Court restores powers to local representatives
A two-member bench comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Farah Jamshed presided over the case. The petitions were filed by Humayun Mayar, Zubair Ali, and others, and were argued by Advocate Babar Khan Yousafzai.
During the hearing, Yousafzai informed the court that local government elections were held in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa in February 2022, after which the newly elected representatives took oath and began performing their duties. However, the provincial government soon initiated efforts to curtail their authority and, later that year, amended the Local Government Act.
Yousafzai argued that these amendments significantly rolled back the powers of elected local bodies and stripped them of their authority to allocate and utilize development funds. These powers were instead transferred to the district administration and other government departments. He pointed out that the majority of seats in the first phase of elections were won by opposition parties, prompting the government to tighten its control by changing the law.
The lawyer further contended that by shifting most powers from the Act to the Rules, the government bypassed legal safeguards. Specifically, amendments were made to Sections 23A and 25 of the Local Government Act, altering the composition of the Tehsil Local Government structure originally defined in the 2019 version of the law.
He emphasized that the 2022 amendments not only took away powers from local representatives such as Tehsil Mayors and Village Council members, but also deprived them of any developmental funds for the past three years.
This, he noted, had created a situation of uncertainty and pressure, as representatives face public expectations without any resources to meet them.
Yousafzai argued that if such amendments were deemed necessary, they should have been applied prospectively, during future elections, rather than retroactively undermining the authority of currently elected officials under the 2019 Act.
In response, the Additional Advocate General contended that the amendments were lawful and within the authority of the provincial government. He claimed the changes were presented before the provincial assembly and that the elected representatives had been granted their due rights.
After reviewing the arguments, the bench declared the provincial government's amendments invalid, restoring the original powers and funding mechanisms for local government representatives as per the 2019 Local Government Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
SC revises court procedures
After a gap of 45 years, the Supreme Court has issued new procedural rules titled Supreme Court Rules 2025, formally repealing the Supreme Court Rules 1980. Aimed at enhancing transparency, efficiency and overall effectiveness in judicial proceedings, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi has constituted a committee, headed by Justice Shahid Waheed and comprising Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, to draft the new rules. The committee sought proposals from judges, the SC office, as well as bar councils and associations. The new rules are being applied with effect from August 6. It has been clarified that any proceedings already pending under the revoked rules – whether by way of application, petition, appeal, reference or review – shall continue and be disposed of as if the new rules had not been made. "If any difficulty arises in giving effect to any of the provisions of these Rules, the Chief Justice of Pakistan, on the recommendations of a committee to be constituted by him, may make such order, not inconsistent with the provisions of these Rules, as may appear to him to be necessary for the purpose of removing such difficulty." Under the new rules, the time limit for filing criminal appeals, criminal petitions for leave to appeal and direct civil appeals has been extended from 30 days to 60 days. Appeals against registrar office objections must be filed within 14 days, while review petitions against SC judgments must be filed within 30 days. "Application for review shall be filed in the Registry within thirty days after the pronouncement of the judgement or order, as the case may be, which is sought to be reviewed," the draft states. Applicants are required to notify the opposing party immediately after filing the review application and send a copy of the notice to the Registry. Every review application must be accompanied by a certified copy of the judgment or order being challenged. If it is based on newly discovered evidence, certified copies of relevant documents must be attached along with an affidavit explaining the circumstances of the discovery. The advocate or party signing the application must briefly specify the points on which the review is sought and provide a certificate confirming that a review is justifiable in accordance with the law and practice of the court. The certificate must be in the form of a reasoned opinion. The new rules state that costs for proceedings will be at the court's discretion, but not less than Rs25,000. Interveners will not be entitled to costs unless otherwise ordered. If the hearing of a case is delayed due to an advocate-on-record's neglect, such as failing to attend or provide necessary documents, the court may direct that advocate to personally bear the costs. Where adjournments are sought without sufficient cause, compensatory costs may be imposed on the advocate or party. The same applies to those filing false or vexatious proceedings that waste the court's time. No court fee will be charged for jail petitions. Regarding constitutional matters, the rules provide that any petition, appeal, or review involving the original jurisdiction of the court under Article 184, the appellate jurisdiction under clause (3) of Article 185 (where a High Court judgment involves the constitutionality of a law or a substantial constitutional question), or the advisory jurisdiction under Article 186 shall be heard by a constitutional bench constituted under Article 191A of the Constitution. Such a bench will consist of no fewer than five judges, nominated by the committee. If the judges hearing a matter are equally divided in opinion, the committee may refer it either to another judge or to a larger bench.
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Govt panel proposes major changes to Companies Act 2017
A high-level subcommittee on regulatory reforms has recommended significant amendments to the Companies Act 2017 to bring Pakistan's corporate framework in line with international best practices. The proposals were discussed on Monday at a meeting chaired by Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Industries and Production Haroon Akhtar Khan, according to a press release. The session was attended by Scott Jacobs, representatives from the Board of Investment (BOI), the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), and the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP). According to officials, the SECP and BOI jointly presented a package of recommendations aimed at modernising the Act. Section 42 of Companies Act, 2017: IHC adjudicate on tax references filed by SECP-registered firm Key proposals include removing the minimum and maximum limits on the number of members in private and public companies, introducing greater flexibility in corporate forms, and scrapping unnecessary restrictions. Haroon Akhtar said the agreed recommendations should be drafted without delay, warning that excessive regulations, procedural delays, and barriers to ease of doing business were serious challenges for enterprises in the country. He added that several provisions in the existing law were outdated and hindered innovation in modern corporate structures.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Committee constituted to check cannabis misuse
Listen to article In a bid to check the misuse of cannabis and market manipulation, the government has formed a high-level committee to examine the proposed National Cannabis Control and Regulatory Policy, 2025 carefully from the perspective of international best practices. The cabinet, in a recent meeting, constituted the committee, led by the minister for defence. During discussion, while appreciating the timely formulation of the national cannabis policy, aimed at reaping economic benefits from the regulated cultivation of its plants and the manufacturing and sale of its derivatives for medicinal and industrial use, the cabinet observed that it was for the first time that such a policy was being introduced in Pakistan. Therefore, it was necessary to examine it very carefully to ensure that no loophole was left in the policy framework, which could be exploited and undermine the purpose and objectives of the policy. The committee will scrutinise the proposed policy framework to identify and remove loopholes, if any. It will assess the adequacy of safeguards to prevent the misuse of cannabis plants, its products or derivatives along the supply chain. It will also estimate the optimal human resources requirement of the Cannabis Control and Regulatory Authority, including financial implications. The committee will identify any overlaps or incompatibilities between federal and provincial policies or administrative or legal domains that require resolution, and examine any matter ancillary to the policy. The federal government will, from time to time, prepare and prescribe a national policy governing all aspects of the cannabis plant market from cultivation to sale and production as well as export and import of cannabis or its derivatives. It may seek input and assistance from the regulatory authority and provincial governments. The cabinet was informed that the Cannabis Control and Regulatory Authority had initially submitted a draft National Cannabis Policy, 2025 to regulate its cultivation and promote new cultivation sites for medicinal and industrial purposes as well as development of the value chain from cultivation to product manufacturing. The policy had been approved by all stakeholders, including all provincial governments, in the eighth meeting of the apex committee of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) and endorsed by the board of governors of the regulatory authority on December 26, 2024, following which the board advised its submission to the cabinet for approval, as stipulated under Section 13 of the Act. It was brought to the cabinet's notice that through a letter dated February 7, 2025, the Cabinet Division requested the regulatory authority to resubmit the National Cannabis Policy, 2025 after review by the newly appointed director general of the authority. Later, the authority submitted a refined version of the draft policy titled "National Cannabis Control and Regulatory Policy, 2025," after review by the DG and endorsement by the board of governors. The draft policy was submitted to the prime minister, who gave directives to seek input from provincial governments and get the policy vetted by the Law Division. In compliance with the directives, the regulatory authority, through a letter dated May 29, 2025, submitted the following: The authority has ensured full compliance with Section 13 of the Cannabis Control and Regulatory Authority Act, 2024 and the National Cannabis Control and Regulatory Policy, 2025 has undergone extensive deliberations across three sessions of the board of governors held on August 7, 2024, December 26, 2024 and April 9, 2025. The final approval was unanimously granted during the third board of governors' meeting. These sessions were attended by all federal and provincial representatives, including the ex-officio members from the respective provincial governments. The cabinet was also informed that the Ministry of Law had endorsed the draft policy. The regulatory authority's DG gave a detailed presentation, including the background, objectives, administrative structure, licensing regime and execution framework to operationalise the policy and the envisaged modes of financing.
