Diddy jury return for third day of deliberations after partial verdict reached
Date: 14:24 BST
Title: Chaos outside court
Content: Sakshi VenkatramanReporting from court
The atmosphere around the courthouse has been chaotic since yesterday, with journalists, content creators and Diddy fans trying to get inside to hear a verdict.
Combs' supporters appear to be growing in number by the day.
Yesterday, a group of fans outside the courtroom were hawking baby oil and t-shirts that said "A freak-o is not a rico". And one woman was running around outside the courtroom in her underwear.
The vibe gets especially frenetic when someone from the Combs family enters the building.
This week, all six of his adult children have been in attendance. His mother has also regularly attended.
Update:
Date: 14:17 BST
Title: Diddy is in the courtroom
Content: Sean "Diddy" Combs has arrived in the courtroom and is talking with his legal team.
Update:
Date: 14:12 BST
Title: Diddy's mother, lawyer and his publicist arrive at court
Content: Janice Combs, mother of Sean "Diddy" Combs, walks outside the courthouse
Holly Baird, publicist of Sean "Diddy" Combs
Marc Agnifilo, attorney for Sean "Diddy" Combs, walks outside the courthouse
Update:
Date: 14:04 BST
Title: Diddy faces five counts
Content: The jury has reached a verdict on four of the five counts that Sean "Diddy" Combs faces (we've put those ones in bold in the list below). But they are split on the most serious of the charges, racketeering conspiracy.
While the jury says they have reached a verdict in those four charges, we do not yet know what that verdict is.
Update:
Date: 13:58 BST
Title: Listen to the BBC's Diddy on Trial podcast
Content: Anoushka Mutanda-DoughertyPodcast host, Diddy on Trial
The BBC's Diddy on Trial podcast has followed every twist and turn in Diddy's case since November 2024.
From bombshell allegations of so-called "freak-offs", to testimony from Grammy-winning rapper Kid Cudi, there have been headline-making moments every week.
We're bringing you all the updates straight from court in New York.
You can listen to the podcast on BBC Sounds or watch on our YouTube channel, external.
Update:
Date: 13:55 BST
Title: Jury return to deliberate after dramatic day in court
Content: Madeline HalpertReporting from court
Hello and welcome to our live coverage of the criminal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs in New York.
We're back in federal court this morning after a long day of deliberations on Tuesday.
Jurors have now reached a verdict on four out of the five counts against Combs - these are sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution charges.
We still don't know what their verdict is, and the jurors said yesterday they are struggling to reach an agreement on racketeering conspiracy charges against Combs.
It is the most complicated and most serious charge. It has a potential life in prison sentence if Combs is found guilty.
But as the judge told them to do at the end of the day on Tuesday, jurors will go back and try to fulfil their duty to reach a unanimous verdict.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pensioner, 81, loses 'ridiculous' £280,000 neighbour row over 'inches' of land... after seven years of fighting
A pensioner has lost a 'ridiculous' £280,000 legal battle against her neighbour over a just a few inches of land. Christel Naish, 81, and her doctor neighbour Jyotibala Patel had been fighting over an inches-wide strip between their houses too narrow for a person to comfortably walk down. Ms Naish complained that Dr Patel's garden tap and pipe were 'trespassing' on her property in Ilford, east London and after several rounds of litigation, brought her case before the High Court. Senior Judge Sir Anthony Mann said in the High Court that the offending strip of land was 'not worth arguing about' and criticised Ms Naish for 'bringing litigation in to disrepute'. The decision marks the end of an seven-year legal battle started by Ms Naish after she returned to the property in 2001 following her father's death. It comes after a trial at Mayors and City County Court in central London, which last year ruled in Dr Patel's favour on the boundary issue - landing Ms Naish with more than £200,000 in lawyers' bills. Following the trial, the pensioner had been told to pay for 65 per cent of her neighbours' costs - amounting to about £100,000 - on top of the six-figure sum she ran up herself. The appeal is costing more than £30,000, the High Court heard, and Ms Naish's lawyers say there could be 'another £200,000' spent on a second trial if she succeeds. At the High Court, Sir Anthony criticised the parties for the 'ridiculous' row after hearing the tap and pipe issue which began the dispute did not even matter any more - with the tap having now been removed by Dr Patel. He told Ms Naish's lawyers: 'Hundreds of thousands of pounds about a tap and a pipe that doesn't matter - this brings litigation into disrepute. 'You don't care about the pipe and the tap, so why does it matter, for goodness' sake, where the boundary lies? It seems to me to be a ridiculous piece of litigation - on both sides, no doubt.' The court heard Ms Naish first moved into her semi-detached house as a teenager with her parents and, although she moved out, frequently returned as she worked from there in the family's tarmac business. She eventually moved back permanently after the death of her father in 2001, with Dr Patel and husband Vasos Vassili buying the house next door for £450,000 in 2013. The couple's barrister Paul Wilmshurst told the judge the dispute began due to Ms Naish complaining a tap and pipe outside their house trespassed on her land. He accused her of 'terrorising' the couple with 'petty and vindictive' complaints and that they felt forced to sue due to the 'blight' on their home's value caused by the unresolved row. At the county court, they said they owned the tiny gap between the houses created when previous occupants built an extension on a much wider gap in 1983. They insisted the boundary between the two properties was the flank wall of Ms Naish's house and not the edge of her guttering hanging above, as she claimed. After hearing the trial in 2023, Judge Stephen Hellman last year found for Dr Patel and Mr Vassili, ruling that Ms Naish's flank wall was the boundary and the couple owned the gap between the houses. However, he found against them on Ms Naish's counter-claim, under which she sought damages for damp ingress into her conservatory caused by the couple having installed decking above the level of her damp-proof course. The judge found that, although the damp problem was already in existence, the installation of the decking screed was a 20 per cent contribution to it and he awarded Ms Naish £1,226 in damages. But because he had found against her on who owns the gap between the houses, he ordered she pay 65 per cent of her neighbours' lawyers' bills. Concluding his judgment, he said: 'Now that the parties have the benefit of a judgment on the various issues that have been troubling them, I hope that tensions will subside and that they will be able to live together as good neighbours.' Ms Naish has continued to fight and took her case to the High Court for an appeal last week, with judge Sir Anthony asking why the neighbours were pressing on and demanding of Ms Naish's barrister David Mayall: 'What is the point of this litigation?' Mr Mayall replied: 'To be frank, two things - costs and the damp issue.' Dr Patel's barrister Mr Wilmshurst said the couple felt they had to fight to protect the value of their home. He added: 'It's because for many years the appellant has been making allegations about the trespassing nature of the [tap and pipe], thereby making it impossible for them to sell their house.' For Ms Naish, Mr Mayall argued that Judge Hellman's reasoning in finding that the boundary was the flank wall was 'fatally flawed' and should be overturned - although he noted a second trial in the event of a successful appeal would cost the parties 'another £200,000'. Mr Mayall said any 'reasonable purchaser' looking at the houses when they were first built and conveyed in the 1950s would have assumed that the boundary was the edge of Ms Naish's guttering, giving her a few inches of extra land. He added: 'The only proper conclusion that he could have come to when construing the original conveyance was that the boundary ran along the outermost part of the house as constructed, including the eaves, guttering and foundations.' For Dr Patel, who appeared in court, and Mr Vassili, who watched via a video link, Mr Wilmshurst said the appeal was a challenge to findings the judge was entitled to make on the evidence. He said: 'Overall, the judge did not overlook the contention of the appellant as to guttering, eaves and foundations - he considered it directly, evaluated it, and rejected it as being material to where the boundary was. 'The judge correctly held that the legal boundary was shown by the conveyance plans as running along the flank wall of [Ms Naish's house], not the outermost projection.' On the issue of what contribution to Ms Naish's damp her neighbours' decking screed caused, he added: 'There is no basis on which it can be properly said that the judge was wrong to find the concrete screed was only responsible for 20 per cent of the damp problems. 'The judge also carried out a site view and was in the best position to form an assessment of the evidence.' After a day in court, Sir Anthony reserved judgement on the appeal.
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tragic 15-year-old schoolboy took his own life with father's shotgun amid a 'perfect storm' of exam stress, breakup with girlfriend and struggles with ADHD, inquest hears
A private school pupil killed himself with his father's shotgun after a 'perfect storm' of GCSE stress, breaking up with his girlfriend and ADHD, an inquest heard. Jairus Earl was found by his father Philip in his office at their Dorset holiday home as they prepared to return to London for the 15-year-old to start his exams. The family had gone to their cottage near Sherborne for the Easter holidays to destress and took some shotguns with them for clay pigeon shooting. The inquest heard Jairus, who was feeling anxious and negative about his GCSEs, spent the mornings revising and did shooting and fly fishing with his father in the afternoons. But as they packed up the car to return home Jairus told his father he was going in to the toilet but instead went into the office where his father had his shotguns in cases. Mr Earl, a director of a construction company, was listening to music and so did not hear the gunshot but knew something was wrong when the family dog came out and 'looked very stressed'. Mr Earl, 56, went inside and found his son unresponsive in the office at about 3.45pm on April 14, 2024. Jairus was pronounced dead at the scene at 4pm. At his inquest the Dorset coroner Rachael Griffin raised concerns about possible gaps in gun licence laws that she will be making a prevention of future deaths report about to the government. While she recognised that Mr Earl was a responsible gun licence holder, she said there may be an issue about people keeping guns in second homes without the authorities knowing. She said there was also a concern about the lack of consideration for the mental health of other people in the same household as a licence holder. The Bournemouth inquest heard Jairus was 'very social and loved to have fun' but struggled with school and had been falling behind. He attended the £30,000-a-year Thames Christian School in Clapham, south London. He had been diagnosed with ADHD at 14 and was experiencing low mood and suicidal ideation but was seeing both a psychologist and a child psychiatrist in the months leading up to his death and his mood seemed to be improving. The family said Jairus had been affected by the Covid lockdowns, the first of which came when he was just two terms into secondary school and was 'extremely detrimental'. The Bournemouth inquest that Mr Earl's wife Sophie and daughter Lily had already returned to London by early April while he and Jairus stayed in Dorset for longer. Mr Earl said in a statement: 'In recent years things had become more stressful. He felt very negative about school, homework and exams. 'His self-esteem took a bad hit. He felt like no one believed in him or were on his side. 'He was facing GCSEs, which was overwhelming for him. He had concerns that he had been behind but wouldn't consider the possibility of repeating the year.' Mr Earl said he thought that pressure was a 'huge part of the final moment' and he was 'so triggered he made that terrible impulsive decision to take his life'. He added: 'The factors that collaborated to create a perfect storm were the breakdown of his relationship with his girlfriend, schooling and GCSEs, his struggle with ADHD and the fact it was coming with symptoms of depression and anxiety.' Ms Griffin recorded a verdict of suicide. She said: 'I have heard a wealth of evidence that indicates how much loved Jairus was. He was also a young man who in the later stages of his life was troubled. 'There is nothing in the evidence before me that indicates his father was anything but a responsible gun licence holder. 'Jairus said he was going to the toilet, that was sadly the last his father saw him alive. 'I don't know what happened from the moment Jairus' father last saw him and when he found him. There was no note left, no evidence of any messages or searching around what his intent might be. 'Jairus had a very good knowledge of guns…those that knew him best believe that he intended to end his life. 'I am satisfied he intended the consequences to be his own death.' Addressing her concerns about gun licence regulations, she said: 'I do have ongoing concerns about the lack of regulation, including the fact people may have a second residence where items are stored that may not be known to the authorities that needs to be known. 'When applications for licence are made at the moment there is no requirement to assess or access medical information for other persons residing in the property. 'I do intend to submit a report to the secretary of state for health and the Home Office to raise the concerns I have to the gaps in regulations.'
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Dave Hughes reveals why he almost got into a fistfight with a fan who called him HITLER at Wimbledon
Dave Hughes has revealed he almost 'got into a punch on' with an 'entitled English wanker' while watching an Aussie star win his second-round match at Wimbledon. The comedian and his teenage son Rafferty were taking in Jordan Thompson's match at one of the All England Club's outer courts on Wednesday night, Australian time, when the trouble kicked off. 'Three rows of seating on Court 15, within metres of the players, tense fifth set, and this English bloke would not stop loudly talking to his friend as if he was down at his local boozer,' Hughes wrote on Instagram. 'When I eventually told him to pipe down, he was livid, real 'how dare you tell me what to do you Aussie scum' vibe. 'He called me 'Little Hitler'. But after a long, very tense back and forth, he zipped it and everyone was happy, except him.' The 54-year-old elaborated on the incident in a video featuring his son. 'There was this English bloke behind us, just would not shut up, right through the match,' he said. 'Eventually I said, can you just be quiet ... everyone around us was happy that I did it. 'What is it with entitled English wankers?' Hughes and his son got a real treat when they watched Thompson's match - apart from the English fan. The Aussie came into Wimbledon with a large box of painkillers, a thick black brace for his back, and a crazy dream that somehow he would defy his badly injured body long enough to make an impact at the tournament he loves so much. Two titanic five-set matches later, the hirsute Sydneysider is still standing on the green lawns of SW19, just. With Davis Cup captain Lleyton Hewitt, the last Australian man to win at Wimbledon, watching on, Thompson beat Benjamin Bonzi 7-5 6-7 (2-7) 4-6 6-2 6-4 in nine minutes shy of four hours. After Bonzi hit a return into the net on the second match point, Thompson let out a primal scream into the cool evening sky, smiled a grin as wide as Sydney Harbour, and pointed to his heart. 'Everyone the whole week has just told me to show some ticker, so I just pointed to it and said, that's some f***ing ticker,' said Thompson, adding the gesture was aimed at Hewitt, who often used the phrase himself and had been demanding it from Thompson. After his first-round defeat of Vit Kopriva, when he came from two sets down, Thompson looked shattered, said he was not enjoying himself, and wondered aloud if he would even be able to start Wednesday's match. He's now proud of himself, but still not enjoying it. 'The only thing that brought me a smile is the win and the fact that I didn't have to be out there anymore because it was so tough,' Thompson said. 'It's frustrating. There's movements I can't do, but the competitive juices are keeping me going. It's not just the back, it's everything. I'm super stiff. I'm not practising, but I keep moving and I'm having lots of treatment, yoga, core.'
