign government official charged with a child sex crime to avoid prosecution?" Tucker Carlson wrote in his newsletter. Some voices have taken specific aim at Chattah, who was born in Israel. "The U.S. attorney general who released him is Israeli-born Sigal Chattah. Makes sense now!" posted Candace Owens, who misstated Chattah's role. Chattah's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the backlash. Between the lines: Parts of MAGA's base have long obsessed over the "Deep State," which originally referred to a supposed cabal of pedophilic elites who control the government. A slice of the far-right also promotes antisemitic conspiracy theories about Israel and Jews secretly pulling the strings in Washington. Those two threads intersected with the case of Jeffrey Epstein, who some conspiracy theorists allege was an Israeli intelligence asset who used his underage sex trafficking ring to blackmail global elites. Zoom out: It's not just conspiracy theorists fueling MAGA's growing skepticism of the U.S. relationship with Israel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store