Syria troops quit Druze heartland province after deadly clashes: monitor
The pullout came after Islamist interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa said in a televised address that "responsibility" for security in Sweida would be handed to religious elders and some local factions "based on the supreme national interest."
"The Syrian authorities have withdrawn their military forces from the city of Sweida and the the whole province, and Druze fighters have deployed" in their place, Syrian Observatory for Human Rights head Rami Abdel Rahman told AFP.
Government troops who had pulled out of the province told AFP that the order to withdraw came shortly before midnight (2100 GMT Wednesday) and they completed their pullout at dawn.
"The city of Sweida seems devoid of any government forces presence," the editor in chief of the Suwayda 24 news website, Rayan Maarouf, told AFP.
Government forces had deployed to the city on Tuesday with the stated aim of overseeing a truce, following days of deadly clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouin tribes.
But witnesses said government forces had instead joined the Bedouin in attacking Druze fighters and civilians.
Neighbouring Israel responded with strikes on the Syrian military, including its headquarters in Damascus, which it warned would intensify until the Islamist-led government withdrew its forces from the south.
Israel, which is home to around 150,000 Druze citizens, has repeatedly stated its intention to defend the Druze of Syria in bouts of sectarian violence that have broken out since the Islamist now in power in Damascus toppled longtime leader Bashar al-Assad in December.
The Israeli military, which has taken control of the UN-monitored demilitarised zone on the Golan Heights and conducted hundreds of strikes on military targets in Syria, also says it will not allow any Syrian military presence on its border.
Despite having initiated contact, Israel remains extremely wary of Syria's new rulers, including Sharaa whose Hayat Tahrir al-Sham movement was once linked to Al-Qaeda. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Filmmakers try to cash in on India-Pakistan battle
FILE PHOTO: A woman wearing a T-shirt featuring "OPERATION SINDOOR" checks her mobile phone near a market area in Ludhiana on May 17, 2025. Indian filmmakers are locking up the rights to movie titles that can profit from the patriotism fanned by a four-day conflict with Pakistan, which killed more than 70 people. India tagged its military action against Pakistan "Operation Sindoor", the Hindi word for vermillion, which married Hindu women wear on their foreheads. - AFP MUMBAI: Indian filmmakers are locking up the rights to movie titles that can profit from the patriotism fanned by a four-day conflict with Pakistan, which killed more than 70 people. The nuclear-armed rivals exchanged artillery, drone and air strikes in May, after India blamed Pakistan for an armed attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir. The fighting came to an end when US President Donald Trump announced a surprise ceasefire. Now, some Bollywood filmmakers see an opportunity to cash in on the battle. India tagged its military action against Pakistan "Operation Sindoor", the Hindi word for vermilion, which married Hindu women wear on their foreheads. The name was seen as a symbol of Delhi's determination to avenge those widowed in the April 22 attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam, which sparked the hostilities. Film studios have registered a slew of titles evoking the operation, including: "Mission Sindoor", "Sindoor: The Revenge", "The Pahalgam Terror", and "Sindoor Operation". "It's a story which needs to be told," said director Vivek Agnihotri. "If it was Hollywood, they would have made 10 films on this subject. People want to know what happened behind the scenes," he told AFP. Agnihotri struck box office success with his 2022 release, "The Kashmir Files", based on the mass flight of Hindus from Kashmir in the 1990s. The ruling right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party gave that film a glowing endorsement, despite accusations that it aimed to stir up hatred against India's minority Muslims. Since Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi took office in 2014, some critics say Bollywood is increasingly promoting his government's ideology. Raja Sen, a film critic and screenwriter, said filmmakers felt emboldened by an amenable government. "We tried to wage a war and then we quietened down when Mr Trump asked us to. So what is the valour here?" Sen told AFP of the Pakistan clashes. Anil Sharma, known for directing rabble-rousing movies, criticised the apparent rush to make films related to the Pahalgam attack. "This is herd mentality... these are seasonal filmmakers, they have their constraints," he said. "I don't wait for an incident to happen and then make a film based on that. A subject should evoke feelings and only then cinema happens," said Sharma. Sharma's historical action flick "Gadar: Ek Prem Katha" (2001) and its sequel "Gadar 2" (2023), both featuring Sunny Deol in lead roles, were big hits. In Bollywood, filmmakers often seek to time releases for national holidays like Independence Day, which are associated with heightened patriotic fervour. "Fighter", featuring big stars Hrithik Roshan and Deepika Padukone, was released on the eve of India's Republic Day on January 25 last year. Though not a factual retelling, it drew heavily from India's 2019 airstrike on Pakistan's Balakot. The film received mixed-to-positive reviews but raked in US$28 million in India, making it the fourth highest-grossing Hindi film of that year. This year, "Chhaava", a drama based on the life of Sambhaji Maharaj, a ruler of the Maratha Empire, became the highest-grossing film so far this year. It also generated significant criticism for fuelling anti-Muslim bias. "This is at a time when cinema is aggressively painting Muslim kings and leaders in violent light," said Sen. "This is where those who are telling the stories need to be responsible about which stories they choose to tell." Sen said filmmakers were reluctant to choose topics that are "against the establishment". "If the public is flooded with dozens of films that are all trying to serve an agenda, without the other side allowed to make itself heard, then that propaganda and misinformation enters the public psyche," he said. Acclaimed director Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra said true patriotism is promoting peace and harmony through the medium of cinema. Mehra's socio-political drama "Rang De Basanti" (2006) won the National Film Award for Best Popular Film and was chosen as India's official entry for the Golden Globe Awards and the Academy Awards in the Best Foreign Language Film category. "How we can arrive at peace and build a better society? How we can learn to love our neighbours?" he asked. "For me that is patriotism." - AFP
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Victoria plans to make work from home a legal right for employees
SYDNEY: The Victorian government has unveiled plans to legally guarantee work-from-home rights, ensuring employees can work remotely for a minimum of two days per week where possible. Premier Jacinta Allan announced the proposal at the Labor Party's state conference, framing it as a productivity and cost-saving measure. 'We're doing that because we know what the evidence tells us—workers are more productive, it saves time for families, it saves money for families,' Allan said. She emphasised that the policy would make remote work 'a right, not a request' for eligible employees. The proposed legislation could save workers an estimated $110 weekly while reducing road congestion and supporting women's workforce participation. The policy will undergo consultation with businesses, unions, and workers before being finalised. Opposition Leader Brad Battin acknowledged the benefits of flexible work arrangements, stating his support for initiatives that improve work-life balance. The proposal follows the federal Liberal-National coalition's unsuccessful push to end remote work during May's elections, which contributed to their electoral setback. The bill is expected to be introduced in Victoria's parliament next year. - AFP
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize obsession explained
WASHINGTON: A mix of rivalry, prestige, and provocation fuels Donald Trump's fixation on the Nobel Peace Prize. His recent push for recognition has drawn both support and sharp criticism. 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on July 31. She cited his mediation in conflicts involving India-Pakistan, Cambodia-Thailand, and others as proof of his peacemaking efforts. However, critics highlight omissions—Ukraine and Gaza remain unresolved despite Trump's promises. Leavitt also pointed to US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities as contributing to global stability, a claim met with scepticism. Pakistan and Israel have nominated Trump for the prize. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Pakistani officials backed his candidacy, while African leaders praised him during a White House meeting. 'We could do this all day long,' Trump quipped after their flattering remarks. Law professor Anat Alon-Beck submitted Trump's name to the Nobel committee, citing his 'strategic brilliance' in hostage negotiations. Yet, many reject the idea. 'Nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is like entering a hyena in a dog show,' wrote researcher Emma Shortis. Trump himself doubts he'll win. 'I deserve it, but they will never give it to me,' he said in February. On Truth Social, he lamented, 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do.' His rivalry with Barack Obama, a 2009 laureate, adds another layer. 'If I were named Obama, I would have had the Nobel Prize given to me in 10 seconds,' Trump complained in 2024. With 338 nominees this year, betting sites rank Trump second behind Yulia Navalnaya, widow of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. – AFP
